[Bug middle-end/68292] [6 regression] ICE in copy_blkmode_to_reg, at expr.c:2277

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68292 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/68292] [6 regression] ICE in copy_blkmode_to_reg, at expr.c:2277

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68292 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68162] [5/6 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 --- Comment #10 from Joseph S. Myers --- I have verified that the patch in comment#7, (a) on its own and (b) together with my patch, does not cause any regressions on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. My inclination would be that this patch should go in,

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #18 from Gary Funck --- (In reply to Gary Funck from comment #17) > We're seeing this ICE on x86-64, while building the 32-bit libgfortran. > We're building the target libraries with -O3 with GCC compiler checks > enabled. Taking

[Bug middle-end/67220] GCC fails to properly handle libcall symbol visibility of built functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67220 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36697|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c/67784] Incorrect parsing when using declarations in for loops and typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67784 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/67784] Incorrect parsing when using declarations in for loops and typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67784 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Nov 12 21:07:04 2015 New Revision: 230273 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230273=gcc=rev Log: PR c/67784 * c-parser.c (c_parser_for_statement): Reclassify the

[Bug fortran/68318] ICE on duplicate entry declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68318 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68294] gcc cannot deduce (a | b) != 0 from (a != 0 && b != 0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68294 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 Zdenek Sojka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/68305] [6 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (ssa_name) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/68304] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/950612-1.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops -fpeel-loops -ftracer -finline-functions (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68304 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |rtl-optimization Target

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/68268] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68268 --- Comment #6 from isearcher at 126 dot com --- I "make distclean",and make again. Everything goes well. And gfortran is made. The problem is solved. thanks for the advice.

[Bug fortran/68268] configure: error: GNU Fortran is not working;

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68268 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I "make distclean",and make again. Everything goes well. And gfortran is made. > The problem is solved. thanks for the advice. You're welcome! Further advice, 4.8.0 is quite old and unsupported:

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu |aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,

[Bug c++/68308] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68308 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68296] [6 regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68296 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/58497] SLP vectorizes identical operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58497 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 12 09:00:37 2015 New Revision: 230216 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230216=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-12 Richard Biener PR

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from TC

[Bug libstdc++/68303] performance: unordered_map up to 7x speedup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68303 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com ---

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > Does this patch > > diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c > index 2ac3828..8b57875 100644 > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.c > +++

[Bug rtl-optimization/68298] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68305] [6 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (ssa_name) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68305 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug middle-end/68296] [6 regression] ICE in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68296 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/68300] Bogus -Wnon-virtual-dtor warning with protected base class constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68300 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- From class.c: 1629 /* Return true, iff class T has a non-virtual destructor that is 1630accessible from outside the class heirarchy (i.e. is public, or 1631there's a suitable friend. */ 1632

[Bug c++/68308] New: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68308 Bug ID: 68308 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/68307] [mingw32] Missing enum values in std::errc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68307 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.3 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener

[Bug c++/68309] New: [C++14] Expanding a captured parameter pack with std::forward<decltype(args)>(args) fails.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309 Bug ID: 68309 Summary: [C++14] Expanding a captured parameter pack with std::forward(args) fails. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/68290] g++.dg/concepts/auto1.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68269] [5/6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr68129_1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269 Gary Funck changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gary at intrepid dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug fortran/68318] ICE on duplicate entry declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68318 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #19 from Gary Funck --- We see similar failure an x86-64 opensuse VM in the 32-bit libgfortran build but on a different file: eoshift.c. After removing the .lo and .o files and re-running make, the build completed without error. As

[Bug libfortran/68115] [6 Regression] Unsatisfied symbol "__sync_lock_test_and_set_4" in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/hppa64-hp-hpux11.11/./libgomp/../libgfortran/.libs/libgfortran.sl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68115 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from John David

[Bug libstdc++/68323] New: chrono reference to ‘literals’ namespace is ambiguous when using gnu-versioned-namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68323 Bug ID: 68323 Summary: chrono reference to ‘literals’ namespace is ambiguous when using gnu-versioned-namespace Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #17 from Gary Funck --- We're seeing this ICE on x86-64, while building the 32-bit libgfortran. We're building the target libraries with -O3 with GCC compiler checks enabled. libtool: compile:

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 36699 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36699=edit tree dump It is compiled with -O2 -mx32.

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68290] g++.dg/concepts/auto1.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68290 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/67872] missing -Warray-bounds warning, bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/68318] ICE on duplicate entry declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68318 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Nov 13 00:14:32 2015 New Revision: 230278 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230278=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-12 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug lto/68322] New: -Wodr warning on templates should list the instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68322 Bug ID: 68322 Summary: -Wodr warning on templates should list the instantiation Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > No, even for the false edge we can record proper expressions, see > record_conds and how it handles the cases if the condition was true or false. > record_conds

[Bug fortran/68318] ICE on duplicate entry declarations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68318 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Nov 13 01:11:10 2015 New Revision: 230282 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230282=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-12 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug target/68277] [5/6 Regression] [SH]: error: insn does not satisfy its constraints when compiling erlang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68277 --- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #6) I've changed the predicate of the 2nd operand to arith_operand instead of const_int_operand in your patch and run testsuite. There is one new failure: FAIL:

[Bug driver/67613] spell suggestions for misspelled command line options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67613 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Fri Nov 13 01:59:03 2015 New Revision: 230285 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230285=gcc=rev Log: PR driver/67613 - spell suggestions for misspelled command line options

[Bug c/68310] New: [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 1 in options-save.c:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68310 Bug ID: 68310 Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 1 in options-save.c:3521 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/68309] [5/6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67265] [x86] 'asm' operand has impossible constraints with -fstack-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265 --- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Nov 12 12:01:40 2015 New Revision: 230249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230249=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67265 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug bootstrap/68271] [6 Regression] Boostrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at r230084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68271 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Ny need to keep this PR opened?

[Bug bootstrap/68271] [6 Regression] Boostrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at r230084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68271 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, so that we don't forget to apply a real fix.

[Bug fortran/50221] Allocatable string length fails with array assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50221 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/68291] [6 regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68291 --- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich --- Should be fixed by r230238.

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 --- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich --- Should be fixed by r230238.

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #9 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 12 Nov 2015, uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 > > --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Weigand --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug c++/68288] botched floating-point UDL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68288 --- Comment #2 from lucdanton at free dot fr --- (In reply to TC from comment #1) > This behavior looks correct to me. (Clang behaves identically.) > > 0e1_e+0 is a valid pp-number, so per max munch it must be parsed that way, > as a single

[Bug bootstrap/68271] [6 Regression] Boostrap fails on x86_64-apple-darwin14 at r230084

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68271 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|blocker |normal --- Comment #19 from

[Bug tree-optimization/68305] [6 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (ssa_name) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68305 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Thu Nov 12 12:59:05 2015 New Revision: 230252 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230252=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ PR tree-optimization/68305 * tree-vect-slp.c

[Bug middle-end/68310] [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 1 in options-save.c:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68310 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/68134] [6 Regression] float64x1_t comparison ICE on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68134 Ramana Radhakrishnan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/68312] [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug fortran/63932] posible problem with allocatable character(:)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63932 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/66408] deferred-length character & overloaded assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66408 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68312] New: [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312 Bug ID: 68312 Summary: [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/67265] [x86] 'asm' operand has impossible constraints with -fstack-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265 --- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Nov 12 11:59:23 2015 New Revision: 230247 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230247=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67265 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug target/68286] [6 Regression] ICE: in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68286 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #8 from Ulrich Weigand --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > I think there was some inconsistencies in C vs. C++ FEs in this area (but as > usual I don't remember exactly but I remember Uli complaining about it again >

[Bug c/68311] New: gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- clang compiling gcc trunk dated 20151112 says ../../src/trunk/gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041:73: warning: multiple unsequenced modifications to 'class_id' [-Wunsequenced] Source code

[Bug tree-optimization/68305] [6 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (ssa_name) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68305 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/68309] [5/6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68309 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Without headers: namespace std { template _Tp forward(int); template class initializer_list { int *_M_array; unsigned long _M_len; }; } using namespace std; template void print(Ts... args) {

[Bug fortran/68283] [5/6 Regression] ice: gfc_variable_attr(): Bad array reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68283 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/68312] [6 Regression] Memory leaks in cilkplus

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 36696 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36696=edit valgrind2

[Bug middle-end/68310] [6 Regression] Invalid read of size 1 in options-save.c:3521

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68310 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- PR 67484 ?

[Bug target/68286] [6 Regression] ICE: in wide_int_to_tree, at tree.c:1468

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68286 --- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich --- Should be fixed by r230238.

[Bug target/67265] [x86] 'asm' operand has impossible constraints with -fstack-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67265 --- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Thu Nov 12 11:55:11 2015 New Revision: 230245 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230245=gcc=rev Log: PR target/67265 * config/i386/i386.c

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 Ulrich Weigand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/68325] missing -Warray-bounds on a negative subscript into a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68325 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68326] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68326 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libstdc++/68197] negative index to ios_base::iword lead to unpredictable result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68197 --- Comment #2 from Mickael Guene --- Anyway it's a bad usage since index must come from xalloc. I was unable to find what the specifications say in case of using a negative index (or invalid index), do you have some inputs in this case ?

[Bug tree-optimization/68326] New: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151112 (experimental) [trunk revision 230270] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn2’: small.c:12:27: warning: iteration 2147483638 invokes undefined behavior [-Waggressive-loop

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- I haven't seen this issue since Jason's GC related C++ patches went in: r230201 and r230202. But of course this may well be another statistical fluke.

[Bug c/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, I though common inside {} are sequenced points.

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 --- Comment #7 from Zdenek Sojka --- At least for aarch64, this is fixed.

[Bug tree-optimization/68327] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8562

/local/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151112 (experimental) [trunk revision 230270] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-5.2 -O3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:5:1

[Bug c/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I see what's happening here (and boy it's much better to be debugging with real screens and a good night's sleep). So imagine what happens when you build a thread path and on that path you've got a block

[Bug c++/68313] New: "using" shadows declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68313 Bug ID: 68313 Summary: "using" shadows declaration Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Thu Nov 12 14:02:44 2015 New Revision: 230260 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230260=gcc=rev Log: 2015-11-12 Richard Biener PR

[Bug other/68247] Remove pass_first_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68247 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- RFC: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01492.html

[Bug other/68247] Remove pass_first_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68247 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68192] AIX libstdc++ TLS symbols not exported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68192 Torbjörn Gard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tgard at opentext dot com --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/67478] gcc-5.1.0/gcc-5.2.0 undefined symbol std::__once_callable in AIX 6.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*

[Bug middle-end/68314] New: [6 Regression] Invalid read in build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (graphite-sese-to-poly.c:148)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68314 Bug ID: 68314 Summary: [6 Regression] Invalid read in build_pbb_minimal_scattering_polyhedrons (graphite-sese-to-poly.c:148) Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7) > Can you please attach -details dumps of the pass instance that does this? It is done in fre pass. > Note that the large number '5368709811' (0x1fff) might point

[Bug c/67784] Incorrect parsing when using declarations in for loops and typedefs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67784 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The reason is as stated in comment#1: it's necessary to examine the token after "if ( 1 ) ;" to see if it's the "else" keyword; if it were "else", that token would be within the C99/C11

  1   2   >