[Bug lto/68820] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- this does not reproduce for me at PPC nor x86-64. Are there any compilation farm machines that reproduce it?

[Bug tree-optimization/69155] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 14 15:25:22 2016 New Revision: 232368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232368=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/68146 PR tree-optimization/69155 *

[Bug tree-optimization/69155] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/68881] [6 Regression] UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #5) > (In reply to vries from comment #3) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > Tom, what target did you reproduce on? > > > > ... > > $ gcc -v > >

[Bug ipa/68419] ICE segfault in determine_locally_known_aggregate_parts / ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68419 --- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Lauri Kasanen from comment #10) > The gcc docs state that any version of gcc above 3.4 is supported, so this > is still a bug. They say to start with an existing GCC binary, not that *any*

[Bug lto/68881] [6 Regression] UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > Tom, what target did you reproduce on? > > ... > $ gcc -v > Using built-in specs. >

[Bug target/69275] New: ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Bug ID: 69275 Summary: ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug c++/69261] [6 Regression] Copying char arrays during constexpr evaluation does not work reliably

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Jan 14 15:32:31 2016 New Revision: 232370 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232370=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69261 * constexpr.c (find_array_ctor_elt): Handle splitting

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc64le-linux CC|

[Bug middle-end/68146] [6 Regression] ice in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68146 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jan 14 15:25:22 2016 New Revision: 232368 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232368=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/68146 PR tree-optimization/69155 *

[Bug target/68269] [5 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr68129_1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 regression] FAIL: |[5 regression] FAIL:

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69275] ICE compiling rs6000/float-128.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69275 --- Comment #2 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1) > An explicit --enable-gnu-indirect-function during configuration works fine. This seems to work for me too, using my old binutils. I tried building with a

[Bug target/63890] [4.9/5/6 regression] Compiling trivial program with -O -p leads to misaligned stack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890 --- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka --- > Dominique, can you please test the #c9 patch with the #c22 improvement and if > it works, submit to gcc-patches? It would be really nice to test some bigger codebase (like bootstrap with -p), not just

[Bug sanitizer/69276] Address sanitizer does not handle heap overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69276 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Comment on attachment 37341 [details] > suggested patch > > + else if (is_gimple_call (stmt) && gimple_store_p (stmt) > +&& gimple_clobber_p (stmt)) > +

[Bug c++/69277] ICE (Segmentation fault) used but never defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69277 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug sanitizer/69279] New: Uncomplete documentation for -fsanitize-recovery option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69279 Bug ID: 69279 Summary: Uncomplete documentation for -fsanitize-recovery option Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69261] [6 Regression] Copying char arrays during constexpr evaluation does not work reliably

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/57193] [4.9/5/6 Regression] suboptimal register allocation for SSE registers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57193 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Look in lra-coalesce, if we have code to eliminate those copies, that's where I'd expect to find it.

[Bug c++/68936] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68936 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug other/69280] New: Where did -fno-plt go?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69280 Bug ID: 69280 Summary: Where did -fno-plt go? Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee:

[Bug c/69262] Request for better array bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69262 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69281] New: gfortran ICE on temporary array in function call with -fstack-arrays -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69281 Bug ID: 69281 Summary: gfortran ICE on temporary array in function call with -fstack-arrays -fopenmp Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/69281] gfortran ICE on temporary array in function call with -fstack-arrays -fopenmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69281 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68648] [4.9 Regression][ARM] ICE: fail to generate BIC(immediate) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68648 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jan 14 17:27:42 2016 New Revision: 232375 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232375=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][4.9 backport] Fix PR target/68648 PR target/68648

[Bug c/69272] [6 Regression] ICE: in c_builtin_function, at c/c-decl.c:4020 with -fgnu-tm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69272 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rth at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68803] gcc.vect/powerpc/20050603-3.c failures since r230167

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Do 4.9.2 and 5.3.0 actually fail the testcase? Huh?

[Bug target/69008] gcc emits unneeded memory access when passing trivial structs by value (ARM)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69008 Renlin Li changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/68188] Ambiguous code gets compiled successfully when class and its namespace have the same name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188 --- Comment #3 from Piotr Pilarczyk --- Still not fixed in 5.3.0, tested here: https://gcc.godbolt.org/

[Bug target/68648] [4.9 Regression][ARM] ICE: fail to generate BIC(immediate) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68648 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug c/69262] Request for better array bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69262 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Thu Jan 14 17:46:25 2016 New Revision: 232376 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232376=gcc=rev Log: PR c/69262 * c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Provide more information

[Bug tree-optimization/66992] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Incorrect array subscript is above bounds warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66992 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/69258] Flexible arrays break TBAA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69258 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/64411] ICE: in verify_target_availability, at sel-sched.c:1577 with -Os -mcmodel=medium -fPIC -fschedule-insns -fselective-scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64411 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/69032] [5/6 Regression] ICE: in cfg_preds_1, at sel-sched-ir.c:4809 with -fsched-pressure -fsel-sched-pipelining -fselective-scheduling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69032 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug rtl-optimization/69102] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE: in move_op_ascend, at sel-sched.c:6138 with -fselective-scheduling2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69102 Andrey Belevantsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt --- The linked page from comment #2 mentions a discussion about this issue which I'm unable to find. Any hints where it is? Anyway, we've looked into it, and it seems that this bit of code generated a duplicate

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Confirmed on powerpc64le: > > $ /build/gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc -B /build/gcc-trunk/gcc -O3 -S -Wall -Wextra > -Wpedantic -mcpu=power8 -o/dev/stdout >

[Bug regression/67415] [5/6 Regression] -mcpu= breaks -print-file-name for ARM crosscompilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67415 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68473] ICE: in contains_point, at diagnostic-show-locus.c:340 after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |--- Summary|[6 Regression]

[Bug c++/68385] [6 Regression] ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69160] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69160 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68060] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68060 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/68060] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68060 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- It's a bogus detected double reduction.

[Bug middle-end/46555] [4.9/5/6 Regression] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46555 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- The idea is to add forwarder blocks here. Of course doing this too aggressively may be bad, not sure (extra jumps instead of extra copies). Eventually the targets want some control on this.

[Bug fortran/69268] [5 Regression] Sourced allocation calls function twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69268 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68585] [5/6 Regression] c++14 code accepted by 4.9 not accepted by 5 and 6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68585 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/68560] [6 Regression] The test gfortran.dg/shape_8.f90 now fails when compiled with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/69261] [6 Regression] Copying char arrays during constexpr evaluation does not work reliably

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69261 --- Comment #4 from Jens Auer --- It produces the correct results if you change foo to not use constexpr: void foo() { auto const s1 = s( "bla" ); auto const s2 = s( "blu" ); string_constexpr<7> const s1s2 = concat(s1,s2); auto

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #6 from Dominik Vogt --- There are several approaches to fix the problem: 1) An "Intermediate" DIE is generated if the corresponding type has not yet been recorded. When creating the DIE also generate the type. This may lead to

[Bug target/69264] [4.9/5 regression] ICE when building spidermonkey w/-maltivec -O3: rs6000_builtin_vectorization_cost, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:4350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69264 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |5.3.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/69263] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_store_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/54896] optimization slowness on large basic blocks

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54896 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Known to fail|

[Bug c++/69263] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_store_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69263 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/67145] [6 Regression] associativity from pseudo-reg ordering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67145 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/67323] Use non-unit stride loads by preference when applicable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/68586] [6 Regression] Enum template parameter wrongly rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/67373] Can't compile gcc snapshot for avr target with mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67373 Jonas Jelten changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jj at stusta dot net --- Comment #3 from

[Bug c++/68789] [5/6 Regression] ICE in tsubst_copy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68789 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c++/68782] [6 regression] bad reference member formed with constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68782 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/66038] [5 regression] (stage 2) build/genmatch issue (gcc/hash-table.h|c) with --disable-checking [ introduced by r218976 ]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 14 Jan 2016, kumba at gentoo dot org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038 > > --- Comment #33 from Joshua Kinard --- > The problem may be tied to a particular

[Bug c++/68847] [6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on __atomic_compare_exchange (constexpr.c:3719) in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68847 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug lto/68881] [6 Regression] UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-solaris Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/69155] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37335|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/68963] [4.9/5/6 Regression] O3 vs. O2 discards part of loop and terminates early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68963 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/68419] ICE segfault in determine_locally_known_aggregate_parts / ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68419 --- Comment #7 from Martin Jambor --- Hi, (In reply to Lauri Kasanen from comment #6) > Here's more details on my system. > > Host gcc: 4.2.2 > Host binutils: 2.25.1 > m68k binutils: 2.24 > > I used make -j13, but a parallel build shouldn't

[Bug target/69014] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/991023-1.c FAILs with -Os -fmodulo-sched -fno-tree-vrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69014 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/69030] [6 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu at -O2 and above in 32-bit mode (ICE in copy_rtx, at rtl.c:358)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69030 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Target|x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug lto/68881] [6 Regression] UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Tom, what target did you reproduce on? ... $ gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=./install/bin/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/69042] [6 regression] Missed optimization in ivopts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69042 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||i?86-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug c++/69098] [6.0 regression] Member function pointer template flagged with 'is not a function template'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Version|unknown

[Bug lto/69133] [6 Regression] LTO segfault in lto_get_decl_name_mapping() on 483.xalancbmk with -flto-partition=none

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/69135] [5/6 Regression][ARM] instruction cannot be conditional -- `vcvtpne.s32.f32 s0,s0'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69135 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/68419] ICE segfault in determine_locally_known_aggregate_parts / ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68419 --- Comment #8 from Lauri Kasanen --- Today's gcc 5 branch, git 4e07f8a1b79f5e or svn r232358, still fails. /tmp/gccbuild/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/gccbuild/./gcc/ -B/tmp/tmpgcc/m68k-elf/bin/ -B/tmp/tmpgcc/m68k-elf/lib/ -isystem

[Bug c++/69126] [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/68698] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovap[sd]-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68698 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69198] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovaps-1.c scan-assembler-times vmovaps[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%xmm[0-9]+[^\n]*\\){%k[1-7]}(?:\n|[ \\t]+#) 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- *** Bug 68698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug ipa/68419] ICE segfault in determine_locally_known_aggregate_parts / ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68419 --- Comment #10 from Lauri Kasanen --- When using gcc 5.2 as the host compiler, there is no crash. The gcc docs state that any version of gcc above 3.4 is supported, so this is still a bug.

[Bug lto/68820] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ubizjak at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug target/68648] [4.9 Regression][ARM] ICE: fail to generate BIC(immediate) instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug ipa/68672] [4.9/5/6 Regression] g++.dg/torture/pr68470.C: ICE: cannot update SSA form: statement uses released SSA name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/68698] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vmovap[sd]-1.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68698 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/68679] [5/6 Regression] gcc-5.2.1 ICE in C++11 anon union of structs with template fns, OK in gcc <= 4.9.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68679 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/68767] [6 regression] spurious warning: null argument where non-null required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68767 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/69194] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > The patch checked in fixes this PR. I think this still needs a backport to GCC 5 though

[Bug lto/69271] New: LTO drops weak binding from aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69271 Bug ID: 69271 Summary: LTO drops weak binding from aliases Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug tree-optimization/68990] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68990 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5/6 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Version|unknown

[Bug c++/69273] New: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/sbergman/gcc/trunk/inst/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper > Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > Configured with: ../src/trunk/configure > --prefix=/home/sbergman/gcc/trunk/inst --enable-languages=c,c++,lto > Thread model: posix > gcc version 6.0.0 2

[Bug c++/68763] [6 Regression] ICE: in verify_unstripped_args, at cp/pt.c:1132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug target/69194] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/68820] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c execution, -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/68955] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86-64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68955 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/68936] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected call_expr, have target_expr in build_min_non_dep_call_vec, at cp/tree.c:2744

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68936 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug tree-optimization/68961] [6 regression] Test case gcc.target/powerpc/pr60203.c fails since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68961 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug lto/69003] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Undefined reference with gcc -r incremental linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69003 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Priority|P3

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

  1   2   3   >