https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63562
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
More info in /home/trippels/moz-build-dir/toolkit/library on gcc110:
trippels@gcc1-power7 library % cat list
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --disable-libsanitizer --disable-bootstrap
--disable-libstdcxx-pch --disable-libvtv --disable-libitm --disable-libcilkrts
--disable-libssp --disable-libgomp --disable-werror --disable-multilib
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61605
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 17 06:36:45 2014
New Revision: 216365
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216365root=gccview=rev
Log:
Use fuse-caller-save info in cprop-hardreg
2014-10-17 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61605
--- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Fri Oct 17 06:36:35 2014
New Revision: 216364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216364root=gccview=rev
Log:
Handle copy cycles in pass_cprop_hardreg
2014-10-17 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Bug ID: 63569
Summary: [5.0 Regression] Wrong code with volatile and ICF
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33743
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33743action=edit
A Testcase which ICEs instead of just wrong code
Compile with -O2.
The ICE you get:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58945
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33744
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33744action=edit
Simplified patch
Somehow simplified patch for mainline. Still fails with -O2 -mcx16:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58945
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
Hm, starting from:
(unspec_volatile:TI [
(mem/v:TI (symbol_ref:DI (i) var_decl
0x2adae9631c60 i) [-1 S16 A128])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61605
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63570
Bug ID: 63570
Summary: [F2015] Implement 13.7.137 RANDOM INIT (REPEATABLE,
IMAGE DISTINCT)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63568
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63571
Bug ID: 63571
Summary: Local functions with only local aliases not regparm
optimized on i686-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63536
Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Bug ID: 63572
Summary: [5 Regression] ICF breaks user debugging experience
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51772
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In config/locale/newlib/ctype_members.cc:
default:
// Different from the generic version, xdigit and print in
// newlib are defined as bitwise-OR result of bitmasks:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For debugging most important is to get
(gdb) b foo
still work when foo was merged with bar and the program now calls bar
Similarly nice (but probably impossible) is
(gdb) b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #35 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33745
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33745action=edit
Use SImode for FPSCR, add __builtin_sh_get_fpscr, __builtin_sh_set_fpscr
So I ended up
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63562
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63562
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
dup.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 63566 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Better testcase, where ICF actually happens.
struct S { int a; int b; int c; };
__attribute__((noinline)) static int
f1 (struct S *x)
{
static int u = 1;
int g = x-a * 7;
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573
Bug ID: 63573
Summary: [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on
powerpc-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63574
Bug ID: 63574
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE building libjava (segfault) on
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at redhat dot com|
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63575
Bug ID: 63575
Summary: [5 Regression] ICF miscompiles libstdc++
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63575
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #23 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 17 10:50:16 2014
New Revision: 216391
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216391root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63302
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #24 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 17 10:53:36 2014
New Revision: 216392
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216392root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63302
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 17 10:54:54 2014
New Revision: 216393
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216393root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63464
* gimple.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63184
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ok, so we can (and do) forward addresses like a[_9] into plain dereferences,
so lowering these addresses early is probably not a good idea. We could
lower them as a very first
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56365
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
No, that doesn't handle PHI nodes. phiopt needs to be improved to handle
merged PHIs for this case.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
So, supposedly there is something we want to match-and-simplify, perhaps
also something we want to simplify at the RTL level, and check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63575
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #24 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
We are able to reproduce the bug.
SET_GOT removed as the only use of GOT register was hidden by:
(insn 37 34 38 6 (set (mem:TF (pre_dec:SI (reg/f:SI 7 sp)) [0 S16 A8])
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63463
Bug 63463 depends on bug 63404, which changed state.
Bug 63404 Summary: [5 Regression] gcc 5 miscompiles linux block layer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63404
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63404
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63563
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #26 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 17-Oct-14, at 7:10 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Should be fixed now.
Thanks, Jakub.
Dave
--
John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33746
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33746action=edit
RTL dumps
This is trunk rev 216304 + change to i386.md.
-O2 -m32.
For O0/1 the output is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Stupachenko Evgeny from comment #24)
We are able to reproduce the bug.
SET_GOT removed as the only use of GOT register was hidden by:
(insn 37 34 38 6 (set (mem:TF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61773
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz ---
There's how gold's ICF works for test attached by Jakub:
gcc --version:
gcc version 5.0.0 20141016 (experimental) (GCC)
ld --version:
GNU gold (GNU Binutils 2.24.51.20141010) 1.11
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
There's how gold's ICF works for test attached by Jakub:
gcc --version:
gcc version 5.0.0 20141016 (experimental) (GCC)
ld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63572
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz ---
Created attachment 33747
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33747action=edit
Gold ICF dwarfdump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #36 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #35)
Created attachment 33745 [details]
Use SImode for FPSCR, add __builtin_sh_get_fpscr, __builtin_sh_set_fpscr
So I ended up removing the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #27 from Stupachenko Evgeny evstupac at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33748
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33748action=edit
Fix SET_GOT delete
The patch fix the problem.
Can you please run darwin bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63576
Bug ID: 63576
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE : in ipa_merge_profiles, at
ipa-utils.c:540 during Firefox LTO/PGO build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
--- Comment #5 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I also observe that the cpi/cpc/brne idiom that is used throughout -
before and after your patch - is nonsentical.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
Bug ID: 63577
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5? Regression]: Huge compile time and memory
usage with -O and not -fPIC
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the patches in comments 15 and 27 applied on top of r216304, bootstrap
stil fails with
libtool: compile: /opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/opt/gcc/p_build/./gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
--- Comment #6 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #4)
However, you now made it all the way use an incorrect order - starting at the
end and incrementing from there.
Oops,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #4 from Ralf allizgubccg at reallysoft dot de ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
Actually, I can't reproduce it with 4.9 nor with 5. I'd say your version
doesn't have r215459 yet, which I believe is the fix. Can you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63223
--- Comment #7 from Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke from comment #5)
I also observe that the cpi/cpc/brne idiom that is used throughout -
before and after your patch - is nonsentical.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529
Renlin Li renlin.li at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||renlin.li at arm dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529
--- Comment #6 from Renlin Li renlin.li at arm dot com ---
emit_case_nodes calls conditional_probability with a very large first argument.
After GCOV_COMPUTE_SCALE calculation, the result overflows into a negative
number.
It's recorded into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #3 from Bill Klees bill.klees at teamquest dot com ---
Simplified Preprocessed source fails with same error
typedef int TItype __attribute__((mode(TI)));
typedef int DItype
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545
--- Comment #4 from Bill Klees bill.klees at teamquest dot com ---
Much simpler test case
--
struct DWstruct { int high, low; };
typedef union
{
struct DWstruct s;
int ll;
} DWunion;
int
__multi3(int u, int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63578
Bug ID: 63578
Summary: ICE In layout_type, at stor-layout.c:2398
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #29 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
I thought we had already dealt with the hidden GOT usages that show up during
reload... Is it IRA that's removing the SET_GOT?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534
--- Comment #30 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
FWIW, I built a stage #1 with fortran, objc and ada enabled.
libgcc, libstdc++v3, libgomp, libobjc and libada build.
libgfortran libquadmath fail (errors as per Dominique's post).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63579
Bug ID: 63579
Summary: New attribute for empty member optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63579
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33750
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33750action=edit
Hack to handle empty members as bases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33745|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57250
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63549
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Oct 17 18:42:27 2014
New Revision: 216413
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216413root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/63549
* c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63549
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63543
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Oct 17 18:53:35 2014
New Revision: 216414
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216414root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/63543
* c-tree.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63543
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63580
Bug ID: 63580
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE : error: invalid argument to gimple
call
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63580
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63531
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Ralf from comment #4)
I've tried it with 4.9.1 release version.. i don't see any newer release.
Which version should i test?
I meant a GCC build, that contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63567
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Oct 17 21:02:54 2014
New Revision: 216416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216416root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c/63567
* c-typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63567
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63581
Bug ID: 63581
Summary: undefined references in debug_info
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63581
--- Comment #1 from xur at google dot com ---
Patches is here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01795.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #38 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #37)
Created attachment 33751 [details]
Use SImode for FPSCR, add __builtin_sh_get_fpscr, __builtin_sh_set_fpscr
I'm now testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63569
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53513
--- Comment #39 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #38)
... there are no new failures for -m4 -ml and -m4 -mb. I'm tempted to apply
it. Kaz, do you have any objections?
I have no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63582
Bug ID: 63582
Summary: [5 Regression]: g++.dg/init/enum1.C ... (test for
errors, line 12)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63583
Bug ID: 63583
Summary: ICF does not check that the template strings are the
same
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63583
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63528
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63584
Bug ID: 63584
Summary: ICE in strip_typedefs, at cp/tree.c:1326
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63584
--- Comment #1 from jaredhoberock at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33753
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33753action=edit
preprocessed output of ICE reproducer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63567
Sasha Levin sasha.levin at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
94 matches
Mail list logo
