https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #24 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
Okay, I've made a new patch that fixes the problem with only the hotpatch tests
running in the s390 test suite. This change passes all tests on 64 and 31 bit.
After this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65548
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
Bug ID: 66335
Summary: a dump bug related to loop invariant in
before_dom_children
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #1 from vfdff zhongyunde at huawei dot com ---
I suggest using the code following code similar to fix the issue.
for (bsi = gsi_start_phis (bb); !gsi_end_p (bsi); gsi_next (bsi))
{
stmt = gsi_stmt (bsi);
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related to PR66251 (partial backport fixes the gcc 5 branch).
On trunk the issue is that we have a SLP node
node
stmt 0 _9-re = _17;
stmt 1 _9-im = _23;
node
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
--- Comment #3 from vfdff zhongyunde at huawei dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
No, it's working as intended - we just print where we _could_ hoist it to
(together with the cost).
you mean function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66184
--- Comment #2 from Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net ---
Correction: r223462 was a fix on the c++-concepts branch, the trunk fix was
r223461.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #26 from Dominik Vogt vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---
The patch for upstream gcc is available here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg02739.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #25 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch looks good to me. Please post it on the mailing list and I'll commit
it.
Jakub, thanks for your valuable comments! Does Dominik's last patch address
your concerns?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66330
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
It works for me, so - which target, which linker?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Which shows a bug in hybrid SLP detection.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66335
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66314
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri May 29 10:50:58 2015
New Revision: 223861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223861root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-29 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66184
Casey Carter Casey at Carter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66336
Bug ID: 66336
Summary: [C++14][Variable templates] Spurious error: expansion
pattern contains no argument packs
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66314
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66142
--- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri May 29 13:06:23 2015
New Revision: 223863
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223863root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/66142
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66327
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri May 29 13:28:54 2015
New Revision: 223865
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223865root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66327
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66280
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Which also fixes the original testcase on trunk!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66329
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikhail Maltsev from comment #4)
Clang is more verbose:
./test.c:4:11: warning: has lower precedence than ==; == will be evaluated
first [-Wparentheses]
x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62308
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10)
Hello Vladimir,
Have you been able to make progress on this bug?
Thanks for the remainder, Cristophe. Sometimes I am loosing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66282
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Joseph S. Myers jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timo.kreuzer at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63175
--- Comment #39 from Bill Schmidt wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Fri May 29 16:48:37 2015
New Revision: 223872
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223872root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-05-29 Bill Schmidt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
Bug ID: 66337
Summary: __alignof__(s.d) incorrect for a double member with
-malign-power
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Or rather it is a bit weird as it is dependent on the first element. X86 is
even worse as they are not equal either but the alignment requirement is only
dependent on if it is in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339
Bug ID: 66339
Summary: g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #28 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
BTW, the hotpatch-19.c, hotpatch-20.c and hotpatch-compile-15.c testcases look
wrong, always_inline attribute shouldn't be used on functions not declared
inline.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
This seems to work:
diff --git a/gcc/lra-lives.c b/gcc/lra-lives.c
index 085411e..a0c6171 100644
--- a/gcc/lra-lives.c
+++ b/gcc/lra-lives.c
@@ -979,8 +979,7 @@ process_bb_lives
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
On 05/28/2015 12:41 PM, 田部 wrote:
gcc is, in this code, or put out a warning?
-O4 only???
-O3 and higher enables more aggressive loop unrolling. This happens in
the pass_complete_unrolli function. With -O3 or higher, the inner loop
is unrolled 12 times because the array size is 12. The array
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66340
Bug ID: 66340
Summary: [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86-64
with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66318
--- Comment #5 from Keith Thompson Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com ---
Mikhail: Newlines in file names (either the actual file name or via a
#line directive) cause problems with __FILE__, though that particular
problem occurs only if there's an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Tomulik ptomulik at meil dot pw.edu.pl ---
I found this to be related to std::tuple constructors, especially this one:
templatetypename... _UElements, typename = typename
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
Bug ID: 66338
Summary: std::forward_as_tuple() issue with single argument
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66338
--- Comment #1 from Pawel Tomulik ptomulik at meil dot pw.edu.pl ---
As a side note, the following variant also does not compile:
int main()
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66257
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri May 29 19:04:30 2015
New Revision: 223875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223875root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR fortran/66257
gcc/fortran/
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63509
Paul Greenberg paul at greenberg dot pro changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paul at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66215
--- Comment #27 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: krebbel
Date: Fri May 29 14:26:56 2015
New Revision: 223867
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223867root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR 66215: S390: Fix placement of post-label
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66334
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
The block has a EDGE_ABNORMAL_CALL predecessor.
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: src/configure --prefix=install --with-cloog=infra
--with-ppl=infra --with-gmp=infra --with-mpfr=infra --with-mpc=infra
--with-isl=infra --disable-bootstrap --enable-checking=yes,rtl
--enable-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150529
45 matches
Mail list logo
