[Bug middle-end/63926] [5 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth, at ipa-inline.h:300

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63926 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on|

[Bug target/64030] New: some libiberty sources includes stdio.h prior to config.h causing redefined symbol warnings on i?86-*-solaris2.11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64030 Bug ID: 64030 Summary: some libiberty sources includes stdio.h prior to config.h causing redefined symbol warnings on i?86-*-solaris2.11 Product: gcc Version:

[Bug tree-optimization/64031] New: Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031 Bug ID: 64031 Summary: Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/63905] redundant fields left in gcc/cp/cp-tree.h:lang_decl_fn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63905 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/64031] Vectorization of max/min is not robust enough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64031 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- -ffast-math lets it vectorize (using min directly). Otherwise, for the first test, ifcvt gives (ab)?a:b which is vectorized as such, but for the second test, it doesn't unless we pass

[Bug c++/63959] G++ misreports volatile int as trivially copyable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63959 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/63497] std::regex can't handle [^class] correctly and cause runtime crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|moophy at foxmail dot com |

[Bug c++/63423] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_abort_tentative_parse, at cp/parser.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63423 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/63385] internal compiler error: in pop_binding, at cp/name-lookup.c for implicitly captured variable called closure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63385 --- Comment #4 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com --- Jason, can we resolve this?

[Bug c++/63216] gcc crash: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63216 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/60943] [C++1y] Return type deduction interferes with ref-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60943 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/61019] ICE: incomplete type of class template as pseudo-destructor-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/57758] gcc accepts incorrect in-class brace initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57758 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/48483] Construct from yourself w/o warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48483 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lundberj

[Bug c++/57919] [C++11] Alias templates cause partial specialization to erroneously fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57919 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/63875] Bogus unused-but-set-parameter warning when expanding a variadic template argument pack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|tejohnson at google dot com

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 --- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34076 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34076action=edit Patch to fix aliases and dead code removal. One of problem was the abstract origin

[Bug c++/63786] crash on argument pack in switch case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63786 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last

[Bug c++/63472] transaction_atomic within while loop causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63472 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|spear at cse dot lehigh.edu|

[Bug ipa/61324] [5 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV at ipa-comdats.c:321 with -fno-use-cxa-atexit -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61324 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- It is caused by r210597.

[Bug c/64032] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64032 Bug ID: 64032 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/undefined-loop-2.c (test for warnings, line 18) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #25 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) 2. we have so many versions, different layouts and version-specific issues, that I think it's time to reorganise our GCC

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #26 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34077 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34077action=edit Patch removing 10.4 and earlier support from our specs/driver

[Bug rtl-optimization/64033] New: [5.0 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7741

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64033 Bug ID: 64033 Summary: [5.0 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1, at expr.c:7741 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #25) (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23) 2. we have so many versions, different layouts and version-specific issues, that

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2 Regression] cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets, at reginfo.c:178

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #7 from Denis Excoffier g...@denis-excoffier.org --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #6) There is no lldb here, and also no direct 'bt' available. I used gdb with a break point: % cd /tmp/lcl/tmp/gcc/obj % % grep -n

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- 32-bit x86 looks OK: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-11/msg02534.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-11/msg02537.html

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2 Regression] cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets, at reginfo.c:178

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2014-11-22 00:00:00

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34078 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34078action=edit Reduced problem from linux kernel This one exposes a problem of the sh_optimize_sett_clrt

[Bug middle-end/62247] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- We now have: FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[ \t]_?_ ZTI4Heya FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)?[

[Bug middle-end/62247] [5.0 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/abi/anon3.C -std=c++98 scan-assembler .weak(_definition)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34079 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34079action=edit Assembler output

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/62018] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/ftrapv-1.c * execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin13

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018 --- Comment #28 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27) 10.7+ - (albeit 10.7 is somewhat transitionary) here we need to stop building the eh stuff into libgcc, we probably need to split the

[Bug middle-end/60102] [4.9/5 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices at dwf_regno

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- sorry I fixed this months ago locally.. I will push a patch to fix ASAP. note that there are 4 bootstrap breakers on PPC (trunk) 1. this 2. libcc1 (same fail as x86) 3. libiberty

[Bug bootstrap/63703] [4.9.2/5 Regression] Bootstrap broken on powerpc-apple-darwin, cc1: internal compiler error: in init_reg_sets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63703 --- Comment #11 from Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) note that there are 4 bootstrap breakers on PPC (trunk) More annoying, I think, is that this one is also on 4.9, and

[Bug libstdc++/63497] std::regex can't handle [^class] correctly and cause runtime crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, I think this is OK for the branch

[Bug target/55023] hppa: wrong code generated with tail call optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023 --- Comment #12 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Breakpoint 3, delete_dead_store_insn (insn_info=0x1b5ccf0) at ../../gcc/gcc/dse.c:948 948 if (!dbg_cnt (dse)) (gdb) p *insn_info $3 = {cannot_delete = false, wild_read

[Bug tree-optimization/64034] New: [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64034 Bug ID: 64034 Summary: [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/64034] [5 regression] cc1 stack-overflow with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64034 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/63203] Self-initialization of reference not diagnosed if it occurs within a loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63203 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/63940] C++ constexpr errors on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63940 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- HJ, The test was not failing on Linux x86-64 nor x86-32. I sent pre-processed testcase from AIX that Jason was able to reproduce on Linux. But the fix did not solve the failure on

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #10 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Nov 23 21:16:26 2014 New Revision: 217987 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217987root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/53976 *

[Bug c++/64035] New: [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64035 Bug ID: 64035 Summary: [C++11] ICE in reshape_init_r when using initializer list aggregate initialization for default function parameters Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/53976] [SH] Unnecessary clrt/sett after bt/bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53976 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Nov 23 21:45:18 2014 New Revision: 217989 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217989root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline 2014-11-23

[Bug target/64036] New: [SH] Evaluate re-enabling scheduling before RA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64036 Bug ID: 64036 Summary: [SH] Evaluate re-enabling scheduling before RA Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/64037] New: Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 Bug ID: 64037 Summary: Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #1 from Julian Stecklina js at alien8 dot de --- Created attachment 34083 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34083action=edit gcc --verbose --version for 4.9.1

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #2 from Julian Stecklina js at alien8 dot de --- Created attachment 34084 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34084action=edit gcc --verbose --version for 4.9.2

[Bug c++/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 --- Comment #3 from Julian Stecklina js at alien8 dot de --- Created attachment 34085 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34085action=edit Miscompiled binary (built with 4.9.2)

[Bug target/64037] Miscompilation with LTO and enum class : char parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64037 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*

[Bug fortran/44054] Handle -Werror, -Werror=, -fdiagnostics-show-option, !GCC$ diagnostic (pragmas) and color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44054 --- Comment #19 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: manu Date: Sun Nov 23 23:47:42 2014 New Revision: 217992 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217992root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/fortran/ChangeLog: 2014-11-23 Manuel

[Bug c/59708] clang-compatible checked arithmetic builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708 --- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 22-Nov-14, at 2:31 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Is that with r217946 or later? This is now fixed on hppa-unknown-linux-gnu. -- John David Anglindave.ang...@bell.net

[Bug bootstrap/64023] [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using gcc as the bootstrap compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023 Francois-Xavier Coudert fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug target/55023] hppa: wrong code generated with tail call optimisation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55023 --- Comment #13 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 34086 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34086action=edit Patch Testing...

[Bug bootstrap/64023] [5 Regression] r216964 breaks bootstrap on darwin when using gcc as the bootstrap compiler.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64023 --- Comment #4 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #3) Even with that patch, there remains the silent issue of not linking statically when clang is the system compiler. The

[Bug testsuite/64038] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64038 Bug ID: 64038 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/ipa-icf-5.c (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/63790] [5 Regression] Tests XFAILed because of the match-and-simplify merge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug tree-optimization/64039] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized return 28;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039 Bug ID: 64039 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized return 28; Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/64040] New: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 Bug ID: 64040 Summary: FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/63852] [5 regression] acats failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63852 John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at

[Bug libstdc++/64040] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Strange. Maybe some number is overflowing and trying to allocate a huge number of bytes. I'll try to look into it but not for a few days.

[Bug libstdc++/64040] FAIL: 23_containers/vector/ext_pointer/types/2.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64040 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. 0xc020e9d8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.2 (gdb) bt #0 0xc020e9d8 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libc.2 #1 0xc01a9a74 in ?? () from

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com --- You force it to register? In fact, I tend to not force it to register in gen_ccmp_next, since it will introduce more overhead for ccmp, which performance maybe worse. My patch

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Zhenqiang Chen from comment #2) 2) How to justify it is valueable (the overhead of ccmp is OK) when generating ccmp? If we ignore the case for swapping. Try this

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) See how with forcing is always the same size or smaller? Actually is always smaller by at least one instruction. due to the need to do

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 --- Comment #4 from Airbak airbak.li at huawei dot com --- When I build toolchain with GNU gcc-4.9.2.tar.bz2, the problem also exist. -- lijianhui@key:~/hi3535/Hi3535_SDK_V2.0.3.1/osdrv/kernel/linux-3.4.y$

[Bug target/64015] [5.0 Regression] AArch64 ICE due to conditional compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64015 --- Comment #5 from Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.chen at arm dot com --- It seams you always win with ccmp. Please go ahead for your patch and make sure the following case work. int test (unsigned short a, unsigned char b) { return a 0xfff2 b

[Bug middle-end/64012] GCC-4.9.2 option -fcaller-saves in -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64012 --- Comment #5 from Airbak airbak.li at huawei dot com --- I'm sorry for my mistake. GCC-4.8.3 also have this phenomenon. GCC 4.4.1 is OK.

[Bug fortran/63938] OpenMP atomic update does not protect access to automatic array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63938 Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64041] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64041 Bug ID: 64041 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug go/64021] Empty struct vs libffi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64021 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 ---