[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/52291] __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Jan 21 03:38:32 2016 New Revision: 232662 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232662=gcc=rev Log: PR c/52291 - __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer

[Bug fortran/68442] ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4) > Related to pr69397. With the patch in pr69397 comment 2, the ICE is replaced > with the error: > > pr68442.f90:7:21: > >character(kind=gkind())

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Doh, I should have caught that earlier. The bug can be seen in: % grep -c dg-option special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc 3 Using dg-additional-option for the timeout solves the issue.

[Bug c/69407] New: -Wunused-value on __atomic_fetch_OP and __atomic_OP_fetch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69407 Bug ID: 69407 Summary: -Wunused-value on __atomic_fetch_OP and __atomic_OP_fetch Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor

[Bug c/52291] __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Documentation patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01581.html

[Bug c/69404] New: atomic builtins silently discard cv-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 Bug ID: 69404 Summary: atomic builtins silently discard cv-qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- The GCC manual says the __atomic builtins are meant to be compatible with those described in the Intel Itanium Processor-specific Application Binary Interface, section 7.4. Both the ABI and the GCC manual

[Bug c/52291] __sync_fetch_and_add and friends poorly specified for pointer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52291 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69403] New: Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69403 Bug ID: 69403 Summary: Wrong thumb2_ior_scc_strict_it insn pattern. Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|atomic builtins silently|atomic builtins accept

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug c/69405] New: [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 Bug ID: 69405 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69397] ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 --- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2) > Related to/duplicate of pr68442. Sort of related, but I find 68442 fixed already. > - gcc_assert (sym->attr.flavor == FL_PROCEDURE); > + /*

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Fix this may also fix PR 69399.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69377] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #1) > Actually, with more testing I see the builtins do even more than that: they > silently convert between pointers to types of the same size. (Clang > diagnoses

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Oh one more thing about qualifiers: _Atomic is a qualifer.

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Before wide-int: Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 18446744073709551614. Adding SSA edges to worklist. After wide-int: Lattice value changed to CONSTANT 0xfffe. Adding SSA edges to

[Bug c++/69402] Incorrect dependency generation when precompiled headers are used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69402 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/14933] missing pre-compiled header depends with -MD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14933 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hcma at hcma dot info --- Comment #14

[Bug c/69404] atomic builtins accept incompatible pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69404 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- So this might be following C++ rules here dealing with qualifiers. There is no discarding of qualifiers either but rather adding them according to C++ rules. Note C and C++ deals with inner qualifiers

[Bug c/69405] [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code

[Bug c/69405] [6 Regression] ICE in c_tree_printer on an invalid __atomic_fetch_add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69405 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||6.0 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor

[Bug testsuite/69406] New: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69406 Bug ID: 69406 Summary: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/c++2011/linkage.cc (test for excess errors) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/55115] [4.9/5/6 Regression] missing headers as fatal breaks cproto logic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55115 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug testsuite/69366] All MPX tests are unsupported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69366 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Wed Jan 20 14:34:55 2016 New Revision: 232617 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232617=gcc=rev Log: Require non-x32 target for compile-time MPX tests Compile-time MPX tests

[Bug testsuite/69371] UNRESOLVED: special_functions/18_riemann_zeta/check_value.cc compilation failed to produce executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69371 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Ed Smith-Rowland from comment #2) > The message looks more like a header - cmath - is not included or that > the line > // { dg-options "-D__STDCPP_WANT_MATH_SPEC_FUNCS__" } > or equivalent

[Bug target/65546] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-31a.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65546 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/46393] [4.9/5/6 Regression] m68k code size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46393 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- It appears the problem starts with forwprop turning the pointer accesses into array/structure memory accesses. This is generally a good thing. However, in this instance it makes it awful hard to recover

[Bug c++/69390] dynamic_cast on rvalue fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69390 Kyle J Strand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyle.strand at beckman dot com ---

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > > This changed behavior with r213102 aka PR61861. > > Perhaps this comment is relevant? > >

[Bug target/46393] [4.9/5/6 Regression] m68k code size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46393 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Summary|m68k code size

[Bug c/24293] Undefined behaviour not diagnosed with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293 --- Comment #5 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: prathamesh3492 Date: Wed Jan 20 16:25:23 2016 New Revision: 232622 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232622=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-15 Prathamesh Kulkarni

[Bug c/24293] Undefined behaviour not diagnosed with -fsyntax-only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24293 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug target/69176] [6 Regression] ICE in in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2981 on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69176 --- Comment #19 from Matthias Klose --- here is a test case from an ICE I saw when backporting the patch to the gcc-5 Linaro branch. Fails with -O2, works with -O1 typedef int Nlm_Int4, ValNodePtr; Nlm_Int4 b, e; char c, d; void fn1(); typedef

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #14 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: torvald Date: Wed Jan 20 17:47:03 2016 New Revision: 232628 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232628=gcc=rev Log: libstdc++: Darwin does not support weak refs without definition.

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/59463] Illegal Instruction: min() _GLIBCXX_USE_NOEXCEPT { return __FLT_MIN__; }

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59463 dank at kegel dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dank at kegel dot com ---

[Bug lto/69394] New: [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 Bug ID: 69394 Summary: [5.3] ICE when linking with lto Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug target/69343] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69343 --- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jan 20 18:53:56 2016 New Revision: 232631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232631=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/69343 PR bootstrap/69339 PR tree-opt/68964 Revert: gcc/ * tree.c

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #12 from Jack Howarth --- I can confirm that the following change allows current gcc trunk to bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15. Index: libstdc++-v3/config/os/bsd/darwin/os_defines.h

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #7 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 37408 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37408=edit List of errors This is a list of all remaining errors of the Plumhall test. I've not checked whether they all depend

[Bug target/67439] [4.9 Regression]ICE: unrecognizable insn compiling arm-fp16 testcases with -march=armv7-a and -mrestrict-it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67439 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Jan 20 17:44:58 2016 New Revision: 232627 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232627=gcc=rev Log: Add C++11 overloads to the global namespace PR libstdc++/60401

[Bug rtl-optimization/64895] RA picks the wrong register for -fipa-ra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64895 Renlin Li changed: What|Removed |Added CC||renlin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #12

[Bug target/68964] [6 regression] Internal compiler error for test case gcc.dg/tm/20100610.c since r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68964 --- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jan 20 18:53:56 2016 New Revision: 232631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232631=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/69343 PR bootstrap/69339 PR tree-opt/68964 Revert: gcc/ * tree.c

[Bug target/69339] [6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target: libitm/vect128.cc:1:0: error: AltiVec and SPE instructions cannot coexist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69339 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jan 20 18:53:56 2016 New Revision: 232631 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232631=gcc=rev Log: PR bootstrap/69343 PR bootstrap/69339 PR tree-opt/68964 Revert: gcc/ * tree.c

[Bug preprocessor/69391] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 mail at bobah dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Incorrect __LINE__ |Incorrect __LINE__

[Bug target/67439] [4.9 Regression]ICE: unrecognizable insn compiling arm-fp16 testcases with -march=armv7-a and -mrestrict-it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67439 --- Comment #9 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Wed Jan 20 17:05:43 2016 New Revision: 232623 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232623=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR 67439: Allow matching of *arm32_movhf when -mrestrict-it

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Hi, The immediate problem is that if (gfc_option.rtcheck & GFC_RTCHECK_MEM && gfc_expr_attr (expr1).allocatable && expr1->rank && !expr2->rank) { in

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

conversion from ‘double (*)(double) throw ()’ to ‘long double (*)(long double)’ [-fpermissive] static long double (*p3c_)(long double) = acosh; ^ $ g++ --version g++ (GCC) 6.0.0 20160120 (experimental)

[Bug libstdc++/69310] [6 Regression] Revision r232454 breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69310 --- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I can confirm that the following change allows current gcc trunk > to bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin15. I confirm also.

[Bug c++/69116] [4.9/5/6 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug target/65096] Illegal memory access beyond packed struct ARCH: ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65096 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- I would say so. OP may reopen if he can reproduce on 5.2 or later. Almost certainly a dup.

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #8 from Dominik Vogt --- List of functions the test complains about: acosh, asinh, atanh, cbrt, copysign, erf, erfc, exp2, expm1, fdim, fma, fmax, fmin, hypot, ilogb, isinf, isnan, lgamma, llrint, llround, log1p, log2, logb, lrint,

[Bug preprocessor/69391] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 --- Comment #2 from mail at bobah dot net --- And if I make this change it works even with '-ftrack-macro-expansion=0' - #define LINE STR(__LINE__) STR(__LINE__) + #define LINE() STR(__LINE__) STR(__LINE__) - std::cout << LINE << "\n"; +

[Bug libstdc++/60401] stdlib.h does not provide abs(long) overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60401 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- The isnan and isinf errors need a glibc fix, which will be in glibc 2.23, the rest I have a patch for.

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/69392] New: G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69392 Bug ID: 69392 Summary: G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/69391] [5/6 Regression] Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 on g++5.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69339] [6 Regression] Failed to bootstrap powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe target: libitm/vect128.cc:1:0: error: AltiVec and SPE instructions cannot coexist

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69339 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69343] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on s390{,x}-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69343 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69396] New: ICE on type mismatch, in update_ppc_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:5580

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69396 Bug ID: 69396 Summary: ICE on type mismatch, in update_ppc_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:5580 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69396] ICE on type mismatch, in update_ppc_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:5580

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69396 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- FYI, works with correct type specification : $ cat z2.f90 module m1 type t1 end type end module m2 use m1 type t2 procedure(f), pointer :: f2

[Bug fortran/69397] New: ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 Bug ID: 69397 Summary: ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/69398] ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas, detected : $ cat z2.f90 program p type t end type type(t), allocatable :: z(:) target :: z(:) allocate (z(2)) end $ gfortran -c z2.f90

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #6 from Bill Seurer --- As of Tuesday (19 January 2015) morning this test case was no longer failing. Something fixed things up in the Friday-Monday timespan though I do not know what it was.

[Bug target/68609] PowerPC reciprocal estimate missed opportunities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609 --- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn --- Author: dje Date: Wed Jan 20 19:39:08 2016 New Revision: 232632 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232632=gcc=rev Log: PR target/68609 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_emit_swsqrt): Add

[Bug fortran/69395] New: ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 Bug ID: 69395 Summary: ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69395] ICE on declaring array with more than 7 dimensions+codimensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69395 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Whereas, detected with this declaration variant : $ cat z2.f90 program p real :: z4d(2,2,2,2)[2,2,2,*] end $ gfortran -fcoarray=single z2.f90 z2.f90:2:30:

[Bug fortran/69398] ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- BTW : $ cat z1c.f90 program p type t end type class(t), allocatable :: z(:) target :: z(2) allocate (z(2)) end $ gfortran-5.3.1 -c z1c.f90

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #7 from Bill Seurer --- I should say that it succeeds on power8 LE. I haven't tried it on a BE system nor targeting power7.

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner --- I did try it with svn id 232575 yesterday on a power7 BE target, using various optimization levels and various -mcpu=/-mtune= combinations.

[Bug fortran/69397] ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #9 from Michael Meissner --- Whoops, I saved the response too soon. I meant I tried various combinations of optimization, -mcpu=, -mtune=, -mbig/-mlittle, -m32 and I couldn't get it to fail with subversion id 232575.

[Bug target/69269] [6 Regression] ICE on ibm-ldouble.c in extract_constrain_insn_cached, at recog.c:2201

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69269 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/69398] New: ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 Bug ID: 69398 Summary: ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/69399] New: [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 (due to ccp?)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399 Bug ID: 69399 Summary: [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 (due to ccp?) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug jit/64296] link failure of libgccjit.so for "in tree" gmp/mpc/mpfr/isl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- See also bug 67137 for a possible duplicate.

[Bug target/34087] ICE in regrename.c for movdf_hardfloat64_mfpgpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34087 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/47122] vax-*-openbsd* configuration purports to require openbsd-pthread.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47122 --- Comment #4 from rep.dot.nop at gmail dot com --- On January 18, 2016 3:57:22 PM GMT+01:00, "bernds at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >Can this be closed? Sorry, yes, i think so.

[Bug tree-optimization/69400] New: [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69400 Bug ID: 69400 Summary: [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O and int128 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/67137] --enable-languages=jit and --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67137 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302 --- Comment #20 from Steve Ellcey --- I have still not been able to reproduce this or understand what is happening. Aurelien, could you try applying the patch that has been submitted for PR 69129 to see if that helps? The failure modes for

[Bug fortran/69397] ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/67355] [5 Regression] ICE compiling LTP testcase, endless cselib recursion from var-tracking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net ---

[Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302 --- Comment #21 from Aurelien Jarno --- (In reply to Steve Ellcey from comment #20) > I have still not been able to reproduce this or understand what is happening. > > Aurelien, could you try applying the patch that has been submitted for PR >

[Bug debug/68302] [5/6 Regression] ICE with debugging enabled on mips

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68302 Aurelien Jarno changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/69391] New: Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69391 Bug ID: 69391 Summary: Incorrect __LINE__ expansion with -ftrack-macro-expansion=0 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69355] [5/6 Regression] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #16

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Created attachment 37414 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37414=edit Reduced testcase Reduced testcase. Compile with a mipsel-linux-gnu cross compiler with -O2. It's easiest to see

[Bug ipa/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel with -fipa-sra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69396] ICE on type mismatch, in update_ppc_arglist, at fortran/resolve.c:5580

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69396 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- In fact I have hit the same ICE with a slightly different test case: program test implicit none type :: t real, allocatable :: r(:) end type type(t) :: a a%r = 0. end

[Bug target/66655] [5/6 Regression] miscompilation due to ipa-ra on MinGW

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66655 --- Comment #14 from Roger Orr --- I don't know I'm afraid: I'm a very occasional mingw user and I haven't (yet...) tried building gcc on mingw...

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/69398] ICE on class with duplicate dimension attribute specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69398 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   3   >