https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685
--- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-06-30, at 4:36 PM, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
Sorry, I missed that this was after r225000. Does the attached patch fix it?
No, we still have same error.
--
John David Anglin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17)
Increasing insn lengths unnecessarily might result in some unlucky constant
pool placements and far branches and some code might get
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
before try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt:
...
bb 9:
.omp_data_i_45 = .omp_data_arr.11;
# DEBUG .omp_data_i = .omp_data_i_45
__ganglocal_ptr.10_47 = __builtin_GOACC_get_ganglocal_ptr ();
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #2 from Jason gcc-bugs at hussar dot demon.co.uk ---
(With due sense of dread:) I note that the __cxxabiv1 seems to have a v1 in it.
Why not define a v2 with a better signature? Although I realise that this is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #4)
Testing tentative patch
Bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 went ok.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715
Bug ID: 66715
Summary: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-{2,3}
.c exec fails -Ofast
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240
Divya Jyoti Das divyajyotidas15 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
101 - 107 of 107 matches
Mail list logo