[Bug middle-end/66685] [6 Regression] conftest.c:16:1: internal compiler error: in as_a, at is-a.h:192

2015-06-30 Thread dave.anglin at bell dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66685 --- Comment #7 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2015-06-30, at 4:36 PM, rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: Sorry, I missed that this was after r225000. Does the attached patch fix it? No, we still have same error. -- John David Anglin

[Bug target/64833] [SH]: Error: pcrel too far when compiling imagemagick and graphicsmagick on Debian sh4

2015-06-30 Thread kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833 --- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17) Increasing insn lengths unnecessarily might result in some unlucky constant pool placements and far branches and some code might get

[Bug debug/66716] gomp4: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/kernels-loop.c -g ICE

2015-06-30 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66716 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- before try_transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt: ... bb 9: .omp_data_i_45 = .omp_data_arr.11; # DEBUG .omp_data_i = .omp_data_i_45 __ganglocal_ptr.10_47 = __builtin_GOACC_get_ganglocal_ptr ();

[Bug c++/66701] __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an argument of the pointer to the function that was called, please?

2015-06-30 Thread gcc-bugs at hussar dot demon.co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701 --- Comment #2 from Jason gcc-bugs at hussar dot demon.co.uk --- (With due sense of dread:) I note that the __cxxabiv1 seems to have a v1 in it. Why not define a v2 with a better signature? Although I realise that this is a

[Bug middle-end/66432] libgomp.c/appendix-a/a.29.1.c -O2 -g: type mismatch between an SSA_NAME and its symbol

2015-06-30 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #4) Testing tentative patch Bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 went ok.

[Bug libgomp/66715] New: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-{2,3}.c exec fails -Ofast

2015-06-30 Thread vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66715 Bug ID: 66715 Summary: libgomp.oacc-c/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/data-{2,3} .c exec fails -Ofast Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/61240] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect warning integer overflow in expression on pointer-pointer subtraction

2015-06-30 Thread divyajyotidas15 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61240 Divya Jyoti Das divyajyotidas15 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

<    1   2