[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- *** Bug 69649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/69651] New: Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651 Bug ID: 69651 Summary: Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37565 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37565=edit gcc6-pr69241.patch So, it seems we have at least 3 different issues, the attached patch fixes two of them, there is

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Kyrill, > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html Ah - much better! I have approved the parts of your series that I can, In

[Bug lto/69650] New: [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 Bug ID: 69650 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69268] [5 Regression] Sourced allocation calls function twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69268 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug target/69120] sse2_shufpd_v2df_mask has wrong name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin --- Looked closely. The name was chosen intentionally to simplify "sse2_shufpd" expand. If we want to fix this name - new subst attribute need to be introduced and if () emit_insn (avx512vl_... else

[Bug target/69120] sse2_shufpd_v2df_mask has wrong name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120 --- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin --- Will fix.

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Wed Feb 3 09:44:18 2016 New Revision: 233099 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233099=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/69418] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type ... in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418 --- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Wed Feb 3 09:44:18 2016 New Revision: 233099 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233099=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/69418] [5/6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected record_type ... in gfc_class_vptr_get, at fortran/trans-expr.c:149

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69418 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Wed Feb 3 10:39:09 2016 New Revision: 233101 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233101=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #6 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vehre Date: Wed Feb 3 10:39:09 2016 New Revision: 233101 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233101=gcc=rev Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2016-02-03 Andre Vehreschild

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Well, comment 9 of 69241 is an exact dup.

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #12 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11) > Hi Kyrill, > > > For this failure (among others) I proposed the series at: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01713.html > > Ah -

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37564 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37564=edit tentative patch Fixes the two failures, while still passing vect/pr46032.c.

[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 37566 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37566=edit output assembly (intel syntax) The failing instructions are around line 156: mov eax, DWORD PTR 60[esp] #

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #18 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Here is Jakub's testcase. It it shorter and nicer than that from comment1. struct A { virtual void m1 (); }; struct C : A { void m1 () { m1 (); } }; template struct B { T *t; B (T *x) : t (x) {

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4) > Looks good but I'm not sure if you should ask for in other partition for > builtins. We ask for in_other_partition for parallelized fns

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug target/69118] Wrong condition in avx512f_maskcmp3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libfortran/69651] Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651 --- Comment #1 from Kirill Yukhin --- File is: libgfortran/io/list_read.c

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #4 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi Paul, I will have a look at it today. May be a fresh pair of eyes can be of help. - Andre

[Bug fortran/67451] [5/6 Regression] [F08] ICE with sourced allocation from coarray.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451 --- Comment #7 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commited fix; waiting one week for error reports before closing.

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- *** Bug 69649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug target/69647] gcc build for avr-unknown-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69647 --- Comment #2 from Pieter Cardoen --- I am using binutils 2.24. Best regards Pieter

[Bug c++/69641] invalid int32 comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69641 --- Comment #3 from Vladimir Sedach --- Thanks. Better to use "unsigned int" than options: 0 > (int)((unsigned int)i + 0x0080)

[Bug c++/69631] [6 Regression] Bogus overflow in constant expression error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On February 3, 2016 10:01:45 AM GMT+01:00, "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 > >--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > Created attachment 37565 [details] > gcc6-pr69241.patch > > So, it seems we have at least 3 different issues, the attached patch fixes > two of them,

[Bug libgomp/69597] execution failure for libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/atomic_capture-1.c with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69597 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 69597 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c/69627] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in (anonymous namespace)::layout::get_state_at_point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69653] New: More CSE opportunities in address expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69653 Bug ID: 69653 Summary: More CSE opportunities in address expressions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #17) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > > Created attachment 37565 [details] > > gcc6-pr69241.patch > > > > So, it seems we have at least 3

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37567 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37567=edit ten

[Bug target/69118] Wrong condition in avx512f_maskcmp3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118 --- Comment #2 from Kirill Yukhin --- Author: kyukhin Date: Wed Feb 3 13:44:50 2016 New Revision: 233103 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233103=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69118 gcc/ * config/i386/sse.md (define_insn

[Bug target/69118] Wrong condition in avx512f_maskcmp3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 --- Comment #2 from Zdenek Sojka --- If I understand the .reload dump correctly, r87 is not live in insn 289, but it should be: ... 289: r416:SI=r87:SI+const(unspec[`*.LC9'] 1) REG_EQUAL `*.LC9' Creating newreg=417 from

[Bug target/69120] sse2_shufpd_v2df_mask has wrong name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Can you add a comment and resolve it?

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69631] [6 Regression] Bogus overflow in constant expression error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug target/69647] gcc build for avr-unknown-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69647 --- Comment #3 from Pieter Cardoen --- Created attachment 37571 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37571=edit console printout

[Bug c++/69594] ICE in discriminator_for_local_entity for libgomp.c++/udr-*.C with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69594 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 69594 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/69120] sse2_shufpd_v2df_mask has wrong name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69652] New: [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652 Bug ID: 69652 Summary: [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69649] [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/69649] New: [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69649 Bug ID: 69649 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in assign_temp Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to vehre from comment #4) > Hi Paul, > > I will have a look at it today. May be a fresh pair of eyes can be of help. > > - Andre Thanks. I haven't given it much attention yet. I diverted into

[Bug tree-optimization/66330] gcc.c-torture/execute/20040709-1.c compilation fatal error with -flto -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66330 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ipa/69241] [6 Regression] ICE with noreturn and function that return non-POD

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Ah, as for whether versioning supports changing return type to void, clearly it supports it and even fnsplit uses it for the !split_part_return_p. So perhaps: --- ipa-split.c.jj1 2016-01-04

[Bug target/69613] [6 Regression] wrong code with -O and simple 128bit arithmetics and vectors @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69613 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/69118] Wrong condition in avx512f_maskcmp3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69118 --- Comment #3 from Kirill Yukhin --- Author: kyukhin Date: Wed Feb 3 13:48:27 2016 New Revision: 233104 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233104=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69118. gcc/ * config/i386/sse.md (define_insn

[Bug c++/69056] Argument pack deduction failure during overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69056 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Tobler --- Author: andreast Date: Wed Feb 3 22:15:21 2016 New Revision: 233111 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233111=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-03 Andreas Tobler PR bootstrap/69611

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- In addition, these also fail (hiding PR69607, which is triggered in the same test-cases when undoing r232384): ... FAIL: libgomp.oacc-fortran/atomic_capture-1.f90 -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_nvidia=1

[Bug libstdc++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- is not unrelated, it declares overloads of std::abs. If you include a genuinely unrelated file then you get your expected output.

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libgomp/69607] undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- With: - the tentative fix for PR69599 - the tentative fix for PR59627 - the undo of r232384 patch that caused PR69655 this still reproduces. Apparently this is an independent issue.

[Bug other/62002] -fcilkplus switch breaks format attribute.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62002 --- Comment #6 from Viacheslav Chernyshev --- Still happens on 5.3.0.

[Bug target/53440] [arm] generic thunk code fails for method which uses '...'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug target/69660] New: Microblaze break_handler and symbol `_interrupt_handler' is already defined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69660 Bug ID: 69660 Summary: Microblaze break_handler and symbol `_interrupt_handler' is already defined Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #3) > It's not crashing for me, but I think I agree there's a problem. Will > investigate a bit. Looks like PIC register is not initialized properly.

[Bug fortran/69654] New: ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 Bug ID: 69654 Summary: ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug tree-optimization/69653] More CSE opportunities in address expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69653 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Since tree optimizer cannot handle cse opportunities as described here, backend needs to force register scaling expr (instead of loop invariant part address expression) out of memory reference,

[Bug target/69634] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-vrp @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69634 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug libgomp/69625] deadlock in libgomp.c/doacross-1.c test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69625 --- Comment #1 from Dominik Vogt --- It's a bug in the S/390 backend that sometimes trashes r6 in vararg functions. We're working on a fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/69652] [6 Regression] [ICE] verify_ssa fail w/ -O2 -ffast-math -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69652 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Schmidt --- Yeah, my current theory is that r87 is spilled at the start, then the spill reg is inherited in all the existing uses of it, and lra thinks it can avoid storing it to memory. Then we add a new reference to

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69644] ICE with -O on __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with short in extract_insn, at recog.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69644 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 3 22:38:56 2016 New Revision: 233113 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233113=gcc=rev Log: PR target/69644 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c

[Bug c++/69657] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69662] New: -Wplacement-new on allocated one element array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662 Bug ID: 69662 Summary: -Wplacement-new on allocated one element array members Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/69662] -Wplacement-new on allocated one element array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug target/69663] New: [ARM] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69663 Bug ID: 69663 Summary: [ARM] Implement overflow arithmetic standard names {u,}{add,sub,mul}v4 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/69661] New: missing -Wsequence-point warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661 Bug ID: 69661 Summary: missing -Wsequence-point warning Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug target/69461] [6 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69461 --- Comment #16 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Feb 4 00:39:34 2016 New Revision: 233120 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233120=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-03 Michael Meissner

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > I bet that adding an int overload that redirects to __builtin_abs similar to > the others will fix the issue. Hmm, I wonder if the following needs to hold true: extern

[Bug c/69627] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) in (anonymous namespace)::layout::get_state_at_point

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69627 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Feb 3 22:40:22 2016 New Revision: 233114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233114=gcc=rev Log: PR c/69627 * diagnostic-show-locus.c (layout::get_state_at_point):

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #5 from Wilco --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > Recategorising as component=c++, and removing the regression marker (because > > the change in libstdc++ that reveals

[Bug libstdc++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- This exhibits the same problem: namespace foo { inline double abs(double __x) { return __builtin_fabs(__x); } } using foo::abs; #include int wrap_abs (int x) { return std::abs (x) +

[Bug c++/69662] -Wplacement-new on allocated one element array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69662 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug c/69661] missing -Wsequence-point warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > Note I see the long, long long, int128, float, double, long double > overloads, but where is the plain int overload defined? In the libc header, not in libstdc++.

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > (In reply to Wilco from comment #5) > > I bet that adding an int overload that redirects to __builtin_abs similar to > > the others will fix the issue. > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/69195] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr44913.c FAILs with -O3 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69195 --- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9) > I think we have another bug in addition to the bug where we reuse a register > that is already in use. We have the rtl below which is used to initialize >

[Bug fortran/68442] ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/69665] New: Internal error on #pragma push_macro("__FILE__")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69665 Bug ID: 69665 Summary: Internal error on #pragma push_macro("__FILE__") Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/49973] Column numbers count special characters as multiple columns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49973 --- Comment #11 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This should be fixed in libcpp, probably in lex.c, but maybe other places also. A good testcase to start with would be: /* ñ /* */ /* a /* */ cc1 -Wcomment prog.cc:1:7: warning: "/*" within comment

[Bug preprocessor/69664] [6 Regression] column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 Summary|column

[Bug preprocessor/69664] New: column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 Bug ID: 69664 Summary: column info is lost Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor

[Bug fortran/69397] ICE on missing subprogram in generic interface

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69397 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/8529] wontcompile copy() of map to ostream_iterator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8529 Annaliese Saint changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joesiahleif at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69666] New: gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "verify_gimple failed"

zero/trunk/root-gcc --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160203 (experimental) [trunk revision 233104] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk abc.c -O2 abc.c: In function 'fun2': abc.c:13:1: error: conversion of register to a different size } ^ VIEW_CO

[Bug lto/69655] [6 Regression] libgomp lto failures: segfault in cgraph_node::mark_force_output

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69655 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

  1   2   >