[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #18 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13) > Seems get_ref_base_and_extent already has code for some cases of the > flexible array members, but it has apparently some dead code in it that > wasn't really

[Bug lto/69630] [6 Regression] LTO ICE in types_same_for_odr at ipa-devirt.c:402

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/69146] [5 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69146 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug sanitizer/69656] -fsanitize=undefined compile time hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #27 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:54:37 2016 New Revision: 233132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233132=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][2/4] Fix operand costing logic for SMUL[TB][TB] PR

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #15 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:54:37 2016 New Revision: 233132 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233132=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][2/4] Fix operand costing logic for SMUL[TB][TB] PR

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P4 Component|tree-optimization

[Bug sanitizer/69276] Address sanitizer does not handle heap overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69276 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgomp/69607] undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 --- Comment #4 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #3) > Tested -flto-partition=. > > fails: > - balanced > - 1to1 > > passes: > - max > - none > - one Same with -fno-use-linker-plugin.

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #25 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:50:12 2016 New Revision: 233130 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233130=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOTE_MODE

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #13 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:50:12 2016 New Revision: 233130 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233130=gcc=rev Log: [ARM] PR target/65932: stop changing signedness in PROMOTE_MODE

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #14 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:51:35 2016 New Revision: 233131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233131=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][1/4] PR target/65932: Add testcase PR target/65932

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #26 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:51:35 2016 New Revision: 233131 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233131=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][1/4] PR target/65932: Add testcase PR target/65932

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #28 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:56:13 2016 New Revision: 233133 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233133=gcc=rev Log: [cse][3/4] Don't overwrite original rtx when folding source of set

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #17 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:57:36 2016 New Revision: 233134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233134=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][4/4] Adjust gcc.target/arm/wmul-[123].c tests PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #29 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:57:36 2016 New Revision: 233134 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233134=gcc=rev Log: [ARM][4/4] Adjust gcc.target/arm/wmul-[123].c tests PR

[Bug sanitizer/69276] Address sanitizer does not handle heap overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69276 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Feb 4 11:50:40 2016 New Revision: 233137 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233137=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR sanitizer/69276 * g++.dg/asan/pr69276.C: New test. PR

[Bug fortran/69654] ICE in gfc_trans_structure_assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69654 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69643] Address space discarded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69666] [5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "verify_gimple failed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69666 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/69423] [6 Regression] Invalid optimization with deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69423 --- Comment #8 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org --- I recognize most of the code your patch strips, because I initially wrote/modified it to get the deferred length character arrays working. I am somewhat unconvinced that removing them is safe.

[Bug target/69648] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -O -mtune=winchip-c6 -fPIC -fexpensive-optimizations -msse4 @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69648 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/69650] [6 Regression] ICE in linemap_line_start, at libcpp/line-map.c:803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug preprocessor/69664] [6 Regression] column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/69659] [6 Regression] ICE on using option -frepack-arrays, in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Seems get_ref_base_and_extent already has code for some cases of the flexible array members, but it has apparently some dead code in it that wasn't really meant to be dead (hint, this check is after a while

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14) > > But I guess even this doesn't help, while it will help poor man's flexible > > array members in C/C++, in this Fortran case the problem is that there

[Bug fortran/69646] multiple warnings with -Wintrinsics-std

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69646 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69639] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener

[Bug target/69639] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69639 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 --- Comment #16 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Feb 4 09:56:13 2016 New Revision: 233133 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233133=gcc=rev Log: [cse][3/4] Don't overwrite original rtx when folding source of set

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note the dead code is there since r204391. Perhaps we need goto done; vs. goto done2;, so that for MEM_REF/TARGET_MEM_REF we bypass this check?

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #17 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #16) > (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #14) > > > But I guess even this doesn't help, while it will help poor man's flexible > > > array members in

[Bug target/69634] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -O2 -fno-dce -fschedule-insns -fno-tree-vrp @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69634 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c/69669] New: ICE with enum __attribute__((mode(QI)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669 Bug ID: 69669 Summary: ICE with enum __attribute__((mode(QI))) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/65932] [5 Regression] Linux-3.10.75 on arm926ej-s does not boot due to wrong code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932 --- Comment #30 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed for GCC 6. I've asked for a backport to GCC 5 and if approved I'll do it after it had a bit of time to bake on trunk.

[Bug target/67714] [6 Regression] signed char is zero-extended instead of sign-extended

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67714 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/69653] More CSE opportunities in address expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69653 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > But I guess even this doesn't help, while it will help poor man's flexible > array members in C/C++, in this Fortran case the problem is that there is > COMMON /FMCOM/ X(1) > in this TU, while >

[Bug target/69667] [6 Regression] ppc64le -mlra: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/69659] [6 Regression] ICE on using option -frepack-arrays, in gfc_conv_descriptor_data_get

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c/69661] missing -Wsequence-point warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69661 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/29815] internal compiler error with option -mfloat-gprs=yes and -mcpu=505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29815 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug bootstrap/69677] [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69677 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- STV turns: insn 21 19 23 4 (parallel [ (set (reg:DI 102 [ val ]) (and:DI (reg/v:DI 97 [ val ]) (mem/u:DI (plus:SI (mult:SI (reg/v:SI 96 [ mode ])

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 Andreas Tobler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/69677] [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69677 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > Created attachment 37584 [details] > gcc6-pr69677.patch > > I'm currently bootstrapping/regtesting --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7 > --with-fpmath=sse i686-linux

[Bug c/69669] [5/6 Regression] ICE with enum __attribute__((mode(QI)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 4 22:17:05 2016 New Revision: 233154 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233154=gcc=rev Log: PR c/69669 * c-decl.c (finish_enum): When honoring mode attribute,

[Bug c/69669] [5 Regression] ICE with enum __attribute__((mode(QI)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69669 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE with |[5 Regression] ICE with

[Bug rtl-optimization/64682] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Feb 4 23:09:51 2016 New Revision: 233159 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233159=gcc=rev Log: combine: distribute_notes again (PR69567, PR64682) As it happens the patch I

[Bug rtl-optimization/69567] PowerPC64: cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Feb 4 23:09:51 2016 New Revision: 233159 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233159=gcc=rev Log: combine: distribute_notes again (PR69567, PR64682) As it happens the patch I

[Bug other/69582] [meta-bug] Cilk+

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||69024, 69021, 69017 --- Comment #4

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #26 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 4 22:15:33 2016 New Revision: 233153 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233153=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/69368 * tree-dfa.c (get_ref_base_and_extent): Remove

[Bug preprocessor/69664] [6 Regression] column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 --- Comment #4 from David Malcolm --- Candidate patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00372.html

[Bug libgomp/69607] undefined reference to MAIN__._omp_fn.0 in atomic_capture-1.f with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69607 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37585 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37585=edit tentative patch (In reply to iverbin from comment #9) > (In reply to vries from comment #8) > > (In reply

[Bug target/69667] [6 Regression] ppc64le -mlra: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69577] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with -fno-forward-propagate -mavx and 128bit arithmetics since r215450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69577 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 4 22:10:56 2016 New Revision: 233152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233152=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69577 Revert: 2015-10-29

[Bug target/68124] [6 Regression] Many i386 test failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68124 --- Comment #13 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 4 22:10:56 2016 New Revision: 233152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233152=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69577 Revert: 2015-10-29

[Bug rtl-optimization/67609] [5 Regression] Generates wrong code for SSE2 _mm_load_pd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609 --- Comment #45 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Feb 4 22:10:56 2016 New Revision: 233152 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233152=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/69577 Revert: 2015-10-29

[Bug rtl-optimization/69567] PowerPC64: cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Feb 4 23:16:44 2016 New Revision: 233160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233160=gcc=rev Log: combine: distribute_notes again (PR69567, PR64682) As it happens the patch I

[Bug rtl-optimization/64682] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64682 --- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Feb 4 23:16:44 2016 New Revision: 233160 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233160=gcc=rev Log: combine: distribute_notes again (PR69567, PR64682) As it happens the patch I

[Bug target/69667] [6 Regression] ppc64le -mlra: ICE: Max. number of generated reload insns per insn is achieved (90)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69667 --- Comment #11 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Feb 4 21:05:14 2016 New Revision: 233147 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233147=gcc=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-02-04 Michael Meissner

[Bug c/69680] New: stdlib.h does not declare aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69680 Bug ID: 69680 Summary: stdlib.h does not declare aligned_alloc Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/69567] PowerPC64: cstore optimisation produces bad code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69567 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69680] stdlib.h does not declare aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69680 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jeff Hammond from comment #0) > It seems that none of the GCC 5.3.0 headers declare this function... Because GCC doesn't provide a C library, it uses the one from your OS. Presumably it

[Bug c/69680] stdlib.h does not declare aligned_alloc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69680 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/51837] Use of result from 64*64->128 bit multiply via __uint128_t not optimized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51837 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #1

[Bug bootstrap/69677] [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69677 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69146] [5 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69146 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/69609] [6 Regression] block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time, REE consumes much memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/39159] unhelpful attribute warning on matching declaration after definition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159 wipedout at yandex dot ru changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wipedout at yandex dot ru

[Bug libstdc++/69626] [6 Regression] std::strtoll etc. no longer defined in c++98 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69626 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Thu Feb 4 23:47:21 2016 New Revision: 233161 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233161=gcc=rev Log: Test for C99 stdlib.h functions with -std=c++98 PR libstdc++/69626

[Bug libstdc++/69626] [6 Regression] std::strtoll etc. no longer defined in c++98 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69626 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69682] expression (a && (b==c)) with side effects rewritten to ((b==c) & a)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69682 --- Comment #1 from Mike Liang --- Created attachment 37587 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37587=edit Makefile

[Bug tree-optimization/69682] New: expression (a && (b==c)) with side effects rewritten to ((b==c) & a)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69682 Bug ID: 69682 Summary: expression (a && (b==c)) with side effects rewritten to ((b==c) & a) Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/3920] [PPC] wrong register number for CTR in stabs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3920 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/69350] Don't define the C99 functions in -std=c++98 mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69350 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- The simplest solution might be something like: --- a/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cmath +++ b/libstdc++-v3/include/c_global/cmath @@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ _GLIBCXX_BEGIN_NAMESPACE_VERSION return

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > I don't think "(int)( != )" is a valid constant integer expression > in either C or C++. (definitely not in C). This is why GCC rejects it. Oops, good point.

[Bug tree-optimization/69682] expression (a && (b==c)) with side effects rewritten to ((b==c) & a)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69682 --- Comment #2 from Mike Liang --- Created attachment 37588 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37588=edit run tests

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think "(int)( != )" is a valid constant integer expression in either C or C++. (definitely not in C). This is why GCC rejects it.

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug c++/69681] New: C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 Bug ID: 69681 Summary: C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/69681] C/C++ FEs do not consider comparisons of distinct function pointers to be constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69681 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- (Sorry about the typos in the original comment. To fix them, s/since both foo and bar/since both foo and bar are/ s/when comparing and pointers/when comparing pointers/ s/the subsequent declarations/then

[Bug bootstrap/69677] [6 Regression] bootstrap failed with --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69677 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Another problem. STV is disabled even when stack is aligned: [hjl@gnu-skl-1 pr69677]$ cat x.i struct bar { int i[16] __attribute__ ((aligned(16))); }; extern void fn2 (void); long long a, b; struct bar fn1

[Bug c++/69658] [6 Regression] Bogus "C99 designator outside aggregate initializer" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just a shot in the dark: --- gcc/cp/init.c.jj2016-01-29 12:12:46.0 +0100 +++ gcc/cp/init.c 2016-02-04 14:49:15.383997315 +0100 @@ -1636,16 +1636,15 @@ expand_default_init (tree binfo, tree

[Bug bootstrap/69611] Bootstrap broken on PowerPC FreeBSD, IEEE 128-bit floating point support.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69611 --- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt --- Andreas, if this is complete, please move to RESOLVED/FIXED state. Thanks!

[Bug rtl-optimization/67396] [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression compiling variadic function with many arguments in RTL DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67396 --- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou --- It's the --param max-dse-active-local-stores stuff, but the default value is apparently not well suited to this testcase.

[Bug target/68273] [5/6 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > I am currently testing the following patch to eventually mitigate the issue > somewhat by forcing all "registers" to have non-qualified type (their >

[Bug sanitizer/69656] -fsanitize=undefined compile time hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/69644] ICE with -O on __sync_bool_compare_and_swap with short in extract_insn, at recog.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69644 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Feb 4 13:59:27 2016 New Revision: 233139 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233139=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-02-03 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/63805] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2327 with -mcpu=power8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63805 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt --- >From correspondence with Uli Weigand, it appears that the code is valid even with misaligned data, but a locking implementation is needed. I haven't checked whether other targets succeed here; that would

[Bug target/69671] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69671 Bug ID: 69671 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vl-vpmovqb-1.c scan-assembler-times vpmovqb[ \\t]+[^{\n]*%ymm[0-9]+[^\n]*%xmm[0-9]+{%k[1-7]}{z}(?

[Bug c++/69672] New: Useless -Wenum-compare when comparing enum vaue against the same value in enum hack

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69672 Bug ID: 69672 Summary: Useless -Wenum-compare when comparing enum vaue against the same value in enum hack Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/69656] -fsanitize=undefined compile time hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- So somewhat oldish trunk shows 30s -> 170s for me. Nothing obvious in -ftime-report. Generated assembly is 82MB vs. 16MB so we're shoveling a lot more code through the machinery and that's what we'd need

[Bug sanitizer/69656] -fsanitize=undefined compile time hog

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69656 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Hmm, today's clang takes over 11 minutes to compile the testcase with -fsanitize=undefined. The instrumented spots are fewer however: 28856 callq __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch 22770

[Bug fortran/53086] [4.8 Regression] 416.gamess in SPEC CPU 2006 miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53086 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #24 from Dominique d'Humieres --- FIXED??

[Bug fortran/69636] ICE(s) on using option -fmodule-private

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69636 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/69274] [6 Regression] 435.gromacs performance regression after r231814 on x86 Haswell and bdver2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

  1   2   3   >