[Bug rtl-optimization/69430] [6 regression] stage2 miscompiled by CCMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69430 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/69430] [6 regression] stage2 miscompiled by CCMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69430 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/69415] -Wmisleading-indentation warns on "if (__b < __a) return __b; return __a;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69415 --- Comment #9 from David Malcolm --- Similar issue seen here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=811579 Package: mosh > make[5]: Entering directory '/<>/src/protobufs' ... > userinput.pb.cc: In member function 'virtual bool >

[Bug rtl-optimization/69430] New: [6 regression] stage2 miscompiled by CCMP

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org CC: jiong.wang at arm dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: aarch64-*-* make[4]: Entering directory '/opt/gcc/gcc-20160122

[Bug target/69416] [6 Regression] Nonsense rtl checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org ---

[Bug bootstrap/69434] New: [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69434 Bug ID: 69434 Summary: [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69392] G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69392 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Fri Jan 22 20:36:30 2016 New Revision: 232746 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232746=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69392 * lambda.c (lambda_capture_field_type): Handle 'this'

[Bug driver/69351] response files on linux leave undeleted temporary files

ski/src/local/gcc/configure --prefix=/home/apinski/local-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-sanitizer --with-cpu=thunderx+lse Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160122 (experimental) [trunk revision 232737] (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4

[Bug c++/68754] Explicitly defaulted constexpr assignment operator fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68754 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic --- Comment #1 from Andrew

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 James Almer changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37282|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/69392] G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69392 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69434] [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69434 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED URL|

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to James Almer from comment #2) > Compile it with "std=c++14 -Wall", otherwise it apparently will not ICE. For > example "g++ -std=c++14 -ftemplate-backtrace-limit=0 -Wall 69203_2.ii" std=c++14 is

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to vmorgulys from comment #0) > auto& f2(auto v) This is not standard C++, it's part of the Concepts TS, and so doesn't work properly until GCC 6.

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5/6 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Jan 22 21:15:41 2016 New Revision: 232748 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232748=gcc=rev Log: Constrain std::valarray functions and operators PR libstdc++/69116

[Bug driver/69351] response files on linux leave undeleted temporary files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69351 --- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich --- My failing versions are: $ LANG=C gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/5.3.0/gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/5.3.0/lto-wrapper Target:

[Bug tree-optimization/69341] [6 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 37 does not dominate use in block 30)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69341 Bug 69341 depends on bug 68692, which changed state. Bug 68692 Summary: [6 Regression][graphite] ice: Segmentation fault https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] [6 Regression][graphite] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69347] [6 regression] excessive compile time with -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69347 --- Comment #15 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Jan 22 20:18:59 2016 New Revision: 232745 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232745=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/69347 * tree-ssa-dom.c (back_propagate_equivalences):

[Bug jit/69435] New: Truncated lines in jit.sum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 Bug ID: 69435 Summary: Truncated lines in jit.sum Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit Assignee:

[Bug c++/69436] New: Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-sdt=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 Bug ID: 69436 Summary: Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-sdt=c++17) Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I think the problem is the two auto are considered the same. I don't know the C++ standard in these places to say if GCC should reject or accept it so I cannot comment on that.

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- Created attachment 37440 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37440=edit Candidate fix This patch appears to fix it; tested successfully with "make check-jit" and "make check-jit -j64" on a

[Bug ipa/62051] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > this patch adds the logic to gimple-fold.c which makes the offending dtor > non-refeable. It is bit uglier than I hoped for. The reason is that the > dtor

[Bug c/69437] New: fail to build - compile error in graphite-optimize-isl.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69437 Bug ID: 69437 Summary: fail to build - compile error in graphite-optimize-isl.c:304 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/68847] [6 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on __atomic_compare_exchange (constexpr.c:3719) in c++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68847 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69292] [6 Regression][graphite] ICE with -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69292 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68692] [6 Regression][graphite] ice: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692 --- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop --- *** Bug 69292 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- "PASSED" is coming from dejagnu.h "PASS" is coming from jit.exp's fixed_host_execute

[Bug c++/69392] G++ can't capture 'this' pointer to templated type using init-capture

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69392 --- Comment #2 from Kyle J Strand --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1) > Log: > PR c++/69392 > * lambda.c (lambda_capture_field_type): Handle 'this' specially > for init-capture, too. > What special handling is

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69203 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/69438] New: ICE while trying to cross-compile V8 for AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 Bug ID: 69438 Summary: ICE while trying to cross-compile V8 for AArch64 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/69266] bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266 Irfan Adilovic changed: What|Removed |Added CC||irfanadilovic at gmail dot com ---

[Bug other/69432] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c with -O3 -m32 -minline-stringops-dynamically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 --- Comment #30 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #28) > Another example: > > template inline void end(Tp) { } > > template bool tnegative(const T& t) { return t.end < 0; } > > > pe.cc: In function ‘bool

[Bug c++/69327] [6 Regression] constexpr leaves reference member var uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69327 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- I think there is a dup of this bug somewhere too.

[Bug c++/69315] [6 Regression] ICE in finish_function with constexpr and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315 Alexandre Oliva changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug lto/69254] [6 Regression] ICE in streamer_get_builtin_tree when using -fsanitize=shift on the compile side only

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69254 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37435 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37435=edit gcc6-pr69254-wip.patch WIP patch. This handles the merging of the -fsanitize=/-fno-sanitize= options from the

[Bug c++/69057] [C++14] constexpr static variable template assertion segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69057 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/69432] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c with -O3 -m32 -minline-stringops-dynamically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/69415] -Wmisleading-indentation warns on "if (__b < __a) return __b; return __a;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69415 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ok, I stand convinced.

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/69422] Unexpected result with allocatable character type component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug libstdc++/69266] bootstrap failure undefined reference to `std::basic_ios<char, std::char_traits >::

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69266 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-12/msg01653.html seems to have worked ok

[Bug c++/67364] [5/6 Regression] "accessing uninitialized member" error in constexpr context

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67364 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 --- Comment #28 from Jonathan Wakely --- Another example: template inline void end(Tp) { } template bool tnegative(const T& t) { return t.end < 0; } pe.cc: In function ‘bool tnegative(const T&)’: pe.cc:3:61: error: parse error in template

[Bug c++/69315] [6 Regression] ICE in finish_function with constexpr and templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69315 --- Comment #3 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 37436 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37436=edit Patch I'm testing to fix the bug Delayed folding may have to instantiate and evaluate template constexpr functions.

[Bug lto/68685] LTO build hits ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68685 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/42329] Deduction of template template argument via base class fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42329 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/69433] New: missing -Wreturn-local-addr assigning address of a local to a static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69433 Bug ID: 69433 Summary: missing -Wreturn-local-addr assigning address of a local to a static Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69433] missing -Wreturn-local-addr assigning address of a local to a static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69433 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/69433] missing -Wreturn-local-addr assigning address of a local to a static

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69433 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Hmm, I don't know how GCC can detect this except with optimizations because the assignment to s happens at runtime.

[Bug target/69416] [6 Regression] Nonsense rtl checking failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-10-21 21:32:49 |2016-1-22 --- Comment #29 from

[Bug c++/69203] ICE in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:4754

|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- This works with: gcc version 6.0.0 20160122 (experimental) [trunk revision 232716] (GCC) So closing as fixed.

[Bug c/65403] -Wno-error= is an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65403 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug fortran/69419] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have real_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69419 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/66877] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-3-big-array.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: detected" 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66877 alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/69012] gcc-6.0.0 internal compiler error building libgfortran for mips64el target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69012 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Yes, the type is meant to go into the debug info. But it is DECL_NAMELESS, so the debug info should not contain DW_AT_name or linkage name for it.

[Bug tree-optimization/69426] [6 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: missing definition) w/ -O2 (and above) -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69426 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37431 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37431=edit tentative patch

[Bug c++/55843] ICE after exceeding template instantiation depth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55843 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- This is fixed in trunk and 5.x. I'm adding a testcase and closing the bug.

[Bug fortran/69420] ICE: tree check: expected array_type, have pointer_type in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69420 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/69328] [6 Regression] ice in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1379 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69328 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 22 09:40:54 2016 New Revision: 232719 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232719=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/8 * dwarf2out.c (add_child_die_after): New function.

[Bug tree-optimization/69355] [5 Regression] Wrong results with -O1 optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69355 --- Comment #18 from Martin Jambor --- The reduced testcase does not fail for me for some reason, but the original one does. In any event, the problem is that an grp_unscalarized_data flag is zero even though evidently it should not be. That

[Bug lto/69393] [6 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_finish, at dwarf2out.c:27175 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 22 Jan 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69393 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Yes, the type is meant to go into the

[Bug fortran/69422] Unexpected result with allocatable character type component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69422 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/55843] ICE after exceeding template instantiation depth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55843 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69116] [4.9/5/6 Regression] compile error when including valarray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |libstdc++ --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/55843] ICE after exceeding template instantiation depth

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55843 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Fri Jan 22 11:03:54 2016 New Revision: 232721 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232721=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-22 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c/69429] New: gcc create sparse exec/libs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 Bug ID: 69429 Summary: gcc create sparse exec/libs Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE while trying to cross-compile V8 for AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 --- Comment #4 from TC --- Although this still breaks on trunk GCC on Wandbox: long x; auto& f(auto) { return x; } auto* g(auto) { return } auto r = f(1); auto p = g(1); prog.cc: In instantiation of 'auto& f(auto:1) [with auto:1 = int]':

[Bug jit/69435] Truncated lines in jit.log

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- I've reported this here: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-01/msg00013.html

[Bug c/69437] fail to build - compile error in graphite-optimize-isl.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69437 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/69438] [6 Regression] ICE while building V8 for AArch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69438 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from TC

[Bug other/69432] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c with -O3 -m32 -minline-stringops-dynamically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in

[Bug other/69432] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.c with -O3 -m32 -minline-stringops-dynamically

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Fri Jan 22 23:14:27 2016 New Revision: 232754 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232754=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69432 * config/i386/i386.c: Include dojump.h.

[Bug target/63805] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 with -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805 --- Comment #6 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Fri Jan 22 22:13:43 2016 New Revision: 232752 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232752=gcc=rev Log: This "branch" is to support kelvin's work on bugzilla PR 63805.

[Bug driver/69351] response files on linux leave undeleted temporary files

/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-bootstrap --prefix=/home/slyfox/dev/git/gcc-native-quick/../gcc-native-quick-installed Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160122 (experimental) (GCC) $ ld -v GNU

[Bug target/67260] [sh] Register spill bug for sibcall+complex+softfloat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67260 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Reduced testcase (in C now): struct A { double a; }; double a; void foo (_Bool *x) { long i; for (i = 0; i < 64; i++) { struct A c; x[i] = c.a || a; } }

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- trippels@CFARM-IUT-TLSE3 ~ % cat octave.ii template class A; template <> struct A { double m_fn1() { return _M_value; } double _M_value; }; double a; template void mx_inline_and(unsigned long,

[Bug tree-optimization/69376] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69376 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug lto/69394] [5.3] ICE when linking with lto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, daniel.f.starke at freenet dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69394 > > --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke --- > I have tested the same with gcc

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 --- Comment #11 from Dominik Vogt --- The problem is gone with this fix on s390 and s390x, and check-gcc doesn't show any regressions. (Haven't run a full check though.)

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/69385] [6 regression] ICE on valid with -fcheck=mem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69385 --- Comment #13 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #11) > Changing the entire block to: > [...] > fixes Martin's problem and makes the following work correctly: It also cures my problem, i.e. comment 5.

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Wouldn't a useless_type_conversion_p check be better instead of just testing number of elements?

[Bug target/69421] [6 Regression] ICE in maybe_legitimize_operand, at optabs.c:6888 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69421 --- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Wouldn't a useless_type_conversion_p check be better instead of just testing > number of elements? Yep. Will use it.

[Bug c/69429] gcc create sparse exec/libs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69429 --- Comment #2 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > Why do you file this against gcc? If anything, it is related to binutils, You are right, I though it was a gcc problem because I

  1   2   >