[Bug c++/70616] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:303

-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160409 (experimental) [trunk revision 234848] (GCC) $ $ g++-4.6 small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk small.cpp small.cpp: In instantiation of ‘void test() [with int = 0]’: small.cpp:20:15: required from

[Bug c++/70615] New: ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in add_expr, at tree.c:7870

-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160409 (experimental) [trunk revision 234848] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -O0 small.cpp $ g++-5.3 -O1 small.cpp $ $ g++-trunk -O1 small.cpp small.cpp: In function ‘int main()’: small.cpp:26:21: internal

[Bug c/70614] New: GCC gets stuck with -O

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70614 Bug ID: 70614 Summary: GCC gets stuck with -O Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c++/70613] New: -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 Bug ID: 70613 Summary: -fabi-version docs don't match implementation Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/70603] gcc alignas issue with pointers to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603 --- Comment #4 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou --- But of course. I am checking the alignment of the wrong things, in my example...

[Bug c++/70603] gcc alignas issue with pointers to class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603 --- Comment #3 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou --- I am trying to use posix_memalign and a double pointer to double, and that is also failing. Is this an overalignment issue as well? #include #include struct B { B() { x = new

[Bug fortran/30792] DATA implied-do substring allowed with -std=f95/f2003

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30792 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Still present at revision r234859.

[Bug libfortran/25830] [libgfortran] Optionally support multi-process locking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug libstdc++/70607] The return type of std::conj must be std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607 --- Comment #2 from Alexander Voigt --- I absolutely agree, that the definition of the std::conj() overloads in C++11 is problematic. However, in my opinion one has to be strict when implementing the standard. Otherwise, people might

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Patches are posted at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00929.html https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00995.html

[Bug testsuite/66402] gcc.dg/uninit-19.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- *** Bug 66402 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sat Apr 9 19:09:02 2016 New Revision: 234864 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234864=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-09 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/68566

[Bug fortran/47040] Make error message for empty array constructor more helpful/correct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47040 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug fortran/68600] Inlined MATMUL is too slow.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #8) > Created attachment 36887 [details] > A faster version > > I took the example code found in > http://wiki.cs.utexas.edu/rvdg/HowToOptimizeGemm/ where the

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/64039] [5 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c scan-tree-dump optimized "return 28;"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64039 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 17:36:24 2016 New Revision: 234863 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234863=gcc=rev Log: PR testsuite/64039 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-dom-cse-2.c: xfail

[Bug rtl-optimization/66669] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2015-12-01

[Bug rtl-optimization/66669] FAIL: gcc.dg/loop-8.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 17:15:15 2016 New Revision: 234861 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234861=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/9 * gcc.dg/loop-8.c: Skip on

[Bug testsuite/66402] gcc.dg/uninit-19.c FAILs with PIE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66402 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of pr65364?

[Bug testsuite/70324] FAIL: gcc.dg/pic-1.c (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70324 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Component|target

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 70592, which changed state. Bug 70592 Summary: Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/70612] -mtune=native -maes does not detect that AES is not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612 Daniel Gutson changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Daniel

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 --- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sat Apr 9 16:14:02 2016 New Revision: 234858 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234858=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug target/70612] -mtune=native -maes does not detect that AES is not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #10 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- asked follow-up question ( https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00444.html ), waiting for answer before marking fixed-resolved.

[Bug tree-optimization/68644] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <p_" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 15:55:42 2016 New Revision: 234855 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234855=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68644 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c:

[Bug tree-optimization/68644] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <p_" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 15:54:29 2016 New Revision: 234854 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234854=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68644 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-lt-2.c:

[Bug rtl-optimization/64886] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr64434.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand "Swap operands" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886 --- Comment #4 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 15:47:50 2016 New Revision: 234853 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234853=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/64886 * gcc.dg/pr64434.c: Skip on

[Bug rtl-optimization/64886] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr64434.c scan-rtl-dump-times expand "Swap operands" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64886 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Sat Apr 9 15:43:05 2016 New Revision: 234852 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234852=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/64886 * gcc.dg/pr64434.c: Skip on

[Bug target/70612] New: -mtune=native -maes does not detect that AES is not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70612 Bug ID: 70612 Summary: -mtune=native -maes does not detect that AES is not present Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/56149] 64 bit gFortran-C interop hidden character argument length passed as 32 bit value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56149 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70584] constexpr variables cannot be used as intrinsic arguments where an immediate is expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Gutson --- (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #4) > Thanks Martin. > > Andres is finishing 70210 soon next week, and he can address this after s/70210/70201/ > solving it. Feel free to assign this issue to

[Bug c++/70584] constexpr variables cannot be used as intrinsic arguments where an immediate is expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Gutson --- Thanks Martin. Andres is finishing 70210 soon next week, and he can address this after solving it. Feel free to assign this issue to him (andres.tirabos...@tallertechnologies.com).

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 --- Comment #9 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Sat Apr 9 15:28:24 2016 New Revision: 234851 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234851=gcc=rev Log: Fix pdr accesses order 2016-04-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug lto/70611] New: Compiling binutils with -flto -Wstack-usage fails.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70611 Bug ID: 70611 Summary: Compiling binutils with -flto -Wstack-usage fails. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/63469] Automatic reallocation of allocatable scalar length even when substring implicitly specified

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63469 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The test in comment 4 works with trunk (6.0), but not with 5.3.1.

[Bug ipa/70583] [6 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C -std=gnu++98 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-* (elf) CC|

[Bug fortran/47469] Check whether arrayfunc_assign_needs_temporary misses TBP/PPC attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47469 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- PING!

[Bug fortran/57778] Missing warning for -Wimplicit-procedure for dummy arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57778 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/58667] Add -Wfloat-conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58667 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/58001] Make it possible to silence "Extension: Tab character in format" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58001 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from

[Bug fortran/51820] [doc] underscoring documentation incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51820 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Is the following patch a step in the right direction? --- ../_clean/gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-03-13 09:07:16.0 +0100 +++ gcc/fortran/invoke.texi 2016-04-09 15:58:43.0 +0200

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 --- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sat Apr 9 13:29:32 2016 New Revision: 234850 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234850=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/52403] coarray component gives error with CLASS( ) declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52403 Bug 52403 depends on bug 51632, which changed state. Bug 51632 Summary: [OOP] Bogus argument checking for generated _def_init parameter and _copy procedure with CAF https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/51632] [OOP] Bogus argument checking for generated _def_init parameter and _copy procedure with CAF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70610] New: [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70610 Bug ID: 70610 Summary: [6 regression] error: invalid initialization of non-const reference of type Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/63158] Possible wrong code with absend optional BT_CLASS -> optional BT_DERIVED dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63158 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 --- Comment #17 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #12) > Confirmed. As noted in bug 67911, the solution proposed for the next > version of C++ is the following: >

[Bug fortran/27436] gfortran: Abort compiling if there are insufficient data descriptors in format after reversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27436 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See also pr28397.

[Bug fortran/28397] Check format mismatches at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28397 --- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres --- See also pr27436.

[Bug fortran/38979] OpenMP extension: THREADPRIVATE for EQUIVALENCEd symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38979 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/42478] [meta-bug] gfortran OpenMP bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42478 Bug 42478 depends on bug 38979, which changed state. Bug 38979 Summary: OpenMP extension: THREADPRIVATE for EQUIVALENCEd symbols https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38979 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/62007] default(none) conflicts with iteration variable in openmp parallel loop simd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62007 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/61628] [MinGW)Write of medium sized or larger matrix fails without error message.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61628 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/70609] std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file size is 0 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609 --- Comment #1 from furkan --- Also worth to note that I've tested a similar program with Boost::Filesystem, QFile and Poco::File they all worked, so I don't think there is a system-related bug

[Bug tree-optimization/70586] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit and 64-bit modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70586 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|4.9.4 |7.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6

[Bug libstdc++/70609] New: std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file size is 0 bytes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70609 Bug ID: 70609 Summary: std::experimental::filesystem::copy fails if the file size is 0 bytes Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70586] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit and 64-bit modes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70586 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Apr 9 11:23:51 2016 New Revision: 234849 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234849=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/70586 * tree-ssa-ifcombine.c

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I am using OSX but I agree, after building the compiler from the tip > of gcc-5-branch, that the problem does not exist there, but is present > at gcc-5_3_0_release. Indeed! but nothing can be done

[Bug c++/21802] Two-stage name lookup fails for operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 --- Comment #3 from Peter Knowles --- I am using OSX but I agree, after building the compiler from the tip of gcc-5-branch, that the problem does not exist there, but is present at gcc-5_3_0_release.

[Bug libfortran/70311] libgfortran build dies on "implicit declaration of function strncasecmp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70311 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68600] Inlined MATMUL is too slow.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68600 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I think you are seeing the effects of inefficiencies of assumed-shape arrays. > > If you want to use matmul on very small matrix sizes, it is best to > use fixed-size explicit arrays. Then IMO the

[Bug testsuite/70516] Regtesting acats hangs on x86_64-apple-darwin15.4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70516 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/70573] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/halt_on_error-1.c -O* execution test x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70573 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/70573] FAIL: c-c++-common/asan/halt_on_error-1.c -O* execution test x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70573 --- Comment #11 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Sat Apr 9 09:24:45 2016 New Revision: 234848 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234848=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-09 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug fortran/70592] Addressing error in dynamically-allocated character array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70592 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/70605] allocatable character scalar in type empty after assign

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug fortran/67674] Incorrect result or ICE for deferred-length character component

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67674 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nuclearlee at gmail dot com ---

[Bug fortran/68241] [meta-bug] Deferred-length character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241 Bug 68241 depends on bug 70605, which changed state. Bug 70605 Summary: allocatable character scalar in type empty after assign https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/21802] Two-stage name lookup fails for operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802 --- Comment #9 from David Abdurachmanov --- Created attachment 38230 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38230=edit Failing file (pre-processed)

[Bug c++/21802] Two-stage name lookup fails for operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802 David Abdurachmanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/70598] Fortran OpenACC host_data construct ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to vries from comment #1) > On trunk Sorry, that should have been gomp-4_0-branch

[Bug fortran/70598] Fortran OpenACC host_data construct ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70598 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/70608] New: Braced initializer in default argument misses friendship

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70608 Bug ID: 70608 Summary: Braced initializer in default argument misses friendship Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot

[Bug target/68945] enable libcilkrts on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945 --- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #7 from Stefan Teleman --- >> Since Stefan hasn't followed up and I'm currently looking at other >> libcilkrts issues anyway, I'm taking over from here. > > Had every

[Bug libstdc++/70607] The return type of std::conj must be std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#1137