[Bug libstdc++/58931] condition_variable::wait_until overflowed by large time_pointsteady_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931 --- Comment #4 from Aaron Graham aaron at aarongraham dot com --- See bug 41861 for discussion of steady_clock wrt condition_variable.

[Bug c/66088] -Wunused-but-set-variable does not regard static variable access in local scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66088 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is gcc warning about t being set but unused? If so then the warning is correct t = is just setting t and the variable is otherwise unused and can be removed as it has no side

[Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #8 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #7) Just built with gcc-4.9_4.9.2-7 which previously successfully built gcc-4.9_4.9.2-10 [1] but fails to build

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #33 from Jürgen Reuter juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Great, with that comment everything in our code works again, thanks, Mikael. So, what about Dominique's comment with the fix for PR 58586 and that this breaks our code again.

[Bug c/66090] New: Wrong loop code generation with -O2 on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66090 Bug ID: 66090 Summary: Wrong loop code generation with -O2 on ARM Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug libstdc++/58931] condition_variable::wait_until overflowed by large time_pointsteady_clock

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58931 Aaron Graham aaron at aarongraham dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron at

[Bug debug/61352] gcc 4.9.0 fails to execute dsymutil when linking executables on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352 --- Comment #15 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35512 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35512action=edit Disable dsymutil when -save-temps is on the command line. … something like this…

[Bug c/66088] -Wunused-but-set-variable does not regard static variable access in local scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66088 --- Comment #1 from Vladimir vshebordaev at mail dot ru --- Well, the build is broken when -Werror option is specified just like it is expected, I've overlooked a typo.

[Bug c/66088] -Wunused-but-set-variable does not regard static variable access in local scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66088 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir vshebordaev at mail dot ru --- Well, I doubt that modification of the static variable has no side effects.

[Bug c++/66091] New: [c++-concepts] Overloading of member operators based on constraints rejected; regression from r211591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66091 Bug ID: 66091 Summary: [c++-concepts] Overloading of member operators based on constraints rejected; regression from r211591 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/66092] New: Concept can't check variadic template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092 Bug ID: 66092 Summary: Concept can't check variadic template arguments Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug sanitizer/64839] libsanitizer shouldn't require rpc/xdr.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839 --- Comment #11 from Harald van Dijk harald at gigawatt dot nl --- (In reply to Yury Gribov from comment #10) Did libsanitizer build for you both with and without xdr.h? If yes, I'll just go ahead and submit this. I'm using your patch applied

[Bug sanitizer/64839] libsanitizer shouldn't require rpc/xdr.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64839 --- Comment #12 from Yury Gribov y.gribov at samsung dot com --- I'm using your patch applied to 5.1.0 without issues on my system without xdr.h. That's probably ok, thanks. I'll submit on Monday then (to be online if problems arise).

[Bug c/66084] ICE:internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1974

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66084 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- The assert is correct in that it is checking that the size of what is being converted to a vector type is the same size as the vector. The problem is more likely before that point.

[Bug fortran/66035] [5/6 Regression] gfortran ICE segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66035 Evangelos Foutras evangelos at foutrelis dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/66084] ICE:internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1974

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66084 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #6) To be followed up. Just built with gcc-4.9_4.9.2-7 which previously successfully built

[Bug bootstrap/66085] New: [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085 Bug ID: 66085 Summary: [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/66086] New: Casting a pointer to a double confuses the optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66086 Bug ID: 66086 Summary: Casting a pointer to a double confuses the optimizer Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug bootstrap/66085] [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/66087] New: Invalid narrowing of MEM with containing POST_INC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66087 Bug ID: 66087 Summary: Invalid narrowing of MEM with containing POST_INC Product: gcc Version: 4.8.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/66066] [6 Regression] r222889 causes bogus error: initializer element is not constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66066 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/64454] optimize (x%5)%5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454 --- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: glisse Date: Sat May 9 15:40:05 2015 New Revision: 222970 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222970root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-05-09 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr

[Bug rtl-optimization/66087] Invalid narrowing of MEM with containing POST_INC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66087 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Good old allowing subreg of a mem as register operand before reload.

[Bug c/66088] New: -Wunused-but-set-variable does not regard static variable access in local scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66088 Bug ID: 66088 Summary: -Wunused-but-set-variable does not regard static variable access in local scope Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/65894] [6 Regression] severe regression in gfortran 6.0.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65894 --- Comment #32 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mikael Date: Sat May 9 13:36:14 2015 New Revision: 222968 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222968root=gccview=rev Log: Fix fortran/65894 elemental procedures wrong-code

[Bug bootstrap/66085] [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/66085] [6 Regression] Revision r222934 breaks bootstrap on darwin.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66085 --- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: aldyh Date: Sat May 9 13:50:21 2015 New Revision: 222969 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=222969root=gccview=rev Log: PR bootstrap/66085 * decl2.c

[Bug fortran/66089] New: elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 Bug ID: 66089 Summary: elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66089] elemental dependency mishandling when derived types are involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Draft patch: Index: trans-array.c === --- trans-array.c (révision 222968) +++ trans-array.c (copie de

[Bug debug/61352] gcc 4.9.0 fails to execute dsymutil when linking executables on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61352 --- Comment #14 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Joel Brobecker from comment #13) Sorry guys, but dsymutil is not working very well. I have a couple of examples where, either dsymutil is excluding some DIEs from the

[Bug c/66084] New: ICE:internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1974

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66084 Bug ID: 66084 Summary: ICE:internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1974 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/66084] ICE:internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:1974

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66084 --- Comment #1 from vfdff zhongyunde at huawei dot com --- the following try can fix the issue, but need consider the reason why the gcc_assert is added original ? [zhongyunde@linux-root ~/6183_hcc/gcc/gcc-4.7.0/gcc]$svn diff fold-const.c