[Bug middle-end/66429] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_LAST_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66429 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 17 18:10:23 2015 New Revision: 224570 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224570root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-17 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com

[Bug fortran/66577] ICE in generate_finalization_wrapper, at fortran/class.c:1567

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66577 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c/66552] Missed optimization when shift amount is result of signed modulus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66552 Martin Sebor msebor at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Bug c++/66445] [5/6 Regression] ICE with lambda in stmt expression in a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66445 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||megahallon at

[Bug c++/66517] [5 Regression] [C++11] sorry, unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind type_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66517 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66445] [5/6 Regression] ICE with lambda in stmt expression in a template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66445 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug go/66574] Time is provided in millisecond precision instead of nanoseconds as described in go documentation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66574 --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com --- I suppose it doesn't matter much to me one way or another. It's between you and your team leader.

[Bug middle-end/66429] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_LAST_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66429 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 17 17:59:25 2015 New Revision: 224568 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224568root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/66429 * omp-low.c

[Bug fortran/66578] [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578 Thomas Koenig tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug middle-end/66429] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_LAST_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66429 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 17 18:11:42 2015 New Revision: 224571 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224571root=gccview=rev Log: PR middle-end/66429 * omp-low.c

[Bug fortran/66578] New: [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578 Bug ID: 66578 Summary: [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/66383] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 66383, which changed state. Bug 66383 Summary: [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 What|Removed

[Bug c++/66571] Template substitution causes some OpenMP rejects-valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66571 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/66429] ICE in expand_GOMP_SIMD_LAST_LANE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66429 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #15 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- On 2015–06–18, at 5:58 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org wrote: These changes shouldn't affect the ABI. Eh… the simplest case of a fancy pointer is a raw

[Bug target/66579] New: frv target: -gsplit-dwarf confuses assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66579 Bug ID: 66579 Summary: frv target: -gsplit-dwarf confuses assembler Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/66579] frv target: -gsplit-dwarf confuses assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66579 --- Comment #1 from Nicolai Stange nicstange at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 35798 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35798action=edit Output of `gcc -S -gsplit-dwarf' on Testcase

[Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272 Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||potswa at mac

[Bug libstdc++/57272] node-based containers don't use allocator's pointer type internally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57272 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- c.f. http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2261

[Bug c++/66572] [6 Regression] Bogus Wlogical-op warning for operands coming from template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66572 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #1) Why is it a regression? Because GCC 5.1 and 4.9.2 do not issue such warning.

[Bug c++/66571] Template substitution causes some OpenMP rejects-valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66571 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 17 18:01:05 2015 New Revision: 224569 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224569root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66571 * pt.c

[Bug c++/66571] Template substitution causes some OpenMP rejects-valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66571 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Jun 17 18:14:49 2015 New Revision: 224572 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224572root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66571 * pt.c

[Bug fortran/66549] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid in OMP parallel region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66549 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) r221586 in particular. There is no openmp change in that revision. :-/ --- comment_0.f90.003t.original.good2015-06-17

[Bug c++/66289] [5/6 Regression] error: ambiguous template instantiation with partial specialization defined in terms of alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jun 17 20:36:42 2015 New Revision: 224580 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224580root=gccview=rev Log: C++11 allocator support for std::list. PR

[Bug c++/66515] [5/6 Regression] g++ segfaults when creating an std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66515 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 20:45:32 2015 New Revision: 224581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224581root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66515 * call.c

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #13 from David Krauss potswa at mac dot com --- Nice! Just a few things: 1. Line 304: rebind isn’t an official member of allocator_traits. Prefer rebind_alloc. 2. _M_put_node is assuming no fancy pointers: its parameter is a

[Bug c++/66061] [5/6 Regression] Internal Compiler Error when specializing a variable template when the specialization is variadic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66061 Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug libstdc++/55409] std::list not properly wrapping access to custom allocator through allocator_traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55409 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to David Krauss from comment #13) 1. Line 304: rebind isn’t an official member of allocator_traits. Prefer rebind_alloc. That isn't allocator_traits, it's

[Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

-fpic -m4 -ml, though the bug looks a bit fragile like as other RA related bugs. I've attached unreduced test case. sh-elf compiler ICEs for this test case even with -O2 only here. Confirmed with gcc version 6.0.0 20150617 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/66358] [5/6 Regression] [SH] ICE: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2232

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66358 --- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org --- It seems the problem is adjacent insns that need R0: (insn 10503 2627 2628 402 (set (reg:SI 2424) (sign_extend:SI (mem:QI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 243 [ p2 ])

[Bug testsuite/65767] Test pr65276 failed on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65767 --- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #9) It's been more than a month without any activity to fix this. There's now also PR testsuite/65944 about

[Bug c++/66572] [6 Regression] Bogus Wlogical-op warning for operands coming from template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66572 --- Comment #3 from Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Started with r222408. The commit message says: PR c/63357 * c-common.c (warn_logical_operator): Warn if the operands have the same expressions. * doc/invoke.texi: Update

[Bug fortran/66577] New: ICE with gfortran-5.1.0 in generate_finalization_wrapper

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66577 Bug ID: 66577 Summary: ICE with gfortran-5.1.0 in generate_finalization_wrapper Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66578] [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug fortran/66549] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid in OMP parallel region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66549 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 35796 -- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35796action=edit Draft patch

[Bug middle-end/66568] New: [CHKP] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66568 Bug ID: 66568 Summary: [CHKP] internal compiler error: in expand_expr_addr_expr_1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/66566] New: [CHKP] ICE in early_inliner: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66566 Bug ID: 66566 Summary: [CHKP] ICE in early_inliner: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h:714 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/66569] New: [CHKP]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66569 Bug ID: 66569 Summary: [CHKP] Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/66567] New: [CHKP] internal compiler error: in assign_parms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66567 Bug ID: 66567 Summary: [CHKP] internal compiler error: in assign_parms Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/61171] vectorization fails for a reduction in presence of subtraction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61171 alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/66554] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5365) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554 --- Comment #4 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Kugan, Are you working on fixing this issue on 4.9? If so, would you please assign yourself to this bug. Thanks.

[Bug target/66554] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5365) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/65527] ICE: in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7120 with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65527 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ienkovich Date: Wed Jun 17 07:42:39 2015 New Revision: 224547 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224547root=gccview=rev Log: gcc/ Backport from mainline

[Bug fortran/45440] [F03] ALLOCATE with SOURCE gives an ICE (segfault)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45440 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/44672] [F08] ALLOCATE with SOURCE and no array-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/57307] ICE with sourced allocation with array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57307 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug target/66554] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5365) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554 --- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- can_fix_p is returining CODE_FOR_nothing for converting from tomode=V4SImode to frommode=V4SFmode with branch 4.9. With trunk it is returning CODE_FOR_fix_truncv4sfv4si2.

[Bug target/66554] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5365) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554 --- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- correction: with 4.9 when it ICE we have: Breakpoint 1, expand_fix (to=to@entry=0x765b5480, from=0x765b2000, unsignedp=unsignedp@entry=0) at

[Bug middle-end/66251] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1484

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251 --- Comment #19 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Jun 17 07:37:40 2015 New Revision: 224545 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224545root=gccview=rev Log: 2015-06-17 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de

[Bug target/66554] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in expand_fix, at optabs.c:5365) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66554 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug c++/66564] New: ICE on explicit instantiation of nested template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66564 Bug ID: 66564 Summary: ICE on explicit instantiation of nested template class Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/66563] New: [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 Bug ID: 66563 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/65944] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276: undefined reference to std2::exception::~exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65944 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jun 17 10:12:17 2015 New Revision: 224551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224551root=gccview=rev Log: PR testsuite/65944 * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C: Add

[Bug libfortran/66557] gfortran gives segfault error when trying to replace file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66557 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING

[Bug fortran/66549] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid in OMP parallel region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66549 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[Regression] ICE on valid |[5/6

[Bug middle-end/66565] New: Problems and limitation GCC cost metrics and ways to improve the situation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565 Bug ID: 66565 Summary: Problems and limitation GCC cost metrics and ways to improve the situation Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/63494] ICE with deferred-character-length component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63494 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #1 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- Hi Matthias! Thanks for the bug report but I think this might actually a problem with the host compiler or its libraries. I have seen segfaults in multiple

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3

[Bug testsuite/65944] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276: undefined reference to std2::exception::~exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65944 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jun 17 10:03:49 2015 New Revision: 224550 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224550root=gccview=rev Log: PR testsuite/65944 * g++.dg/lto/pr65276_0.C: Add

[Bug testsuite/65944] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276: undefined reference to std2::exception::~exception()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65944 Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66562] ICE with gfortran-5.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66562 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/66549] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid in OMP parallel region

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66549 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc

[Bug fortran/66544] ICE on function with pointer result in combination with implicit none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66544 Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Bug target/66563] [4.9 Regression] ICE (segmentation fault) on sh4-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de --- Just as a heads up: Once the buildd has finished building the latest gcc-4.9_4.9.2-21 package, I will update all buildds and reschedule all affected packages

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 --- Comment #7 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) So aarch64 has no DImode vectors? Or just no DImode multiply (but it has a DImode vector shift?). Yes, the latter.

[Bug c++/66383] [5/6 Regression] ICE in gimplify_expr on this passed in inline initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |4.9.3

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 --- Comment #8 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to alalaw01 from comment #7) (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) So aarch64 has no DImode vectors? Or just no DImode multiply (but it has a DImode vector shift?).

[Bug fortran/66562] ICE with gfortran-5.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66562 --- Comment #3 from Dan Kokron Daniel.Kokron at nasa dot gov --- @karlg The original code accessed the array with in a loop using i:, so the proposed workaround doesn't help my case. PS: Thanks for the advise. Newbie mistake.

[Bug target/65527] ICE: in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7120 with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65527 Ilya Enkovich ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug other/65530] [meta-bug] -mmpx -fcheck-pointer-bounds failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65530 Bug 65530 depends on bug 65527, which changed state. Bug 65527 Summary: ICE: in expand_builtin_with_bounds, at builtins.c:7120 with -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65527 What|Removed

[Bug lto/66394] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in -flto -fmerge-all-constants -fno-use-linker-plugin targetting i686-w64-mingw32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.3

[Bug bootstrap/63740] [4.9 Regression] GCC 4.9.2 bootstrap fails on ARM, haifa-sched.c:6507:1: internal compiler error: in lra_create

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot

[Bug c++/66536] [5/6 Regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref, at cp/tree.c:2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66536 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- So aarch64 has no DImode vectors? Or just no DImode multiply (but it has a DImode vector shift?). If so this could be handled by a vectorizer pattern transforming the multiply to

[Bug ipa/64190] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64190 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|3.4.4 |4.9.3

[Bug ipa/64190] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ipa/pr63551.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64190 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |3.4.4

[Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- There's pending patch in ML: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg00746.html I'm going to ping Honza.

[Bug c++/66536] [5 Regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref, at cp/tree.c:2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66536 Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.1.0, 6.0

[Bug c/63307] [4.9 Regression] Cilk+ breaks -fcompare-debug bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307 Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P2

[Bug bootstrap/63740] [4.9 Regression] GCC 4.9.2 bootstrap fails on ARM, haifa-sched.c:6507:1: internal compiler error: in lra_create

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740 --- Comment #13 from Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) Any progress on this? This has slipped off my radar. Thanks for the ping, I'm working on this now.

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 --- Comment #5 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- So the above example tends to get fully unrolled, but even on an example with 32 ptrs rather than 4, yes the vectorizer fails because of the multiplication - but the multiplication is gone by

[Bug ipa/65908] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in expand_thunk, at cgraphunit.c:1700

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65908 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Any progress on this? This is a P1 and we'd like to release GCC 5.2 soon.

[Bug c++/66450] [5 Regression][C++11][constexpr] Issues when delegating implicit copy constructor in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66450 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 14:33:02 2015 New Revision: 224557 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224557root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66450 * constexpr.c

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 14:33:08 2015 New Revision: 224558 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224558root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66387 * pt.c (tsubst_copy)

[Bug c++/66289] [5/6 Regression] error: ambiguous template instantiation with partial specialization defined in terms of alias template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66289 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 14:32:55 2015 New Revision: 224556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224556root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66289 * cp-tree.h

[Bug c++/66536] [5 Regression] ICE in build_ctor_subob_ref, at cp/tree.c:2534

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66536 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 14:33:23 2015 New Revision: 224560 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224560root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/66536 * tree.c

[Bug c++/58063] default arguments evaluated twice per call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58063 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: jason Date: Wed Jun 17 14:33:17 2015 New Revision: 224559 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224559root=gccview=rev Log: PR c++/58063 * tree.c (bot_manip):

[Bug c++/66571] New: Template substitution causes some OpenMP rejects-valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66571 Bug ID: 66571 Summary: Template substitution causes some OpenMP rejects-valid Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/66570] New: libbacktrace is not installed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66570 Bug ID: 66570 Summary: libbacktrace is not installed Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug bootstrap/63740] [4.9 Regression] GCC 4.9.2 bootstrap fails on ARM, haifa-sched.c:6507:1: internal compiler error: in lra_create

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63740 Maxim Kuvyrkov mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/66572] New: [6 Regression] Bogus Wlogical-op warning for operands coming from template instantiations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66572 Bug ID: 66572 Summary: [6 Regression] Bogus Wlogical-op warning for operands coming from template instantiations Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 --- Comment #10 from Thomas Preud'homme thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- There is something strange about this bug. I compiled an arm-linux-gnueabihf gcc only (using make all-gcc) twice, once with an arm-none-eabi cross binutils in the PATH and

[Bug c++/66387] [5/6 Regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl with lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/66573] New: Unexpected change in static, branch-prediction cost from O1 to O2.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573 Bug ID: 66573 Summary: Unexpected change in static, branch-prediction cost from O1 to O2. Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug go/66138] json decoder Decode function fails for some structure return values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66138 --- Comment #1 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- I am not sure, but this appears to be similar to the golang issue I opened yesterday https://github.com/golang/go/issues/11236 which was closed as a duplicate of

[Bug target/65914] [6 Regression] error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65914 Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

  1   2   >