[Bug c++/68071] Generic lambda variadic argument pack cannot be empty

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68071 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC

[Bug ada/68179] Missing error on Default_Value and Default_Component_Value aspects specified for derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68179 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug libstdc++/68190] [5/6 Regression] iterator mix up with set::find and heterogenous lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68190 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/68029] Strange behavior of -fdiagnostics-color option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029 --- Comment #7 from Jiří Engelthaler --- Created attachment 36638 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36638=edit diag_color.patch fdiagnostics_color_idx can by on first place so comparing as > 1 will miss it. There should be >=

[Bug fortran/68196] New: [6.0.0] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196 Bug ID: 68196 Summary: [6.0.0] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ada/68179] Missing error on Default_Value and Default_Component_Value aspects specified for derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68179 --- Comment #4 from Troy --- You are correct that RM 3.5. 56.3/3 says the same for Default_Value, that it shall only be applied to full_type_declaration. So obviously full_type_declaration here must include derived types, or the whole feature

[Bug target/68192] AIX libstdc++ TLS symbols not exported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Is this a regression?

[Bug target/65251] sh4: internal compiler error: Bus error when compiling cpp-netlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65251 --- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5) > Hmm, the build now failed due to "out of memory" apparently [1]: > > [ 7%] Building CXX object >

[Bug c/68193] _Generic -Woverflow false alarm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68193 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug tree-optimization/68189] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36641 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36641=edit cse2 dump containing the 'bad' RTL attaching the cse2 dump.

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49429] [4.7 Regression] dse.c change (r175063) causes execution failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49429 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Alexandre Oliva from comment #19) > Would you guys with access to the affected platforms please let me know in > case revision 229696, just installed in the trunk, regresses this? Yes, I

[Bug fortran/68196] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on function result with procedure pointer component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68196 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36640 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36640=edit cprop dump before the suspected bad transformation Confirmed the failure. However I think the cited

[Bug target/68192] AIX libstdc++ TLS symbols not exported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- This is a regression, but only indirectly a GCC regression.

[Bug target/67657] [SH][5/6 Regression]: internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2396 when compiling libjpeg-turbo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67657 --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #17) > I have scheduled a rebuild of libjpeg-turbo now. The package is now waiting > for the next free buildd. Please have a look at the package log here [1]

[Bug target/67657] [SH][5/6 Regression]: internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2396 when compiling libjpeg-turbo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67657 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo --- OK, thanks for checking.

[Bug c++/68188] Ambiguous code gets compiled successfully when class and its namespace have the same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, |

[Bug target/68178] [arm] Relative address expressions bind at as-time, even if symbol is weak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68178 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug target/67657] [SH][5/6 Regression]: internal compiler error: in cselib_record_set, at cselib.c:2396 when compiling libjpeg-turbo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67657 --- Comment #19 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #18) > Sorry, I don't think anybody will remember to keep polling the build > machines to monitor the build of this package. You don't have to. The package

[Bug fortran/66465] Procedure pointer component & non-component interpreted as different type or kind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66465 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9.2,5.1.0,6.0.0] |Procedure pointer component

[Bug tree-optimization/68189] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65751] Bogus in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65751 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I don't understand comment 2 > And I think an English error message that points out the place > of the error is more useful than a native-language one which doesn't, > so I would favor back porting.

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #25 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Nonetheless, as a work-around, you could use: > >unsigned int offset = loc->nextc - loc->lb->line; >location = linemap_position_for_loc_and_offset (line_table, >

[Bug libstdc++/68197] New: negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 Bug ID: 68197 Summary: negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68199] New: avr-gcc rise a warning when defining a custom interruption

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68199 Bug ID: 68199 Summary: avr-gcc rise a warning when defining a custom interruption Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/68190] [5/6 Regression] iterator mix up with set::find and heterogenous lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68190 --- Comment #9 from Howard Hinnant --- Untested fix suggested: #if __cplusplus > 201103L template auto

[Bug target/68149] [6 Regression][ARM] ICE when splitting unaligned DImode load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug target/68149] [6 Regression][ARM] ICE when splitting unaligned DImode load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ktkachov at gcc dot

[Bug libstdc++/68200] g++ 5.2 optimizes out pointer assignment in libstdc++ mt_allocator freelist destructor, causing crash at global-dtor time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68200 --- Comment #1 from Joshua Oreman --- Correction: the original bug was PR 52604, not PR 52064.

[Bug libstdc++/68200] New: g++ 5.2 optimizes out pointer assignment in libstdc++ mt_allocator freelist destructor, causing crash at global-dtor time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68200 Bug ID: 68200 Summary: g++ 5.2 optimizes out pointer assignment in libstdc++ mt_allocator freelist destructor, causing crash at global-dtor time Product: gcc

[Bug c/68162] [5/6 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67982] Incorrect -Wunused-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982 --- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele --- (In reply to dominiq from comment #7) > Author: dominiq > Date: Tue Nov 3 18:03:38 2015 > New Revision: 229716 thanks... just doing this myself :-)

[Bug c++/68202] New: Missed diagnostic: rvalue reference allowed in exception-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68202 Bug ID: 68202 Summary: Missed diagnostic: rvalue reference allowed in exception-specifier Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/68201] New: alloc_size attribute and memory pools

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68201 Bug ID: 68201 Summary: alloc_size attribute and memory pools Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug fortran/66680] [5 Regression] ICE with openmp, a loop and a type bound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66680 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug fortran/67982] Incorrect -Wunused-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982 --- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Tue Nov 3 18:03:38 2015 New Revision: 229716 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229716=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-03 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/67982] Incorrect -Wunused-function warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67982 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67882] surprising offsetof result on an invalid array member without diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67882 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 3 18:53:19 2015 New Revision: 229717 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229717=gcc=rev Log: PR c++-common/67882 * c-family/c-common.h (fold_offsetof_1): Add argument.

[Bug c/67882] surprising offsetof result on an invalid array member without diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67882 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68202] Missed diagnostic: rvalue reference allowed in exception-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68202 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug c++/68204] g++ fails to expand a template parameter pack in with variable templates in a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68204 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #29 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have tried the following patch --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c 2015-10-29 18:20:14.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c2015-11-03 19:39:39.0 +0100 @@ -285,7 +285,11 @@

[Bug c++/68203] New: Аbout infinite compilation time on struct with nested array of pairs with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68203 Bug ID: 68203 Summary: Аbout infinite compilation time on struct with nested array of pairs with -std=c++11 Product: gcc Version: 5.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/68204] New: g++ fails to expand a template parameter pack in with variable templates in a function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68204 Bug ID: 68204 Summary: g++ fails to expand a template parameter pack in with variable templates in a function Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libobjc/24775] libobjc should not include GCC's target headers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24775 --- Comment #7 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: tbsaunde Date: Tue Nov 3 22:43:22 2015 New Revision: 229727 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229727=gcc=rev Log: remove usage of ROUND_TYPE_SIZE from encoding.c gcc got rid of

[Bug c++/68170] Declaring friend template class template in C++1z produces error: specialization of ‘template class A’ must appear at namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68170 --- Comment #1 from Mohammad Alaggan --- In gcc-6-20151101, the attached example compiles correctly. However, the same problem manifests in this example: // { dg-do compile } // { dg-options "-std=c++1z" } template concept bool C() { return

[Bug rtl-optimization/68205] New: ICE compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c with -fno-common on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68205 Bug ID: 68205 Summary: ICE compiling gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-2.c with -fno-common on arm-none-eabi Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/68190] [5/6 Regression] iterator mix up with set::find and heterogenous lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68190 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Howard's suggestion is approved if someone tests it, I only have my phone and no machine I can build or test on.

[Bug c++/68207] New: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5469 caused by nested struct initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68207 Bug ID: 68207 Summary: internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5469 caused by nested struct initialization Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status:

[Bug preprocessor/68206] New: ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68206 Bug ID: 68206 Summary: ICE: unimplemented: unexpected AST of kind loop_expr in potential_constant_expression_1 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/68029] Strange behavior of -fdiagnostics-color option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029 --- Comment #9 from Jiří Engelthaler --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8) > > Good catch! In principle your patch seems correct. I think you are only > missing a testcase. This patch is small enough to not require a copyright >

[Bug rtl-optimization/67753] [6 Regression] FAIL: cxg1005, cxg2002, cxg2006, cxg2007, cxg2008, cxg2018, cxg2019 and cxg2020

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67753 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/59832] [c++11] ICE in reshape_init_class with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59832 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.am.inuyasha at gmail dot com

[Bug c++/68207] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:5469 caused by nested struct initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68207 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/21643] GCC fails to merge ranges in comparison.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21643 Gilbie Rivas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rivasgilbie121 at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/68203] Аbout infinite compilation time on struct with nested array of pairs with -std=c++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/62007] default(none) conflicts with iteration variable in openmp parallel loop simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62007 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #27) > > At some moment, the Fortran FE sets DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION() on a tree, > > probably using loc->lb->line. Finding out where this happens probably

[Bug libstdc++/68190] [5/6 Regression] iterator mix up with set::find and heterogenous lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68190 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Nik Bougalis from comment #6) > I don't follow why an auto return is used, instead of simply > iterator/const_iterator which is the required return value per the > documentation I've read.

[Bug fortran/63861] OpenACC coarray ICE (also with OpenMP?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The ICE is gone and between revisions r229303 and r229482 compiling the test gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/goacc/coarray.f95 with '-fcoarray=single -fopenacc' gives

[Bug fortran/63861] OpenACC coarray ICE (also with OpenMP?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug ada/68179] Missing error on Default_Value and Default_Component_Value aspects specified for derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68179 --- Comment #3 from Troy --- RM 3.6. 22.2/3 says that Default_Component_Value should only be specified for a full_type_declaration. I.e. not for derived types. Is this not correct?

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'm on the road the rest of this will, but will definitely take a look at this ASAP.

[Bug fortran/51024] OpenMP: ICE with type(c_ptr) in private()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51024 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||06needhamt at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/59577] OpenMP: ICE with type(c_ptr) in private()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59577 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm, aarch64|arm, aarch64,x86_64, ppc64 ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] New: Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 Bug ID: 68198 Summary: Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/68029] Strange behavior of -fdiagnostics-color option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68029 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jiří Engelthaler from comment #7) > Created attachment 36638 [details] > diag_color.patch > > fdiagnostics_color_idx can by on first place so comparing as > 1 will miss > it. > There

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #27 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > At some moment, the Fortran FE sets DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION() on a tree, > probably using loc->lb->line. Finding out where this happens probably > requires a bit of debugging. /* Set the backend

[Bug tree-optimization/67742] 3rd-level restrict ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67742 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Just this patch left: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg00202.html

[Bug fortran/38724] Segfault caused by derived-type with allocatable component in OpenMP private clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38724 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/40876] OpenMP private variable referenced in a statement function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40876 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/52531] [OOP] Compilation fails with polymorphic dummy argument and OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #9 from

[Bug fortran/54224] Warn for unused internal procedures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54224 --- Comment #26 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #25) > > Nonetheless, as a work-around, you could use: > > > >unsigned int offset = loc->nextc - loc->lb->line; > >location =

[Bug c++/68184] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Exception from a virtual function does not get caught

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68184 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68189] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu by RTL if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug rtl-optimization/68189] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu by RTL if-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68189 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Symptom in the asm is that %ecx is used uninitialized.

[Bug ada/68179] Default_Component_Value aspect wrongly ignored on derived type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68179 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|accepts-invalid |wrong-code Summary|Missing