[Bug bootstrap/70650] [6 regression] bootstrap failure: ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3546

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin15 |x86_64-apple-darwin15,

[Bug bootstrap/70650] bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/70649] [6 Regression] Incorrect C++ warning on zero-sized array passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70649 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 --- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson --- Patch posted for review here https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html

[Bug bootstrap/70650] bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650 --- Comment #2 from Jack Howarth --- This regression is caused by the commit... r234959 | jason | 2016-04-13 16:11:20 -0400 (Wed, 13 Apr 2016) | 7 lines Pass

[Bug c++/70613] -fabi-version docs don't match implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70613 --- Comment #2 from Jim Wilson --- Patch posted for review here https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-04/msg00480.html

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #22 from Bill Schmidt --- The most suspicious thing I see in r224221 is following the gap adjustment: vect__39.29_261 = REALIGN_LOAD ; vectp_s.20_260 = vectp_s.20_278 +

[Bug c++/70653] New: bubble sorting algorithm fail to run on the compiler giving a bug in it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70653 Bug ID: 70653 Summary: bubble sorting algorithm fail to run on the compiler giving a bug in it Product: gcc Version: 3.0.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #21 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38258 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38258=edit Vectorization dump for r224221

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #20 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38257 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38257=edit Vectorization dump for r224220

[Bug bootstrap/70652] [6 Regression] r234966 causes bootstrap to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/70652] New: [6 Regression] r234966 causes bootstrap to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70652 Bug ID: 70652 Summary: [6 Regression] r234966 causes bootstrap to fail Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/70651] New: ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5728

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20160413 (experimental) [trunk revision 234931] (GCC) $ $ gcc-5.3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:4:3: internal compiler error: in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5728

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674 (r224221 is the true start of the problem)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[6 Regression] h264ref |[6 Regression] h264ref

[Bug bootstrap/70650] bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70650 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/64971] [5/6 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37433.c ICEs with -mabi=ilp32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug bootstrap/70650] New: bootstrap failure on x86_64 darwin

-darwin15.5.0/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs -B/sw/lib/gcc6/x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0/bin/ -B/sw/lib/gcc6/x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0/lib/ -isystem /sw/lib/gcc6/x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0/include -isystem /sw/lib/gcc6/x86_64-apple-darwin15.5.0/sys-include -I/sw/src/fink.build/gcc6-6.0.0-1/gcc-6-20160413/libstdc

[Bug c++/70543] [6 Regression] wrong non-const error for enable_if and constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70543 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/70649] [6 Regression] Incorrect C++ warning on zero-sized array passing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70649 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/70649] New: [6 Regression] Incorrect C++ warning on zero-sized array passing

bp .cfi_def_cfa 7, 8 ret .cfi_endproc .LFE0: .size _Z3foov, .-_Z3foov .ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20160413 (experimental)" .section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits [hjl@gnu-6 pr60336d]$ The warning is incorrect since there is no change in zero-sized array passing.

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 70588, which changed state. Bug 70588 Summary: SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/70588] SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/16994] [meta-bug] VLA and C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994 Bug 16994 depends on bug 70019, which changed state. Bug 70019 Summary: VLA size overflow not detected https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/70019] VLA size overflow not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/69517] [5 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.3, 6.0 Summary|[5/6

[Bug c++/69517] [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 --- Comment #9 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016 New Revision: 234966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements PR

[Bug c++/70588] SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016 New Revision: 234966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements PR

[Bug c++/70019] VLA size overflow not detected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70019 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Apr 13 23:26:41 2016 New Revision: 234966 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234966=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/69517 - [5/6 regression] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements PR

[Bug target/70640] IEEE 128-bit floating point negative/abs has two thinkos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70640 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 mednafen at sent dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mednafen at sent dot com ---

[Bug c++/70647] Feature request: warning for self-moving in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/19808] miss a warning about uninitialized member usage in member initializer list in constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matt at godbolt dot org ---

[Bug c++/70648] [6 Regression] adplug-xmms fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/70648] New: [6 Regression] adplug-xmms fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70648 Bug ID: 70648 Summary: [6 Regression] adplug-xmms fails to compile Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/70641] [5 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #36 from Jakub Jelinek --- Tobias said he still sees some -fcompare-debug issue even with both of these patches, so not closing this yet.

[Bug c++/70641] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 20:43:10 2016 New Revision: 234962 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234962=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70641 * ipa-pure-const.c (pass_nothrow::execute): Call

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 20:35:59 2016 New Revision: 234961 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234961=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70594 * tree-sra.c (create_access_replacement,

[Bug c++/70647] New: Feature request: warning for self-moving in constructors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70647 Bug ID: 70647 Summary: Feature request: warning for self-moving in constructors Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #6 from Denis Vlasenko --- I can collapse the chain of inlines down to this and still see the bug. Removing "__attribute__((always_inline))", or merging __swab64p() and wwn_to_u64(), makes bug disappear. typedef unsigned char u8;

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #5 from Denis Vlasenko --- Even smaller reproducer. Bug disappears if "__attribute__((always_inline))" is removed everywhere. typedef unsigned char u8; typedef unsigned int u32; typedef unsigned long long u64; static inline

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #4 from Denis Vlasenko --- Shorter reproducer: typedef __signed__ char __s8; typedef unsigned char __u8; typedef __signed__ short __s16; typedef unsigned short __u16; typedef __signed__ int __s32; typedef unsigned int __u32;

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 Denis Vlasenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vda.linux at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug testsuite/68242] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-2.c, and other OpenACC reduction test case "oddities"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug testsuite/68242] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/reduction-2.c, and other OpenACC reduction test case "oddities"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68242 --- Comment #7 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Wed Apr 13 18:54:41 2016 New Revision: 234957 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234957=gcc=rev Log: libgomp/ PR testsuite/68242 *

[Bug target/70568] [4.9/5/6 regression] PowerPC64: union of floating and fixed doesn't use POWER8 GPR/VSR moves

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70568 acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 13 18:32:11 2016 New Revision: 234956 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234956=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70627 * decl.c (start_enum): Don't change an existing

[Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 --- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth --- SPARC V9 part fixed for 6.1.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "2 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68749 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth --- Author: ro Date: Wed Apr 13 18:13:31 2016 New Revision: 234955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234955=gcc=rev Log: Fix gcc.dg/ifcvt-4.c on 64-bit SPARC (PR rtl-optimization/68749) PR

[Bug target/65344] Exception is not catched on AIX - class with more ancestors, virtual method throws

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65344 Miroslav Jezbera changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.3 |5.3.1 --- Comment #1 from Miroslav

[Bug bootstrap/70173] make distclean: leaves stage_final and libcc1/compiler-name.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70173 --- Comment #7 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Wed Apr 13 18:02:08 2016 New Revision: 234954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234954=gcc=rev Log: Make distclean clean up more (PR70173) Currently, distclean does not remove

[Bug c++/70635] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on (and rejects) valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70635 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on

[Bug c++/70635] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on (and rejects) valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70635 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Wed Apr 13 17:11:03 2016 New Revision: 234953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234953=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-04-13 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug rtl-optimization/70461] [6 Regression] Performance regression after r234527

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70461 Alexander Fomin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #6 from Alexander

[Bug c++/70639] internal compiler error: in guard_tinfo_to_string, at c-family/c-indentation.c:560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639 --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 13 16:28:46 2016 New Revision: 234952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234952=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70639 * c-indentation.c

[Bug c++/70639] internal compiler error: in guard_tinfo_to_string, at c-family/c-indentation.c:560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70639] internal compiler error: in guard_tinfo_to_string, at c-family/c-indentation.c:560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/70436] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -Wparentheses missing ambiguous else warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70436 --- Comment #16 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Wed Apr 13 16:00:52 2016 New Revision: 234949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234949=gcc=rev Log: PR c/70436 * c-parser.c (c_parser_statement_after_labels): Add

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on |[4.9/5 Regression] ICE on

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to psturm from comment #13) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12) > > Patches are posted at > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00929.html > >

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #34 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #33) > (pop_labels): During named_labels traversal, just push the slot > pointers into a vector, then qsort it by DECL_UID and only then > call

[Bug c++/58822] Segfault when calling make_shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58822 --- Comment #30 from Michi Henning --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #29) > > make_shared(args) doesn't always do the same thing as shared_ptr(new > > T(args)) > > It does do effectively the same thing. The difference in behaviour

[Bug c++/70615] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in add_expr, at tree.c:7870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf --- Created attachment 38256 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38256=edit Linux kernel config

[Bug c/70646] New: Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 Bug ID: 70646 Summary: Corrupt truncated function Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug tree-optimization/70604] switch statement optimization creates dead code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70604 Josh Poimboeuf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/70646] Corrupt truncated function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70646 --- Comment #2 from Josh Poimboeuf --- $ gcc -Wp,-MD,drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/.qla_attr.o.d -nostdinc -isystem /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/5.3.1/include -I./arch/x86/include -Iarch/x86/include/generated/uapi -Iarch/x86/include/generated

[Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039 --- Comment #8 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Apr 13 15:04:57 2016 New Revision: 234946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234946=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug c++/70634] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault (program cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70634 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 13 15:02:23 2016 New Revision: 234945 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234945=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70634 * pt.c (instantiation_dependent_uneval_expression_p):

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 14:45:46 2016 New Revision: 234942 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234942=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70594 * decl.c (pop_labels_1): Removed.

[Bug c++/70615] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in add_expr, at tree.c:7870

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70615 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Wed Apr 13 14:33:53 2016 New Revision: 234940 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234940=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70615 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_genericize_r): Expand PTRMEM_CST

[Bug c++/70639] internal compiler error: in guard_tinfo_to_string, at c-family/c-indentation.c:560

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70639 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- So I think rather this one: --- a/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c +++ b/gcc/c-family/c-indentation.c @@ -239,10 +239,11 @@ should_warn_for_misleading_indentation (const token_indent_info _tinfo, if

[Bug ada/70645] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fguess-branch-probability breaks debug-information, only in Ada

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70645 Bug ID: 70645 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fguess-branch-probability breaks debug-information, only in Ada Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/70623] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in compute_antic at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70623 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- "Patch" in testing. Note that the issue seems to be oscillating values because of bitmap_set_and only taking expressions from 'dest', pruning out those for which the value-and removed their value. But

[Bug c++/70641] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38254 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38254=edit gcc6-pr70641.patch Untested fix.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #18 from Bill Schmidt --- Never mind, it would get zero initialization, and specifying that directly doesn't help.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #17 from Bill Schmidt --- Though as I look at it, the "p" field is undefined in Alan's test. Let me fix that and see what we get.

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38253 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38253=edit Vectorization dump with patch applied

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #15 from Bill Schmidt --- Created attachment 38252 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38252=edit Vectorization dump without patch

[Bug debug/70628] [5 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 13:57:29 2016 New Revision: 234937 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234937=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/70628 * explow.c (convert_memory_address_addr_space_1):

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #14 from Bill Schmidt --- Unfortunately the patch doesn't help with Alan's streamlined test. It still fails (tested on powerpc64le).

[Bug libstdc++/70607] The return type of std::conj must be std::complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Aha, that DR was reverted by http://wg21.link/lwg1522 (I failed to find it because the deleted text says "All the specified ..." and I searched for "All of the specified ..."

[Bug fortran/58000] Accept OPEN( ... NAME=) with -std=legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/58000] Accept OPEN( ... NAME=) with -std=legacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000 --- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Wed Apr 13 13:17:45 2016 New Revision: 234936 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234936=gcc=rev Log: 2016-04-13 Dominique d'Humieres PR

[Bug middle-end/70638] transaction_wrap: too strict compatibility check and transaction_pure wrappers fail to wrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70638 --- Comment #4 from Hillel Avni --- (In reply to torvald from comment #3) > (In reply to Hillel Avni from comment #2) > > On gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11, I must declare the wrapper as pure. > > But using that version the wrapper was indeed used and

[Bug c++/70641] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Guess in the if (callee_t && recursive_call_p (current_function_decl, callee_t)) continue; case we should set some bool flag, and if we decide to set nothrow flag at the end and we saw some

[Bug middle-end/70638] transaction_wrap: too strict compatibility check and transaction_pure wrappers fail to wrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70638 --- Comment #3 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Hillel Avni from comment #2) > On gcc-linaro-4.9-2014.11, I must declare the wrapper as pure. But using that version the wrapper was indeed used and not the original function,

[Bug c++/70627] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_type failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70627 --- Comment #7 from jseward at acm dot org --- I tried the fix at PR70029 comment 7 (disabling a check) but that doesn't help, at least for the original, unreduced test case (Unified_cpp_dom_animation0.ii).

[Bug debug/70628] [5 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 regression] ICE in |[5 regression] ICE in

[Bug target/70633] [5 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os (in 32-bit mode) on x86_64-linux-gnu: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] ICE on |[5 Regression] ICE on valid

[Bug c++/70641] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- Does the following fix it? I'm not entirely happy with it because of the comment. Index: gcc/tree-vect-stmts.c === ---

[Bug target/70633] [5/6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -Os (in 32-bit mode) on x86_64-linux-gnu: output_operand: invalid expression as operand

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70633 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 12:27:52 2016 New Revision: 234934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234934=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/70633 * gimplify.c (gimplify_init_constructor): Clear

[Bug debug/70628] [5/6 regression] ICE in get_reg_rtx, at emit-rtl.c:1025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70628 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Apr 13 12:26:26 2016 New Revision: 234933 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234933=gcc=rev Log: PR debug/70628 * rtl.h (convert_memory_address_addr_space_1): New

[Bug c++/70594] [6 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594 --- Comment #32 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38251 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38251=edit gcc6-pr70594.patch Alternate patch for the SRA fancy names in -fdump-final-insns= dumps (and other TDF_NOUID dumps).

[Bug tree-optimization/70130] [6 Regression] h264ref fails with verification error starting with r231674

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70130 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

  1   2   >