[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #29 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #26) > OK, I'll commit attachment 36400 [details] to trunk then. Do you think it's > safe for GCC 5 branch, too? Or shall we test it on the branch? I think so,

[Bug target/67732] [SH] Strange LRA addsi3 usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732 --- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo --- Created attachment 36402 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36402=edit CSiBE comparison This is the detailed CSiBE comparision of no LRA vs. LRA. There are some improvements with LRA, but the

[Bug other/57195] Mode attributes with specific mode iterator can not be used as mode iterators in *.md files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57195 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67734] New: Gcc warning "gcc: warning: couldn’t understand kern.osversion ‘14.5.0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67734 Bug ID: 67734 Summary: Gcc warning "gcc: warning: couldn’t understand kern.osversion ‘14.5.0" Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/67734] Gcc warning "gcc: warning: couldn’t understand kern.osversion ‘14.5.0"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67734 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #27 from Oleg Endo --- Author: olegendo Date: Sun Sep 27 11:55:55 2015 New Revision: 228176 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228176=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/67391 * config/sh/sh-protos.h (sh_lra_p): Declare.

[Bug bootstrap/67733] New: elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 Bug ID: 67733 Summary: elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #26 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #25) > Yes, 36400 fixes that failure: > PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-3.c -O1 (test for warnings, line ) OK, I'll commit attachment 36400 to trunk then. Do

[Bug target/67733] elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|bootstrap |target --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug target/67733] elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 --- Comment #2 from Igor Kozhukhov --- /usr/ccs links old and unused. also - illumos != solaris and can use his own layout. at this moment it's not easy try to move to 'illumos' platform definition because autotools not ready to define and use

[Bug target/67733] elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 --- Comment #4 from graham.stott at btinternet dot com --- Sent from Samsung Mobile on O2 Original message From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" Date:27/09/2015 17:25 (GMT+00:00) To:

[Bug target/67732] New: [SH] Strange LRA addsi3 usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732 Bug ID: 67732 Summary: [SH] Strange LRA addsi3 usage Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #28 from Oleg Endo --- I've created a new PR for the LRA addsi3 thing .. PR 67732.

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #25 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #24) > Could you please re-run that test with attachment 36400 [details]? Yes, 36400 fixes that failure: PASS: gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-3.c -O1 (test for

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67597, which changed state. Bug 67597 Summary: [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #30 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #29) > I think so, though we should test it on 5-branch. I'm running tests > on 5-branch now. No new failures on sh-elf with make -k check

[Bug fortran/66762] ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > I tried to investigate: > gfortran ./gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/submodule_6.f08 -flto > > If I compare corresponding argument passed to output_addr_const w/o LTO, I

[Bug c++/67735] New: internal compiler error while trying to use __direct_bases to create parallel hierarchy of classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67735 Bug ID: 67735 Summary: internal compiler error while trying to use __direct_bases to create parallel hierarchy of classes Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/67736] New: Wrong optimization with -fexpensive-optimizations on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736 Bug ID: 67736 Summary: Wrong optimization with -fexpensive-optimizations on mips64el Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/67733] elfdump and readelf in perl scripts should to use env vars ELFDUMP and READELF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67733 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Igor Kozhukhov from comment #2) > /usr/ccs links old and unused. > also - illumos != solaris and can use his own layout. > at this moment it's not easy try to move to 'illumos' platform

[Bug middle-end/67340] [6 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67340 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67312] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in expand_expr_real_1 (expr.c:9561) with -ftree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67312 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67490] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr16458-1.c scan-assembler-not cmpw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67490 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67312, which changed state. Bug 67312 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in expand_expr_real_1 (expr.c:9561) with -ftree-coalesce-vars https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67312 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67490, which changed state. Bug 67490 Summary: [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr16458-1.c scan-assembler-not cmpw https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67490 What|Removed

[Bug target/67736] Wrong optimization with -fexpensive-optimizations on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Can you try the patch in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00401.html ? I never got around to updating it for the comments.

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 Bug 64164 depends on bug 67340, which changed state. Bug 67340 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:279 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67340 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/67737] New: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67737 Bug ID: 67737 Summary: ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:1299 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug other/67738] New: infinite recursion in libiberty/cp-demangle.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738 Bug ID: 67738 Summary: infinite recursion in libiberty/cp-demangle.c Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #31 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #29) Tests for 5-branch with/without -mlra completed with no new failures on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #116 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #91) > > I can confirm the -1140 bytes / -0.04% on the CSiBE set. Since r228176 this is no longer true. Now the gap of no-LRA and LRA is a bit wider: 3345527 -> 3334351

[Bug tree-optimization/67312] [6 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in expand_expr_real_1 (expr.c:9561) with -ftree-coalesce-vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67312 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Sun Sep 27 09:02:00 2015 New Revision: 228175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228175=gcc=rev Log: revert to assign_parms assignments using default defs Revert the fragile and

[Bug middle-end/67340] [6 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:279

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67340 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Sun Sep 27 09:02:00 2015 New Revision: 228175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228175=gcc=rev Log: revert to assign_parms assignments using default defs Revert the fragile and

[Bug rtl-optimization/64164] [4.9/5/6 Regression] one more stack slot used due to one less inlining level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164 --- Comment #55 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Sun Sep 27 09:02:00 2015 New Revision: 228175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228175=gcc=rev Log: revert to assign_parms assignments using default defs Revert the fragile and

[Bug middle-end/67490] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/pr16458-1.c scan-assembler-not cmpw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67490 --- Comment #2 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Sun Sep 27 09:02:00 2015 New Revision: 228175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228175=gcc=rev Log: revert to assign_parms assignments using default defs Revert the fragile and

[Bug bootstrap/67597] [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67597 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Author: aoliva Date: Sun Sep 27 09:02:00 2015 New Revision: 228175 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228175=gcc=rev Log: revert to assign_parms assignments using default defs Revert the fragile and

[Bug c/67729] New: scanf is missing buffer length sanity check ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67729 Bug ID: 67729 Summary: scanf is missing buffer length sanity check ? Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #23 from Kazumoto Kojima --- My tests are done. Only gcc.c-torture/compile/sync-3.c -O1 (internal compiler error) for -mno-lra is the new test that fails.

[Bug libstdc++/67617] [DR 2542] Non-standard const requirements imposed on associative container comparison objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67617 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67391] [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391 --- Comment #24 from Oleg Endo --- Thanks! Could you please re-run that test with attachment 36400? (Because the problem was triggered only by this test, I think we don't need to fully re-test it)

[Bug c/67730] New: [5.2 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 Bug ID: 67730 Summary: [5.2 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug rtl-optimization/67731] New: Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67731 Bug ID: 67731 Summary: Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: