https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Feb 5 08:06:04 2015
New Revision: 220436
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220436root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Paul Thomas pa...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49213
Bug 49213 depends on bug 64757, which changed state.
Bug 64757 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2353
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Bug ID: 64943
Summary: No error on ultimate allocatable components in IO list
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63776
--- Comment #8 from Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I'm not sure how you call boost::regex in your code, here's what I did:
// g++ b.cc -lboost_regex -licuuc
#include boost/regex/icu.hpp
#include boost/regex.hpp
#include iostream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43264
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 6 05:34:00 2015
New Revision: 220471
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220471root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/43264
* config/h8300/h8300.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #18 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #16)
The cost of expression p + ((sizetype)(99 - i_6(D)) + 1) * 4 computed
using normal +/-/* operators on sparc64 is 18, but the cost is 32 if it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43264
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #19)
The assembly is as below on sparc64:
f1:
.register %g2, #scratch
sllx%o1, 2, %g1
mov 99, %g2
add %o0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The assembly is as below on sparc64:
f1:
.register %g2, #scratch
sllx%o1, 2, %g1
mov 99, %g2
add %o0, %g1, %o0
sub %g2,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I took a closer look at this one. The error I am getting is running out of
allocatable space in realloc used in fbuf.c (fbuf_alloc). We are allocating
one byte at a time, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63775
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63920
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #5 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
Created attachment 34681
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34681action=edit
_io.i.gz: larger test file
With this compiler:
firefly:~/Downloads/gambit/lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64928
--- Comment #6 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
The problem does not appear with this compiler:
maclaurin-271% gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-redhat-linux
Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr --mandir=/usr/share/man
model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20150205 (experimental) [trunk revision 220434] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c; a.out
$ gcc-4.9 -O1 small.c; a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
--
int a, b;
int
main ()
{
a = 0;
for (; a 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60020
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17306
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 6 06:19:03 2015
New Revision: 220472
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220472root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/17306
* config/h8300/constraints.md
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17306
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61720
Tim Shen timshen at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
Bug ID: 64946
Summary: For Aarch64, vectorization with abs instruction is
not hapenning with vector elements of char/short type.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The test case is got from gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64941
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
--- Comment #3 from Markus F.X.J. Oberhumer markus at oberhumer dot com ---
Just for reference, here is the expected result:
$ clang -target armv5-unknown-linux-gnu -marm -mfloat-abi=soft --version
clang version 3.5.1 (tags/RELEASE_351/final)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
In principle, we do have a similar check in resolve.c's resolve_transfer.
The question is why it doesn't trigger.
Answer: Only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Better now?
Yes, I have bootstrapped a clean revision r220437 on x86_64-apple-darwin10,
regtesting in progress.
For the record, I still see the warning
ld: warning: can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64326
--- Comment #5 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #4)
make_forwarder_block is definitely wrong on not capping. But I do not see
how vectorizing can get us to a frequncy over FREQ_MAX? So probably some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In principle, we do have a similar check in resolve.c's resolve_transfer. The
question is why it doesn't trigger.
if (ts-type == BT_CLASS)
{
/* FIXME: Test for defined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64940
--- Comment #4 from Bill Torpey bill.torpey at ullink dot com ---
That was the first thing I tried, but the system limits.h does an include_next
which fails, and the system features.h doesnt include compiler-specific
definitions, so that also
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
--- Comment #1 from Lorenz Hüdepohl bugs at stellardeath dot org ---
Also present in 4.8.3:
# gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 4.8.3 20141208 [gcc-4_8-branch revision 218481]
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GNU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #18 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #17)
Better now?
Yes, I have bootstrapped a clean revision r220437 on x86_64-apple-darwin10,
regtesting in progress.
For the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Internal compiler error: in |ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34680
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34680action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64205
Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
David Malcolm dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33163
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32693
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955
Bug ID: 64955
Summary: RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string
to use
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64944
Bug ID: 64944
Summary: Coarrays not registered for structure constructor with
allocatable coarray components
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64757
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64951
Bug ID: 64951
Summary: g++ generates incorrect code when using a register
variable within a template function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
Bug ID: 64952
Summary: Missing temporary in assignment from elemental
function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64945
Bug ID: 64945
Summary: Structure constructors and non-NULL-data-targets and
polymorphic pointer components
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34674
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34674action=edit
Initial patch
Marcus,
Would you please bootstrap / test this patch?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #8 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Markus,
I'll test it on x86/x86_64 and arm/aarch64, but I don't have a powerpc box to
bootstrap on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31934
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64947
Bug ID: 64947
Summary: Internal compiler error: in gimplify_expr, at
gimplify.c:8425
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60463
gene at staubsaal dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gene at staubsaal dot de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #13 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:01:49 2015
New Revision: 220453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220453root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64915
gene at staubsaal dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Feb 5 15:06:40 2015
New Revision: 220454
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220454root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64580
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64948
Bug ID: 64948
Summary: Lambda reference capture initialization in template
function creates segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64580
Segher Boessenkool segher at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64876
--- Comment #6 from Alan Modra amodra at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amodra
Date: Thu Feb 5 22:52:24 2015
New Revision: 220463
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220463root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64876
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: burnus
Date: Thu Feb 5 21:58:38 2015
New Revision: 220462
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220462root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956
Bug ID: 64956
Summary: __GXX_ABI_VERSION needs a proper definition for the
5.x releases
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45633
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ysato at users dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64660
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43264
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64884
Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47998
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64884
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We don't have an effective target for comdat support, but we e.g. have
comdat_group. That is supposedly a strict subset of comdat support, perhaps
that would be good enough?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35455
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52598
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49878
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tony at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35455
--- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
*** Bug 47983 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46918
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42128
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
--- Comment #17 from Jeffrey A. Law law at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 5 17:04:04 2015
New Revision: 220457
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220457root=gccview=rev
Log:
* config/h8300/constraints.md (U constraint): Use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64950
Bug ID: 64950
Summary: postpone expanding va_arg till pass_stdarg
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64889
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64602
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51153
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63754
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49874
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #51 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34678
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34678action=edit
tentative patch
Here is a patch proposal: with it I an able to cross-build GCC for
aarch64-linux and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49877
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58400
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lacombar at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47983
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48231
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42790
Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55541
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34677
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34677action=edit
gcc5-pr55541.patch
Untested fix (that cures the testcase).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64949
Bug ID: 64949
Summary: jit linking fails when building with in-tree libraries
(mpc etc...)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64813
--- Comment #15 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #12)
I'been testing patch that does not create retval and return gimple statement.
Any updates on the testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64937
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
Compiling the test gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c on x86_64-apple-darwin14 gives an
ICE
[Book15] f90/bug% gcc5 /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c
-Os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64718
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64922
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64943
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
If this is about ccache, I wonder if ccache couldn't preprocess with
-fdirectives-only instead, that way hopefully no info is lost.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64905
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
Compiling the test gcc.target/i386/pr64905.c on x86_64-apple-darwin14 gives
an ICE
I have a patch that disables the test on -fPIC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Arnaud Charlet charlet at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50948
James Greenhalgh jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61466
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
