[Bug target/67459] New: [SH] addc/subc/negc set of T reg rtx seem wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67459 Bug ID: 67459 Summary: [SH] addc/subc/negc set of T reg rtx seem wrong Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/65250] [SH] Improve comparisons followed by a negated cstore

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65250 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- The patch attachment 36012 for PR 54236 improves the treg_set_expr machinery by doing proper comparison inversion, instead of trying only EQ <-> NE. This will be the prerequisite to match a (set (reg:SI 168)

[Bug fortran/55758] LOGICAL and BIND(C): Reject kind=2/4/8/16 with -std=f2008, improve warning, switch to nonBOOLEAN_TYPE for those

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55758 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/53379] [4.9/5/6 Regression] No backtrace generated for array bounds violation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379 --- Comment #26 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Janne Blomqvist from comment #25) > Fixed on trunk, closing. Thanks!

[Bug fortran/47648] libgfortran/libgfortran.h:53:29: fatal error: quadmath_weak.h: No such file or directory - FreeBSD ia64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47648 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/60355] C519 of Fortran 2008 for BIND attribute not enforced

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60355 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67177] MOVE_ALLOC not automatically allocating deferred character arrays in derived types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67177 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66312] [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo --- Adrian, the recent GCC 5 build/bootstrap on SH included D, didn't it?

[Bug target/67458] New: x86: atomic store with memory_order_release doesn't order other stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67458 Bug ID: 67458 Summary: x86: atomic store with memory_order_release doesn't order other stores Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/42568] [Cygwin] BLOCKDATA referenced in EXTERNAL not loading from library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42568 --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Is it still true on recent versions of Cygwin (it has been fixed on darwin > since darwin10, see pr34136)? Ping! Without answer I'll close this PR as FIXED.

[Bug target/66312] [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #18 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17) > Adrian, the recent GCC 5 build/bootstrap on SH included D, didn't it? If you mean that gdc is built with gcc-5 on sh4, then no. The gdc packages are

[Bug fortran/67460] [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/67457] New: segfault in libbacktrace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67457 Bug ID: 67457 Summary: segfault in libbacktrace Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee:

[Bug fortran/67460] New: [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 Bug ID: 67460 Summary: [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/66312] [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #18) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #17) > > Adrian, the recent GCC 5 build/bootstrap on SH included D, didn't it? > > If you mean that gdc is built

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/63921] [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the function is a type bound function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/66189] Block loops for inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66189 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/66236] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr42691.c on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66236 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug fortran/66694] Failure in function returning an allocated CHARACTER array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66694 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66465] [4.9.2,5.1.0,6.0.0] procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67462] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 Bug ID: 67462 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/67430] reallocate lhs with overloaded assignment operators causes memory error and wrong size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67430 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67460] [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 --- Comment #3 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2) > Again a problem caused by buffering. Some warnings converted into error may > get buffered and then discarded but that doesn't reset >

[Bug tree-optimization/67465] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150905 (experimental) [trunk revision 227508] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-trunk -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.2 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 --- Comment #6 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36295 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36295=edit pre-processed C source pre-processed, without function calls

[Bug c/63336] cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63336 --- Comment #5 from tprince at computer dot org --- Created attachment 36294 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36294=edit shortened c code C source with external function calls removed

[Bug target/66312] [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #12) > Created attachment 36224 [details] > Stage 3 compiled version of ctfeexpr.dmd.o (unstripped) (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #11)

[Bug fortran/66227] [OOP] EXTENDS_TYPE_OF n returns wrong result for polymorphic variable allocated to extended type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66227 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/67461] New: Multiple atomic stores generate a StoreLoad barrier between each one, not just at the end

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67461 Bug ID: 67461 Summary: Multiple atomic stores generate a StoreLoad barrier between each one, not just at the end Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug objc/67455] Inheriting from Object doesn't provide alloc, init or new rendering methods usless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455 --- Comment #2 from James Hobson --- Okay. Interesting. Why is it then that many place on the internet indicate that they do? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1064045

[Bug objc/67455] Inheriting from Object doesn't provide alloc, init or new rendering methods usless

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67455 --- Comment #3 from James Hobson --- Or more importantly, how can I write an +alloc method?

[Bug fortran/67076] [5/6 Regression] Critical inside a module procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67076 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67460] [5/6 Regression] Spurious: f951: all warnings being treated as errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460 --- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Again a problem caused by buffering. Some warnings converted into error may get buffered and then discarded but that doesn't reset ->some_warnings_are_errors. However, we probably do not need this

[Bug pending/67463] New: PGO (Profile Guided Optimizations) are not applied with gcc-5.2.1 (they are fine on gcc-4.9.x)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67463 Bug ID: 67463 Summary: PGO (Profile Guided Optimizations) are not applied with gcc-5.2.1 (they are fine on gcc-4.9.x) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/66833] [4.9/5.1/6.0]: ICE on assumed-rank character actual argument to intrinsic functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66833 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67466] New: Project segfaulting, working with other compilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67466 Bug ID: 67466 Summary: Project segfaulting, working with other compilers Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/25071] dummy argument larger than actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25071 --- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres --- No activity for more than four years. AFAICT everything is fixed, but for comment 7 preferring an error instead of the warning. Since warnings can be turned into errors with -Werror, I don't think

[Bug fortran/66238] C/Fortran interoperability broken with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66238 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66762] ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66158] Use DO loop constraints for optimizing bounds checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66158 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67464] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150905 (experimental) [trunk revision 227508] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c; ./a.out 01 $ gcc-5.2 -O3 small.c; ./a.out 01 $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 small.c $ ./a.out 00 $ - int printf (const char *, ...); int a = 1, b, c, d, e, f, g; void