[Bug tree-optimization/65818] [6 Regression] libiberty/vprintf-support.c:41:1: ICE: in expand_i fn_va_arg_1, at tree-stdarg.c:1095

2015-04-28 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818 --- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Apr 28 06:05:14 2015 New Revision: 222509 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222509root=gccview=rev Log: Evaluate side-effects in expand_ifn_va_arg_1 2015-04-28 Tom de

[Bug tree-optimization/65818] [6 Regression] libiberty/vprintf-support.c:41:1: ICE: in expand_i fn_va_arg_1, at tree-stdarg.c:1095

2015-04-28 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 28 07:26:41 2015 New Revision: 222510 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222510root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug other/65911] [6 Regression] r222508 breaks clang-tblgen

2015-04-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: trippels Date: Tue Apr 28 10:09:43 2015 New Revision: 222521 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222521root=gccview=rev Log: Fix PR65911 2015-04-28 Markus

[Bug other/65911] [6 Regression] r222508 breaks clang-tblgen

2015-04-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug c++/42033] libstdc++ seems to miss std::basic_stringchar, std::char_traitschar, std::allocatorchar ::basic_stringchar*(char*, char*, std::allocatorchar const)

2015-04-28 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42033 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manoj from comment #12) I am facing a similar issue. Following is the error that I am facing at run time: This is not similar at all. This bug was about a failure to

[Bug bootstrap/65910] r222473 breaks x86_64 darwin bootstrap

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Looks obvious to me.

[Bug other/65911] [6 Regression] r222508 breaks clang-tblgen

2015-04-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- The formatting is also wrong, both ? and : shouldn't be at the end of lines, but at the start. Patch with the formatting fixes included preapproved for trunk.

[Bug libstdc++/65913] New: Linking failure without -latomic

2015-04-28 Thread yan12125 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65913 Bug ID: 65913 Summary: Linking failure without -latomic Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug other/65911] [6 Regression] r222508 breaks clang-tblgen

2015-04-28 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug other/65911] [6 Regression] r222508 breaks clang-tblgen

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/65912] New: x_rtl.x_frame_offset not updated after frame related insn deleted

2015-04-28 Thread jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65912 Bug ID: 65912 Summary: x_rtl.x_frame_offset not updated after frame related insn deleted Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

2015-04-28 Thread prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to clyon from comment #16) (In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #15) I am not understanding why vfpv3-d16 appears in collect_gcc_options in run_gcc(). Isn't this

[Bug libstdc++/65883] [5/6 Regression] numeric_limitsunsigned __int128::max() returns incorrect value

2015-04-28 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Tue Apr 28 19:35:49 2015 New Revision: 222540 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222540root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-28 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr

[Bug libstdc++/65883] [5 Regression] numeric_limitsunsigned __int128::max() returns incorrect value

2015-04-28 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/44282] fastcall is not mangled at all

2015-04-28 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44282 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot

[Bug c++/65919] Regression - GCC 5.1 with options -g -std=c++14 fails to compile multiple lambdas used as default function parameters

2015-04-28 Thread maltsevm at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65919 Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||maltsevm at

[Bug preprocessor/60014] Bad warning suppression caused by track-macro-expansion when not using integrated cpp

2015-04-28 Thread megahallon at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014 --- Comment #5 from Fredrik Hallenberg megahallon at gmail dot com --- Same results with gcc 5.1.0.

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

2015-04-28 Thread dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- With the attached patch your small test case and the test suite runs w/o segfault now. Furthermore does gcc6 bootstrap and regtest ok with the patch. Confirmed. The bigger

[Bug c++/65851] ice in set_lattice_value at tree-ssa-cc p.c:535

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700

2015-04-28 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/65875] [5/6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

2015-04-28 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/65905] Building eCos fails with clist.hxx:304:1: error: template with C linkage

2015-04-28 Thread bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65905 Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 --- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Apr 28 08:30:44 2015 New Revision: 222514 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222514root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 Bug 53947 depends on bug 62283, which changed state. Bug 62283 Summary: basic-block vectorization fails https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/62283] basic-block vectorization fails

2015-04-28 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

<    1   2