[Bug fortran/66461] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on missing end program in fixed source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461 --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- This is a bandaid, but it works. diff --git a/gcc/fortran/match.c b/gcc/fortran/match.c index 2490f856..726973a6 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/match.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/match.c @@ -1438,7 +1438,16 @@

[Bug target/71118] [5 Regression] ftois instruction not emitted for float -> int bitcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118 --- Comment #1 from Matt Turner --- (In reply to Matt Turner from comment #0) > Created attachment 38490 [details] > ftois.c > > For the attached ftois.c, gcc-4.9.3 -O2 -mcpu=ev67 emits > > : >0: 01 0f 1f 72 ftois

[Bug rtl-optimization/11488] Pre-regalloc scheduling severely worsens performance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11488 Matt Turner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattst88 at gmail dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug rtl-optimization/71119] New: [4.9 Regression] ftoit instruction not emitted for double -> long bitcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71119 Bug ID: 71119 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ftoit instruction not emitted for double -> long bitcast Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug rtl-optimization/71118] New: [5 Regression] ftois instruction not emitted for float -> int bitcast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71118 Bug ID: 71118 Summary: [5 Regression] ftois instruction not emitted for float -> int bitcast Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/70869] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Kai Tietz from comment #15) > Created attachment 38477 [details] Please send patches to gcc-patches (and me) as well as posting them on the PR. This change will mess with DECL_INITIAL every

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #10 from Nick --- I am currently testing both cases...

[Bug c++/71117] [6.1 regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 --- Comment #1 from Casey Carter --- Very closely related, but not an exact duplicate of, PR 71105.

[Bug c++/57335] internal compiler error: in cxx_eval_bit_field_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335 --- Comment #14 from Orgad Shaneh --- With 6.1, this doesn't only fail for static_assert. Even a simple function call fails: struct Bits { unsigned char a : 7; unsigned char b : 1; constexpr Bits() : a(0), b(0) {} }; struct Foo {

[Bug fortran/56226] Add support for DEC UNION and MAP extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/56226] Add support for DEC UNION and MAP extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 --- Comment #32 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 14 19:52:46 2016 New Revision: 236244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236244=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-14 Fritz Reese Backport from

[Bug fortran/71047] [7 Regression] Allocatable component of INTENT(OUT) dummy not set correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71047 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 14 19:52:46 2016 New Revision: 236244 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236244=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-14 Fritz Reese Backport from

[Bug c++/71117] New: [6.1 regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 Bug ID: 71117 Summary: [6.1 regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object Product: gcc

[Bug c++/71116] New: Lambdas should not be literal types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71116 Bug ID: 71116 Summary: Lambdas should not be literal types Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug target/71112] [6 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71112] [6 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Big-endian: (insn 5 4 6 (set (reg:DI 73) (high:DI (symbol_ref:DI ("_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_" t.i:5 -1 (nil)) (insn 6 5 7 (set (reg/f:SI 76) (unspec:SI [ (mem/u/c:SI

[Bug target/71112] [6 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Here is the full backtrace: #0 mark_jump_label_1 (x=0x0, insn=0x76cc5340, in_mem=true, is_target=false) at /data1/src/gcc-cavium/toolchain-6/scripts/../src/gcc/jump.c:1095 #1 0x00945cfa in

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Nick from comment #0) > Created attachment 38475 [details] > Source code trigging bug > > - Compiling amos/zunhj.f in scipy package crashes with: > > zunhj.f:1:0: > >SUBROUTINE

[Bug tree-optimization/71020] [6/7 Regression] SSA corruption: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 13 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71020 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug fortran/56226] Add support for DEC UNION and MAP extensions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 --- Comment #31 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:48:17PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 02:55:01PM +, fritzoreese at gmail dot com wrote: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56226 > > > > ---

[Bug fortran/71047] [7 Regression] Allocatable component of INTENT(OUT) dummy not set correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71047 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/71047] [7 Regression] Allocatable component of INTENT(OUT) dummy not set correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71047 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Sat May 14 15:29:13 2016 New Revision: 236241 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236241=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-14 Fritz Reese PR fortran/71047

[Bug target/71097] Additional testsuite failures with -mcmodel=medium

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71097 --- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Sat May 14 13:22:45 2016 New Revision: 236240 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236240=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71097 * config/i386/i386.md (*movtf_internal):

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Reduced test #include extern void abort(void); extern void exit(int); #define BITS 8 static unsigned long long const data[8] = { 0x123456789abcdefULL, 0x2468acf13579bdeULL,

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > And the exact same installation on XeonE5-266[5|0v3] works seamlessly. > So I wouldn't expect the tar, nor installation options to be the fault. Did you run the test suite on the Opteron

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #7 from Nick --- And the exact same installation on XeonE5-266[5|0v3] works seamlessly. So I wouldn't expect the tar, nor installation options to be the fault.

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug preprocessor/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #4 from Benjamin Robin --- If I preprocessed the source with GCC then compile it with Clang, I do not have the warning. Bug inside the compiler or the preprocessor ?

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #3 from Benjamin Robin --- If I preprocessed the source with clang then compile it with GCC, I do have the warning. This looks like it is related to the way NULL is expanded.

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #2 from Benjamin Robin --- Created attachment 38489 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38489=edit Preprocessed by Clang source file t.c attached

[Bug c/71115] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 --- Comment #1 from Benjamin Robin --- Created attachment 38488 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38488=edit Preprocessed by GCC source file t.c attached

[Bug c/71115] New: Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Bug ID: 71115 Summary: Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #6 from Nick --- http://ftp.download-by.net/gnu/gnu/gcc/gcc-6.1.0/gcc-6.1.0.tar.bz2 md5sum is good: 8fb6cb98b8459f5863328380fbf06bd1 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/gcc.html 2016-05-14 14:02 GMT+02:00

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #5 from Nick --- http://ftp.download-by.net/gnu/gnu/gcc/gcc-6.1.0/gcc-6.1.0.tar.bz2 md5sum is good: 8fb6cb98b8459f5863328380fbf06bd1 http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/gcc.html

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Same error with this compilation: Where did you get your gfortran 6.1?

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #3 from Nick --- Same error with this compilation: gfortran -O2 -march=corei7 -mtune=corei7 -c zunhj.f (still only on Opteron)

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 38486 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38486=edit Assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/ashldi-1.c compiled with r236090 Assembly for

[Bug target/71114] [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Created attachment 38485 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38485=edit Assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/ashldi-1.c for r236089 Assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/ashldi-1.c

[Bug target/71114] New: [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114 Bug ID: 71114 Summary: [7 Regression] Several test suite failures on x86_64-apple-darwin* after revision r236090 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/71087] scipy amos crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71087 --- Comment #1 from Nick --- I have debugged this further. This bug only happens on Opteron with : - 2354 - 2382 - 6136 Only those architectures I have available.

[Bug ada/71072] GNAT doesn't respect --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71072 --- Comment #2 from nicolas.boulenguez at free dot fr --- Does examples/first_steps/ada_main.gpr trigger the failure? And the same project with the C library removed? Once you have a minimal reproducer, you may get the exact compiler invokations

[Bug c++/71113] Adding "const" to value in constexpr constructor places const object in .bss instead of .rodata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71113 --- Comment #1 from Freddie Chopin --- BTW, I've come to the code as above from a slightly different scenario - initially I tried using references, but it was failing (placed in RAM, not in flash) no matter what I did. Now I think that the two

[Bug c++/71113] New: Adding "const" to value in constexpr constructor places const object in .bss instead of .rodata

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71113 Bug ID: 71113 Summary: Adding "const" to value in constexpr constructor places const object in .bss instead of .rodata Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71095] Problem with captureless generic lambda and calling function object with arguments passed by reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71095 --- Comment #2 from Karol Wozniak --- it seems to be same as: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70942

[Bug rtl-optimization/70825] x86_64: __atomic_compare_exchange_n() accesses stack unnecessarily

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70825 ghalliday at hpccsystems dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ghalliday at