[Bug target/67732] [SH] Strange LRA addsi3 usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732 --- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > There are some improvements with LRA, but the regression in teem-1.6.0-src > > total: 1105728 -> 1122288+16560 / +1.497656 % > > outweighs all of the

[Bug target/67756] ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 36411 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36411=edit preprocessed source file

[Bug middle-end/48390] Multiple setting to restricted pointer variable not optimized away

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48390 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ada/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 28 Sep 2015, vries at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 > > --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug target/67756] New: ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756 Bug ID: 67756 Summary: ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/67756] [6 Regression] ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|ICE compiling

[Bug fortran/67757] New: ICE after "ambiguous reference"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67757 Bug ID: 67757 Summary: ICE after "ambiguous reference" Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug rtl-optimization/67037] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization

[Bug libstdc++/65393] std::thread shared_ptr inefficiency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65393 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 29 12:54:05 2015 New Revision: 228242 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228242=gcc=rev Log: Reduce space and time overhead of std::thread PR libstdc++/65393

[Bug fortran/67170] PRE can't hoist out a readonly argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 29 13:04:18 2015 New Revision: 228244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228244=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-29 Richard Biener PR

[Bug bootstrap/67761] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/67170] PRE can't hoist out a readonly argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67170 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67698] internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67698 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 67698, which changed state. Bug 67698 Summary: internal compiler error: in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67698 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/49367] missed optimization with __restrict field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49367 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/67763] New: [SH] Redirect conditional branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67763 Bug ID: 67763 Summary: [SH] Redirect conditional branches Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug testsuite/67583] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/seekoff/char/1.cc:92 erroneous call to sputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67583 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Sep 29 13:31:51 2015 New Revision: 228245 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228245=gcc=rev Log: PR libstdc++/67583 Fix invalid sputn calls in tests PR libstdc++/67583

[Bug target/67745] [ARM] wrong alignments when __attribute__ ((optimize,target,align) is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67745 chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm Target Milestone|---

[Bug testsuite/67583] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/seekoff/char/1.cc:92 erroneous call to sputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67583 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67762] New: [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 Bug ID: 67762 Summary: [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/67764] New: -Wconversion generates false warnings for bitmask+cast expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67764 Bug ID: 67764 Summary: -Wconversion generates false warnings for bitmask+cast expressions Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67766] New: [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766 Bug ID: 67766 Summary: [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- The compile-time error goes away when adding -fno-sanitize=null,returns-nonnull-attribute,nonnull-attribute to the command-line options.

[Bug fortran/44672] [F08] ALLOCATE with SOURCE and no array-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672 --- Comment #14 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Yes, it does, but the fix is due to its size only available on trunk.

[Bug target/67765] New: [SH] Improve treg_combine pass

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67765 Bug ID: 67765 Summary: [SH] Improve treg_combine pass Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Not reducing anymore; creduce dies for me :(.

[Bug other/67652] liboffloadmic/runtime/offload_engine.cpp:176: strange expression in sizeof ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67652 iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716 --- Comment #19 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18) > (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #16) > > Regardless of those, Kaz, can you please commit attachment 36397 [details]? > > Then I can handle the other cases

[Bug libstdc++/65393] std::thread shared_ptr inefficiency

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65393 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67741] Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Sep 29 13:02:42 2015 New Revision: 228243 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228243=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-29 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/67741] Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Component|c

[Bug target/65105] [i386] XMM registers are not used for 64bit computations on 32bit target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105 --- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Tue Sep 29 09:32:40 2015 New Revision: 228231 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228231=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR target/65105 * config/i386/i386.c: Include dbgcnt.h.

[Bug fortran/67758] New: [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758 Bug ID: 67758 Summary: [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug bootstrap/67761] New: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761 Bug ID: 67761 Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap

[Bug libstdc++/67747] experimental/filesystem/iterators/recursive_directory_iterator.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67747 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Proposed patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-09/msg02186.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/67736] Wrong optimization with -fexpensive-optimizations on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736 --- Comment #3 from Aurelien Jarno --- The ffmpeg testsuite is successful on mips64el-linux-gnu with this patch applied.

[Bug target/67037] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- I believe that when we see this in testcase.c.232r.reload 73: [r166:SI++]=r142:SI#0 REG_DEAD r142:SI REG_INC r149:SI Inserting insn reload before: 153: r166:SI=[afp:SI+0x14f8]

[Bug fortran/44672] [F08] ALLOCATE with SOURCE and no array-spec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44672 zmi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zmi007 at gmail dot com --- Comment #13 from zmi

[Bug target/65105] [i386] XMM registers are not used for 64bit computations on 32bit target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65105 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/67756] [6 Regression] ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/67756] [6 Regression] ICE compiling Linux Kernel fs/namei.c on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67756 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/67741] Invalid built-in usage should not cause segmentation fault in compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67741 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/67759] New: Missing warning "makes pointer from integer without a cast" after multiline assert

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67759 Bug ID: 67759 Summary: Missing warning "makes pointer from integer without a cast" after multiline assert Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/67760] New: ICE on contained subroutine in function modifying function return value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67760 Bug ID: 67760 Summary: ICE on contained subroutine in function modifying function return value Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/67736] Wrong optimization with -fexpensive-optimizations on mips64el

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67736 --- Comment #2 from Aurelien Jarno --- Thanks for the patch. I have just tested it, and it indeed fixes the issue from the testcase. I am currently trying to build ffmpeg, from which the testcase has been extracted to see if all the issues are

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/67718] [aarch64] long double incorrect code for copysign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67718 --- Comment #2 from Than McIntosh --- >>using __builtin_copysignl should generate better code generation anyways. Tried replacing the guts of the function with a call to __builtin_copysignl -- the bug is still present. Any recommendations on

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #2) > We diffed the output of -fdump-tree-graphite-all for interchange-1.c and the > problem seems to be related to the ISL scheduler: I would highly recommend > that people

[Bug bootstrap/67761] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67761 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop --- We diffed the output of -fdump-tree-graphite-all for interchange-1.c and the problem seems to be related to the ISL scheduler: I would highly recommend that people stop using outdated ISL versions. with ISL

[Bug target/67732] [SH] Strange LRA addsi3 usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- Hm, those addressing mode issues are supposed to be improved by the AMS pass. But it's not ready yet. Compiling CSiBE with the current AMS branch, without LRA: sum: 879 -> 3318319-15560 / -0.466724 %

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 --- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3) > Not reducing anymore; creduce dies for me :(. Yes, I was unsuccessful in reducing it with creduce, too. (Well, clang doesn't support C++ concepts yet, so

[Bug c/67730] [5/6 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67767] New: -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn suggests noreturn for function which already has noreturn and cold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767 Bug ID: 67767 Summary: -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn suggests noreturn for function which already has noreturn and cold. Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67768] New: Second and subsequent captured variable in variadic template unpaking are default constructed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67768 Bug ID: 67768 Summary: Second and subsequent captured variable in variadic template unpaking are default constructed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/55212] [SH] Switch to LRA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212 --- Comment #117 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #94) > Kaz, do you think we can enable LRA by default for GCC 6? > > Some early results from the AMS optimization show new R0 spill failures. > For example, AMS uses

[Bug c++/67767] -Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn suggests noreturn for function which already has noreturn and cold.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67767 --- Comment #1 from zerotype at yahoo dot com --- This particular use case also challenges the assertion in the GCC documentation that "It does not make sense for a noreturn function to have a return type other than void.". Some of the function

[Bug c/67769] New: VRP pass does wrong optimization

on Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150929 (experimental) [trunk revision 143368] (GCC) I looked into the tree dump, it seems that VRP2 pass. The second MAX_EXPR is folded. Folding statement: iftmp.0_3 = MIN_EXPR <N_2(D), 16>; Not folded Folding statement: iftmp.0_6 = MAX_EXPR &

[Bug ipa/66424] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424 --- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Tue Sep 29 16:37:26 2015 New Revision: 228256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228256=gcc=rev Log: 2015-09-29 Vladimir Makarov Backport from

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop --- The release managers will decide the requirements and when lib versions will be deprecated. I am still investigating a fix to continue supporting ISL-0.14: we will add code to configure.ac to detect ISL

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36415|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > As I do not see the errors in my builds, I will investigate. > Thanks for letting me know that this testcase is still failing. Are you testing with -m32?

[Bug target/66960] Add interrupt/exception attribute to x86 backend

"GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20150929 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits [hjl@gnu-6 interrupt-7]$ Both fn1 and fn2 have to save and restore caller-saved registers. If all registers in bar are callee-saved, fn1 and fn2 can be much smaller.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ada |rtl-optimization --- Comment #1

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Note that the failures FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/block-1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/block-1.f90 -O (test for excess errors) with -m32 are still there with

[Bug target/67716] [5] [SH]: Miscompiles libraw: Assembler: unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716 --- Comment #20 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #19) I have no objection. I thought that the fix for PR67723 on trunk is first, though either way will be fine.

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67754] [graphite] Many testsuite failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67754 --- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop --- Author: spop Date: Tue Sep 29 22:15:08 2015 New Revision: 228268 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228268=gcc=rev Log: use MIN fusion for ISL-14 This patch fixes PR66754 by reverting an earlier

[Bug fortran/67758] [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid use of COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #4 from

[Bug c++/67774] New: [concepts] ICE when mismatching template arguments to concept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67774 Bug ID: 67774 Summary: [concepts] ICE when mismatching template arguments to concept Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/67775] New: [concepts] bug when using variadic expansions in compound requirements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67775 Bug ID: 67775 Summary: [concepts] bug when using variadic expansions in compound requirements Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This is most likely fixed for 5.2 also.

[Bug target/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > This is most likely fixed for 5.2 also. See PR 65408.

[Bug c++/67773] New: dealloc called on temp object before and named object after move, while not being called on named object before move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773 Bug ID: 67773 Summary: dealloc called on temp object before and named object after move, while not being called on named object before move Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, ppc64

[Bug c++/67777] New: unsigned wchar_t and signed wchar_t should cause compiler errors but do not.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Bug ID: 6 Summary: unsigned wchar_t and signed wchar_t should cause compiler errors but do not. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3) > Andrew, > > Did you manage to reproduce this on aarch64 or did you really mean ppc64 in > target ? I most likely just meant ppc64 (I had aarch64 on the

[Bug c++/67772] New: wrong type_info emitted for cv-qualified pointer to member types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67772 Bug ID: 67772 Summary: wrong type_info emitted for cv-qualified pointer to member types Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/67718] [aarch64] long double incorrect code for copysign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67718 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 --- Comment #73 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Now fixed ,Matthew ? Ramana

[Bug rtl-optimization/67778] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2297

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20150929 (experimental) [trunk revision 228242] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -m32 -O2 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-5.2 -m32 -O3 small.c; ./a.out

[Bug c++/67773] destructor called on temp object before and named object after move, while not being called on named object before move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67773 --- Comment #1 from Adam Wenocur --- compiler output: -*- mode: compilation; default-directory: "~/compiler-test/" -*- Compilation started at Wed Sep 30 00:45:55 ./compile.sh

[Bug target/67143] [5/6 Regression] ICE (could not split insn) on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67143 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67776] New: Missing warning when using asm labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67776 Bug ID: 67776 Summary: Missing warning when using asm labels Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/58644] [OOP] Missing .data ref in passing a CLASS array as actual argument to a TYPE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58644 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I believe that my imminent fix for PR63205 will correct this issue > and so eliminate this PR. Does it? If yes, this PR should be closed as FIXED. If no, what is missing?

[Bug tree-optimization/67769] [6 Regression] VRP pass does wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/61960] internal compiler error: in gfc_conv_component_ref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61960 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/66424] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67431] ALLOCATE with SOURCE ignores overloaded assignment operator and uses intrinsic when copying values

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67431 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/63205] [OOP] Wrongly rejects type = class (for identical declared type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63205 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/67758] [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid use of COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67769] [6 Regression] VRP pass does wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/67721] deep copy missing when assigning a derived type constructor to an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67721 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67721] deep copy missing when assigning a derived type constructor to an array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67721 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Any plan to back port the fix to 5.3? If no, the PR could be closed as FIXED.

[Bug tree-optimization/67769] [6 Regression] VRP pass does wrong optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67769 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- Probably phiopt not clearing the flow sensitive info.

[Bug c++/67762] [C++1z] 'not a constant expression" errors only with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36417|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/67764] -Wconversion generates false warnings for bitmask+cast expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67764 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

  1   2   >