https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
After some debugging, root cause appears to be in initialization of
pic_offset_table_rtx.
In i386.h:
/* Register to hold the addressing base for position independent
code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Indeed, adding this to toplev.c fixes the issue:
@@ -2166,7 +2169,8 @@ toplev::finalize (void)
{
rtl_initialized = false;
this_target_rtl-target_specific_initialized =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you explain it? Usually when this function is called, pic_offset_table_rtx
is NULL and your i386.h macro relies on that.
When initializing default target during initialization it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46164
Hale Wang Hale.Wang at arm dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hale.Wang at arm dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for that in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63439
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
Bug ID: 64728
Summary: internal compiler error: SSA corruption
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64726
--- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch, lightly tested. (The test case will later fail in gimplify.c with
sorry, not implemented.)
(In the function below, only op == EXEC_OACC_PARALLEL_LOOP or op ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
dg-bogus is better, yet. FWIW, the patch has been successfully
regtested/bootstrapped now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also, if you keep pic_offset_table_rtx NULL, then PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM will
be 3 instead of -1 in other places.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Andrew, are you going to post the patch? I think it is pretty obvious...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64729
Bug ID: 64729
Summary: gcc.dg/stackprotectexplicit1.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg01884.ht
ml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64342
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64277
Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59366
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325
--- Comment #4 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tbsaunde
Date: Thu Jan 22 11:55:33 2015
New Revision: 219994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219994root=gccview=rev
Log:
make fold ignore decl_with_vis.symtab_node
gcc/
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64510
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64730
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64730
Bug ID: 64730
Summary: g++.dg/ipa/pr64049-1.C ICE: SEGV when printing NULL
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63439
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61403
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59107
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Updated patch for 5.0
--- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/gfortran.h2015-01-19 02:01:40.0 +0100
+++ gcc/fortran/gfortran.h2015-01-22 11:42:56.0 +0100
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63439
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34530
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34530action=edit
sparc vectorizer dump
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34531
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34531action=edit
gcc5-pr64511.patch
The #c13 testcase can be fixed by the attached patch. Not including
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Started with r217034.
Reduced testcase for -O:
char a[128];
int b, d;
void baz (long);
int setjmp (char [128]);
static void
bar (long *x)
{
if (d)
*x = b;
}
void
foo ()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
Index: tree-ssa-coalesce.c
===
--- tree-ssa-coalesce.c (revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64730
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: tree-ssa-coalesce.c
===
--- tree-ssa-coalesce.c (revision 219989)
+++ tree-ssa-coalesce.c (working copy)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64612
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #16)
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If you are willing to cook up an effective-target for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #61 from Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #60)
FWIW I've been including backports of r202778 and r206437 (which I think are
the two relevant fixes) in my 4.8-based GCCs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64477
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57748
--- Comment #62 from Mikael Pettersson mikpelinux at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #61)
if you already have used/tested that patch on 4.8 for such a long time,
I would appreciate it very much if you post it on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Annotating rs6000_stack_info() in perf shows:
│/* First, find out if we use _any_ altivec registers. */
│for (i = FIRST_ALTIVEC_REGNO; i =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63970
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34527
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34527action=edit
gcc5-ice-nobt.patch
Untested fix for the undesirable backtrace from driver.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Bug ID: 64727
Summary: [5 Regression]
g++.dg/torture/darwin-cfstring-3.C:11:80: internal
compiler error: Segmentation fault: 11
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Can you reproduce it with stage1 cc1plus? As in, is it miscompiled compiler or
just some problem on the testcase? If the former, can you bisect exactly to
the version and bisect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Of course the question is whether
int
main (void)
{
struct A { char buf1[9]; char buf2[1]; } a;
char *p = a.buf1;
p += 4;
strcpy (p, str1 + 5);
}
should detect a buffer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #35 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
I see three possibilities for this PR:
(1) Revert r211405 for 5.0 and r212329 for 4.9.
(2) Understand why elemental procedures expose the problem when expr-expr_type
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64535
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 22 09:21:48 2015
New Revision: 219988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219988root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It would appear so, in which case the following (untested, only quick hack)
should work:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cpp/pr36320.c
index
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64725
Bug ID: 64725
Summary: FAIL: libgo/runtime TestFinalizerType testing.go:278:
#2: finalizer for type func(*int) didn't run
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64726
Bug ID: 64726
Summary: [OpenACC] ICE with -fopenacc and reduction(+:a)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, openacc
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60570
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
-#elif /* { dg-error with no expression } */
+#elif
Perhaps turn it into dg-bogus instead?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
The original test case is already using the equivalent of a.buf1[4], without
any intermediate variable.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64715
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Note that if I fix this the only possible fix will complain for
char *p = (char *)a;
p += 4;
...
as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If stage1 fails, then it is not miscompilation of the compiler itself (or it
would be miscompilation by your system compiler instead).
So no *.o bisection is needed. That said, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
If stage1 fails, then it is not miscompilation of the compiler itself
(or it would be miscompilation by your system compiler instead).
My bootstrap compiler is
gcc version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64690
--- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Thu Jan 22 10:55:32 2015
New Revision: 219990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219990root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Max Ostapenko
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The only FE change among those is r219973.
) version 5.0.0 20150122 (experimental) (x86_64-apple-darwin14.1.0)
compiled by GNU C version 5.0.0 20150122 (experimental), GMP version 6.0.0,
MPFR version 3.1.2, MPC version 1.0.2
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096
ignoring nonexistent directory
/sw/src
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
r219076 introduced:
if (current_badness != badness)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64694
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63325
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64159
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64732
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64732
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64477
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jan 22 14:43:55 2015
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64688
PR target/64477
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #10)
which led to investigating this code in ix86_conditional_register_usage:
4394 j = PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM;
4395 if (j !=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64712
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64712
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I also don't see the failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64728
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jan 22 16:07:36 2015
New Revision: 220003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220003root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-01-22 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64732
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #2)
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
Waiting for some kind of a testcase (or at least a pointer to what Julia
is).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Doesn't look like a regression, I see roughly same code quality all the way
from 4.1 which I tried first to current trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326
tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52076
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Jan 22 21:24:28 2015
New Revision: 220015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220015root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/52076
* config/m68k/m68k.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52076
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64081
--- Comment #11 from Igor Zamyatin izamyatin at gmail dot com ---
Could you please provide details of your compiler configuration for me to try
to reproduce the problem?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64712
--- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also reproduced with r219989.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64707
--- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34535
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34535action=edit
tentative patch, makes fopenmp an LTO option, adds lto-wrapper handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64672
--- Comment #16 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34536
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34536action=edit
tentative patch, makes fopenacc an LTO option, adds lto-wrapper handling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #12 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #11)
This seems to be because darwin_build_constant_cfstring uses CONST_DECL for
a global variable, and the C++ front end expects CONST_DECL to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
But then wonder if/how target_reinit works for i?86 32-bit.
Perhaps pic_offset_table_rtx should be cleared in init_emit_regs before
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 61403, which changed state.
Bug 61403 Summary: An opportunity for x86 gcc vectorizer (~40% gain)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61403
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64731
Bug ID: 64731
Summary: poor code when using vector_size((32)) for sse2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64688
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jan 22 14:43:55 2015
New Revision: 22
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=22root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64688
PR target/64477
* config/i386/sse.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com ---
different hooks(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
Can you explain it? Usually when this function is called,
pic_offset_table_rtx is NULL and your i386.h macro relies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64722
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Notes to self on how I debugged this:
I added the following to harness.h:
gcc_jit_context_set_bool_option (
ctxt,
GCC_JIT_BOOL_OPTION_DUMP_EVERYTHING,
1);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64732
Bug ID: 64732
Summary: [5 Regression] julia build failure: double free or
corruption in libgfortran.so.3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64727
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
The only FE change among those is r219973.
And indeed if I revert it, the ICE disappears.
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
