https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67151
Nickolay Merkin nickolay.merkin at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67176
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66332
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Schwinge tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Mon Aug 10 16:48:26 2015
New Revision: 226763
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226763root=gccview=rev
Log:
[PR libgomp/65742, PR middle-end/66332]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67176
Bug ID: 67176
Summary: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67177
Bug ID: 67177
Summary: MOVE_ALLOC not automatically allocating deferred
character arrays in derived types
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16351
--- Comment #44 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com ---
Duh, I should have remembered that we had returns_nonnull because I wrote a
dataflow pass to find any NULLs that flow to such statements :-)
The pieces that are missing are tagging
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66292
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67151
Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67151
--- Comment #3 from Nickolay Merkin nickolay.merkin at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
Already fixed in gcc-5 branch and trunk.
Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67175
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36164
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36164action=edit
tentative patch
Does this patch fix the fail on sparc?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Aug 10 17:42:00 2015
New Revision: 226764
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226764root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-08-10 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67168
Kostya Serebryany kcc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178
Bug ID: 67178
Summary: [concepts] ICE on self-referencing concept
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56549
Tom Tanner tanner at gmx dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tanner at gmx dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67178
Marek Polacek mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:24:53PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921
mirco mirco.valentini at polimi dot it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
Fixed on trunk.
The GFORTRAN_1.6 section of the symbol map where I've inserted
the _gfortan_mvbits_i16 symbol does not exist in 5-branch. If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #12 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Mon Aug 10 21:45:01 2015
New Revision: 226769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226769root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-08-10 Steven G. Kargl ka...@gcc.gnu.org
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu ---
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:40:51PM +, hjl.tools at gmail dot com wrote:
Index: intrinsics/mvbits.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
--- Comment #1 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
Seems to have started with r214954. Here's the direct link to the ML post:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg00409.html
Per discussions with Kai,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66014
--- Comment #3 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 36166
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36166action=edit
Patch to bypass sys_siglist and disable stpcpy builtin during bootstrap
I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54803
Mikhail Maltsev miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miyuki at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54089
--- Comment #39 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx ---
Oleg, do you have rights under your copyright assignment agreement to
dual-license the libgcc part of the patch under GPLv2 so it could be included
in the kernel, and if so, would you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com joseph at codesourcery dot
com ---
Well, making libgcc use a host-side target macro again certainly isn't the
right fix. Why is EH_FRAME_SECTION_NAME differently defined when building
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
--- Comment #3 from Matt Breedlove breedlove.matt at gmail dot com ---
In gcc/defaults.h, it gets defined via:
/* If we have a definition of INCOMING_RETURN_ADDR_RTX, assume that
the rest of the DWARF 2 frame unwind support is also provided.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67172
Bug ID: 67172
Summary: [5/6 regression] i686-w64-mingw32 dwarf2 bootstrap
fails with undefined reference to __EH_FRAME_BEGIN__
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66735
aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67173
Bug ID: 67173
Summary: experimental/filesystem/operations/current_path.cc
FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67173
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67168
Bug ID: 67168
Summary: Asan crashes on program startup
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67167
Bug ID: 67167
Summary: cilkplus vectorization problems
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 65952, which changed state.
Bug 65952 Summary: [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer
addresses for LP64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67169
Bug ID: 67169
Summary: -fstack-check=no doesn't disable stack checking
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57125
--- Comment #9 from Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo dot org ---
after having the backport deployed in Gentoo, we found an edge case with the
fix in trunk ...
we still have this rule in gcc/Makefile.in:
# Generated source files for gengtype.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Bug ID: 67174
Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška mliska at suse dot cz ---
Created attachment 36160
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36160action=edit
Test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170
Bug ID: 67170
Summary: PRE can't hoist out a readonly argument
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #1 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
First working thesis on this:
offset of d is errorneously propagate to tmp.
A suitable workaround is to wrap the last allocate in an associate:
associate (t = tmp(1:50,:))
allocate( d( 50, 2 ),
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153
--- Comment #4 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
Also fails 5.2.1 (Debian 5.2.1--15) 5.2.1 20150808
As noted, the third version of the program, using bitset but not using
lambdas, is as slow as the version using unsigned int -- even when built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153
--- Comment #5 from ncm at cantrip dot org ---
My preliminary conclusion is that a hardware optimization provided in Haswell
but not in Westmere is not recognizing the opportunity in the unsigned int
test case, that it finds in the original
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Another test case is the GIT version of LLVM, which fails when compiling
ExecutionEngine.cpp for Debug+Asserts build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Bug ID: 67171
Summary: [6.0 regression] sourced allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67175
Bug ID: 67175
Summary: gcc.dg/vect/trapv-vect-reduc-4.c FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67175
Rainer Orth ro at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65995
Daniel Vollmer zerolo at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zerolo at gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67173
Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
56 matches
Mail list logo