[Bug target/68028] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point", with "-flto" on different variant of powerpc like -mcpu=e6500, 8540, 8548, e500m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 --- Comment #4 from martin --- $ ./powerpc-pc-linux-gcc test.c -mcpu=e6500 does that work? (without LTO?) Yes, It works without -flto.

[Bug target/68028] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point", with "-flto" on different variant of powerpc like -mcpu=e6500, 8540, 8548, e500m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 --- Comment #2 from martin --- Hi Richard, You mean to say that there is no issue with LTO, the error is only due to addition flags for particular -mcpu. I am only getting this issue when I passs -flto option with -mcpu=e6500. Without -flto

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #5 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > With the patch in comment 2, bootstrap completed without any problem. > > Preliminary tests for g++ and asan > > === g++ Summary for

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Further tests for ubsan and gcc in progress. g++/ubsan === g++ Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes2950 # of expected failures 49 # of unsupported

[Bug rtl-optimization/67635] [SH] ifcvt missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67635 --- Comment #3 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #2) > > Perhaps we can consider teaching cse to not transform these kinds of > expressions (c ? x : x + a) if the target has a store_flag/addcc instruction > of the

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- With the patch in comment 2, bootstrap completed without any problem. Preliminary tests for g++ and asan === g++ Summary for unix/-m64 === # of expected passes1007 # of

[Bug target/68028] Compilation error "lto1: error: target attribute or pragma changes single precision floating point", with "-flto" on different variant of powerpc like -mcpu=e6500, 8540, 8548, e500m

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/67991] Pointer to function with internal linkage not being allowed, when it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67991 --- Comment #7 from Jacob McIntosh --- Per a thread on the isocpp group(linked in the OP), N4268's wording was incorporated shortly before C++14's ratification, so it's unclear to me why this is a C++1z feature and not a C++14 feature.

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz

[Bug testsuite/67948] xor-and.c needs updating after r228661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948 --- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Oct 22 05:12:32 2015 New Revision: 229161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229161=gcc=rev Log: [PATCH][ARM] Fix for testcase after r228661 This patch addresses PR-67948

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #8 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 36556 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36556=edit The patch I've posted to gcc-patches ML for review.

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 36556 [details] > The patch I've posted to gcc-patches ML for review. I have not tested the part "removes -lc++abi flag for UBSan on Darwin" (later tonight). Comment from Iain

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5/6 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #13) > The runtime version of the test still fails: > > > gcc -O2 -pr67609.c > > $ ./a.out > Aborted > > set_lower: > .LFB518: > movdqa reg(%rip), %xmm1

[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko --- I wonder if the fix would be just output patterns adjustment (just like here: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63939)?

[Bug sanitizer/68042] [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55986] RHS of logical operators may render LHS unevaluated in constant-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55986 --- Comment #5 from Shafik Yaghmour --- It looks like this case from this Stackoverflow question http://stackoverflow.com/q/32920229/1708801 is possibly related: int main(int argc, char**) { constexpr int a = argc * 0; } gcc treats `argc *

[Bug sanitizer/68042] New: [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68042 Bug ID: 68042 Summary: [6 Regression] c-c++-common/asan/(memcmp-1.c|sanity-check-pure-c-1.c) failures on x86_64-apple-darwin14 after r229111 Product: gcc

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I'll do that later today. pr68042.

[Bug c/68024] Diagnose variadic functions defined without prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68024 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/68024] Diagnose variadic functions defined without prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68024 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Oct 21 17:30:20 2015 New Revision: 229131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229131=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68024 * c-decl.c (start_function): Warn about vararg

[Bug c/68024] Diagnose variadic functions defined without prototypes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68024 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/67968] go1: internal compiler error: in write_specific_type_functions, at go/gofrontend/types.cc:1812

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67968 --- Comment #2 from gong_su at hotmail dot com --- Hi Dominik, the command that failed with go1 internal error has a lot of .go files specified so I don't know which one actually caused the problem. So instead I can send you the entire Ethereum

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Oct 21 18:00:30 2015 New Revision: 229132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229132=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/67966 * tree.c (verify_type): Verify that TYPE_MODE

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5/6 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 --- Comment #17 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #16) > reload has traditionally removed subregs of hardregs and passes after reload > have depended on that behaviour. Doing something similar in lra is >

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5/6 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #15

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 Harald Anlauf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gmx dot de --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/67939] ICE on using data with negative substring range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67939 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #26 from Giuseppe Ottaviano --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #25) > There was a G++ bug (now fixed) that made void_t not work, try this > alternative version: > > template< class... > struct __voider { using type =

[Bug target/68018] [6 Regression] ICE: in ix86_compute_frame_layout, at config/i386/i386.c:11308 with -mstackrealign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68018 --- Comment #5 from Zdenek Sojka --- I did a test run with r229094 + the patch applied, and there are no ICEs. All the ICEs archived from older runs are gone, and no new ones are introduced (eg. everything that failed in the past now compiles

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Giuseppe Ottaviano from comment #26) > Do you use partial specializations as performance optimizations (thus > equivalent to the general case) in libstdc++? No, but doing so for

[Bug middle-end/66214] [6 Regression] ICE verify_type failed with -O0 -g via gen_type_die_with_usage's dwarf2out.c:20250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214 --- Comment #16 from Magnus Fromreide --- Should the importance of this bug be raised? It is a bit embarrasing that the program #include ice's

[Bug debug/68010] internal compiler error: in tree_to_shwi, at tree.h:3661

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68010 --- Comment #6 from Andrey Chistyakov --- I simplified the Marcus' code: Ghoort@blade /cygdrive/c/Projects/bug $ cat c2.cpp namespace boost {} template struct C { }; template class StructDecoder : C { public: StructDecoder() {

[Bug driver/68043] New: many undocumented options, missing punctuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68043 Bug ID: 68043 Summary: many undocumented options, missing punctuation Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug driver/68043] many undocumented options, missing punctuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68043 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Roelofs --- Created attachment 36557 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36557=edit fix implementation (gcc) I've implemented the fix you described in the binutils thread, and it does in fact clear

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Roelofs --- Created attachment 36558 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36558=edit fix implementation (binutils)

[Bug c/68044] New: ceil() with -O3 and -masm=intel fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68044 Bug ID: 68044 Summary: ceil() with -O3 and -masm=intel fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/67056] [5/6 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 --- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka --- Author: hubicka Date: Wed Oct 21 21:14:06 2015 New Revision: 229148 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229148=gcc=rev Log: PR ipa/67056 * ipa-polymorphic-call.c (possible_placement_new): If

[Bug target/67871] LTO falis for ARM big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67871 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Roelofs --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-10/msg02177.html

[Bug fortran/67939] ICE on using data with negative substring range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67939 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Wed Oct 21 21:40:05 2015 New Revision: 229153 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229153=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-21 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug c++/61259] Spurious "ISO C++ forbids zero-size array" warning with -pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61259 ilja.j.honkonen at nasa dot gov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ilja.j.honkonen at nasa

[Bug driver/68043] many undocumented options, missing punctuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68043 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Oct 21 22:24:41 2015 New Revision: 229155 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229155=gcc=rev Log: Improve --help output to generate references to option aliases. gcc/ PR

[Bug middle-end/68046] -ftrapv doesn't catch leaq-based overflows on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c/64955] RFE: have -Wformat suggest the correct format string to use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64955 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/66781] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with wrong enum within class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66781 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68045] New: [concepts] segfault in contains_struct_check ../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:2971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68045 Bug ID: 68045 Summary: [concepts] segfault in contains_struct_check ../../gcc/gcc/tree.h:2971 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/68043] many undocumented options, missing punctuation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68043 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68044] ceil() with -O3 and -masm=intel fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67966] [6 regression] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:282

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67966 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68046] New: -ftrapv doesn't catch leaq-based overflows on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046 Bug ID: 68046 Summary: -ftrapv doesn't catch leaq-based overflows on x86-64 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/67847] ICE on (invalid) nested enum declaration on x86_64-linux-gnu in is_ancestor, at cp/name-lookup.c:2771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67847 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 21 22:52:45 2015 New Revision: 229156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229156=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2015-10-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/66781] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with wrong enum within class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66781 --- Comment #1 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Oct 21 22:52:45 2015 New Revision: 229156 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229156=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2015-10-21 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/67847] ICE on (invalid) nested enum declaration on x86_64-linux-gnu in is_ancestor, at cp/name-lookup.c:2771

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67847 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5/6 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #29 from Ramana Radhakrishnan --- Author: ramana Date: Thu Oct 22 04:26:50 2015 New Revision: 229160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229160=gcc=rev Log: [Patch AArch64 63304] Fix issue with global state. Jiong pointed out

[Bug c++/68047] New: diagnose placement new with misaligned buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68047 Bug ID: 68047 Summary: diagnose placement new with misaligned buffer Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68047] diagnose placement new with misaligned buffer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68047 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68044] ceil() with -O3 and -masm=intel fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68044 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I don't think use of -masm=intel is within the scope of what glibc wants to support for inline asm in its headers. Rather, GCC should be made to inline the relevant function if it doesn't

[Bug middle-end/65315] incorrect alignment of local variable with aligned attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65315 Steve Ellcey changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68046] -ftrapv doesn't catch leaq-based overflows on x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68046 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I wonder if it would be possible to map -ftrapv to something like -fsanitize=signed-integer-overflow -fsanitize-undefined-trap-on-error (whatever is most closely equivalent to -ftrapv and

[Bug fortran/47879] wrong-debug issue with multiple USE-assoc of variables of other translation units

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47879 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/47030] !GCC$ Attributes do not work for COMMON variables in procedures and BLOCK DATA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47030 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/68016] ASan doesn't catch overflow in globals when COPY relocation is involved.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68016 --- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Ok, I guess won't fix here.

[Bug bootstrap/68048] New: Unable to compile ./host-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/version.c! Can't pass preprocessor strings!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68048 Bug ID: 68048 Summary: Unable to compile ./host-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc/version.c! Can't pass preprocessor strings! Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug ipa/67056] [5 regression] Wrong code generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67056 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|UNCONFIRMED Summary|[5/6

[Bug tree-optimization/68031] [6 Regression] cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031 Mihail Popa changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED --- Comment #7 from Mihail Popa

[Bug fortran/68040] New: [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Bug ID: 68040 Summary: [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/66999] Missing comma in lambda capture causes internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66999 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #1 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Yes, this is mine.

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Mikael, yes, you are absolutely right. I mixed those two up, sorry. My head is in CUDA programming currently and that's keeping it quite busy. Feel free to review though :-) Regards, Andre

[Bug c++/66583] incorrect implicitly-defined move constructor for class with anonymous union and NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66583 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 21 09:27:18 2015 New Revision: 229122 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229122=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/66583 * init.c (innermost_aggr_scope): New.

[Bug c++/67557] [4.9/5/6 regression] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Oct 21 09:27:12 2015 New Revision: 229121 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229121=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/67557 * call.c (is_base_field_ref): New.

[Bug c++/66583] incorrect implicitly-defined move constructor for class with anonymous union and NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66583 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Indeed, there is an issue with outer-loop unswitching - it should not be performed for infinite loops. But if we slightly modify test if finite outer-loop we will get the same error: char a; void fn1(char

[Bug c++/66897] ICE when using remove_reference with type tagged with __may_alias__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66897 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|apfokin at

[Bug fortran/55207] [F08] Variables declared in the main program should implicitly get the SAVE attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55207 Janne Blomqvist changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jb at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19

[Bug fortran/67171] [6 regression] sourced allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug tree-optimization/68036] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68036 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68031] [6 Regression] cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #6

[Bug c++/66781] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with wrong enum within class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66781 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/68041] New: [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 Bug ID: 68041 Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 --- Comment #2 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 36555 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36555=edit First version of the fix. Dominique, I'm sorry about that. Could you please try attached patch? There may be other

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #5 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Hi HJ I added my evaluation to bug. It looks like my changes are not responsible for ICE. 2015-10-20 13:20 GMT+03:00 hjl.tools at gmail dot com : >

[Bug target/66326] Floating point exception with -mfpmath=387 and -fcilkplus.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66326 ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com

[Bug fortran/68040] [5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68040 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug bootstrap/68041] [6 Regression] Bootstrap broken on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at revision r229119

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68041 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely --- There was a G++ bug (now fixed) that made void_t not work, try this alternative version: template< class... > struct __voider { using type = void; }; template< class... _T0toN > using __void_t = typename

[Bug sanitizer/63958] [5 Regression] bootstrap failure in the sanitizer libs on sparc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63958 --- Comment #14 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Author: chefmax Date: Wed Oct 21 07:44:35 2015 New Revision: 229113 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229113=gcc=rev Log: libsanitizer/ PR sanitizer/63958 Reapply: 2014-10-14

[Bug bootstrap/63888] [5 Regression] bootstrap failed when configured with -with-build-config=bootstrap-asan --disable-werror

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888 --- Comment #41 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Author: chefmax Date: Wed Oct 21 07:47:54 2015 New Revision: 229114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229114=gcc=rev Log: libsanitizer/ PR bootstrap/63888 Reapply: 2015-02-20

[Bug c++/67904] g++ crashes and asks for bugreport

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com,

[Bug tree-optimization/68031] [6 Regression] cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68036] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68036 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5/6 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- The runtime version of the test still fails: --cut here-- #include __m128d reg = { 2.0, 4.0 }; void __attribute__((noinline)) set_lower (double b) { double v[2]; _mm_store_pd(v, reg); v[0] = b;

[Bug tree-optimization/68026] [6 Regression] Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68026] [6 Regression] Regression in GCC-6.0.0's optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68026 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 21 07:56:54 2015 New Revision: 229117 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229117=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-21 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/68031] [6 Regression] cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Wed Oct 21 08:08:05 2015 New Revision: 229118 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229118=gcc=rev Log: 2015-10-21 Richard Biener PR middle-end/68031

[Bug ipa/68035] ipa performance issue when no procedures are present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/68035] [5/6 Regression] ipa performance issue when no procedures are present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog Target

  1   2   >