[Bug libstdc++/66464] codecvt_utf16 max_length returning incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/45780] Warning for arithmetic operations involving C99 _Bool variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45780 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think -Wbool-arith makes sense as a separate option. While -Wc90-c99-compat warns about any use of bool (in a declaration, cast, ...), -Wbool-arith would only warn about

[Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709 Gael Guennebaud gael.guennebaud at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/57709] -Wshadow is too strict / has false positives

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709 --- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Gael Guennebaud from comment #15) -Wshadow still trigger false positive when a base member functions is imported with the using keyword, as in the following

[Bug target/66470] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to ix86_split_long_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 9 07:51:24 2015 New Revision: 224266 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224266root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/66413] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 9 08:06:17 2015 New Revision: 224267 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224267root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/66419] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-6.c execution, -O3 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr --- Created attachment 35718 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35718action=edit Tentative patch for issue #3 The patch does not fix the

[Bug libstdc++/66030] [5.1.0] std::codecvt_byname missing from libstdc++ DLL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Tue Jun 9 08:50:00 2015 New Revision: 224273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224273root=gccview=rev Log: PR libstdc++/66030 *

[Bug target/66470] New: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to ix86_split_long_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470 Bug ID: 66470 Summary: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to ix86_split_long_move Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66467] [6 Regression] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66467 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at

[Bug c++/66467] [6 Regression] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66467 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/65882] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65882 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 66467 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/66419] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-6.c execution, -O3 -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jun 9 08:22:20 2015 New Revision: 224271 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224271root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-09 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug tree-optimization/48052] loop not vectorized if index is unsigned int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052 Bug 48052 depends on bug 66396, which changed state. Bug 66396 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/66396] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/run-id-pr47593.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/66422] [5 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2) The testcase is invalid: markus@x4 testc % g++ -r -nostdlib a.ii c.ii e.ii -g -O2 -flto a.ii:21:8: warning: ‘Run’ violates the

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/66469] New: config/rl78/rl78.c:679: possible bad array index ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66469 Bug ID: 66469 Summary: config/rl78/rl78.c:679: possible bad array index ? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/61074] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61074 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/66413] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] ICE at -Os and above with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Target

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at redhat dot com --- It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated. On Jun 9, 2015 4:36 AM, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote:

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10) It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated. indeed; state as of now is that (with both proposed patches in place and

[Bug c++/33661] template methods forget explicit local reg vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661 --- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35723 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35723action=edit Experimental fix The attached patch fixes the problem for me. There appear to be

[Bug target/66470] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to ix86_split_long_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at

[Bug target/66470] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to ix86_split_long_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5

[Bug bootstrap/66471] New: BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471 Bug ID: 66471 Summary: BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug bootstrap/66471] BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35725 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35725action=edit Patch May I ask you for testing the patch? Thanks, Martin

[Bug c++/66472] New: -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472 Bug ID: 66472 Summary: -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template classes Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/66471] BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471 --- Comment #2 from İsmail Dönmez ismail at donmez dot ws --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) Created attachment 35725 [details] Patch May I ask you for testing the patch? Fixes the bootstrap for me, thanks.

[Bug bootstrap/66471] BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to İsmail Dönmez from comment #2) (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) Created attachment 35725 [details] Patch May I ask you for testing the patch? Fixes

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11) (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10) It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated. The test suite is running - was

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35722 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35722action=edit Build script

[Bug debug/66468] New: [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Bug ID: 66468 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66467] New: [6 Regression] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66467 Bug ID: 66467 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/66200] GCC for ARM / AArch64 doesn't define TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200 --- Comment #4 from Sharad Singhai singhai at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: singhai Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015 New Revision: 224265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265root=gccview=rev Log: Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref

[Bug c++/66192] C++ static initializer unnecessary __cxa_guard_acquire for TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192 --- Comment #3 from Sharad Singhai singhai at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: singhai Date: Tue Jun 9 06:45:43 2015 New Revision: 224265 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224265root=gccview=rev Log: Backport r224118 from trunk for Google ref

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 --- Comment #14 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de --- Attached some prepared test files. Added more test cases for integer and real. Added new test case for logical : subroutine s2 logical(8), parameter :: z1(2)

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 15:27:01 2015 New Revision: 224287 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224287root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66387 * semantics.c

[Bug c++/65966] [5/6 Regression] [C++14] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind try_block when initializing a 2D array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65966 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/66299] more optimize opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: mpolacek Date: Tue Jun 9 14:24:04 2015 New Revision: 224283 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224283root=gccview=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/66299 *

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 --- Comment #13 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de --- Created attachment 35728 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35728action=edit test case pr66193_3_diverse.f90

[Bug c++/65815] brace elision doesn't work in NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 65815, which changed state. Bug 65815 Summary: brace elision doesn't work in NSDMI https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 14:51:30 2015 New Revision: 224285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224285root=gccview=rev Log: PR bootstrap/66448 * toplev.c

[Bug libstdc++/64504] Invalid free() with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64504 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Vihrov andrey.vihrov at gmail dot com --- Thanks for your reply. You have a point: using -fwhole-program introduces more effects than needed, as evidenced by this bug report, so an anonymous namespace is safer and

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 --- Comment #12 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de --- Created attachment 35727 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35727action=edit test case pr66193_2_integer.f90

[Bug fortran/66193] ICE for initialisation of some non-zero-sized arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193 --- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz gerhard.steinmetz.fort...@t-online.de --- Created attachment 35726 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35726action=edit test case pr66193_1_real.f90

[Bug c++/66383] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 14:13:22 2015 New Revision: 224282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224282root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66383 * tree.c

[Bug tree-optimization/66299] more optimize opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299 Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/65815] brace elision doesn't work in NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815 --- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue Jun 9 14:59:08 2015 New Revision: 224286 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224286root=gccview=rev Log: /cp 2015-06-09 Paolo Carlini

[Bug target/66474] Document the use of %x in powerpc asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474 Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/66475] Access checking in templates circumvented with 'using' (C++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug target/66473] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Ops, Kirill is already looking at this. Kirill, you have much better facilities for testing, do you want to take the proposed patch from here?

[Bug c++/66476] New: Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 Bug ID: 66476 Summary: Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/51747] [DR 1467] [C++11] cannot call defaulted copy constructor using list-initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 16:56:12 2015 New Revision: 224289 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224289root=gccview=rev Log: DR 1467 PR c++/51747 *

[Bug target/66474] New: Document the use of %x in powerpc asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474 Bug ID: 66474 Summary: Document the use of %x in powerpc asm statements Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/66476] Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from temporary initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug target/66473] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86

[Bug target/66473] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35729 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35729action=edit Proposed patch Patch that fixes the failure.

[Bug target/66473] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last

[Bug rtl-optimization/66306] ICE in reload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306 Andreas Krebbel krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 David Edelsohn dje at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot

[Bug c++/66475] New: Access checking in templates circumvented with 'using' (C++11)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475 Bug ID: 66475 Summary: Access checking in templates circumvented with 'using' (C++11) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66163] [6 Regression] Not working Firefox built with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163 --- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Great, do you have patch? Honza

[Bug libstdc++/64504] Invalid free() with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG and -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64504 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation

[Bug c++/66383] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 17:19:12 2015 New Revision: 224291 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224291root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66383 * tree.c

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Tue Jun 9 17:19:18 2015 New Revision: 224292 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224292root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66387 * semantics.c

[Bug middle-end/19987] [meta-bug] fold missing optimizations in general

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987 Bug 19987 depends on bug 15350, which changed state. Bug 15350 Summary: [tree-ssa] Convert if ((1 a) 1) into if (a == 0). https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15350 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/66474] Document the use of %x in powerpc asm statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner meissner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35732 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35732action=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem

[Bug tree-optimization/15350] [tree-ssa] Convert if ((1 a) 1) into if (a == 0).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15350 Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/66163] [6 Regression] Not working Firefox built with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) Great, do you have patch? Honza Yes, I've suggested a patch here: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167119 Let's see if it

[Bug c++/66478] New: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with read of non-constant variable as discarded value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66478 Bug ID: 66478 Summary: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with read of non-constant variable as discarded value Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/66473] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable insn) with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473 --- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sure, I'll report tomorrow.

[Bug c++/66477] New: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with constexpr member call on non-constant reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477 Bug ID: 66477 Summary: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with constexpr member call on non-constant reference Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/58074] [C++11] __is_trivial intrinsic fails for deleted members and for non-trivial copy-c'tors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58074 Richard Smith richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/65460] parloops transforms offloaded functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Jun 9 21:14:46 2015 New Revision: 224303 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224303root=gccview=rev Log: Mark offloaded functions as parallelized 2015-06-09 Tom de

[Bug middle-end/66479] New: -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with size -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479 Bug ID: 66479 Summary: -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with size -1 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/65460] parloops transforms offloaded functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66480] New: FPE calling cpu_time() with -ffpe-trap=inexact

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480 Bug ID: 66480 Summary: FPE calling cpu_time() with -ffpe-trap=inexact Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/66480] FPE calling cpu_time() with -ffpe-trap=inexact

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480 --- Comment #1 from Nicolas Bock nicolasbock at gmail dot com --- gcc-4.7.4 fails just the same.

[Bug bootstrap/66448] [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448 --- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35734 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35734action=edit Patch to ICE on other duplicate DW_AT_ attributes On 06/09/2015 08:00 AM, iains at gcc

[Bug fortran/66480] FPE calling cpu_time() with -ffpe-trap=inexact

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480 --- Comment #2 from Nicolas Bock nicolasbock at gmail dot com --- gcc-4.9.2 fails as well.

[Bug libstdc++/66417] std::codecvt_utf16char32_t, 0x10FFFF, std::codecvt_mode::generate_header generates incorrect output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417 --- Comment #5 from Leo Carreon lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au --- Is this fix going to be applied to Fedora 22?

[Bug tree-optimization/60656] [4.8 regression] x86 vectorization produces wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656 Bernhard Kaindl bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Alexandre Oliva aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/66464] codecvt_utf16 max_length returning incorrect value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464 --- Comment #2 from Leo Carreon lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au --- Just clarifying that my comments are to do with codecvt_utf16char32_t and codecvt_utf8char32_t. The way I understand it, codecvt_utf16char32_t should be converting between UTF-16

[Bug libstdc++/66441] wstring_convert not working correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441 --- Comment #5 from Leo Carreon lcarreon at bigpond dot net.au --- Is this fix going to be applied to Fedora 22?

[Bug middle-end/66375] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375 Bernhard Kaindl bernhard.kaindl at thalesgroup dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug middle-end/66479] -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with size -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW ---

[Bug middle-end/66479] -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with size -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479 Eric Botcazou ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug middle-end/66479] -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with size -1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479 --- Comment #2 from Jann Horn jann at thejh dot net --- $ ulimit -s 8192

[Bug c++/66472] -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472 Christoph Hertzberg chtz at informatik dot uni-bremen.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/66472] -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

  1   2   >