https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818
--- Comment #14 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Apr 28 06:05:14 2015
New Revision: 222509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222509root=gccview=rev
Log:
Evaluate side-effects in expand_ifn_va_arg_1
2015-04-28 Tom de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65818
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 28 07:26:41 2015
New Revision: 222510
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222510root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: trippels
Date: Tue Apr 28 10:09:43 2015
New Revision: 222521
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222521root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR65911
2015-04-28 Markus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42033
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Manoj from comment #12)
I am facing a similar issue. Following is the error that I am facing at run
time:
This is not similar at all. This bug was about a failure to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks obvious to me.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The formatting is also wrong, both ? and : shouldn't be at the end of lines,
but at the start. Patch with the formatting fixes included preapproved for
trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65913
Bug ID: 65913
Summary: Linking failure without -latomic
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65911
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65912
Bug ID: 65912
Summary: x_rtl.x_frame_offset not updated after frame related
insn deleted
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837
--- Comment #17 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to clyon from comment #16)
(In reply to prathamesh3492 from comment #15)
I am not understanding why vfpv3-d16 appears in collect_gcc_options in
run_gcc().
Isn't this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: glisse
Date: Tue Apr 28 19:35:49 2015
New Revision: 222540
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222540root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-28 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65883
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44282
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65919
Mikhail Maltsev maltsevm at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014
--- Comment #5 from Fredrik Hallenberg megahallon at gmail dot com ---
Same results with gcc 5.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894
--- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr ---
With the attached patch your small test case and the test suite runs
w/o segfault now. Furthermore does gcc6 bootstrap and regtest ok
with the patch.
Confirmed. The bigger
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65851
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
--- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65875
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65905
Bernd Edlinger bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
--- Comment #21 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Apr 28 08:30:44 2015
New Revision: 222514
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222514root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-04-28 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 62283, which changed state.
Bug 62283 Summary: basic-block vectorization fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62283
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
101 - 126 of 126 matches
Mail list logo