https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
There is too little information to be useful.
At least please build with debugging info enabled and find out
exactly what is going on.
Next build with -fsanitize=undefined to see if any undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50394
Marek Behun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kabel at blackhole dot sk
--- Comment #32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70112
Bug ID: 70112
Summary: [lto] Segmentation fault in Libreoffice's program
gengal.bin when build with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66382
dan.parrot at mail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan.parrot at mail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70111
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70104
--- Comment #2 from Niks ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> 'a' || 'A' is 1, so there is no reason to give an error about it.
> The error in the second case is because you have two case labels with the
> same value, 1. That is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Supposedly viable workarounds: omit "-fno-omit-frame-pointer" or use "-O2".
(required and necessary options for observation; omitting any of the
"-f"-options compiles succcessfully: "-Os -march=v10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
This is a regression for the gcc-5 branch compared to the gcc-4_9-branch at
r233942 (not seeing the error for the same options as observed on the
gcc-5-branch).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69040
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70079
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #29 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #28)
> Can anybody comment on the state of this problem here? Were the two commits
> in comment #2 and comment #3 merged into mainline at some point?
AFAIK, those
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29854
--- Comment #7 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #6)
> Looking at the current code in postreload.c, it seems that the patch somehow
> made it into mainline at some point. Although some of the lines now look a
> bit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70106
--- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka ---
Oops, wrong reduction. struct A has to be a template.
template
struct A
{
int x;
void foo () const {
(A::x);
};
};
void
foo ()
{
A ().foo ();
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70106
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70110
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||i?86-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70111
Bug ID: 70111
Summary: Internal compiler error on constant enum access
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160306 (experimental) [trunk revision 234012] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O2 -c small.c
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O3 -c small.c
$ gcc-5.3 -m32 -O3 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O3 -c small.c
small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70109
Bug ID: 70109
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr36098.c
scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorizing stmts usin g
SLP" 0
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69799
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
The patch fixes coarray_allocate_3.f08 but the new testcase fails:
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../gfortran
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/gcc/testsuite/gfortran/../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58646
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-10-07 00:00:00 |2016-3-6
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70108
Bug ID: 70108
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/speculative-store-2.c
-O0 -g thread simulation test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70058
--- Comment #8 from Paul ---
I downloaded the latest version I could find from
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mingw-w64/?source=typ_redirect. It is
version 5.3.0. The problem does not exist with version 5.3.0. My apologies
for not finding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70098
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70088
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089
--- Comment #4 from Richard Earnshaw ---
*** Bug 70088 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70089
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29969
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #4)
> If this is true, using 64 bit fmov for block moves could be beneficial.
> Still, I'd not enable this by default but allow the user to turn it on
> with an -m option.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
All supported gcc versions ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
Bug ID: 70107
Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3546 with
-mcpu=power8
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29854
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67185
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
With checking:
temp.ii:9:13: internal compiler error: in get_partitioning_class, at
symtab.c:1794
int main() {}
^
0x90b559 symtab_node::get_partitioning_class()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67185
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
Bug 29842 depends on bug 28144, which changed state.
Bug 28144 Summary: floating point constant -> byte/char/short conversion is
wrong for java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27394
Bug 27394 depends on bug 28144, which changed state.
Bug 28144 Summary: floating point constant -> byte/char/short conversion is
wrong for java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28144
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67185
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36170|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67210
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36183|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67185
Casey Carter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Casey at Carter dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27394
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29842
Bug 29842 depends on bug 27394, which changed state.
Bug 27394 Summary: double -> char conversion varies with optimization level
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27394
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67628
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70087
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24801
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70106
Bug ID: 70106
Summary: [4.9/5.3/6.0][C++11 or above] adding parenthesis [cerr
<< (var)] cause error: invalid static_cast from type
'const size_t {aka const long unsigned int}' to type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23868
--- Comment #28 from Oleg Endo ---
I've just briefly checked gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-apply4.c on sh-elf after
removing the following conditions:
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/builtin-apply4.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70100
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70105
Bug ID: 70105
Summary: [6 regression] giant warning when building gcc-5 with
gcc-6
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70104
Bug ID: 70104
Summary: Should give an error when using multiple case value in
switch
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70096
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
54 matches
Mail list logo
