[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #27 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- And Example #2 is: module foo type :: t integer :: n character(32), dimension(:), allocatable :: md5 contains procedure :: init = t_init end type t

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- And even if they don't read the libstdc++ documentation, std::search doesn't work with input iterators, that's always been true: https://www.sgi.com/tech/stl/search.html

[Bug libstdc++/65861] New: libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 Bug ID: 65861 Summary: libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug inline-asm/65859] Optimizes out TLS variable called in a child function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65859 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/65860] New: Stringification of User Defined Literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65860 Bug ID: 65860 Summary: Stringification of User Defined Literals Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- This is user error, std::search() requires forward iterators and the library is not required to diagnose it. Defining _GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS causes it to be rejected.

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) This is user error, std::search() requires forward iterators and the library is not required to diagnose it. Defining

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 15:55:21 2015 New Revision: 222377 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222377root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/50800 * tree.c (strip_typedefs):

[Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702 --- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Apr 23 14:49:45 2015 New Revision: 222371 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222371root=gccview=rev Log: Fix PR target/26702 For Kwok Cheung

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) This is user error, std::search() requires forward iterators and the library is not required to diagnose it. Defining

[Bug preprocessor/65860] Stringification of User Defined Literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65860 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #28 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- And Example #2 is: ... Confirmed too, but no ICE under debugger.

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- The kernel should have been compiled with -msoft-float and I thought it was.

[Bug c++/65646] [5 Regression] ICE in invalid syntax

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65646 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 15:55:11 2015 New Revision: 222376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222376root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65646 * pt.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] New: [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 Bug ID: 65862 Summary: [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/26702] .size is not emitted for BSS variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26702 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/ext_compile_checks.html

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Helfer Thomas from comment #7) can you give me the rationale of this usage ? Performance. See also -Wsuggest-final-types -Wsuggest-final-methods in the gcc

[Bug bootstrap/65863] GCC does not compile with weird error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65863 --- Comment #1 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru --- Linux victor.local 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux with 32 bit userland

[Bug bootstrap/65865] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65865 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 --- Comment #7 from Helfer Thomas thomas.helfer at cea dot fr --- can you give me the rationale of this usage ?

[Bug rtl-optimization/65862] [MIPS] IRA/LRA issue: integers spilled to floating-point registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65862 --- Comment #2 from Robert Suchanek robert.suchanek at imgtec dot com --- That's correct. It was just easier to expose this problem by compiling the kernel.

[Bug bootstrap/65865] New: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65865 Bug ID: 65865 Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug c/65864] Consider emitting -Wswitch-bool less aggressively?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65864 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think they should simply cast the controlling expression to int--that should quash the warning. Does this workaround sound reasonable to them?

[Bug ipa/65858] ICE in varpool_node::get_constructor during chromium build on arm-linux-gnueabihf with LTO during LINK chrome

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858 --- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Those two bugs seems to be caused by same issue. Unforutnately it is bit hard to guess what it is coming from - it seems that we manage to store error_mark_node into the LTO object

[Bug c/65864] New: Consider emitting -Wswitch-bool less aggressively?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65864 Bug ID: 65864 Summary: Consider emitting -Wswitch-bool less aggressively? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: enhancement

[Bug bootstrap/65863] GCC does not compile with weird error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65863 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Victor Porton from comment #1) Linux victor.local 3.10-2-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.10.7-1 (2013-08-17) x86_64 GNU/Linux with 32 bit userland Try configure GCC with

[Bug c/65345] ICE with _Generic selection on _Atomic int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345 --- Comment #10 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Apr 23 14:35:12 2015 New Revision: 222370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222370root=gccview=rev Log: PR c/65345 * c-decl.c

[Bug libstdc++/65861] libstdc++ is silently generating wrong code when its std::search is given an input iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65861 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jack Howarth from comment #3) Is the use of _GLIBCXX_CONCEPT_CHECKS well enough advertised in the documentation that we can expect the average developer to know to

[Bug bootstrap/65863] New: GCC does not compile with weird error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65863 Bug ID: 65863 Summary: GCC does not compile with weird error messages Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/65296] [avr] fix various issues with specs file generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65296 Georg-Johann Lay gjl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||link-failure

[Bug c++/65866] New: Wrong warning when using list-initialization: operation on 'b' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65866 Bug ID: 65866 Summary: Wrong warning when using list-initialization: operation on 'b' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point] Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/65868] cannot find -lstdc++ for GNAT compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65868 Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal ---

[Bug target/65867] New: [5 Regression] bootstrap fails for mingw32 due to missing header in ssp.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867 Bug ID: 65867 Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap fails for mingw32 due to missing header in ssp.c Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/65863] GCC does not compile with weird error messages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65863 Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/52251] Nonadvancing I/O and the t edit descriptor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52251 Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/65866] Wrong warning when using list-initialization: operation on 'b' may be undefined [-Wsequence-point]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65866 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug ada/65868] New: cannot find -lstdc++ for GNAT compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65868 Bug ID: 65868 Summary: cannot find -lstdc++ for GNAT compilation Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug rtl-optimization/65805] [5 Regression] Chromium gets miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65805 --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vmakarov Date: Thu Apr 23 19:07:52 2015 New Revision: 222383 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222383root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-23 Vladimir Makarov

[Bug bootstrap/65865] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65865 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- [hjl@gnu-6 gcc]$ cat /tmp/x.cc extern unsigned long indirect_call_wrapper; typedef unsigned long size_t; template typename F F IndirectExternCall(F f) { typedef F (*WrapF)(F);

[Bug bootstrap/65865] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65865 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 --- Comment #8 from dhbbugs bugs at dhbailey dot com --- Jerry DeLisl'e output is certainly not correct -- anint should invariably return the nearest whole number. It should be the equivalent of this code: if (x = 0.0) then anint = aint (x +

[Bug c++/65870] New: Explicit function instantiation with default valued lambda causes duplicate symbol

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65870 Bug ID: 65870 Summary: Explicit function instantiation with default valued lambda causes duplicate symbol Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65456] powerpc64le autovectorized copy loop missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: wschmidt Date: Thu Apr 23 21:03:40 2015 New Revision: 222386 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222386root=gccview=rev Log: [gcc] 2015-04-23 Bill Schmidt

[Bug c++/65869] New: Incorrect overload resolution in function return statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65869 Bug ID: 65869 Summary: Incorrect overload resolution in function return statement Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 Helfer Thomas thomas.helfer at cea dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- If you want some real life examples, grep e.g. the Firefox source tree for final override or override final.

[Bug c++/65854] [c++-concepts] Type constraint satisfaction error for type aliases; regression from r211591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65854 Tom Honermann tom at honermann dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[c++-concepts] Type |[c++-concepts]

[Bug c/52085] incomplete enum not completed correctly if packed was used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52085 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug ada/65868] cannot find -lstdc++ for GNAT compilation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65868 --- Comment #2 from Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru --- Your suggestion to build in a separate directory helped. It compiled completely.

[Bug ada/62042] Missing optimization of copying non-limited objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62042 Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.0 |5.1.0 --- Comment

[Bug c++/61022] [C++11] Bogus error: parameter packs not expanded with '...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61022 --- Comment #2 from Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov at google dot com --- Still fails with trunk @r222386

[Bug other/53313] Add warning levels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313 --- Comment #8 from David Stone david at doublewise dot net --- I have changed my opinion on this and agree that warning levels are probably not the way to go. The two things from this that I do still want are

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 Victor Porton porton at narod dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.9.2 |5.1.0 --- Comment

[Bug c/64918] invalid (?) warning when initializing structure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64918 Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug inline-asm/65859] New: Optimizes out TLS variable called in a child function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65859 Bug ID: 65859 Summary: Optimizes out TLS variable called in a child function Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #21 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- (In reply to vehre from comment #20) Juergen, could you meanwhile check, that the patch fixes the issue? Damn, it seems my text didn't get posted. Being in Japan at the

[Bug fortran/58754] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on allocating character array with source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58754 Bug 58754 depends on bug 57456, which changed state. Bug 57456 Summary: [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/51976] [F2003] Support deferred-length character components of derived types (allocatable string length)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51976 Bug 51976 depends on bug 57456, which changed state. Bug 57456 Summary: [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/57456] [OOP] CLASS + CHARACTER ALLOCATE with typespec: For arrays, the typespec is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57456 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #22 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- One thing is: allocate (foo (0:this%dim-1), source=this%get_integral()) where this is some derived type with integer component dim and TBP get_integral which is a function

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #23 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- The other failure occurs for allocate (foo (this%n), source=this%bar) where n is integer, foo has type character(32), dimension(:), allocatable and bar as well.

[Bug ipa/65858] New: ICE in varpool_node::get_constructor during chromium build on arm-linux-gnueabihf with LTO during LINK chrome

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65858 Bug ID: 65858 Summary: ICE in varpool_node::get_constructor during chromium build on arm-linux-gnueabihf with LTO during LINK chrome Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug libquadmath/65757] gfortran gives incorrect result for anint with real*16 argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65757 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 22 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #3 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/65850] [5 Regression] [graphite]: isl_constraint.c:625: expecting integer value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++

[Bug libstdc++/60936] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Binary code bloat with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60936 --- Comment #11 from __vic d.v.a at ngs dot ru --- Main problem hides in src/c++11/cow-string-inst.cc here: namespace std _GLIBCXX_VISIBILITY(default) { _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION // These came from c++98/misc-inst.cc, repeat them for

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug middle-end/65855] missing optimization: triangular numbers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65855 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- I forgot to add with -Wall -Wextra. gcc needs explicit -Woverloaded-virtual.

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- We are transitioning from known-bits (likely alignment) to an invariant (thus constant). Most of the cases this happens because of too weak UNDEFINED handling. I suppose we should

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- And BTW both clang and EDG warn for the first example: foo.cpp:6:16: warning: 'B::f' hides overloaded virtual function [-Woverloaded-virtual] virtual void f() final;

[Bug fortran/65841] Seg fault on intrinsic assignment to allocatable derived type with allocatable component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65841 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vehre at

[Bug c++/65856] New: -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 Bug ID: 65856 Summary: -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc

[Bug c++/65856] -Wsuggest-override shall not report a warning on final method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65856 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35389 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35389action=edit reduced test case

[Bug c/47701] separate warning to detect c99 enum constraint violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47701 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65857] New: combine won't generate zero-extend from HImode memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65857 Bug ID: 65857 Summary: combine won't generate zero-extend from HImode memory Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/61534] Wlogical-op should not warn when either operand comes from macro expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at

[Bug c/53131] -Wlogical-op: ready for prime time in -Wall ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53131 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65857] combine won't generate zero-extend from HImode memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65857 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- The pattern it tries has the load of a in it. Not sure what you are expecting...

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Ok, so it goes like Visiting PHI node: f_12 = PHI 0B(2), f_8(5) Argument #0 (2 - 6 executable) 0B Value: CONSTANT 0B Argument #1 (5 - 6 not executable)

[Bug lto/65844] [5/6 Regression] ICE (verify_cgraph_node failed) on i686-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844 Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #10 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9) (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #3) Hi, I tried to reproduce the error with a reduced test-case: #include arm_neon.h

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #10 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #20 from

[Bug c++/65721] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65721 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 13:20:08 2015 New Revision: 222363 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222363root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65721 * name-lookup.c

[Bug c++/65727] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Segfault With Decltype In Lambda Expression Used To Initialize Static Class Member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65727 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 13:20:14 2015 New Revision: 222364 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222364root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65727 * semantics.c

[Bug c++/65695] [4.9/5/6 Regression] NSDMI calling constexpr constructor with pointer-to-member is not a constant expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65695 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 13:21:17 2015 New Revision: 222367 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222367root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65695 * cvt.c (cp_fold_convert):

[Bug c++/65727] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Segfault With Decltype In Lambda Expression Used To Initialize Static Class Member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65727 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 13:21:22 2015 New Revision: 222368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222368root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/65727 * lambda.c

[Bug c++/59766] c++1y: declaring friend function with 'auto' return type deduction is rejected with bogus reason

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59766 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Thu Apr 23 13:21:06 2015 New Revision: 222365 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222365root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/59766 * decl.c (grokdeclarator): Do

[Bug c++/65721] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65721 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65848] [c++-concepts] High memory usage and compilation times for subsuming concept chains; regression from r211824

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65848 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com --- I think that is actually not so unfortunate. Statically asserting concept models has helped me find numerous issues in my own code. I'm glad to hear the proposal is

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #13 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #12) (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #11) On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

[Bug fortran/65548] [5/6 Regression] gfc_conv_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548 --- Comment #25 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Example 1: module foo type :: t integer :: n real, dimension(:,:), allocatable :: val contains procedure :: make = t_make generic :: get_int =

  1   2   >