https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69015
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:26:21 2016
New Revision: 233286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233286=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-01 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:32:37 2016
New Revision: 233292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233292=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-14 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:43:01 2016
New Revision: 233299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233299=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-28 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:42:34 2016
New Revision: 233298
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233298=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-27 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57580
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed also for 5.4+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66904
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:12:32 2016
New Revision: 233304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233304=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add complain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 10 19:35:35 2016
New Revision: 233305
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233305=gcc=rev
Log:
PR c++/68926
* pt.c (resolve_nondeduced_context): Add complain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404
--- Comment #28 from Michael Meissner ---
I agree the 'fix' was a work around. I think the real fix is to make the
addresses into normal addresses but I need some way of marking the address to
say this is ok as a fused address, but not as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-02-09 7:47 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Could you try whether this fixes it and still passes regression tests (esp.
> the
> 67881 testcase)?
There is a warning which cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:24:29 2016
New Revision: 233285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233285=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2015-12-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:41:37 2016
New Revision: 233297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233297=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-22 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69546
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69756
Bug ID: 69756
Summary: Passing a multidimensional variable-length array into
a lambda (by reference) causes a segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66368
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66337
--- Comment #3 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kelvin
Date: Wed Feb 10 21:19:17 2016
New Revision: 233308
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233308=gcc=rev
Log:
a branch to work on pr 66337
Added:
branches/ibm/kelvin-66337/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65134
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68255
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e29253 at jp dot ibm.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68672
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37657=edit
gcc6-pr68672-wip.patch
WIP patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68926
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #13 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Does the patch let the test pass on x86_64-apple-darwin15,
> both with -m32 and -m64?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64001
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714
--- Comment #21 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-02-10 1:45 PM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Gah. Try this one instead.
I fixed this up after I sent last mail and restarted build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
Bug ID: 69757
Summary: OpenBSD requires -fPIC to build.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68420
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Can you attach the config.log ? It might be that PIE needs to enabled by
default instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69760
Bug ID: 69760
Summary: Wrong 64-bit memory address caused by an unneeded
overflowing 32-bit integer multiplication on x86_64
under -O2 and -O3 code optimization
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69758
Bug ID: 69758
Summary: [6 Regression] Plugins can't include params.h (missing
params.list)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
Moritz Klammler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||moritz at klammler dot eu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68726
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69757
--- Comment #2 from Edd Barrett ---
Created attachment 37660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37660=edit
config.log
Attached is the config.log without adjusting CFLAGS and without using
--with-pic.
FWIW, OpenBSD has been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct { float r, g, b; } t_rgb;
void write_xpm(void *out, unsigned int flags, const char *title,
const char *legend, const char *label_x, const char *label_y,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
--- Comment #5 from Moritz Klammler ---
Created attachment 37659
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37659=edit
Improved version of download_prerequisites script that verifies package
checksums
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69761
Bug ID: 69761
Summary: collect2 cannot find ld when built with in-tree
binutils on Cygwin
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296
--- Comment #6 from Moritz Klammler ---
I'm sorry, the attachment was meant for this other issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61439
I don't know how this could happen but apparently, I hit some wrong button and
posted it to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69759
Bug ID: 69759
Summary: __builtin_alloca undocumented
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753
Bug ID: 69753
Summary: [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression
before ‘>’ token
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66904
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:30:27 2016
New Revision: 233290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233290=gcc=rev
Log:
PR go/66904
cmd/go: fix "#cgo pkg-config:" comments with gccgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:31:06 2016
New Revision: 233291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233291=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-11 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
--- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:36:53 2016
New Revision: 233294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233294=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-01-19 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Feb 10 18:46:38 2016
New Revision: 233302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233302=gcc=rev
Log:
Backported from mainline
2016-02-08 Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67653
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on |[4.9 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] ICE in |[4.9 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69399
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68176
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5 Regression] all pch |[4.9 Regression] all pch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69762
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
IIRC locales need some libc support and the hookup for libstdc++ to libc uses
some glibc extensions due to needing threaded support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69739
--- Comment #2 from John ---
After reporting the bug, I noticed that in the actual code I have (not the
reduced version I posted before), adding the (:) stride doesn't always make the
ICE go away.
What solved the problem once and for all (and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #14 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2)
> Patch posted for review:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg02372.html
For your original patch, my test result is below (only compare 5 result files,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69491
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33781
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63577
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I'd agree it's too invasive to backport -- both changes are new optimizations
and there may well have been follow-up patches for both. The potential for
destabilizing the release branches would seem to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69630
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Uhm, a fallout from the patch allowing cxa_pure_virtual in the list of possible
targets.
Index: ipa-devirt.c
===
--- ipa-devirt.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50971
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69729
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yes, the patch is meant to disbale streaming of instrumentation thunks, so we
do not output two function bodies for one assembler name into LTO files. Can we
possibly just fix the conditional instead of fully
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743
--- Comment #2 from Konstantin Sadov ---
I just reproduced that in 4.9.3, but the error is a little different
[error]
error: no matching function for call to ‘f(int, int&, lots of int&, int&,
double&)’
note: candidates are:
note: template void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
I will implement the optimization soon (with transparent aliases it is finally
not too hard to do), but the patch will not be backporable to gcc 5 and for
years it was possible to output weakref and its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35629
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
> > The patch simply prohibits references to all COMDAT and EXTERN methods and
> > vtables of types with visibility attributes which will prevent optimizing of
> > many inlines i.e. in libstdc++.
>
> Hmm?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39714
Bug 39714 depends on bug 39723, which changed state.
Bug 39723 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression][cond-optab] worse code with long long
shifts on v850
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bonzini at gnu dot org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69573
--- Comment #15 from Chen Gang ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #9)
> I built the x86_64-apple-darwin15.3.0 cross-compiler to better understand
> what the problem is but I don't see it. The cross compiler says the size
> and alignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
At least it's very slow doing the configure checks and I see it LTOs gmp all
the time (configuring mpfr). Just trying regular LTO bootstrap right now btw,
w/o profile-feedback.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Bug ID: 69742
Summary: ICE with -O3 and ASSOCIATE containing repeated
expression
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
--- Comment #2 from mrestelli ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #1)
> What happens if you run it with
>
> gfortran -ffrontend-optimize
Same ICE
> and with
>
> gfortran -O3 -fno-frontend-optimize ?
Works correctly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743
Bug ID: 69743
Summary: function overload - template instantiation depth
exceeds maximum (gcc4, clang - no problem)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69743
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59878
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 10 11:10:58 2016
New Revision: 233263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233263=gcc=rev
Log:
Constrain std::valarray functions and operators
PR libstdc++/69116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
--- Comment #11 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-02/msg00033.html
Waiting for review and approval of bugreporters whether the patch fixes the
issue or not.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, not inlining compile_length_quantifier_node fixes it as well. It's inlined
in
compile_length_tree.
-fdisable-tree-uncprop1 fixes it - that hints more at a target specific RTL
issue
or an RTL expansion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Wed Feb 10 11:25:33 2016
New Revision: 233265
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233265=gcc=rev
Log:
Constrain std::valarray functions and operators
PR libstdc++/69116
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69737
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69735
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69736
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Feb 10 08:36:03 2016
New Revision: 233262
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233262=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-02-10 Richard Biener
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741
Bug ID: 69741
Summary: forall array scalar loop counters
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59878
--- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #9)
By comparing cloog sources with isl tags I got:
> cloog-0.16.0: isl-0.05
> cloog-0.16.1: isl-0.05.1
> cloog-0.16.2: isl-0.06
> cloog-0.16.3: isl-0.07
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710
--- Comment #8 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reproduced on arm with saxpy.c. The dump for slp is as below:
:
_82 = prologue_after_cost_adjust.7_43 * 4;
vectp_dy.13_81 = dy_9(D) + _82;
_87 = prologue_after_cost_adjust.7_43 * 4;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> This fixes it:
Are you going to post it to gcc-patches (with ChangeLog and testcase)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69710
--- Comment #9 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also the problem exists only for arm because it doesn't support [base+index]
addressing mode for vect load/store. I guess mips doesn't either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
Target Milestone|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
It combines
(insn 353 352 354 63 (set (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(compare:CCZ (mem/f:SI (plus:SI (reg/v/f:SI 225 [ node ])
(const_int 32 [0x20])) [10 MEM[(struct QtfrNode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67451
--- Comment #12 from Dominik Vogt ---
The patch works on s390x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
#0 noce_emit_store_flag (if_info=0x7fffd7d0, x=0x75ade840,
reversep=1, normalize=0) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk3/gcc/ifcvt.c:839
#1 0x017adfa3 in noce_try_store_flag_constants (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69291
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 37651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37651=edit
preprocessed source
Build with -m32 -mtune=generic -march=i586 -O [-fPIC]
-fdisable-rtl-ce2 (if-conversion after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo