[Bug c++/69831] Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69831 --- Comment #2 from sniderdj at umich dot edu --- Created attachment 37697 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37697=edit For convenience, the result of the compilation

[Bug target/60818] ICE in validate_condition_mode on powerpc*-linux-gnu*

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60818 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69831] Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69831 --- Comment #1 from sniderdj at umich dot edu --- *** Bug 69830 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/69831] New: Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69831 Bug ID: 69831 Summary: Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0

[Bug c++/69830] Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69830 sniderdj at umich dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/69830] Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69830 sniderdj at umich dot edu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/69830] New: Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69830 Bug ID: 69830 Summary: Issue with passing a reference_wrapper to a placeholder when using a pointer to member function in bind Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0

[Bug fortran/69456] Namelist value with trailing sign is ignored without error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69456 --- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle --- From the Fortran 95 Standard regarding exponents. The basic form may be followed by an exponent of one of the following forms: (1) A sign followed by a digit-string (2) E followed by zero or more

[Bug target/67458] x86: atomic store with memory_order_release doesn't order other stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67458 Yichao Yu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yyc1992 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 --- Comment #14 from kugan.vivekanandarajah at linaro dot org --- On 16/02/16 02:02, jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 > > --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- > (In reply to kugan from

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 --- Comment #8 from hongxu jia --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > It is not a regression and is user visible change, so I think changing it > just in GCC 6 is sufficient. Got it, thanks for pointing it out. I will backport to our

[Bug fortran/69668] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Error reading namelist opened with DELIM='NONE'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69668 --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 16 00:51:58 2016 New Revision: 233443 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233443=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug fortran/69668] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Error reading namelist opened with DELIM='NONE'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69668 --- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 16 00:38:18 2016 New Revision: 233442 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233442=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from trunk

[Bug libfortran/69651] [6 Regession] Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651 --- Comment #13 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Tue Feb 16 00:38:18 2016 New Revision: 233442 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233442=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Jerry DeLisle Backport from

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68973] [6 regression] Internal compiler error on power for gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr67211.C

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68973 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra --- Author: amodra Date: Mon Feb 15 23:29:17 2016 New Revision: 233438 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233438=gcc=rev Log: [RS6000] reload_vsx_from_gprsf splitter This is PR68973 part 2, caused by the

[Bug c/62184] [C/C++] Extend -Wempty-body to 'while' loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62184 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack

[Bug c/61864] -Wcovered-switch-default to identify "dead" default branch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61864 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic CC|

[Bug c++/31573] -Wall-all to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/31573] -Wall-all to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at doublewise dot net ---

[Bug other/53313] Add warning levels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53313 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/7651] Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7651 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack --- Comment #34 from

[Bug libfortran/69651] [6 Regession] Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Mon Feb 15 22:31:13 2016 New Revision: 233436 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233436=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug c++/69658] [6 Regression] Bogus "C99 designator outside aggregate initializer" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69658] [6 Regression] Bogus "C99 designator outside aggregate initializer" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69658 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 15 22:05:12 2016 New Revision: 233435 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233435=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69658 * init.c (expand_default_init): Only call reshape_init

[Bug c++/69797] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/69797] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 15 21:30:50 2016 New Revision: 233434 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233434=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69797 * c-common.c (sync_resolve_size): Diagnose too few

[Bug fortran/69741] Bad error in formal with array scalar loop counters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69741 --- Comment #7 from Harald Anlauf --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #6) > > I think it should be clearer from the error message of _what is wrong_? > > Agreed -> Updated the summary, set to NEW and enhancement. A potential

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68890] [5/6 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2113

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68890] [5/6 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2113

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 15 21:16:10 2016 New Revision: 233433 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233433=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/68890 * constexpr.c (verify_ctor_sanity): Remove

[Bug c++/68890] [5/6 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2113

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 15 21:13:57 2016 New Revision: 233430 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233430=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/68890 * constexpr.c (verify_ctor_sanity): Remove

[Bug c++/69753] [6 Regression] bogus: expected primary-expression before ‘>’ token

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69753 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 15 21:14:05 2016 New Revision: 233431 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233431=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69753 * search.c (any_dependent_bases_p): Split out...

[Bug fortran/69829] [OOP] Case label overlaps for unlimited polymorphic select type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69829 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug c++/69826] problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69826 --- Comment #2 from collette --- The problem is that this code used to compile. And now, it doesn't. It compiles fine with intel compiler (under Windows).

[Bug fortran/69829] New: [OOP] Case label overlaps for unlimited polymorphic select type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69829 Bug ID: 69829 Summary: [OOP] Case label overlaps for unlimited polymorphic select type Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/69826] problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69826 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What does the CILK+ documentation say about the pragma and using macros. I do know that not all pragma want to process macros in them.

[Bug c/69828] result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 --- Comment #2 from Tom Ace --- My apologies. I read the language spec before posting but I didn't read carefully enough. I agree with your resolution of the report as invalid. Thanks for the fast response.

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 --- Comment #5 from Jean-Michaël Celerier --- > In my experience, options like -Weverything tend to be too noisy to be > generally useful for projects of non-trivial size. It's always possible to run -Weverything -Wno-foo -Wno-bar to remove

[Bug target/69738] PowerPC built-in __builtin_addg6s should be enabled on 64-bit

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69738 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/69828] result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/69828] New: result of shift operation has wrong type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69828 Bug ID: 69828 Summary: result of shift operation has wrong type Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/68890] [5/6 Regression] ICE in verify_ctor_sanity, at cp/constexpr.c:2113

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68890 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 --- Comment #24 from Josh Triplett --- Also, even the documentation seems unfortunate: "In C++ this is normally not an error since const variables take the place of #defines in C++." Why would C code not do this too? The GCC documentation

[Bug c/28901] -Wunused-variable ignores unused const initialised variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28901 Josh Triplett changed: What|Removed |Added CC||josh at joshtriplett dot org ---

[Bug c++/69363] ICE when doing a pragma simd reduction with max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69363 iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug target/69827] [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-cygwin

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/69776] [4.9/5 Regression] Wrong optimization with aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69776 --- Comment #8 from Alexander Cherepanov --- --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- > Actually the middle-end memory model makes this valid and FREs redundant store > elimination breaks it. And function boundaries are not an obstacle for

[Bug tree-optimization/69827] [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69827] New: [5 Regression] sincos not done

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69827 Bug ID: 69827 Summary: [5 Regression] sincos not done Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/69534] [6 Regression] openjade is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69534 --- Comment #10 from Kamil Dudka --- It makes sense to me. Thanks for the explanation!

[Bug driver/66293] Support -Weverything to enable all warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66293 Jean-Michaël Celerier changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeanmichael.celerier@gmail.

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- As for the wrong-code, we used to emit: ... vect_cst_.23_105 = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 }; vect_cst_.24_106 = { 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1 };

[Bug libgomp/69555] libgomp.c++/target-6.C fails because of undefined behaviour

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69555 --- Comment #8 from Jiong Wang --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > { > try > { > ... > D.2689 = (sizetype) D.2477; > D.2690 = D.2689 + 1; > D.2691

[Bug c/69798] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in c_parser_braced_init, at c/c-parser.c:4338

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69798 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/65479] sanitizer stack trace missing frames past #0 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65479 Joakim Tjernlund changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakim.tjernlund at infinera dot c

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37694 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37694=edit gcc6-pr69820.patch As for the ICE, the following patch works for me. VI_512 iterator is only used in the vcond*

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- knl ICE: int a[100], b[100]; short c[100]; void fn1() { for (int i = 0; i < 100; ++i) b[i] = a[i] * (bool)c[i]; }

[Bug fortran/40165] Excessive warnings for REAL DO loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40165 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 --- Comment #13 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to kugan from comment #11) > In remove_unreachable_nodes, just before ipa-cp, this node becomes local > (address taken is false and local.local = true). After that, when > ipa_propagate_frequency

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 --- Comment #4 from Vsevolod Livinskiy --- Test case also cause internal compiler error when it is compiled for knl. > g++ -march=knl -O3 repr.cpp repr.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’: repr.cpp:23:45: internal compiler error: in

[Bug target/68191] s390x Linux Split Stacks support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68191 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- It is not a regression and is user visible change, so I think changing it just in GCC 6 is sufficient.

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69826] New: problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69826 Bug ID: 69826 Summary: problem with cilkplus pragma and preprocessor variable Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 --- Comment #2 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hi, I believe this happens because of setting TREE_TYPE (decl) to error_mark_node in c_parser_translation_unit(): FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (incomplete_record_decls, i, decl) if (DECL_SIZE

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/69794] [5/6 Regression] std::regex_search match failure with regex object with flags grep|icase

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69794 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69811] [5/6 Regression] A gcc folding issue at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69811 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4 --- Comment #2 from Richard

[Bug c/69825] False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c/69825] False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 --- Comment #1 from Dr. David Alan Gilbert --- Oops, forgot to mention; this is on fedora 23 x86-64.

[Bug c/69824] [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69823] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/69825] New: False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69825 Bug ID: 69825 Summary: False -Wdiv-by-zero warning when it should be short-circuited Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- So first half of a patch is Index: gcc/tree-vrp.c === --- gcc/tree-vrp.c (revision 233418) +++ gcc/tree-vrp.c (working copy) @@

[Bug c++/69797] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in operator[], at vec.h:714

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69797 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37693 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37693=edit gcc6-pr69797.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c/69824] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69824 Bug ID: 69824 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] internal compiler error in unshare_body Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/69796] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid code in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:83

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69796 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/69595] [6 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bound warning due to missed optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69595 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 15 13:49:42 2016 New Revision: 233425 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233425=gcc=rev Log: 2016-02-15 Richard Biener PR

[Bug testsuite/69586] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-21.c for target defaulting to short enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69586 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/69802] [4.9/5/6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O1 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69802 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37692 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37692=edit gcc6-pr69802.patch Untested fix.

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug tree-optimization/69732] Vectorization runtime alias check due to failed dependence analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69732 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |--- Summary|[6 Regression]

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c/69819] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree check: expected function_type or method_type, have array_type in function_args_iter_init, at tree.h:4536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/69820] [6 Regression] Test miscompiled with -O3 option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69820 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/69804] [5/6] ICE with -fsanitize=undefined -fcheck-pointer-bounds -mmpx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug other/69821] -fdebug-prefix-map doesn't affect gcc command line switches in DWARF DW_AT_producer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69822] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in get_rename, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:1202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69822 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64 |aarch64, x86_64-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/69719] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719 Bug 69719 depends on bug 69783, which changed state. Bug 69783 Summary: [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/69783] [6 Regression] Loop is not vectorized after r233212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69783 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69823] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: in create_pw_aff_from_tree, at graphite-sese-to-poly.c:445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69823 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

  1   2   >