https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66852
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton noloader at gmail dot com ---
This also appears to be an issue with GCC 4.8 and 5.1. See
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cryptopp-users/BlPiQ2eAWhg/IsX18wAT9ZAJ.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66852
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton noloader at gmail dot com ---
My apologies for *not* having a minimum working example.
If you want to duplicate it, then:
git clone https://github.com/weidai11/cryptopp.git
Open GNUmakefile, and change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58066
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
Another testcase:
[hjl@gnu-tools-1 pr58066]$ cat x.i
struct in_addr
{
int s_addr;
};
typedef long unsigned int size_t;
extern void __snprintf (char *__restrict __s, size_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46193
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66841
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com ---
The program is ill-formed. In this line:
requires ConstructibleT, Args...() // ERROR HERE
There's no single declaration of Constructible that can be matched to those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Sutton andrew.n.sutton at gmail dot com ---
I would expect a partial ordering to prefer the two-parameter overload in that
case. But yeah, it's a separate issue.
The problem is that partial ordering doesn't apply to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66841
--- Comment #2 from Eric Niebler eric.niebler at gmail dot com ---
This answer is deeply unsatisfying. I want valid expressions, not traits. And
if std::is_constructible doesn't do *exactly* what I want (and it doesn't) I
have to author my own
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66852
Bug ID: 66852
Summary: vmovdqa instructions issued on 64-bit aligned array,
causes segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52340
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Related test cases:
template typename T, template typename U, U class struct Sort;
template template typename U, U class Comparator
struct Sortint, Comparator
{
template int I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66851
Bug ID: 66851
Summary: support double reduction in parloops
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
--- Comment #12 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #11)
Hi Patrick. Opening a new bug certainly is OK, in particular in this case
where we failed to just simplify the testcase originally
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66850
Bug ID: 66850
Summary: Adding a forward declaration of a template containing
a template template parm causes ICE on valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49960
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66851
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35963
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35963action=edit
Tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66846
Bug ID: 66846
Summary: parloops does not always mark loops for fixup if
needed
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
Bug ID: 66847
Summary: Derived class calling protected base ctor using C++11
{brace} init = spurious access denied error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
DB db0451 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||db0451 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #1 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35957
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35957action=edit
x86_64-apple-darwin14 binaries that reproduce regressions on
x86_64-apple-darwin15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66845
--- Comment #1 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
Created attachment 35952
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35952action=edit
testcase.c
delta minimized testcase.
gcc -c -O2 -fPIC
look for second call of RPCRT4_strndupA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66845
Bug ID: 66845
Summary: one more %si register function clobbering issue
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63151
DB db0451 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||db0451 at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #3 from DB db0451 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35956
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35956action=edit
-save-temps output .ii file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
Bug ID: 66848
Summary: boehm-gc fails test suite on x86_64-apple-darwin15
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66843
Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66826
--- Comment #2 from Daurnimator quae at daurnimator dot com ---
I recompiled glibc with debug symbols.
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
_dl_lookup_symbol_x (undef_name=0x77634775 anything,
undef_map=0x77ffd998
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66845
--- Comment #2 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
compiler used is gcc version 5.1.1 20150707 [gcc-5-branch revision 225501]
(SUSE Linux) with the patch from bug 66782 applied.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66782
--- Comment #16 from marcus at jet dot franken.de ---
I can confirm that this testcase fixed here and in Wine.
I have however found another issue with register clobbering and opened a new
bug 66845 for it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #2 from DB db0451 at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35955
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35955action=edit
command line output after adding -v and -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66617
--- Comment #7 from DB db0451 at gmail dot com ---
I just found a similar, possibly related issue with {brace} ctor call and
access specifiers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
As mentioned in the comment there, we're looking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #5 from DB db0451 at gmail dot com ---
Another note is that, as per the other tickets, G++ seems to have multiple
possible causes of its confusion with brace-init:
* presence of virtual base in class hierarchy
* signature of calling
,
^
trippels@gcc2-power8 gcc % /home/trippels/gcc_build_dir_/./gcc/xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20150712 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65186
--- Comment #11 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com ---
Hi Patrick. Opening a new bug certainly is OK, in particular in this case where
we failed to just simplify the testcase originally submitted. Thus, when your
patch goes in,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66801
--- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
% gdb --args /home/trippels/gcc_build_dir_/./gcc/xgcc --version
Reading symbols from /home/trippels/gcc_build_dir_/./gcc/xgcc...done.
(gdb) run
Starting program:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Jul 12 11:22:42 2015
New Revision: 225722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225722root=gccview=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2015-07-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66847
--- Comment #4 from DB db0451 at gmail dot com ---
It should be noted that although I have a commented-out {brace} ctor for the
final class in main(), that was just a test; both {brace} and (parenthesis)
init in that context produce the same
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
The seg fault in the thread_leak_test back traces as...
# lldb ./thread_leak_test
(lldb) target create ./thread_leak_test
Current executable set to './thread_leak_test'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66849
Bug ID: 66849
Summary: Incorrect multilib chosen with -mthumb
-mfloat-abi=hard
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #4 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
The gctest hang backtraces as...
# lldb ./gctest
(lldb) target create ./gctest
Current executable set to './gctest' (x86_64).
(lldb) r
Process 35911 launched: './gctest'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ubizjak at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #3 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
The seg fault in staticrootstexst back traces as...
# lldb ./staticrootstest
(lldb) target create ./staticrootstest
Current executable set to './staticrootstest' (x86_64).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #5 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35958
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35958action=edit
bzip2 compressed log of gctest walk in lldb from main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #6 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35959
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35959action=edit
bzip2 compressed log of thread_leak_test walk in lldb from main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #7 from Jack Howarth howarth.at.gcc at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 35960
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35960action=edit
bzip2 compressed log of staticrootstest walk in lldb from main
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marcus at jet dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66845
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
50 matches
Mail list logo
