[Bug driver/67890] search paths for user shared libraries not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67890 francis.andre.kampbell at orange dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/67891] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr43300.c (internal compiler error) on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67891 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #10 from Richard

[Bug tree-optimization/67889] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in VN_INFO, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:384

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67889 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53576] Very unhelpful error message: "Unclassifiable statement" instead of "Can't convert TYPE to ..."

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53576 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/65345] ICE with _Generic selection on _Atomic int

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345 --- Comment #25 from Andreas Krebbel --- Author: krebbel Date: Thu Oct 8 07:49:41 2015 New Revision: 228594 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228594=gcc=rev Log: S/390: Use create_tmp_var_raw in s390_atomic_assign_expand_fenv.

[Bug fortran/67884] Missing error message on required allocatable attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67884 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/53326] -finit-integer, -finit-real and INTENT(OUT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53326 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67826] gcc/fortran/openmp.c:1808: bad test ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67826 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67766] [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > Created attachment 36456 [details] > Patch that fixes bootstrap problem Bootstrap and regression test went OK [1]. There is however one new testsuite failure that

[Bug driver/67890] New: search paths for user shared libraries not respected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67890 Bug ID: 67890 Summary: search paths for user shared libraries not respected Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/67766] [6 Regression]: Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux-gnu: ICE in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67766 --- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #4) > Bootstrap and regression test went OK [1]. There is however one new > testsuite failure that looks related to your original patch from 2015-09-27: > > FAIL:

[Bug target/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 --- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > I think a fix is required for *movdi_internal. Back to target bug. Even in the light of Comment #6 ?

[Bug translation/67892] New: Wrong code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67892 Bug ID: 67892 Summary: Wrong code at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: translation

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 --- Comment #3 from Craig Rodrigues --- This is for cross-compiling the FreeBSD base system with GCC. The FreeBSD base system has libc++, which was recently upgraded to clang 3.7.0. Cross-compiling FreeBSD base system with GCC worked before,

[Bug middle-end/67891] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr43300.c (internal compiler error) on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67891 Bug ID: 67891 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr43300.c (internal compiler error) on alpha-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67894] New: bounds of assumed-rank dummy argument not equal to actual argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67894 Bug ID: 67894 Summary: bounds of assumed-rank dummy argument not equal to actual argument Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/56592] [SH] Add vector ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56592 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- Maybe also interesting: __attribute__((vector)) (function attribute)

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug other/67893] New: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893 Bug ID: 67893 Summary: [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- Please note that with -m32 we have additional testsuite FAIL [1] with ifcvt-3.c: FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

[Bug rtl-optimization/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #12 from

[Bug translation/67892] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67892 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Klose --- > What's the second preprocessed source from? the same .cpp file built with gcc-4.9.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3) > Please note that with -m32 we have additional testsuite FAIL [1] with > ifcvt-3.c: > > FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

[Bug fortran/63158] Possible wrong code with absend optional BT_CLASS -> optional BT_DERIVED dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63158 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I cannot find any file in gcc/fortran containing the string > "!e->ref->u.ar.type != AR_FULL" for 4.8, 4.9 and trunk (5.0). It has been replaced with "e->ref->u.ar.type != AR_FULL" at line 5218:

[Bug c++/67888] Compiling clang 3.7.0 results in is used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67888 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't know what fixed it, or if it's worth backporting.

[Bug fortran/67883] ICE on empty array constructor of character function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67883 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/67893] [5 Regression] memory hog building a C++ file (on x86_64-linux-gnu)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67893 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose --- Created attachment 36463 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36463=edit preprocessed source

[Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67749 Igor Zamyatin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/67843] experimental/filesystem/iterators/directory_iterator.cc fails on armv5t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67843 --- Comment #7 from Christophe Lyon --- You are probably correct: I recompiled my cross-toolchain to default to armv5t and the test now passes. (as opposed to armv7-a toolchain + -march=armv5t to compile the testcase). I agree that a linker

[Bug target/67895] New: Wrong assembly: incorrect rounding/SAE specifier position

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67895 Bug ID: 67895 Summary: Wrong assembly: incorrect rounding/SAE specifier position Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assemble-failure,

[Bug rtl-optimization/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- Almost identical problem is reported in PR 67609, but with: (insn 7 6 0 (set (subreg:DF (reg/v:TI 90 [ v ]) 0) (reg/v:DF 88 [ b ])) pr67609.c:8 -1 (nil))

[Bug c/41517] Unexpected behaviour of #pragma in statement context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41517 Jan Echternach changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.echternach at de dot gbs.com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/67794] [6 regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67794 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- I have proposed a fix on the mailing list: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg00858.html

[Bug c/64765] [OpenACC] Bogus "'copy' is not valid for '#pragma acc kernels loop'"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64765 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/64880] OpenACC gcc/g++ Discrepancy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64880 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67557] [4.9/5/6 regression] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557 --- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Oct 8 14:42:02 2015 New Revision: 228602 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228602=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67557 * call.c (is_base_field_ref): New.

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 --- Comment #15 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Andreas Arnez from comment #11) > Any news here? AFAIK the problem still exists. I still think the solution in comment #10 is the least invasive without being a hack. But someone (you?)

[Bug libstdc++/65913] [5 Regression] Linking failure without -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65913 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/64868] C front-end rejects valid syntax.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64868 --- Comment #5 from Thomas Schwinge --- Anything left to be done here?

[Bug debug/67192] [6 Regression] Backward-goto in loop can get wrong line number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67192 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #14 from Manuel

[Bug libstdc++/65913] [5 Regression] Linking failure without -latomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65913 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Oct 8 16:54:23 2015 New Revision: 228615 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228615=gcc=rev Log: Backport PR libstdc++/65913 fix from mainline. Handle alignment in

[Bug target/67896] New: Inconsistent behaviour between C and C++ for types poly8x8_t and poly16x8_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67896 Bug ID: 67896 Summary: Inconsistent behaviour between C and C++ for types poly8x8_t and poly16x8_t Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/67876] ICE when compiling Firefox 38

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876 --- Comment #2 from Georg Koppen --- Created attachment 36464 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36464=edit Preprocessed file for Unified_cpp_certverifier0.cpp Attached is the compressed preprocessed file. FWIW: GCC 5.2.0 is

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #31 from boger at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: boger Date: Thu Oct 8 19:21:45 2015 New Revision: 228623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228623=gcc=rev Log: Backport of rev 228311 PR target/66870 *

[Bug libgcc/67897] [mingw] Error compile for create libraries static in single user (2 CRITICAL BUGS)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67897 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67900] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Interface bug: Binding parameters to C causes a compiler segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67900 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/67900] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Interface bug: Binding parameters to C causes a compiler segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67900 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/67899] New: build failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67899 Bug ID: 67899 Summary: build failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/67901] New: [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67901 Bug ID: 67901 Summary: [concepts] overloading bug when considered more specialized vs more constrained Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/67900] New: Interface bug: Binding parameters to C causes a compiler segmentation fault.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67900 Bug ID: 67900 Summary: Interface bug: Binding parameters to C causes a compiler segmentation fault. Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libgcc/67902] New: Undefined negation in __divdi3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67902 Bug ID: 67902 Summary: Undefined negation in __divdi3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug c++/67898] New: rejects-valid on overloaded function as non-type template argument of dependent type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898 Bug ID: 67898 Summary: rejects-valid on overloaded function as non-type template argument of dependent type Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/67903] New: std::locale compatibility between gcc4.9 and gcc5.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67903 Bug ID: 67903 Summary: std::locale compatibility between gcc4.9 and gcc5.1 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgcc/67897] [mingw] Error compile for create libraries static in single user (2 CRITICAL BUGS)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67897 --- Comment #2 from RM Beer --- ok, now pasted here. LOG 1: x86_64-w64-mingw32/libgcc/config.log: This file contains any messages produced by compilers while running configure, to aid debugging if configure makes a mistake. It was created

[Bug target/67383] reload_cse_simplify_operands fails on ARMV7-M

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67383 Vladimir Makarov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/65779] [5/6 Regression] undefined local symbol on powerpc [regression]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779 baoshan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pangbw at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from

[Bug c++/67904] New: g++ crashes and asks for bugreport

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904 Bug ID: 67904 Summary: g++ crashes and asks for bugreport Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/67891] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr43300.c (internal compiler error) on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67891 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/25470] [4.9/5/6 Regression] fixincludes/ subdirectory not cleaned by "make distclean"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25470 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/67905] New: running the libstdc++ testsuite as root removed /dev/null from my system

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67905 Bug ID: 67905 Summary: running the libstdc++ testsuite as root removed /dev/null from my system Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libgcc/67897] New: [mingw] Error compile for create libraries static in single user (2 CRITICAL BUGS)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67897 Bug ID: 67897 Summary: [mingw] Error compile for create libraries static in single user (2 CRITICAL BUGS) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED