https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68355
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68277
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #6)
> I think that that trial and AMS show the backend like SH requires
> something even for the old reload, though I'm not sure that
> the 2nd postreload_cse is the righ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68355
Bug ID: 68355
Summary: Constant byte is passed on stack
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68277
--- Comment #8 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #7)
> (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #6)
> I've changed the predicate of the 2nd operand to arith_operand instead
> of const_int_operand in your patch and run
ad model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151114 (experimental) [trunk revision 230382] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3 pr68298.c
$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O2 pr68298.c
$ ./a.out
0
$
x=/usr/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151114 (experimental) [trunk revision 230382] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 pr68328.c
$ ./a.out
0
$ gcc-trunk -Os pr68328.c
$ ./a.out
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68353
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68354
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68354
Bug ID: 68354
Summary: -Warray-bounds on a flexible array member in C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
--- Comment #5 from Ganesh Ajjanagadde ---
That I do not consider a readable or scalable solution.
Furthermore, this is a bug, and the FFmpeg codebase gets compiled across a wide
array of compilers. We can't insert hacks for specific GCC versions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68353
Bug ID: 68353
Summary: [6 Regression] libstdc++-v3/include/bits/basic_string.
h:5524:31: error: 'wcstoll' is not a member of 'std'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66974
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68352
--- Comment #2 from Ben Kane ---
Created attachment 36712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36712&action=edit
permute.ii (1.5 MB)
I uploaded it to Wikisend because of the file size. It disappears in 90 days :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68352
--- Comment #1 from Ben Kane ---
Created attachment 36711
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36711&action=edit
all except permute.ii (attaching separately)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68352
Bug ID: 68352
Summary: [Cygwin] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
max() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
--- Comment #18 from Guille ---
I may be missing something: I could build latest openssl no problem, but
'#include \int main(){return 0;}' ICEs on my system's installed
openssl (OSX 10.9.5).
(In reply to Magnus Fromreide from comment #16)
> Sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz
--- Comment #16 from H.J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guille at cal dot berkeley.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68351
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68351
--- Comment #2 from Guille ---
Created attachment 36710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36710&action=edit
This is the preprocessed file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68351
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68351
Bug ID: 68351
Summary: ICE in ssl.h with -g
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Nov 14 18:54:16 2015
New Revision: 230382
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230382&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/68346
* call.c (build_new_op_1): Don't fold a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68344
--- Comment #2 from i.hamsa at gmail dot com ---
Indeed. I somehow missed that option. It probably would be logical for
-Wold-style-declaration to imply -Wstrict-prototypes, but this is a minor
issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68344
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67803
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67803
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Nov 14 17:43:15 2015
New Revision: 230380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67803
* array.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68298
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67803
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Sat Nov 14 17:31:16 2015
New Revision: 230379
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230379&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-14 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/67803
* array.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68350
Bug ID: 68350
Summary: std::uninitialized_copy overly restrictive for
trivially_copyable types
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68349
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36708
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36708&action=edit
C source code
I used gcc trunk dated 2015
k dated 20151114 to compile the attached C++ code.
The compiler said
../../analitzaplot/plotter2d.cpp: In member function ‘QRectF
Analitza::Plotter2D
::normalizeUserViewport(QRectF)’:
../../analitzaplot/plotter2d.cpp:944:41: in constexpr expansion of
‘#‘result_d
ecl’ not supported by dump_expr#
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Alexey Rychkov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Are you sure that problem is not in GREP_OPTIONS='--color=always' which
> according to man results in color output using default color scheme '01;31'?
No! but you can do the test by unsetting GREP_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #9 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
> > ... results in valid output.
>
> So Mikael probably got the point: don't buil in the source directory.
> Instead of
>
> > cd gcc-5.2.0
> > mkdir build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> ... results in valid output.
So Mikael probably got the point: don't buil in the source directory. Instead
of
> cd gcc-5.2.0
> mkdir build && cd build
> ../configure --disable-multilib
> make
do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #7 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #3)
> > I'm not sure if this can affect something, but I was using tmux on top
> > of ssh session...
>
> Can you try again without tmx? I am not that familiar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Rychkov ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #4)
> Did you set GREP_OPTIONS?
Yes, GREP_OPTIONS='--color=always'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61450
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
With the updated patch below the ICE is now replaced with
pr61450.f90:6:15:
integer i1
2
bind(c,name="foo") :: i1
end module
subroutine truc() bind(c,name="foo")
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Did you set GREP_OPTIONS?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I'm not sure if this can affect something, but I was using tmux on top
> of ssh session...
Can you try again without tmx? I am not that familiar with sequences such as
"^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K", but I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
--- Comment #2 from Alexey Rychkov ---
#define GFC_REAL_4_HUGE ^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K 3.40282347e38f
#define GFC_REAL_4_LITERAL_SUFFIX f
#define GFC_REAL_4_LITERAL(X) (X ## f)
#define GFC_REAL_4_DIGITS ^[[01;31m^[[K^[[m^[[K 24
#define GFC_REAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
--- Comment #28 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Hi Anthony, adding testcases to the patch will help clarify what is working and
what you expect to work but it isn't:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/HowToPrepareATestcase
/gcc/gnatmake version 6.0.0 20151114
(experimental)
=== objc tests ===
I think it would be okay to just "blindly" make the same changes to DragonFly
that you do for FreeBSD in the future. It will almost always be the correct
thing, and if it isn't I'll still c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68347
Bug ID: 68347
Summary: Multiple build errors in libgfortran
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
--- Comment #27 from Anthony Brandon ---
Created attachment 36706
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36706&action=edit
First version of patch for PR19808
This is the current version of my patch.
It still needs some work.
The Wu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note one even can't work around this warning through say:
&& (sizeof (int) >= sizeof (size_t) ? 1 : (size_t) (int) len == len)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346
Bug ID: 68346
Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Nov 14 09:09:01 2015
New Revision: 230373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-13 Arnaud Charlet
PR ada/68345
* s-osinte-d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
Bug ID: 68345
Summary: gnat build broken on dragonfly due to omission of
r229342
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
62 matches
Mail list logo
