https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63339
Bug ID: 63339
Summary: using constructors from virtual bases are implicitly
deleted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751
Job Noorman jobnoorman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jobnoorman at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63339
Job Noorman jobnoorman at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751
--- Comment #2 from Job Noorman jobnoorman at gmail dot com ---
I can also confirm that this is reproducible with GCC 4.9.
Also note that Clang *does* accept this code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
Michael T. m.j.thayer at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.j.thayer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Since it's just an ICE on invalid, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 23 08:09:14 2014
New Revision: 215497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215497root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-09-23 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61606
--- Comment #2 from Fernando G. Tinetti fernando at info dot unlp.edu.ar ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
(In reply to Fernando G. Tinetti from comment #0)
Hi,
I'm making my own todo list for GCC install from sources, given that at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
Bug ID: 63340
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c -O2 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Created attachment 33537
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33537action=edit
Assembler output w/ r215449 reverted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
setf.s f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
setf.d f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Bug ID: 63341
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 RegressionVectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Reduced:
extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
#define TEST_COMPOUND(TYPE, LHSVAL, RHSVAL, OP)\
do\
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026
Martin Jambor jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I see non-NULL offset passed to vect_create_data_ref_ptr by vectorizable_store
(for negative case), vectorizable_load (for this
dr_explicit_realign_optimized),
and to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
--- Comment #1 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
minimized test case
class A
{
virtual void NotifyDialMMISuccess();
};
class : A
{
template 0 void NotifyDialMMISuccess();
};
ICEs with g++ -Woverloaded-virtual -std=gnu++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A bit more reduced (just testing upcoming creduce release):
class C;
class F {
virtual C m_fn1();
};
class C {
public:
virtual int *m_fn3(int);
};
class G : F, C {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hum, from the comment on vect_create_data_ref_ptr I would expect offset to be
in units of the _vector_ size ...
Output:
1. Declare a new ptr to vector_type, and have it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, should be reproducible with negative step cases on x86_64 as well, as we
do
there
if (negative)
offset = size_int (-TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype) + 1);
?
I suppose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that vect_create_addr_base_for_vector_ref _does_ multiply offset by
the scalar element size (even if it calls it 'step'):
tree step = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another testcase:
typedef union U { unsigned short s; unsigned char c; } __attribute__((packed))
U;
struct S { char e __attribute__((aligned (16))); U s[32]; };
struct S t = {0,
/configure --disable-werror
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-tls
--prefix=/scratch/jtaylor/gcc/local-trunk --with-gmp=/usr --with-mpfr=/usr
--with-mpc=/usr --with-cloog=/usr --with-ppl=/usr --with-isl=/usr
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140923 (experimental
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #9 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
The patch to fix the recover.go problem causes significant regression in gccgo
when built for ppc64 (BE). There are 32 unexpected failures in the gcc go
testsuite with the patch 32 unexpected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to boger from comment #9)
On ppc64le, this works as expected but on ppc64(be) the code that is
generated from this is not the address of the function but the address of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
Bug ID: 63343
Summary: g++ accepts incompatible iterator assignemt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another testcase:
markus@x4 tmp % cat t.ii
class A {
virtual int orbits();
};
class B : A {
template typename
void orbits();
};
(4.9 is fine)
markus@x4 tmp % g++
encountered an error in Linux kernel:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c?id=refs/tags/next-20140923
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c:33:12: error: numachip_system causes a
section type conflict with apic_numachip
static
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Sep 23 14:47:45 2014
New Revision: 215515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215515root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/63280
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 23 15:25:55 2014
New Revision: 215516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215516root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/63331
* trans-types.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
Agner Fog agner at agner dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agner at agner dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
Well, the testcase does fail on alpha:
Thanks. In the original testcase (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 23 18:07:59 2014
New Revision: 215528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215528root=gccview=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-09-23 Paolo Carlini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 61857, which changed state.
Bug 61857 Summary: An init-capturing lambda is parsed incorrectly when used in
a braced-init-list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
Bug ID: 63345
Summary: Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast) in
libstdc++-v3/include/bits
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #1 from Byoungyoung Lee blee at gatech dot edu ---
Created attachment 33541
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33541action=edit
Error reports in running Chromium browsers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346
Bug ID: 63346
Summary: xserver_xorg-server-1.15.1 crash on RaspberryPi when
compiled with gcc-4.9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
--- Comment #4 from Steven Stewart-Gallus sstewartgallus00 at mylangara dot
bc.ca ---
What version of GCC and on which target?
Right, I should have mentioned that earlier.
$ uname -a
Linux alonzo 3.13.0-34-generic #1trisquel1 SMP Sun Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
Hmm, so for whatever reason, the problem does not occur again anymore and
binutils just builds fine [1].
I did not upgrade the compiler, however it might be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #9 from Agner Fog agner at agner dot org ---
Many programmers are using a vector class library rather than writing intrinsic
functions directly. Such libraries have overloaded operators which are inlined
to produce intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Two random links into the latest conversation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01812.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02288.html
That version of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Hello,
thanks for the report. I don't think we should blindly replace static_cast with
reinterpret_cast but rather try and understand what is going on. For instance,
for std::list, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
thanks for the report. I don't think we should blindly replace static_cast
with reinterpret_cast but rather try and understand what is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24693
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33542
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33542action=edit
Patch to cache a free node.
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
More
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #5 from Byoungyoung Lee blee at gatech dot edu ---
Thank you for the quick response! The patch I've uploaded is simply the results
by replacing all static_cast in the error reports with reinterpret_cast, so
that the tool stops
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Bug ID: 63347
Summary: m68k misoptimisation with -fschedule-insns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net ---
release code is scary,
debug code is broken,
nightmare :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #8 from Fredrik Hederstierna
fredrik.hederstie...@securitas-direct.com ---
Created attachment 33544
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33544action=edit
CSiBE test results size
Attached some tests with CSiBE v2.1.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
Bug ID: 63348
Summary: regression gcc.dg/pr43670.c fail on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
--- Comment #1 from baoshan pangbw at gmail dot com ---
I believe this regression is introduced by the code for cleanup_barriers() in
jump.c of patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02164.html:
The call insn was followed by a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com ---
Just test it with
g++ test.cc -Wall -lpthread -fsanitize=thread -pie -fPIE -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -g
-O2
There is nothing else I can do on top of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.0, 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Bug ID: 63349
Summary: ICE with template in fold-const.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is with:
dave@mx3210:~/debian/gcc/gcc/gcc-4.9-4.9.1$ gcc-4.9 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.9.real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63350
Bug ID: 63350
Summary: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to
always_inline 'f': function body not available
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63350
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #11 from Agner Fog agner at agner dot org ---
Thanks for the links Marc.
You are right, the discussion in the gcc-patches mailing list ignores integer
vectors. You need a solution that also allows optimizations on integer
intrinsic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63351
Bug ID: 63351
Summary: Optimization: contract broadcast intrinsics when
AVX512 is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
80 matches
Mail list logo
