https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #14 from joern.rennecke at embecosm dot com ---
On 2 February 2015 at 19:58, gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #13 from Chen Gang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #2 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
It seems to me that with the current code that issue should be handled in
libffi. With the current code it's hard for me to see why checking for GNU
Go is correct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64867
--- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey tromey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
That's the wrong thing to assert:
Aha, thank you very much. I obviously did not realize the difference :)
Unfortunately I think even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00093.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
boger at us dot ibm.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
--- Comment #24 from Nathan Sidwell nathan at acm dot org ---
xur, can you provide your testcase? with a regular use of multiple DSOs, I
can't get a failure. (no dlopen used).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #13 from Chen Gang gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
Please leave the bug open until a fix is committed to the trunk.
OK, thanks.
Could any members help to commit the related patch to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
Bug ID: 64909
Summary: [4.8/5 regression] Missed vectorization
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
--- Comment #25 from xur at google dot com ---
attached the test case. replace CC in build_cmd with your compiler.
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 12:59 PM, nathan at acm dot org
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64909
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
Bug ID: 64910
Summary: tree reassociation results in poor code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64911
Bug ID: 64911
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strchr.c
compilation, -O0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64910
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Here's the hack that I was playing with which shows the better code sequence:
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-reassoc.c
index 995..4515a4d 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49951
--- Comment #21 from asmwarrior asmwarrior at gmail dot com ---
I just test the sample code in comment 20 with GCC 4.9.2, and I see this
jumpy behaviour still exists, do we need to reopen this bug? Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64911
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61548
--- Comment #16 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #15)
I think it is best to modify the remove_unreachable_nodes loop to first
remove aliases before removing their target...
how is this related? the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64212
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Well, can someone overwrite dllimport symbol by different definition?
If not, it is a bug of decl_binds_to_current_def_p to return false here.
If it can be inteprposed, I think the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
The patch needs to be reviewed. It's been a long time since I thought about
the _STRICT variants of the REG_OK_ macros and how all that's supposed to work.
I'll have to read up on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34644
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34644action=edit
unreduced testcase
I'm having a hard time reducing the testcase.
Unreduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64848
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899
Bug ID: 64899
Summary: Illegal dynamic initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Ditto the header guards like
GCC_GTHR_POSIX_H
GCC_GTHR_SINGLE_H
GCC_GTHR_H
and macros like
GTHREAD_USE_WEAK
HIDE_EXPORTS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64791
--- Comment #9 from Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com ---
I can't see any warnings with my trunk build from today, either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
Bug ID: 64898
Summary: [5 Regression] qtgui-4.8.6 build error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #22 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21)
In 17_intro/headers/c++*/all_attributes.cc, c++* stands for c++1998,
c++200x, and c++2014. The first instance is fixed now, the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
s/extern function/extern function pointer/
This is a variable of a function pointer type.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
In 17_intro/headers/c++*/all_attributes.cc, c++* stands for c++1998, c++200x,
and c++2014. The first instance is fixed now, the two other ones are still
failing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34643
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34643action=edit
gcc5-pr64756.patch
I'd say we just should never record volatile MEMs into the hash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64836
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 3 03:33:21 2015
New Revision: 220364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220364root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64836
PR go/64838
compiler: Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64912
Bug ID: 64912
Summary: no debug info for struct that pass by reference
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
This code is going to call main.$nested0 with the static chain pointer set to
the address of a struct created in main.for_escapes3. In this code
p := new(int)
*p = i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64901
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 3 02:49:42 2015
New Revision: 220363
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220363root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR c++/64901
* decl.c (duplicate_decls):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64838
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64836
Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #24 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
Confirmed that this patch eliminates the regressions for...
make -k check
RUNTESTFLAGS=conformance.exp=17_intro/headers/c++*/all_attributes.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64838
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Tue Feb 3 03:33:21 2015
New Revision: 220364
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220364root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR go/64836
PR go/64838
compiler: Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63256
--- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
sms-1.c fails with -m32 -mpowerpc64 in a similar way.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56590
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or, alternatively and possible better: to understand why there is now a ULP
difference, which didn't exist in GCC 4.9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62251
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64842
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64901
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Bug ID: 64900
Summary: gotools don't link on Solaris 11/x86
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64900
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #22 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Feb 2 15:21:16 2015
New Revision: 220347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220347root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR jit/64810: support DImode on arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61229
Thomas Huxhorn thomas.huxhorn at web dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64901
Bug ID: 64901
Summary: Overriding final function defined out of line does not
lead to an error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64901
Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63790
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
As far as I know we're clean but on the XFAIL of
g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-reinterpret1.C which was acked by Jason though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
--- Comment #18 from Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: belagod
Date: Mon Feb 2 15:54:59 2015
New Revision: 220348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220348root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-02 Tejas Belagod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61225
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
From my experimentations, I don't see a reasonable way to fix this in stage4
except via some horrid define_peep2.
We don't have the LOG_LINKS we need to do a good job on this during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64903
Bug ID: 64903
Summary: is_partitioned should not apply a predicate more than
(last - first) times
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com ---
Sorry, I missed that this only happens with 4.9. Unfortunately, I was also
unable to reproduce it with 4.9.
I have no idea what the problem is. If you can still reproduce it, run it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63875
--- Comment #2 from Teresa Johnson tejohnson at google dot com ---
Ping. This is still an issue on trunk (as of today at r220345).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64467
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Like some of the BSDs, newlib provides a _B bitmask, but that does not
correspond to isblank so can't be used. The _B mask doesn't match the TAB
character, but isblank must match
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64885
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yeah, they're a mess.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64899
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat SVGAllInOne.ii
class A
{
int m_x, m_y;
};
class B
{
A m_location;
int m_size;
};
class C
{
public:
virtual B m_fn1 () const;
};
class D
{
B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64791
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64903
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64883
--- Comment #23 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
does my incremental patch fix that on Darwin14 - I can send it to you if
cut paste mangled.
If you mean the patch in comment 19, yes it does (I only applied it for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64231
Tejas Belagod belagod at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64810
--- Comment #23 from David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Feb 2 16:11:15 2015
New Revision: 220351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220351root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR jit/64810: fix for arm_option_override
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63566
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64906
Bug ID: 64906
Summary: -fsanitize=integer-divide-by-zero creates false
-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64907
Bug ID: 64907
Summary: Suboptimal code (saving rbx on stack in order to save
another reg in rbx)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
Bug ID: 64905
Summary: unsigned short is loaded with 4-byte load (movl)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61601
--- Comment #8 from Maksymilian Arciemowicz max at cert dot cx ---
there's no memory problem, it just takes exponentially long time to run
(which is expected when using backtracking).
call it cpu resource exhaustion (CWE-400)
To avoid it,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The problem is in the recursion step of
fsm_find_control_statement_thread_paths:
for (i = 0; i gimple_phi_num_args (phi); i++)
{
tree arg = gimple_phi_arg_def (phi, i);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 34647
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34647action=edit
A patch
Does this patch make any sense?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64907
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
--- Comment #23 from xur at google dot com ---
I overlooked that gcov_master was also used in gcov_dump_int.
The bug is exactly as Honza described. I can reproduce with a simple example.
Nathan: did you use dlopen? It seems using dlopen will
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64908
Bug ID: 64908
Summary: [5 Regression] pch broken
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: pch
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22141
hariharan.gcc at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hariharan.gcc at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64908
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This is the actual crash:
==15192== Invalid read of size 1
==15192==at 0xCBB825: ggc_get_size(void const*) (in
/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.0.0/cc1plus)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62117
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Here is the unincluded version of the code:
#include arm_neon.h
int
search_line_fast (uint32x2_t t)
{
return vget_lane_u32 (t, 0);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34642
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34642action=edit
The patch which fixes the C++ failure (but does not include a testcase yet)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64897
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64896
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64756
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
