[Bug other/61391] [5 Regression] ICE in execute_one_pass at -O3 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61391 Arseny Solokha asolokha at gmx dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.0 Known

[Bug c++/63657] [4.9 regression] -Wunused-variable: warning supressed by virtual dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657 --- Comment #1 from petschy at gmail dot com --- Bisected the regression: commit a8b52ce38f3056e464457ba1e95efa25a8f08d07 Author: paolo paolo@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4 Date: Wed Jun 12 21:36:36 2013 + /cp 2013-06-12

[Bug c++/62305] throw segfaults on 64bit Cygwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62305 dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug go/60406] recover.go: test13reflect2 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406 --- Comment #29 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Thanks! It's necessary to handle all cases correctly. But there is nothing wrong with using an efficient mechanism when it works, as long as we can correctly fall back to a

[Bug ipa/63664] New: ipa-icf pass fails with segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63664 Bug ID: 63664 Summary: ipa-icf pass fails with segfault Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ipa

[Bug preprocessor/63662] __has_include is not implemented but it is defined, so #ifdef __has_include guards are ineffective in blocking usage of __has_include

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63662 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] New: [5 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 Bug ID: 63665 Summary: [5 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/63658] [4.9/5 Regression] Using class reference as template parameter causes compilation to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63658 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug tree-optimization/63660] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false positive with -O1 and more

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63660 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/63657] [4.9/5 regression] -Wunused-variable: warning supressed by virtual dtor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63657 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] [5 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] [5 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- To better bisect this also use -fno-tree-copy-prop (which otherwise hides this on the 4.9 branch for example). It's forwprop that does the bogus transform on y_5 = -2147483648;

[Bug target/63424] Octave -O3 build: internal compiler error: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:4237

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63424 --- Comment #3 from Renlin Li renlin.li at arm dot com --- I am working on this issue, and a patch is more or less done for it.

[Bug c/63645] Incorrect code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63645 --- Comment #25 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com --- So, is there a way to under-allocate a union (just allocate enough for the member you want) and access it via the union pointer that is valid C?

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] New: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 Bug ID: 63666 Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #4 from Volker Braun vbraun.name at gmail dot com --- Good point, -lm is not necessary. It was necessary in the original GSL testsuite case, but I removed that part.

[Bug tree-optimization/61114] Scalar evolution hides a big-endian const-folding bug.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61114 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/61997] cc1plus ICE with aarch64 target using PCH and builtin functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61997 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana

[Bug target/61915] [AArch64] High amounts of GP to FP register moves using LRA on AArch64 - Improve Generic register_move_cost and memory_move_cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[AArch64] High amounts of

[Bug target/61749] arm_neon.h _lane and _n intrinsics can cause ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61749 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/61714] configure --with-arch and --with-cpu are ignored on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61714 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment

[Bug target/63173] performance problem with simd intrinsics vld2_dup_* on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63173 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug target/63293] [AArch64] can read from deallocated stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/61915] [AArch64] High amounts of GP to FP register moves using LRA on AArch64 - Improve Generic register_move_cost and memory_move_cost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61915 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/63293] [AArch64] can read from deallocated stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63293 --- Comment #3 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- patch pending review here https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02292.html

[Bug middle-end/62178] [5.0 regression] [AArch64] Performance regression on matrix matrix multiply due to r211211

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62178 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/62173] [5.0 regression] [AArch64] Performance regression due to r213488

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62173 --- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- interesting. r213488 was doing something right, and I guess it exposed some other hidding issues which need our investigations.

[Bug c/63663] [NEON] wrong value when computing the leading zero of int16x4_t type at O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63663 --- Comment #1 from wind spf_zju at 126 dot com --- I find this issue is related to the definition of a MACRO. /* The arm5 clz instruction returns 32. */ #define CLZ_DEFINED_VALUE_AT_ZERO(MODE, VALUE) ((VALUE) = 32, 1). I am confused that in

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 --- Comment #4 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 33827 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33827action=edit ./cc1 -O3 pr45752.i upload testcase. ./cc1 (generated by--target=aarch64-elf) -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/63666] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr45752.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63666 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, reproduced with a ia64 cross and a cut-down testcase w/o includes.

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] [5 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Oct 28 11:42:43 2014 New Revision: 216781 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216781root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-10-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.0 Target

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||howarth at bromo dot

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #6 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- My mistake, I assumed the first output line was an error. loop -2.35802

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #7 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 33828 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33828action=edit assembly at -O2 from test_mathieu.c using clang as gcc in Xcode 6

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 33829 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33829action=edit assembly at -O2 from test_mathieu.c using gcc 4.9.1-RC

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- Created attachment 33830 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33830action=edit assembly at -O1 from test_mathieu.c using gcc 4.9.1-RC

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- for the testcase compiled with clang as gcc at -O2 on Yosemite % setenv DYLD_PRINT_BINDINGS % ./test_mathieu dyld: bind: libgcc_s.1.dylib:0x1098E = libdyld.dylib:dyld_stub_binder,

[Bug fortran/63667] New: ICE with DEFERRED procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63667 Bug ID: 63667 Summary: ICE with DEFERRED procedure Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 --- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- This issue isn't specific to Yosemite. I also see the failure at -O2 with gcc-4.9.1 on darwin13.4.0 using the cctools (as and ld) from Xcode 6.

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Macleod amacleod at redhat dot com --- Created attachment 33831 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33831action=edit promote memory order consume to acquire So have we concluded that we should promote

[Bug target/63663] [NEON] wrong value when computing the leading zero of int16x4_t type at O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63663 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|armeb-linux-gnueabi

[Bug tree-optimization/63574] [5 Regression] ICE building libjava (segfault) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63574 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-linxux-gnueabihf

[Bug tree-optimization/63530] GCC generates incorrect aligned store on ARM after the loop is unrolled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63530 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/63665] [4.8/4.9 Regression] wrong code with signed overflow even with -fwrapv

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63665 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Latent issue. pr45752.c:40:3: note: Load permutation 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 4 4 4 4 4 We have a SLP group size of 5 and computed an unroll factor of 2 (ok). It

[Bug testsuite/62286] [ARM] 4.9 Regression fails for cortex-m3 for vfp-1.c: fmacs, fmscs, fnmacs, fnmscs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62286 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/63210] ira does not select the best register compared with gcc 4.8 for ARM THUMB1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63210 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana

[Bug target/60882] [ARM] Execution fail on spec2K/197.parser

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60882 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 --- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- My view is promote consume to acquire until the standards committees and formal model people have sorted out what to do with it.

[Bug go/61880] Linking with external functions in C does not work in GO when using gccgo, while it works in gc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61880 Jan Kratochvil jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug target/63668] New: -mstd-struct-return fails for non-leaf functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63668 Bug ID: 63668 Summary: -mstd-struct-return fails for non-leaf functions Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/63534] [5 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86_64/i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63534 --- Comment #50 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com --- In addition r216154 breaks a lot of asan tests with -m32: see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-10/msg02834.html Could you please try following patch? diff --git

[Bug target/61153] [ARM] vbic vorn tests fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153 --- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #9) Hi, these tests are still failing. what are we gonna do about it? I am happy for a patch to delete them. Ramana

[Bug target/63661] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug target/63661] [4.9/5 Regression] -O2 miscompiles on OSX 10.10 Yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63661 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.3

[Bug target/61153] [ARM] vbic vorn tests fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153 --- Comment #11 from christophe.lyon at st dot com --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #10) (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #9) Hi, these tests are still failing. what are we gonna do about it? I am happy for a

[Bug target/61153] [ARM] vbic vorn tests fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61153 --- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to christophe.lyon from comment #11) (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #10) (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #9) Hi, these tests are

[Bug preprocessor/42014] Inconsistent column number display for In file incuded from

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42014 Justin Vreeland vreeland.justin at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/61529] [5 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:953

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529 --- Comment #9 from Renlin Li renlin.li at arm dot com --- r215830 fixes this ICE

[Bug middle-end/61529] [5 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_probability, at basic-block.h:953

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61529 Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/63669] New: [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -mno-lra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 Bug ID: 63669 Summary: [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -mno-lra Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status:

[Bug middle-end/63669] [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -mno-lra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- it also fails with -fPIC on aarch64 even without -mno-lra.

[Bug middle-end/63669] [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- We (Cavium) had worked on trying to this bug earlier: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-11/msg02286.html Richard S. also worked on it too:

[Bug middle-end/63669] [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug middle-end/63669] [AArch64] gcc.dg/torture/asm-subreg-1.c ICE in reload.c on 4.8 branch or on 4.9 and 5.0 with -fPIC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63669 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-none-elf|aarch64-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/63530] GCC generates incorrect aligned store on ARM after the loop is unrolled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63530 --- Comment #7 from Carrot carrot at google dot com --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #6) Fixed then ? Yes, thanks for closing it.

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 Łukasz Kucharski luk32 at o2 dot pl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||luk32 at o2 dot pl

[Bug preprocessor/63670] New: Ending C_INCLUDE_PATH with a trailing colon broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670 Bug ID: 63670 Summary: Ending C_INCLUDE_PATH with a trailing colon broken Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug inline-asm/62144] Frame pointer required, but reserved error with -fomit-frame-pointer but only with -m32 -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62144 --- Comment #6 from Łukasz Kucharski luk32 at o2 dot pl --- Comment on attachment 33833 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33833 Example program that fails compilation with optimization enabled. Hello, I believe we run into

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 --- Comment #17 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Macleod from comment #15) So have we concluded that we should promote memory_order_consume to memory_order_acquire for now? I also think that this is the best way

[Bug preprocessor/63670] Ending C_INCLUDE_PATH with a trailing colon broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Since C_INCLUDE_PATH defines the path for system headers, this doesn't look like a bug.

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 --- Comment #18 from Tim Northover t.p.northover at gmail dot com --- I am not aware of any shipping compiler that would actually try to preserve dependencies, and nobody else mentioned any during the discussion of this topic in ISO C++ SG1.

[Bug preprocessor/63670] Ending C_INCLUDE_PATH with a trailing colon broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think this is the correct behaviour, and this is basically a dup of PR30439

[Bug preprocessor/63670] Ending C_INCLUDE_PATH with a trailing colon broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63670 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/63671] New: [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 Bug ID: 63671 Summary: [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- It gets worse with -flto: markus@x4 ~ % g++ -w -Ofast -flto=4 tramp3d-v4.cpp markus@x4 ~ % ./a.out --cartvis 1.0 0.0 --rhomin 1e-8 -n 20 ... Time spent in iteration: 4.6181

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503 --- Comment #21 from Evandro e.menezes at samsung dot com --- (In reply to ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com from comment #20) What's the kind of performance delta you see if you managed to unroll the loop just a wee bit ? Probably not much looking

[Bug fortran/63205] [OOP] Wrongly rejects type = class (for identical declared type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205 paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/44054] Handle -Werror, -Werror=, -fdiagnostics-show-option, !GCC$ diagnostic (pragmas) and color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 --- Comment #17 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Tue Oct 28 21:56:24 2014 New Revision: 216812 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216812root=gccview=rev Log: 2014-10-28 Manuel López-Ibáñez

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503 --- Comment #22 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com --- (In reply to Evandro from comment #21) (In reply to ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com from comment #20) What's the kind of performance delta you see if you managed to unroll the loop just a

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503 --- Comment #23 from Evandro e.menezes at samsung dot com --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #22) Unrolling alone isn't good enough in sum reductions. As I mentioned before, GCC doesn't enable any of the useful loop optimizations by default.

[Bug target/63503] [AArch64] A57 executes fused multiply-add poorly in some situations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503 --- Comment #24 from Wilco wdijkstr at arm dot com --- (In reply to Evandro from comment #23) (In reply to Wilco from comment #22) Unrolling alone isn't good enough in sum reductions. As I mentioned before, GCC doesn't enable any of the

[Bug middle-end/59448] Code generation doesn't respect C11 address-dependency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59448 --- Comment #19 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Tue, 28 Oct 2014, torvald at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Alternatively, we could try to be conservative and add an acquire barrier before the function body

[Bug target/62308] A bug with aarch64 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308 Fei Yang fei.yang0953 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fei.yang0953 at

[Bug rtl-optimization/63210] ira does not select the best register compared with gcc 4.8 for ARM THUMB1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63210 --- Comment #4 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3) Fixed is it? And does it fail in GCC 4.9 ? Fixed on trunk. Same fail in GCC 4.9. It is a performance issue. Do you think it

[Bug target/63672] New: xbegin/xend/xabort missing memory barriers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63672 Bug ID: 63672 Summary: xbegin/xend/xabort missing memory barriers Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target