https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #8 from David Kredba nheghathivhistha at gmail dot com ---
Svn revision 221590 fails bootstrap in gnat1 so I cannot test your patch.
../libiberty/libiberty.a(cplus-dem.o): In function `ada_demangle':
cplus-dem.c:(.text+0xdb8):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65238
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Mar 23 08:02:39 2015
New Revision: 221587
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221587root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR preprocessor/65238
* internal.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65508
ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65499
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
Bug ID: 65521
Summary: [5 Regression] nondeterministic -fcompare-debug
failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35102
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35102action=edit
unreduced testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35092|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65522
Bug ID: 65522
Summary: Svn revision 221590 fails bootstrap -
../libiberty/libiberty.a(cplus-dem.o): In function
`ada_demangle': cplus-dem.c:(.text+0xdb8): multiple
I resent change causes ada no longer to bootstrap
multiple definition of ada_demangle
/usr/local/src/gcc4.3/src/libiberty/cplus-dem.c:895: multiple definition
of `ada_demangle'
ada/adadecode.o:/usr/local/src/gcc4.3/src/gcc/ada/adadecode.c:374: first
defined here
graham
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65517
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65473
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Louis Dionne from comment #0)
One would expect that including _any_ header from the standard library
defines the relevant detection macros.
That's not true for most
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65521
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Though, judging from the fact that we print symtab_node::order into the
-fdump-final-insns= dumps:
;; Function selinux_ops (selinux_ops, funcdef_no=4, cgraph_uid=4,
symbol_order=4)
it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65529
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65506
Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
Yes, though I think for such a class we probably want to consider all virtual
methods unreachable unless they have explicit default visibility; in the
testcase the main program isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65147
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think std::atomicT should increase the alignment of its T member. That will
have the advantage of being layout-compatible with _Atomic T.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
--- Comment #5 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-03-23 12:39 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Doesn't seem to be specific to hppa, on x86_64-linux I can reproduce it as
well, and need ulimit -s 46000 to pass.
The Fedora default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #38 from Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: msebor
Date: Mon Mar 23 17:37:25 2015
New Revision: 221601
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221601root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-03-23 Martin Sebor mse...@redhat.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65526
Bug ID: 65526
Summary: testsuite checks for arm vectorization support on
non-arm targets
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
--- Comment #2 from yuta tomino demoonlit at panathenaia dot halfmoon.jp ---
Created attachment 35115
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35115action=edit
example
I found the way of reproducing.
A tiny change of a-tags.ads is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5)
I suppose we could make C++ FE to track if a type has methods with
visibility default declared (I can't track that from symbol table as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Mar 23 18:19:01 2015
New Revision: 221602
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221602root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/65296
* config/avr/driver-avr.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #9 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
this was also my bug. Sorry for that. It is fixed on current mainlie.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65527
Bug ID: 65527
Summary: ICE: in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7120
with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Mon Mar 23 18:57:58 2015
New Revision: 221604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221604root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/65505
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65526
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532
Harald Anlauf anlauf at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.0
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65532
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
I think we can safely ignore clobbers when scanning functions for
pure/constness.
Yes (it is what the patch does), but doing so may cause worse code in the
function calling these
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35341
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer aldot at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65533
Bug ID: 65533
Summary: [5 Regression] 252.eon in SPEC CPU 2000 failed to
build
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
Bug ID: 65534
Summary: tailcall not optimized away
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65533
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz ---
#ifndef OPTIMIZE_MANUALLY
void setutent(void) {
((void)0);
__setutent_unlocked();
((void)0);
}
#else
extern __typeof (__setutent_unlocked) setutent
__attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65535
Bug ID: 65535
Summary: powerpc64-freebsd build failure
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
