https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
Bug ID: 63743
Summary: Thumb1: big regression for float operators by r216728
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Bug ID: 63744
Summary: Duplicate use-statement causes error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
Bug ID: 63745
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] mythtv build failure due to
aggressive speculative devirtualization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33888
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33888action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry reduced testcase was cut off. Here it is in its full glory:
struct VideoBuffers
{
void StartDisplayingFrame ();
};
struct B
{
VideoBuffers vbuffers;
virtual void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746
Bug ID: 63746
Summary: i/o fragmentation inside basic_filebuf::xsputn
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63620
--- Comment #26 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
PR 63527 is probably related to this issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
--- Comment #5 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: passes.def
===
--- passes.def (revision 217035)
+++ passes.def (working copy)
@@ -255,7 +255,7 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
--- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Were we swapping operands before? I mean, if you rewrite the testcase to
swap the * arguments in the source, did you get the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
Bug ID: 63747
Summary: [5 regression] icf mis-compares switch gimple
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And here's a hopefully valid testcase:
markus@x4 tmp % cat main.ii
struct VideoBuffers
{
void StartDisplayingFrame ();
};
struct B
{
VideoBuffers vbuffers;
virtual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Zhenqiang Chen from comment #2)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Were we swapping operands before? I mean, if you rewrite the testcase to
swap the *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-*-*,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
--- Comment #4 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
(In reply to Zhenqiang Chen from comment #2)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
Were we swapping operands before? I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33885|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #5 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
Created attachment 33890
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33890action=edit
haifa-sched.s.gz
haifa-sched.s (gzipped) from -save-temps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47007
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61847
Janne Blomqvist jb at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63721
--- Comment #3 from Jiong Wang jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to thopre01 from comment #2)
Shouldn't this be merged with PR63747?
not sure, but looks like they are not the same issue. this failure happen on
x86-64 also, and may happen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33855|0 |1
is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63475
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 5 12:02:17 2014
New Revision: 217119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217119root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2014-10-20 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
--- Comment #21 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 5 12:02:17 2014
New Revision: 217119
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217119root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2014-10-20 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63475
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61515
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #23)
The piece you're missing in this is that when we seen an assignment to some
SSA_NAME, call it LHS and we've traversed a backedge,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740
--- Comment #6 from Aaro Koskinen aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi ---
(In reply to Aaro Koskinen from comment #0)
GCC 4.9.2 native bootstrap on ARM fails with ICE from the second stage
compiler:
/home/aaro/gcctest/build/./prev-gcc/xg++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748
Bug ID: 63748
Summary: may be used uninitialized warning on variable
definition with initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61033
--- Comment #10 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Michael,
What is the status of this bug?
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63748
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57792
--- Comment #13 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Yes, I am pretty sure Apple has abandoned this for good. They only attempted
the change because it was assumed to be completely transparent as the compiler
looks in /usr/include by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
struct VideoBuffers
{
void StartDisplayingFrame ();
};
struct B
{
VideoBuffers vbuffers;
virtual void
StartDisplay ()
{
vbuffers.StartDisplayingFrame ();
}
So
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63745
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net ---
Created attachment 33893
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33893action=edit
my hack.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63269
--- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
regarding 2)
I'm not entirely persuaded by your argument for item 2. ...
Hm, good that you doubted it, because the actual mistake is somehwere else:
The unpatched code has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63741
--- Comment #2 from Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Broken on head as well.
lm32-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20141104 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
Maybe not fold but rather what I am working on, gimple_combine.
Rather now gimple_simplify (which is from the match-and-simplify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63749
Bug ID: 63749
Summary: [4.9/5 Regression] registers may not be the same
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63640
patnel97269-gfortran at yahoo dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61110
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||25290
---
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables
-W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long
-Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I. -I../../gcc-5.0-20141105/gcc -I../../gcc-5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63750
--- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Bootstrap attempted with...
../gcc-5.0-20141105/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc5.0/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
--- Comment #47 from Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jsm28
Date: Wed Nov 5 16:19:10 2014
New Revision: 217144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217144root=gccview=rev
Log:
Enable -fextended-identifiers by default.
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Bug ID: 63751
Summary: ICE in tree_to_uhwi, at tree.h:3668
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16989
Bug 16989 depends on bug 9449, which changed state.
Bug 9449 Summary: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9449
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63752
Bug ID: 63752
Summary: avr ICE at reload1.c:2128 building newlib
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63269
--- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
regarding 1)
My earlier explanation of the problem was wrong. Multiply and add is not
generated; it probably only was in the artificial test case that I made and
certainly did
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63595
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 33896
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33896action=edit
reduced test case for tria.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Nov 5 17:23:46 2014
New Revision: 217149
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217149root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2014-11-05 Anthony
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63742
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59593
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
You would probably be better of discussing this on gcc-help. gcc-bugs
is rather full of bugzilla traffic and normal mails are easily missed.
Have you tried setting CONFIG_SHELL in the environment? Also, when
running the build use something like
make SHELL=/bin/bash
R.
On 03/11/14 20:22,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63750
--- Comment #2 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 33897
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33897action=edit
patch to pass fix by appending #include sstream to gcc/ipa-chkp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #10 from Wojciech Koszek wkoszek at gmail dot com ---
I'm very happy seeing it in GCC.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 9:24 AM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #8 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
At r217144 with https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33897 to fix
PR63750, gcc trunk now bootstraps up to the illegal text reloc error. Is this
problem understood well enough to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63753
Bug ID: 63753
Summary: std::transform does not change size
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63211
--- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Confirmed. We'll fix that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63754
Bug ID: 63754
Summary: h8300 ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 during libgcc
autoconf probe
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63754
Joel Sherrill joel at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||h8300-rtems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
--- Comment #8 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Wed Nov 5 19:16:13 2014
New Revision: 217154
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217154root=gccview=rev
Log:
2014-11-04 François Dumont
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63698
François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63755
Bug ID: 63755
Summary: m32c invalid asm generated in libgcc autoconf probe
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63694
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
This bug is easily fixed by adding declaration checks for the new
libiberty functions
to configure.ac (both libiberty and gcc), and rebuilding configure and
config.in.
Sorry, I haven't had
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63538
--- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 5 21:00:07 2014
New Revision: 217156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217156root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/63538
* config/i386/i386.c (in_large_data_p):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #9 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
The darwin linker developer's analysis of this failing linkage is as follows...
That link line contains “-undefined dynamic_lookup” which is almost always a
bad idea. Removing it shows the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63753
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #10 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Note that removal of the -undefined dynamic_lookup produces...
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
__ZNKSt11logic_error4whatEv, referenced from:
__ZTVSt11logic_error in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63538
--- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Nov 5 22:23:05 2014
New Revision: 217160
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217160root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/63538
* config/i386/i386.c (in_large_data_p):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
--- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: manu
Date: Wed Nov 5 22:17:22 2014
New Revision: 217159
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217159root=gccview=rev
Log:
Revert revision 217149 because it breaks Ada:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63538
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63198
Thomas Bernard thomas at famillebernardgouriou dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756
Bug ID: 63756
Summary: _mm_cvtepi16_epi32 with a memory operand produces
either broken or slow asm
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756
--- Comment #1 from Timothy B. Terriberry tterribe at xiph dot org ---
Created attachment 33901
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33901action=edit
Preprocessed file for no-opt version (gcc pmovsxwd.c -msse4.1 -save-temps -o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756
--- Comment #2 from Timothy B. Terriberry tterribe at xiph dot org ---
Created attachment 33902
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33902action=edit
Preprocessed file for opt version (gcc pmovsxwd.c -msse4.1 -O2 -save-temps -o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63756
--- Comment #3 from Timothy B. Terriberry tterribe at xiph dot org ---
GCC version:
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.9.1/work/gcc-4.9.1/configure
--host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #11 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
It looks like we aren't compiling some object files in libstdc++-v3/src/c++98
for gcc trunk which are are on gcc 4.9.2. In particular, we are missing...
ctype.o
ctype_configure_char.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
dev at codyps dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev at codyps dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
This looks like fallout from...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/2014-q4/msg00080.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++-cvs/2014-q3/msg00181.html
where the files moved to c++11 in gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63757
Bug ID: 63757
Summary: nullptr conversion sequence fails to compile
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63757
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63751
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Klose doko at gcc dot gnu.org ---
and it needed r211910, found after a first build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63758
Bug ID: 63758
Summary: liblto_plugin.so has undefined reference to _environ
on OSX
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63758
--- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org ---
Created attachment 33903
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33903action=edit
proposed patch
This patch fixes it on OSX. I haven't verified it on a wide variety of
configurations.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63622
--- Comment #13 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Created attachment 33904
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33904action=edit
preprocessed source for libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/streambuf-inst.cc
-20141105/libstdc++-v3/../libgcc
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/x86_64-apple-darwin14.0.0/libstdc++-v3/include
-I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63759
Bug ID: 63759
Summary: did not use DW_TAG_template_alias for template alias
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
--- Comment #2 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
/* { dg-options -O2 } */
/* { dg-do run } */
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo(int i)
{
switch (i)
{
case 0:
case 1:
case 2:
case 3:
return 0;
default:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
Created attachment 33906
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33906action=edit
/home/joeye01/patches/icf-switch-testcase-141105.patch
Test case patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63747
--- Comment #4 from Joey Ye joey.ye at arm dot com ---
It actually fails on all targets.
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
