https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63554
Bug ID: 63554
Summary: ice in execute_todo, at passes.c:1797 with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63554
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49604
Melissa myriachan at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||myriachan at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63555
Bug ID: 63555
Summary: ICE compiling simple test with SDB debugging info
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #9 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Forgot to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33447
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dorit at il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28643
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33244
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63554
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Bug ID: 63556
Summary: gcc should dedup string postfixes
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Andi Kleen andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61605
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63556
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
This is done by the linker, as part of the merge section handling.
Contents of section .rodata:
4005b0 01000200 78616263 00 xabc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10)
On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, clyon at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63544
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This may be too late to get at lto_file_decl_datas?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #21 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #20)
Still present at revision 203491 and the patch in comment #14 does not help.
Trivial reproducer:
=
__attribute__((noinline))
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #12 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry, I thought you had the setup needed to reproduce the tests.
I am using qemu.
All execution tests fail (not only -O0), for instance with GCC configured as:
--target=arm-none-eabi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63553
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63552
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 63168, which changed state.
Bug 63168 Summary: loop header copying fails - not vectorized: latch block not
empty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 16 10:13:52 2014
New Revision: 216304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216304root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63168
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63557
Bug ID: 63557
Summary: builtin __udivti3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63557
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #31 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Oct 16 10:58:36 2014
New Revision: 216307
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216307root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/53513
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
This may be too late to get at lto_file_decl_datas?
I think the problem is dwarf2out for whatever reason referring to a symbol that
was optimized out...
It does not make sense to try to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63558
Bug ID: 63558
Summary: cannot silence jump to case label with fpermissive
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63551
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
indeed, somewhere we need to view convert the aggregate value... Predicates
works on conditions on arguments, so I suppose this ought to happen at ipa-prop
side. Martin?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49604
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #15 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33733
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33733action=edit
patch to fix darwin bootstrap
With pseudo GOT register we don't need to set GOT
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63559
Bug ID: 63559
Summary: -fsanitize=thread sets no preprocessor flags
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63559
Dmitry Vyukov dvyukov at google dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dvyukov at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #32 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As a next step, I'd like to add built-in functions to get/set the FPSCR on SH.
We have the old __get_fpscr and __set_fpscr functions in libgcc which modify
the __fpscr_values array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63185
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Btw, what was the original testcase?
It's all a little bit complicated and not really fit for the current simple
handling of PHIs. Because with a conditional store we have to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61770
R. Dragone rdragone at asifade dot in changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdragone at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59401
--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Oct 16 12:21:29 2014
New Revision: 216314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216314root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/59401
* config/sh/sh.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63554
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63554
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Oct 16 12:25:52 2014
New Revision: 216315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216315root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62031
--- Comment #13 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
To be more specific, I'm using qemu 2.0.0.
But I've switched to a new x86_64 host running Ubuntu-14.04, and the tests
pass.
I observed the failures when using a x86_64 host running Red-Hat 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63260
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Oct 16 12:32:24 2014
New Revision: 216317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216317root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/63260
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Created attachment 33733 [details]
patch to fix darwin bootstrap
With pseudo GOT register we don't need to set GOT register after any jump,
and therefore don't need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63508
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63185
--- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
Btw, what was the original testcase?
Sorry, I don't remember. Probably something involving std::vector or
std::string. Since llvm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #2 from Bill Klees bill.klees at teamquest dot com ---
Created attachment 33734
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33734action=edit
Preprocessed Source for Failing Compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63560
Bug ID: 63560
Summary: __go_set_defer_retaddr shouldn't be split by IPA split
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #33 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #32)
I'd propose the following for SH:
unsigned int __builtin_sh_get_fpscr ()
void __builtin_sh_set_fpscr (unsigned int)
Any
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63561
Bug ID: 63561
Summary: gfortran runtime hang on function print-stmt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63561
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61100
--- Comment #5 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:42:48 2014
New Revision: 216322
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216322root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63562
Bug ID: 63562
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE : in ipcp_verify_propagated_values,
at ipa-cp.c:907
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61530
--- Comment #10 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:46:39 2014
New Revision: 216326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216326root=gccview=rev
Log:
New asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold
parameter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61547
--- Comment #6 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:46:39 2014
New Revision: 216326
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216326root=gccview=rev
Log:
New asan-instrumentation-with-call-threshold
parameter.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63278
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63562
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
--- Comment #39 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #29)
It is hanging on undefined, I think there is a difference here, a big
difference.
What is the difference for you?
Just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62089
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:52:45 2014
New Revision: 216331
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216331root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61897
--- Comment #5 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:53:33 2014
New Revision: 216332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216332root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62140
--- Comment #8 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Thu Oct 16 13:53:33 2014
New Revision: 216332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216332root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-10-16 Yury Gribov y.gri...@samsung.com
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30617
Cyrus sidio47 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sidio47 at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63561
Cyrus sidio47 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63553
patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61770
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to R. Dragone from comment #1)
Just encountered the same problem myself.
gcc -march=native -E -v - /dev/null 21 | grep cc1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63560
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Does something like this work?
Honza
Index: ipa-split.c
===
--- ipa-split.c(revision 216318)
+++ ipa-split.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #18 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33736
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33736action=edit
patch disabling just nonlocal_goto_receiver split
Am I correct that this is 64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #19 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Can you please try more conservative patch disabling just
nonlocal_goto_receiver split bootstrapping it from scratch?
It still get the same error/warnings as in comment 16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
Commenting that out will severely decrease debug info quality.
It was meant as a workaround for PPC Firefox builds ;)
Yes, dwarf2out really needs a RTL for those, and some that will not affect
-fcompare-debug, with the right (mangled?) name of the var and various other
attributes on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Commenting that out will severely decrease debug info quality.
It was meant as a workaround for PPC Firefox builds ;)
Yes, dwarf2out really needs a RTL for those, and some that will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61713
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63563
Bug ID: 63563
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.c:5106 with -mavx2
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
When this code is invoked, DECL_RTL for some variable might not be set yet,
even when it will or might be set later on (e.g. TLS vars), e.g. when compiling
some other function.
So, we
Here we die because we do not have variable constructor in LTO stream because
the variable was optimized out at compile time already. Do we still need to
build RTL here? We can easily check for optimized out vars...
But if we need a placeholder RTL, I suppose most practical variant would be
to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Here we die because we do not have variable constructor in LTO stream because
the variable was optimized out at compile time already. Do we still need to
build RTL here? We can easily
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Hi,
this patch should avoid production of RTL only for those vars that we know are
never used by real code.
Index: dwarf2out.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63564
Bug ID: 63564
Summary: -fsanitize=address obscures access to free memory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63564
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You would need glibc compiled with -fsanitize=address (unless the write is done
in assembly) to detect that.
And, the reason that glibc malloc reports the problem is that it performs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63564
--- Comment #2 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We don't intercept sem_post/sem_wait and don't instrument glibc where they are
implemented. Sadly, the same applies to quite a few other glibc functions.
In future we may have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63560
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Thu Oct 16 17:17:40 2014
New Revision: 216341
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216341root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/63560
compiler: Mark functions that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63564
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
In the original example (it was ported from windows,
and the windows semaphores are completely immune
against this kind of error) the sem_post were in
*another* thread and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63564
--- Comment #4 from Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #3)
In the original example (it was ported from windows,
and the windows semaphores are completely immune
against this kind of error) the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #34 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Test run for
-m2e -ml, -m2a -mb, -m2a-single -mb, -m4-single-ml
has finished and shows no new failures (except the ISR stuff).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
so I rewound to r216156 and made the change to i386.md (removed the receiver
and nonlocal label stuff).
So, that succeeds in getting to stage #3 and then fails building [m32] target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #9 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
do we have a revision # that triggered this behaviour?
(or has it always been there?)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63559
--- Comment #2 from Roger Orr rogero at howzatt dot demon.co.uk ---
Hi Dmitry,
the false positives I've investigated seem to be down to spin-locked queues and
use of intel tbb concurrency data structures - AFAICT we don't have source for
the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
do we have a revision # that triggered this behaviour?
(or has it always been there?)
Up to r189986 (2012-07-30) compiling the second code in comment 6 gives the
error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The change occurred at r190003 and an error
Error: TS 29113: Noninteroperable argument 'gee' to 'c_funloc' at (1)
is emitted if one uses -std=f2008.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #21 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
libtool: compile: /GCC/ml/gcc-trunk-appleas/./gcc/xgcc
-B/GCC/ml/gcc-trunk-appleas/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888
--- Comment #12 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #11)
The change occurred at r190003 and an error
Error: TS 29113: Noninteroperable argument 'gee' to 'c_funloc' at (1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63565
Bug ID: 63565
Summary: please document that (and why) Go binaries should not
be stripped
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo