[Bug rtl-optimization/19705] -fno-branch-count-reg doesn't prevent decrement and branch instructions on a count register

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19705 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2006-03-05 03:12:14 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 --- Comment #1 from Harald Anlauf --- The patch in comment #0 regtests ok on i686-pc-linux-gnu. Possible ChangeLog entry: 2016-01-27 ... PR fortran/69520 * options.c: Enhance -fcheck by reversal of specifications. *

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 --- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) > At revision 232901, this testcase still ICEs on i686 (or x86_64 with -m32) > on Fedora 23: > > Running target unix/-m32 > FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #15 from Richard Henderson --- Author: rth Date: Wed Jan 27 22:08:02 2016 New Revision: 232905 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232905=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-opt/69447 * lra-remat.c (subreg_regs): New.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 Richard Henderson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug target/5372] [powerpc-*-eabi] -mno-eabi not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5372 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- The PowerPC EABI document itself does not say anything about __eabi or process startup (it even says there are no requirements).

[Bug tree-optimization/68659] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr45230-1.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68659 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-* |powerpc-*-*, arm*-*-*,

[Bug fortran/69520] Implement reversal of -fcheck options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69520 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #17 from Zdenek Sojka --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #16) > Fixed. This patch is not going to the 5-branch?

[Bug fortran/69484] [5/6 Regression] documentation issue: -Wtabs and -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69484 --- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: janus Date: Wed Jan 27 22:32:52 2016 New Revision: 232906 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232906=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Janus Weil PR fortran/69484

[Bug target/18900] Don't use fp regs for mem moves without explicit use of fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18900 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #10 from Alan Modra --- I guess rs6000 needs to implement targetm.override_options_after_change() if we're to keep flag_pic and TARGET_RELOCATABLE consistent.

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc-*-* |powerpc*-*-* Status|NEW

[Bug c++/24208] C++ front-end can still be sped up

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24208 --- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Jan 28 01:06:29 2016 New Revision: 232912 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232912=gcc=rev Log: Low-hanging C++-lexer speedup (PR c++/24208) gcc/cp/ChangeLog: PR

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #22 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #20) [...] > I maintain my opinion that any user-facing diagnostic using %qE is > potentially broken. Thanks; I'm inclined to agree. Notes to self:

[Bug c++/53341] overloaded operator delete(void *) appear in object file even when not directly used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53341 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- With -std=c++0x included (until a few days ago on trunk), which is what caused the difference. I don't see _ZdlPv since 4.8.0 though.

[Bug target/68662] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090210 c_lto_20090210_0.o-c_lto_20090210_1.o link, -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- For the testcase in comment #7, global_options are inconsistent (*) and wrong when compiling foo. I see flag_pic == 2 there?? (*) In particular, TARGET_RELOCATABLE and flag_pic don't agree. See

[Bug middle-end/17958] expand_divmod fails to optimize division of 64-bit quantity by small constant when BITS_PER_WORD is 32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17958 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-07-02 21:30:35 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug fortran/69497] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/69521] -Wdeprecated-declarations errors in unused inline methods

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69521 Loïc Yhuel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||loic.yhuel at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/69523] New: -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 Bug ID: 69523 Summary: -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- How about declaring those headers as system headers by using -isystem instead of using -I :)?

[Bug tree-optimization/22226] vectorization library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug target/19746] printf() optimisation ignores longcall attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19746 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2005-05-09 01:18:53 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69522] New: gcc hangs on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu

per Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160127 (experimental) [trunk revision 232874] (GCC) $ time gcc-trunk abc1.c ^C real21m50

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||carrot at google dot com --- Comment #4

[Bug target/65010] ppc backend generates unnecessary signed extension

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65010 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Last reconfirmed|2015-03-21

[Bug c++/69523] -Wliteral-suffix should not warn within namespace std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69523 --- Comment #2 from Eric Fiselier --- @Andrew I'm a libc++ developer and I really like using compiler warnings when developing and testing libc++. Using -isystem prevents this entirely. Normally they are system headers but this is explicitly

[Bug target/23450] local functions should not sign extend results (and arguments) for speed reasons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23450 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2007-07-01 00:47:09 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 --- Comment #6 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 37498 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37498=edit Patch I'm testing to fix the bug LRA wants harder than reload to avoid creating a stack slot to satisfy insn

[Bug target/22271] No builtin preprocessing defines to tell SDATA mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22271 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/22226] vectorization library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn

[Bug target/18154] Inefficient max/min code for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18154 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW CC|

[Bug debug/21913] REG_EXPR wrong for parameters passed by invisible reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21913 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug target/18900] Don't use fp regs for mem moves without explicit use of fp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18900 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68654] [6 Regression] CoreMark Pro performance degradation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 --- Comment #22 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 > > --- Comment #21 from Alexander Fomin --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug jit/69490] jit testsuite failures (segmentation fault) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69490 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Emrich --- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 26.01.2016 um 16:08 schrieb Rainer Emrich: > Am 26.01.2016 um 15:50 schrieb dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org: >>

[Bug tree-optimization/69336] Constant value not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69336 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Should be fixed with 2016-01-25 Richard Biener PR testsuite/69380 * g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr69336.C: Restrict to x86_64 and i?86.

[Bug tree-optimization/69466] [6 Regression] ICE: Invalid PHI argument after vectorization (on -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69466 --- Comment #5 from Alexandre Oliva --- Created attachment 37486 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37486=edit Patch I'm testing to fix the problem The problem occurs because we call set_current_def for phi nodes after

[Bug jit/69490] jit testsuite failures (segmentation fault) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69490 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug jit/68446] [6 Regression] jit testsuite failures seen inside dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446 Rainer Emrich changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug c++/69317] [6 regression] wrong ABI version in -Wabi warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69317 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/65686] [5/6 regression] inconsistent warning maybe-uninitialized: warn about 'unsigned', not warn about 'int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On January 27, 2016 5:03:18 PM GMT+01:00, "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 > >Marek Polacek changed: > >

[Bug c++/69509] infinite loop compiling a VLA in a recursive constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69509 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69516] [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69516 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69516] New: [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69516 Bug ID: 69516 Summary: [5/6 regression] infinite recursion on a VLA with excess initializer elements in constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/65931] [5/6 regression] dsymutil assertion failure building libgnat-5.dylib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69317] [6 regression] wrong ABI version in -Wabi warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69317 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Jan 27 15:44:07 2016 New Revision: 232881 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232881=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69317 - [6 regression] wrong ABI version in -Wabi warnings

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #12 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #10) > This patch also seems to fix the wrong code in PR 69124 Good to know -- I wasn't able to reproduce that failure myself.

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #6 from Rainer Emrich --- I tested the new version of the proposed patch. Now the tests all pass on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu and x86_64-w64-mingw32. Eric, please submit to mainline.

[Bug target/68380] NetBSD has SSP in libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68380 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/68380] NetBSD has SSP in libc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68380 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 16:54:48 2016 New Revision: 232884 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232884=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Thomas Klausner PR target/68380 *

[Bug ada/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69466] [6 Regression] ICE: Invalid PHI argument after vectorization (on -O2)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69466 --- Comment #9 from Richard Biener --- I am testing that patch now.

[Bug fortran/69495] unused-label warning does not tell which flag triggered it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69495 --- Comment #7 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5) > (In reply to janus from comment #4) > > Is there a reason for this behavior? > > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#wnowarning I see. So this is

[Bug fortran/69484] [5/6 Regression] documentation issue: -Wtabs and -Wall

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69484 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13) > Author: hubicka > Date: Wed Jan 13 23:47:45 2016 > New Revision: 232356 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232356=gcc=rev > Log: > > PR ipa/66487 >

[Bug fortran/49627] NINT(x,16) doesn't work (at all, ever, I don't think)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49627 dr.robert.kosik at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr.robert.kosik at

[Bug tree-optimization/66797] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr65447.c scan-tree-dump-not ivopts "\\nuse 5\\n"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66797 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/66487] [6 Regression] Firefox segfault with LTO enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66487 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69379] [6 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2366

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69379 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 16:46:40 2016 New Revision: 232882 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232882=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69379 * constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression):

[Bug ada/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Wed Jan 27 16:53:27 2016 New Revision: 232883 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232883=gcc=rev Log: PR ada/69488 * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output

[Bug c++/68514] [6 Regression] ICE in tr1/5_numerical_facilities libstdc++ test cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68514 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68542] [6 Regression] 10% 481.wrf performance regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68542 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #13 from Richard Henderson --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > Without knowing the lra-remat code at all, I just wonder if subreg_regs > needs to be one per the whole function, rather than say per extended basic >

[Bug testsuite/69488] tests in gnat/sso give a lot of spurious failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69488 --- Comment #5 from Rainer Emrich --- Created attachment 37491 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37491=edit proposed patch, new version * gnat.dg/sso/*.adb: Robustify dg-output directives. Changed

[Bug c++/69517] New: [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Bug ID: 69517 Summary: [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69436] Method returning "auto&" fails to resolve "*this" (-std=c++17)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69436 --- Comment #6 from vmorgulys at gmail dot com --- Hello Jonathan, I have another similar issue with auto and deleted contructrors ("=delete"). They are not detected at compile time. Do you think it is related to what you mention in your

[Bug fortran/69524] New: [ICE] [F2008] Compiler segfaults on simple testcase @ -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69524 Bug ID: 69524 Summary: [ICE] [F2008] Compiler segfaults on simple testcase @ -O0 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37499|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/60526] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Accepts-invalid: Variable name same as type name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37495|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/69267] [cilkplus] ICE when calling a function with an empty class as an argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/3920] [PPC] wrong register number for CTR in stabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug fortran/66094] Handle transpose(A) in inline matmul

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66094 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 --- Comment #3 from Erich Keane --- Don't know if it is a result of the red-hat packaging, or the .1 release, but the 3.7.1 release from here: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html seems to no longer crash.(In reply to Erich Keane from comment

[Bug target/5372] [powerpc-*-eabi] -mno-eabi not working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5372 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-01-02 06:15:10 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug target/10778] Exception handling seems to fail on a powerpc using GCC 3.2.3 powerpc-eabi cross compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10778 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|

[Bug c++/67824] constexpr char* compare operations not constexpr, but char[] operations ARE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67824 --- Comment #2 from Erich Keane --- Don't know if it is a result of the red-hat packaging, or the .1 release, but the 3.7.1 release from here: http://llvm.org/releases/download.html seems to no longer crash.

[Bug fortran/69497] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:3701

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69497 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/69514] ICE with nested array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69514 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69518] New: Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37493=edit C source code gcc trunk, dated 2016012

[Bug rtl-optimization/69447] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O2 -fno-schedule-insns and mixed 8/16/32/64bit arithmetics @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69447 --- Comment #14 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #13) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #11) > > Without knowing the lra-remat code at all, I just wonder if subreg_regs > > needs to be one per the

[Bug c++/69509] [5/6 regression] infinite loop compiling a VLA in a recursive constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69509 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug target/69512] [6 Regression] ICE when using avx with i586

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69512 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Jan 27 17:08:00 2016 New Revision: 232885 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232885=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-27 Uros Bizjak PR target/69512

[Bug c++/69267] [cilkplus] ICE when calling a function with an empty class as an argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69267 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 17:17:23 2016 New Revision: 232887 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232887=gcc=rev Log: 2016-01-15 Ryan Burn PR cilkplus/69267 *

[Bug testsuite/69479] [4.9 only] test case gcc.dg/and-1.c fails on power for gcc 4.9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69479 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug java/50045] [4.9/5/6 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -fdump-tree-all

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug debug/69518] [6 Regression] Flag -g causes "error: type variant has different TYPE_VFIELD"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69518 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/15767] ppc-linux type attribute aligned, packed on vector types behaves wrongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15767 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2004-06-01 22:33:42 |2016-1-27 CC|

[Bug c/68062] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when comparing vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68062 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Jan 27 19:13:42 2016 New Revision: 232894 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232894=gcc=rev Log: PR c/68062 * c-typeck.c (build_binary_op) [EQ_EXPR, GE_EXPR]:

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 --- Comment #21 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #19) > /tmp/test2.cc:9:24: error: return-statement with a value, in function > returning 'void' [-fpermissive] > return P->bar() + *P; >

[Bug rtl-optimization/16456] PowerPC - redundant subtract involving pointer types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16456 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] [6 Regression] coremark regression due to r229685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 --- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Wed Jan 27 19:19:47 2016 New Revision: 232897 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232897=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68398 * params.def

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] [6 Regression] coremark regression due to r229685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/22238] Awful error messages with virtual functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22238 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

  1   2   3   >