https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
Bug ID: 67991
Summary: Pointer to function with internal linkage not being
allowed, when it should be
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
--- Comment #16 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I checked https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01438.html and the
failure is gone.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67987
--- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> I have a patch that I'm testing. For the code in the
> intial report I get
>
> troutmask:sgk[238] gfc6 -c g6.f90
> g6.f90:2:15:
>
> character(-8) :: c =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #1 from Jacob McIntosh ---
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2014/n4268.html
This is the relevant standard change (as mentioned in the isocpp thread i
linked)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67988
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67993
Bug ID: 67993
Summary: ice in compare_operand with -O2 -march=native
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67987
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 06:03:06PM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67987
>
> --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67996
Bug ID: 67996
Summary: std::ios_base::seekdir raises -Wswitch with Clang
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
i_endproc
.LFE0:
.size __x86_rdrand, .-__x86_rdrand
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20151016 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 pr67985]$
There should be a warning since rdrand isn't supported on Intel Core 2.
and
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20151016 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
[hjl@gnu-6 pr67985]$
There should be a warning since rdrand isn't supported on Intel Core 2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
--- Comment #1 from Joshua Cranmer ---
Created attachment 36531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36531=edit
Implementation of Hawick's algorithm in C++
This is test code I wrote to figure out why I couldn't reproduce the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67997
Bug ID: 67997
Summary: GCC 5.2.0 fails to link std::cout overloaded functions
when -std=c++11 option is used
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67990
Bug ID: 67990
Summary: compare() does not sort null characters in locale
collation order
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992
Bug ID: 67992
Summary: GCOV takes an absurdly long time to process a file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67987
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67988 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jacob McIntosh from comment #4)
> It looks like this is supposed to be a c++1y/1z feature (post c++-14
> anyway)... and it looks like it's not implemented yet in gcc. Same errors
> for me with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Roelofs ---
I've filed the corresponding binutils report here:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19145
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67993
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871
Jonathan Roelofs changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67997
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67998
Bug ID: 67998
Summary: redundant test for 0 when also checking inequality
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Are you sure this is not C++14 feature.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try -std=c++1y or -std=c++1z .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #4 from Jacob McIntosh ---
It looks like this is supposed to be a c++1y/1z feature (post c++-14 anyway)...
and it looks like it's not implemented yet in gcc. Same errors for me with
-std=c++1y and also with -std=c++1z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed on the trunk with -std=c++17 . Since this is a new feature of C++17,
it is not as important as other bugs in the C++ front-end at this stage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67981
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66199
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61830
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67439
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67337
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66494
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.0 |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
--- Comment #1 from inferrna ---
Created attachment 36523
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36523=edit
*.i file compressed
Additional info:
My system is Ubuntu 15.10
gcc --version
gcc-5.real (Ubuntu 5.2.1-22ubuntu1) 5.2.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67978
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67383
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67600
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK,
the problem is that we loss offset of 64. This happens in get_dynamic_type
where we restrict to inner class and get difference in between offset inside
restricted type and offset from basic instance
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67979
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 67978 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67576
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67900
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60403
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24306
Bug 24306 depends on bug 34010, which changed state.
Bug 34010 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ppc64 bad stdargs codegen for zero sized
objects
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34010
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65996
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67984
Bug ID: 67984
Summary: "internal compiler error:" with lot of loop
optimizations enabled
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #18 from Jack Howarth ---
The upstream commit...
https://github.com/ivmai/bdwgc/commit/faef04e7cb3741163dfdf65900ef5d2a0530be0f
2011-02-09 Ivan Maidanski
* src/atomic_ops.c (AO_USE_NO_SIGNALS,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65889
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66325
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66764
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67876
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67926
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Oct 16 07:06:11 2015
New Revision: 228861
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228861=gcc=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-10-16 Paolo Carlini
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67921
--- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry for slow response, I will have a look.
Thanks,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67257
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66223
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66738
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67983
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67657
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66858
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66171
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67977
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65889
vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
Bug ID: 67985
Summary: -miamcu -march=haswell should allow x87 and AVX
instructions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67975
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
I have a prototype that handles (extended) diamonds. With this FRE1 is able to
optimize the check to 1 (with -O -ffast-math).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66171
--- Comment #1 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Yes canonical RTL is retained and is LSHIFT here.
May be need to adjust the machine descriptions to be based on shift.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Maybe r224201 ?
It is
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Jun 7 21:30:58 2015 UTC (4 months, 1 week ago)
Changed paths: 13 (showing only 10; show all)
Log Message:
* alias.c (get_alias_set):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P4 |P2
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab ---
The patch in #c6 survives bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67657
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #15)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14)
> > Fixed.
>
> I was actually waiting for feedback/confirmation from Adrian... but well ..
> yeah, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67975
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg01580.html
Hope that fixes all cases you ran into.
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo