[Bug debug/67855] -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 67855, which changed state. Bug 67855 Summary: -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855 What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/67821] [5 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67821] [5 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821 --- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Oct 5 18:39:16 2015 New Revision: 228499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228499=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/67821 * tree-ssanames.c

[Bug c/67854] Missing diagnostic for passing bool to va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854 --- Comment #2 from Mikhail Maltsev --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1) > I wonder if this is yet another issue with macros from system headers > (bool being defined in a system header to expand to _Bool) ... Looks like

[Bug c++/67853] decltype of parenthesized xvalue does not correctly yield rvalue-reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67853 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- Formal patch submission at [1]. Wine people, can someone please test that the patched compiler solves unaligned stack access, as reported in WineHQ bug? [1]

[Bug rtl-optimization/67814] pentium4 cmp instruction register allocation error (tree-pre?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67814 Jameson changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |rtl-optimization Version|5.2.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/67856] New: callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856 Bug ID: 67856 Summary: callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/67830] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/67859] New: ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151005 (experimental) [trunk revision 228480] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c $ gcc-5.2 -O2 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault fn1

[Bug middle-end/67861] New: coreutils' wc.c:write_counts is miscompiled since commit 7e3a76de7c496449b187c2688d958631cf21a944

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67861 Bug ID: 67861 Summary: coreutils' wc.c:write_counts is miscompiled since commit 7e3a76de7c496449b187c2688d958631cf21a944 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status:

[Bug c++/67862] New: [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12625

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67862 Bug ID: 67862 Summary: [concepts] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:12625 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/67860] New: [concepts] bug with overloaded, refined function with explicit and variadic template arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67860 Bug ID: 67860 Summary: [concepts] bug with overloaded, refined function with explicit and variadic template arguments Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #8 from Justas L --- I applied the first (testing) version of the patch on gcc 5.2.0 release source (with slight modifications to make it apply). All new features work as expected, as per the test in comment #2. However, compiling

[Bug c++/58616] [meta-bug] nsdmi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616 Bug 58616 depends on bug 58583, which changed state. Bug 58583 Summary: [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member initialization in template https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583 What|Removed

[Bug rtl-optimization/67856] callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67852] false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 --- Comment #4 from julien.boucaron at gmail dot com --- Sorry for the waste of time Regards

[Bug middle-end/67857] New: noreturn + volatile results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857 Bug ID: 67857 Summary: noreturn + volatile results in wrong code Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon --- I am not sure what kind of helpful information I can provide. Can you build a cross-compiler (x86 -> armv7-a)? This is what I do and I haven't seen the ICE you mention (I was using r228286).

[Bug c++/67844] [6 Regression] Cannot make tuple of class with template constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844 --- Comment #3 from Ville Voutilainen --- Patch available https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00358.html

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Reduction result looks the same. Maybe critical is that the compiler is built with release checking (though that would be pretty serious - code gen depending on CHECKING) >

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- #1 0x00ae7683 in duplicate_thread_path ( entry= 23)>, exit= 59)>, region=0x1b68550, n_region=10, region_copy=0x1b6abf0) at

[Bug tree-optimization/67830] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67830] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67828] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Started with r228306.

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 mwahab at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.9.4 --- Comment #74 from

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- Yeah, trunk configured with --enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c --disable-bootstrap reproduces the issue for me. Scary.

[Bug target/65697] __atomic memory barriers not strong enough for __sync builtins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65697 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67844] [6 Regression] Cannot make tuple of class with template constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844 --- Comment #4 from Roland B --- (In reply to Ville Voutilainen from comment #3) > Patch available https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00358.html Works for me (sqlpp11, develop branch).

[Bug c++/54430] [C++11] For-Loop: Scope of iterating variable begins too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54430 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/67839] Bit addressable instructions generated for invalid memory address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67839 --- Comment #1 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- Created attachment 36444 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36444=edit Test case Compile with avr-gcc test.c -Os

[Bug c/67819] -Wduplicated-cond should take macros into account

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67819 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Yeah, exactly; this problem will require some significant effort, I'm afraid >:(.

[Bug c++/67847] ICE on (invalid) nested enum declaration on x86_64-linux-gnu in is_ancestor, at cp/name-lookup.c:2771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67847 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Justas L from comment #4) > I haven't tested this yet, but I understand this global solution would > affect the performance of ALL functions, not only those that interface with > outside code,

[Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 36445 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36445=edit Patch that enables force_align_arg_pointer attribute for x86_64 targets

[Bug other/67841] error: unable to find a register to spill if all registers are callee-saved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841 --- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > ix86_expand_prologue in i386.c has > > /* The computation of the size of the re-aligned stack frame means > that we must allocate the size of the

[Bug rtl-optimization/67856] callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856 --- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #1) > The call to "a" needs the prologue, maybe to align the stack? The "subq $8, %rsp" is for stack alignment, and whether it's emitted depends on the parity

[Bug middle-end/67857] noreturn + volatile results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857 --- Comment #3 from karl at skomski dot com --- Thanks for the fast answer and sorry for wasting your time :/ Am Montag, 5. Oktober 2015 schrieb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org : > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857 > > Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/67857] noreturn + volatile results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think you are invoking undefined behavior with overflow on signed integers.

[Bug c++/53856] Default argument allowed on member defined outside of class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/53856] Default argument allowed on member defined outside of class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53856 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Oct 5 21:43:26 2015 New Revision: 228501 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228501=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2015-10-05 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug middle-end/67857] noreturn + volatile results in wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67857 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67474] [6 regression] tree-vect-loop.c:2759:1: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints breaks ARM bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67474 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67834] [5 Regression] Local references inside comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834 --- Comment #1 from John David Anglin --- This issue now breaks gcc build: `.LC2' referenced in section `.gnu.linkonce.t._ZN21mem_alloc_descriptionI9mem_us ageED1Ev' of build/hash-table.o: defined in discarded section `.gnu.linkonce.r._

[Bug target/67808] LRA ICEs on simple double to long double conversion test case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67808 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Tue Oct 6 00:18:20 2015 New Revision: 228511 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228511=gcc=rev Log: Apply fix for PR 67808 Added:

[Bug c++/58583] [c++11] ICE with invalid non-static data member initialization in template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58583 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/67834] [5 Regression] Local references inside comdat groups

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Re comment #2, this is with --disable-comdat added to configure command: ../gcc/configure --with-gnu-as --with-gnu-ld --enable-shared --enable-multiarch --enable-linker-build-id --build=hppa-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/67858] g++-5.1.1 warns about unused variable only when optimization flag is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67858 --- Comment #1 from crayzeewulf --- Here is the compiler command line and the warning: $ g++ -Wall -std=c++11 -O3 -c bug_demo_code.cpp bug_demo_code.cpp:34:27: warning: ‘container’ defined but not used [-Wunused-variable] const

[Bug c++/67858] New: g++-5.1.1 warns about unused variable only when optimization flag is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67858 Bug ID: 67858 Summary: g++-5.1.1 warns about unused variable only when optimization flag is used Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/67852] false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67856] callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67856 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Currently, shrink-wrapping does not allow any call to happen without prologue (see shrink-wrap.c:requires_stack_frame_p). On x86-64, if you do not have a prologue but do do a call, the called function

[Bug c++/67844] [6 Regression] Cannot make tuple of class with template constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67828] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67828 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aoliva at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/67853] New: decltype of parenthesized xvalue does not correctly yield rvalue-reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67853 Bug ID: 67853 Summary: decltype of parenthesized xvalue does not correctly yield rvalue-reference Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- I can attach a statically linked binary, if that helps.

[Bug target/67849] New: AVX512 Hitting upper-bank register on extract insn split

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67849 Bug ID: 67849 Summary: AVX512 Hitting upper-bank register on extract insn split Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assemble-failure,

[Bug c/67840] #define function error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840 --- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA --- THank you for your reply. A.BENAÏSSA Le Dimanche 4 octobre 2015 16h26, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org a écrit : https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840

[Bug target/67848] New: ICE on gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c and gcc.dg/pr65345-3.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67848 Bug ID: 67848 Summary: ICE on gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c and gcc.dg/pr65345-3.c Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/67821] [5/6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Known to work|

[Bug middle-end/67821] [5/6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- I think this should be just diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssanames.c b/gcc/tree-ssanames.c index 64e2379..c3484fe 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssanames.c +++ b/gcc/tree-ssanames.c @@ -561,7 +561,10 @@

[Bug c++/67846] ICE on code with lambda expression on x86_64-linux-gnu in check_return_expr, at cp/typeck.c:8609

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67846 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/67783] [4.9/5 Regression] quadratic time consumption in IPA inlining with -O1 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783 --- Comment #6 from Ulya --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Fixed on trunk sofar. Thank you! Compiles much faster now.

[Bug tree-optimization/67830] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67830 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/67783] quadratic time consumption in IPA inlining with -O1 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Oct 5 11:15:10 2015 New Revision: 228472 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228472=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-05 Richard Biener PR ipa/67783 *

[Bug c++/67851] New: improve "no unique final overrider" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67851 Bug ID: 67851 Summary: improve "no unique final overrider" error Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/67850] New: Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850 Bug ID: 67850 Summary: Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/67844] [6 Regression] Cannot make tuple of class with template constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67844 --- Comment #5 from ville at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ville Date: Mon Oct 5 09:57:20 2015 New Revision: 228468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228468=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-05 Ville Voutilainen PR

[Bug ipa/67783] [4.9/5 Regression] quadratic time consumption in IPA inlining with -O1 and higher

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67783 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5, 6.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/67852] New: false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 Bug ID: 67852 Summary: false warning: trigraph reported Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/67730] [5 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 --- Comment #8 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Oct 5 12:35:20 2015 New Revision: 228480 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228480=gcc=rev Log: PR c/67730 * c-typeck.c (convert_for_assignment): Use the

[Bug c/67730] [5 Regression] No warning when returning NULL in void function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67730 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/42734] trivial use of std::thread fails with "pure virtual method called"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42734 --- Comment #49 from Jonathan Wakely --- std::thread no longer uses shared_ptr on trunk, so no longer depends on atomics and doesn't break if you mix objects compiled with and without native atomics, e.g. mixing objects built for i386 with

[Bug c++/67852] false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Why do you think it's a false warning?

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #11 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Thanks. I've got it to fault here. It'll be first on the list of things to do today.

[Bug other/65021] nvptx mkoffload doesn't clean up its temporary files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65021 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Schwinge --- Author: tschwinge Date: Mon Oct 5 14:07:50 2015 New Revision: 228488 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228488=gcc=rev Log: [PR other/65021] mkoffloads -save-temps handling, and cleanup cleanup

[Bug c++/67852] false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 --- Comment #2 from julien.boucaron at gmail dot com --- It does not seem to be a correctly defined trigraph sequences.

[Bug fortran/67758] [GCC 6 regression] ICE on invalid use of COMMON

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|kargl at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/67850] Wrong call_used_regs used in aggregate_value_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67850 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/67852] false warning: trigraph reported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67852 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- ??) is the trigraph for ]

[Bug c/67854] New: Missing diagnostic for passing bool to va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854 Bug ID: 67854 Summary: Missing diagnostic for passing bool to va_arg Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/67821] [5/6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Oct 5 15:28:06 2015 New Revision: 228490 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228490=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/67821 * tree-ssanames.c

[Bug debug/67855] New: -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67855 Bug ID: 67855 Summary: -g doesn't with x86 interrupt handler Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug

[Bug c/67854] Missing diagnostic for passing bool to va_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67854 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I wonder if this is yet another issue with macros from system headers (bool being defined in a system header to expand to _Bool) ... maybe we need a systematic review of diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/67816] [6 Regression] ICE in duplicate_thread_path, 186.crafty fails to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67816 --- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law --- As I suspected, what's happening is we've got an FSM jump thread path. After we register the FSM path DOM discovers that a block embedded in the path has a control statement with a staticly computable