[Bug libfortran/48925] Code cleanup in write_float.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71314] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-thread-14.c fails starting with its introduction in r235653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71314 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71314] test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-thread-14.c fails starting with its introduction in r235653

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71314 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Jun 1 02:37:50 2016 New Revision: 236974 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236974=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR tree-optimization/71314 gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71077] [7 Regression] gcc -lto raises ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71077 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Wed Jun 1 02:36:27 2016 New Revision: 236973 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236973=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR tree-optimization/71077 gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimization/71077

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- I didn't test carefully enough. The C front end does the right thing (below) but as you noted the C++ front end does still suffer from the problem. Thanks for double checking me! $

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|2016-05-06

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Resolution|FIXED

[Bug c++/57342] [C++11] Warning for narrowing conversion has ugly formatting for floating point number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342 Bug 57342 depends on bug 31158, which changed state. Bug 31158 Summary: wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 What|Removed

[Bug target/71186] PowerPC64: Autovectorised code hits ICE with -O3 -mpower9 -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71186 --- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 38617 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38617=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem

[Bug target/70589] PowerPC target attribute/pragma cannot set/disable -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70589 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71186] PowerPC64: Autovectorised code hits ICE with -O3 -mpower9 -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71186 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug jit/71334] gccjit's sized integers have different underlying types than stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334 --- Comment #3 from Ben Longbons --- What I'm trying to do is: * parse some source code from a new language I'm developing. * Emit that to machine code via some backend (C, GCCJIT, LLVM, firm, etc.) * Also emit a header file so that the library

[Bug c++/38677] extern template declaration accepted after explicit instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38677 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/31158] wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/57342] [C++11] Warning for narrowing conversion has ugly formatting for floating point number

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57342 Bug 57342 depends on bug 31158, which changed state. Bug 31158 Summary: wrong line number in warning: overflow in implicit constant conversion https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31158 What|Removed

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:34 2016 New Revision: 236953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236953=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug c++/71173] [6/7 regression] Qualified name lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71173 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:28 2016 New Revision: 236952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236952=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71173 - wrong qualified lookup PR c++/70522 *

[Bug c++/70522] Hidden friend functions block qualified name lookup into nested unnamed namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70522 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:28 2016 New Revision: 236952 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236952=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71173 - wrong qualified lookup PR c++/70522 *

[Bug c++/71166] [6/7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:46 2016 New Revision: 236955 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236955=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71166 - constexpr array init * decl2.c

[Bug c++/69515] partial specialization of variable templates is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:34 2016 New Revision: 236953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236953=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug c++/70735] [5/6/7 Regression] problem combining std::function, generic lambdas and static variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735 --- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:16 2016 New Revision: 236950 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236950=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70735 - generic lambda and local static variable * pt.c

[Bug c++/70584] constexpr variables cannot be used as intrinsic arguments where an immediate is expected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:22 2016 New Revision: 236951 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236951=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/70584 - error with parenthesized builtin arg *

[Bug c++/71227] [6/7 Regression] template friend function cannot be resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:40 2016 New Revision: 236954 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236954=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71227 - specializing hidden friend * pt.c

[Bug c++/60095] Dubious diagnostics for attempted surrogate call function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60095 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 21:36:34 2016 New Revision: 236953 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236953=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug ada/71317] Compiling gnat for rtems fails at s-taprop.adb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/71317] Compiling gnat for rtems fails at s-taprop.adb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue May 31 21:28:26 2016 New Revision: 236949 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236949=gcc=rev Log: * s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define. PR

[Bug jit/71334] gccjit's sized integers have different underlying types than stdint.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71334 --- Comment #2 from David Malcolm --- For reference, I get this output on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu: underlying size_t: gcc long unsigned int, gccjit unknown underlying uint32_t: gcc unsigned int, gccjit unsigned int underlying uint64_t: gcc long

[Bug libstdc++/71367] New: std::time_get does not implement 'r' or 'p'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71367 Bug ID: 71367 Summary: std::time_get does not implement 'r' or 'p' Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/71366] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160531 (experimental) [trunk revision 236912] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -O2 -c small.c $ gcc-6.1 -O3 -c small.c $ $ gcc-trunk -O3 -c small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation

[Bug libstdc++/71364] [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3 merge.cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Error message: In file included from include/range/v3/begin_end.hpp:23:0, from include/range/v3/core.hpp:17, from test/algorithm/merge.cpp:19:

[Bug libstdc++/71364] New: [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3 merge.cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364 Bug ID: 71364 Summary: [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3 merge.cpp Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/71365] New: [7 Regression] g++ reject access to parent's parent virtual method

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71365 Bug ID: 71365 Summary: [7 Regression] g++ reject access to parent's parent virtual method Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/69515] partial specialization of variable templates is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515 --- Comment #6 from Tom Honermann --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5) > PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates I believe this was intended to refer to PR c++/70095.

[Bug c++/71330] [6/7 Regression] Compile time regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71330 --- Comment #11 from Patrick Palka --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10) > I think the problem is with cp_fold_function() which does > > cp_walk_tree (_SAVED_TREE (fndecl), cp_fold_r, NULL, NULL); > > and cp_fold_r is itself

[Bug ada/71358] GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358 --- Comment #2 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > The testcase yields a STORAGE_ERROR (segfault), which is not pretty indeed. Presumably because the GNAT RTS is compiled with checks disabled? Here

[Bug libfortran/71363] New: Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363 Bug ID: 71363 Summary: Issue when sizeof(double) = sizeof(long double) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug fortran/70350] [5 Regression] ICE with -fcheck=all and array initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350 Kris changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kristopher.kuhlman at gmail dot co

[Bug c++/60095] Dubious diagnostics for attempted surrogate call function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60095 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016 New Revision: 236946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug c++/69515] partial specialization of variable templates is broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016 New Revision: 236946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 --- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 19:49:16 2016 New Revision: 236946 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236946=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/60095 - partial specialization of variable templates PR

[Bug c/71362] New: Wrong position for "error: size of unnamed array is negative"

23 + sizeof(int[-1]); ^~~ -- gcc version: gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160531 (experimental)

[Bug c++/55813] Poorly named/documented option Wctor-dtor-privacy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55813 Kyle J Strand changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kyle.strand at beckman dot com ---

[Bug c/70813] Wrong warning "'0' flag ignored with precision and ‘%d’ gnu_printf format"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Wrong position of this warning seems to be a separate issue, so I filed it as https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813 . This PR is about the fact that this warning is emitted at all in this

[Bug c/71360] Wrong position for "warning: '0' flag ignored with precision and ‘%d’ gnu_printf format [-Wformat=]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71360 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Cherepanov --- Sorry, old bug number is wrong, this is split from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70813.

[Bug tree-optimization/71361] New: [7 Regression] Changes in ivopts caused perf regression on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71361 Bug ID: 71361 Summary: [7 Regression] Changes in ivopts caused perf regression on x86 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71360] New: Wrong position for "warning: '0' flag ignored with precision and ‘%d’ gnu_printf format [-Wformat=]"

function ‘main’: test.c:5:10: warning: '0' flag ignored with precision and ‘%d’ gnu_printf format [-Wformat=] printf("abc" "%05.3d\n", 1); ^ abc 001 ------ gcc version: gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20160

[Bug c++/71227] [6/7 Regression] template friend function cannot be resolved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue May 31 19:16:26 2016 New Revision: 236941 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236941=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71227 - specializing hidden friend * pt.c

[Bug ada/71358] GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 Georg Koppen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/71317] Compiling gnat for rtems fails at s-taprop.adb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue May 31 18:59:45 2016 New Revision: 236939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236939=gcc=rev Log: * s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define.

[Bug ada/71317] Compiling gnat for rtems fails at s-taprop.adb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71317 --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou --- Author: ebotcazou Date: Tue May 31 18:59:36 2016 New Revision: 236938 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236938=gcc=rev Log: * s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads (clock_getres): Define.

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 --- Comment #10 from Maxim Ostapenko --- I've build Firefox locally with clang with optimizations disabled (CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -fsanitize-recover=address -O0") and got pretty the same backtrace: ==12707==ERROR: AddressSanitizer:

[Bug c++/71248] crash on in-class initializer of array of pointer to member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71306] bogus -Wplacement-new with an array element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71306 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71306] bogus -Wplacement-new with an array element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71306 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue May 31 17:24:22 2016 New Revision: 236934 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236934=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71306 - bogus -Wplacement-new with an array element gcc/cp/ChangeLog:

[Bug c++/71248] crash on in-class initializer of array of pointer to member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71248 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Tue May 31 17:17:29 2016 New Revision: 236931 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236931=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-05-31 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug sanitizer/71291] Firefox with GCC reports stack-buffer-overflow but clang does not

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com ---

[Bug debug/71057] [6 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 --- Comment #10 from Romain Geissler --- Thanks ! The current gcc6 branch works fine now.

[Bug tree-optimization/71359] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, vec_safe_length<loop*, va_gc>)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #4 from

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #7 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- Created attachment 38613 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38613=edit Tentative patch for 6.1 Looks like the right fix will need to somehow differentiate between jump tables and

[Bug tree-optimization/71359] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, vec_safe_length<loop*, va_gc>)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Also ICEs if I change char a[]; to char a[1];

[Bug tree-optimization/71359] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, vec_safe_length<loop*, va_gc>)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- commit eedd711b1de214484021ed233aef3d88b0c3988c Author: hubicka Date: Mon May 30 10:40:33 2016 + * predict.h (force_edge_cold): Declare.

[Bug tree-optimization/71359] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, vec_safe_length<loop*, va_gc>)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug tree-optimization/71359] New: ICE at -Os and above in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, vec_safe_length<loop*, va_gc>)

7.0.0 20160531 (experimental) [trunk revision 236912] (GCC) $: gcc-trunk -w -O3 small.c small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:3:6: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault void fn1() { ^~~ 0xbbd02f crash_signal ../../gcc-source-trunk/gcc/toplev.c:333 0xd08d70 vec_safe_length<loo

[Bug tree-optimization/69184] [6/7 Regression] ICE in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184 --- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- No longer reproduces on trunk and 6 branch, due to fix for PR69068.

[Bug c++/70847] [6/7 Regression] exponential time in cp_fold for chained virtual function calls

ble-linux-futex --program-suffix=-6 --without-system-libunwind --enable-multilib --with-arch-32=x86-64 --with-tune=generic --build=x86_64-suse-linux --host=x86_64-suse-linux Thread model: posix gcc version 6.1.1 20160531 (SUSE Linux)

[Bug c/71287] Possibly broken invocation of connect (and maybe other) syscalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287 Artem Polyakov changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/71358] New: GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no switches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358 Bug ID: 71358 Summary: GNAT.Command_Line.Getopt fails if there are no switches Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71287] Possibly broken invocation of connect (and maybe other) syscalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287 --- Comment #13 from Artem Polyakov --- Oh, now I see what was going on! This is a really masked error: while( (rc = connect(sd, (struct sockaddr*), addrlen) < 0) && (errno == EAGAIN) ); instead of: while( (rc = connect(sd, (struct

[Bug c/71287] Possibly broken invocation of connect (and maybe other) syscalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287 --- Comment #12 from Artem Polyakov --- Created attachment 38610 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38610=edit req.s_gcc-6.1.0

[Bug c/71287] Possibly broken invocation of connect (and maybe other) syscalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287 --- Comment #11 from Artem Polyakov --- Created attachment 38609 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38609=edit req.i_gcc-6.1.0

[Bug c/71287] Possibly broken invocation of connect (and maybe other) syscalls

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71287 --- Comment #10 from Artem Polyakov --- The same with gcc-6.1.0 (attached)

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > > We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that > > only tries replacement with

[Bug tree-optimization/71357] [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block follows the use for SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) >> We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that >> only tries

[Bug tree-optimization/71357] New: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block follows the use for SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71357 Bug ID: 71357 Summary: [7 Regression] [graphite] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block follows the use for SSA_NAME) w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/70923] [7 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr60092.c etc. FAIL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70923 --- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > We have vect_recog_mult_pattern that should have triggered here but that > only tries replacement with LSHIFT_EXPR rather than also a simple plus > for 2 * x. I

[Bug tree-optimization/71352] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71352] [7 Regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in zero_one_operation, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1251

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71352 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 31 12:18:15 2016 New Revision: 236920 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236920=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-31 Richard Biener PR

[Bug middle-end/71311] [7 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails since r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- It's rhfuhf.F:ROFOCK. Disabling vectorization fixes it. One notable difference before vectorization MIN/MAX recognition caused by missing swapped comparison handling in /* Transform (@0 < @1 and @0 < @2)

[Bug tree-optimization/70390] [6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_loop_close_phi_args, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2114

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70390 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/68696] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c scan-assembler-times bif\\tv 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68696 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue May 31 11:23:59 2016 New Revision: 236918 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236918=gcc=rev Log: [AArch64] PR target/68696 FAIL: gcc.target/aarch64/vbslq_u64_1.c

[Bug debug/71057] [6 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71311] [7 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails since r235817

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- It's rhfuhf.F (exclusively). Bisected with train, verified with ref. Now I'd need the equivalent of the optimize attribute for fortran... Well. Let's see if I can spot a reasonable difference in dumps.

[Bug target/71340] [RL78] -m64bit-doubles option is documented but not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71340 Oleg Endo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kaushik.phatak@kpitcummins.

[Bug tree-optimization/71354] [7 Regression] gcc.dg/vect/vect-23.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354 --- Comment #1 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- I think the case requires vect_cond which isn't enabled for sparc in target-supports.exp. I will add the requirement to the test.

[Bug web/71356] Unable to reach trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- Anonymous connections are limited. Try again later.

[Bug web/71356] Unable to reach trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |web

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- __attribute__((target("default"))) int foo() { return 1; } __attribute__((target("arch=core2"))) int foo() { return 2; } int main() { if (foo() != 1 && foo() != 2) __builtin_abort(); }

[Bug tree-optimization/71347] [7 regression] Performance drop after r235513 on x86-64 in 32-bit mode.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Thanks for reporting this. The dump after IVOPT now is: : # prephitmp_21 = PHI # prephitmp_23 = PHI # ivtmp.17_16 = PHI

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/71057] [6 Regression] ICE in schedule_generic_params_dies_gen, at dwarf2out.c:24142

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71057 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue May 31 09:58:50 2016 New Revision: 236912 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236912=gcc=rev Log: 2016-05-31 Richard Biener Backport from mainline

[Bug target/71356] New: Unable to reach trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71356 Bug ID: 71356 Summary: Unable to reach trunk Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee:

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38607|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug web/71355] Target not reachable svn link svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@223813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71355 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71346] [AVX-512] AVX-512VL insn emitted when it is disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71346 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/71355] Target not reachable svn link svn co svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@223813

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71355 meerabo changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

  1   2   >