[Bug tree-optimization/71328] [7 Regression] ice in verify_jump_thread

2016-06-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71328 --- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law --- *** Bug 71341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/71341] [7 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 in 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, duplicate_thread_path)

2016-06-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71341 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71328] [7 Regression] ice in verify_jump_thread

2016-06-02 Thread law at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71328 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71328] [7 Regression] ice in verify_jump_thread

2016-06-02 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71328 --- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Fri Jun 3 05:20:16 2016 New Revision: 237052 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237052=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71328 * tree-ssa-threadupdate.c

[Bug c++/71378] A compilable file fails to compile when ASAN options are specified

2016-06-02 Thread asankau at millenniumit dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378 --- Comment #3 from asankau at millenniumit dot com --- Hi, Is there a workaround to this problem ? (I mean is there anything that I can do to the source code of FGConfig.cpp to get rid of this error.)

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

2016-06-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/52393] I/O: "READ format" statement with parenthesed default-char-expr

2016-06-02 Thread jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Jun 3 01:25:31 2016 New Revision: 237051 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237051=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-02 Jerry DeLisle PR fortran/52393

[Bug c/71392] SEGV calling integer overflow built-ins with a null pointer

2016-06-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71392 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Patch posted for review: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00236.html

[Bug target/71390] PowerPC GCC should warn if use does -mcpu=, and an old assembler was used

2016-06-02 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71390 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71395] New: PowerPC vec_init of 4 SFmode values could be improved on Power8

2016-06-02 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71395 Bug ID: 71395 Summary: PowerPC vec_init of 4 SFmode values could be improved on Power8 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c++/71394] New: -Werror=conversion-null identifies incorrect data member of member initializer list

2016-06-02 Thread mitchjcarlson at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71394 Bug ID: 71394 Summary: -Werror=conversion-null identifies incorrect data member of member initializer list Product: gcc Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/71393] [6.1 Regression] Compilation hang

2016-06-02 Thread terra at gnome dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71393 --- Comment #3 from M Welinder --- Bug 70847 claims "virtual" is necessary, so that is probably unrelated. This bug is "virtual"-free.

[Bug c/71392] SEGV calling integer overflow built-ins with a null pointer

2016-06-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71392 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71393] [6.1 Regression] Compilation hang

2016-06-02 Thread sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71393 Franz Sirl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/71377] SFINAE expression compiles, but it should not because of 14.5.5p8

2016-06-02 Thread michele.caini at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71377 --- Comment #2 from Michele Caini --- Right, got it. Actually it's more like a complex way of writing a static assert. Should it be considered a bug anyway? I mean, it's correct for GCC to accept it or it should reject the code? I'm not skilled

[Bug c++/71393] [6.1 Regression] Compilation hang

2016-06-02 Thread terra at gnome dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71393 --- Comment #1 from M Welinder --- Created attachment 38631 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38631=edit Preprocessed version of MyClass.C

[Bug c++/71393] New: [6.1 Regression] Compilation hang

2016-06-02 Thread terra at gnome dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71393 Bug ID: 71393 Summary: [6.1 Regression] Compilation hang Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/71392] New: SEGV calling integer overflow built-ins with a null pointer

2016-06-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71392 Bug ID: 71392 Summary: SEGV calling integer overflow built-ins with a null pointer Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/70350] [5 Regression] ICE with -fcheck=all and array initialization

2016-06-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70350] [5 Regression] ICE with -fcheck=all and array initialization

2016-06-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70350 --- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Thu Jun 2 17:44:59 2016 New Revision: 237043 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237043=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-02 Paul Thomas PR fortran/70350

[Bug rtl-optimization/59511] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr36222-1.c scan-assembler-not movdqa with -mtune=corei7

2016-06-02 Thread peter at cordes dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59511 --- Comment #7 from Peter Cordes --- I'm seeing the same symptom, affecting gcc4.9 through 5.3. Not present in 6.1. IDK if the cause is the same. (code from an improvement to the horizontal_add functions in Agner Fog's vector class library)

[Bug rtl-optimization/59511] [4.9 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr36222-1.c scan-assembler-not movdqa with -mtune=corei7

2016-06-02 Thread peter at cordes dot ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59511 Peter Cordes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter at cordes dot ca --- Comment #6

[Bug c/71362] Wrong position for "error: size of unnamed array is negative"

2016-06-02 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71362 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/71391] New: error on aggregate initialization with side-effects in a constexpr function

2016-06-02 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71391 Bug ID: 71391 Summary: error on aggregate initialization with side-effects in a constexpr function Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/71390] PowerPC GCC should warn if use does -mcpu=, and an old assembler was used

2016-06-02 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71390 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/71390] New: PowerPC GCC should warn if use does -mcpu=, and an old assembler was used

2016-06-02 Thread meissner at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71390 Bug ID: 71390 Summary: PowerPC GCC should warn if use does -mcpu=, and an old assembler was used Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 2 16:43:04 2016 New Revision: 237042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237042=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71372 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): For INDIRECT_REF, if the

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 2 16:36:04 2016 New Revision: 237041 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237041=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/71372 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): For INDIRECT_REF, if the

[Bug c++/71377] SFINAE expression compiles, but it should not because of 14.5.5p8

2016-06-02 Thread schaub.johannes at googlemail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71377 Johannes Schaub changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schaub.johannes@googlemail.

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 --- Comment #7 from David Abdurachmanov --- Just for reference (if someone reads this PR): https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2016-02/msg00205.html It contains a reference to C++ standard.

[Bug target/70957] testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-elemrev-4.c fails on power7

2016-06-02 Thread wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70957 --- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt --- OK, I've traced this down to its sordid origins. The problem arises when the test case is run on a machine using an old target assembler. If the assembler doesn't support POWER8 instructions, this causes

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 --- Comment #6 from David Abdurachmanov --- Agreed. As usual, thanks for verifying this. Will cook and send a patch to TBB.

[Bug middle-end/71387] [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3418 with -Og

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- You should initialize the object in the constructor.

[Bug target/71389] New: ICE on trunk gcc on ivybridge target (df_refs_verify)

2016-06-02 Thread anton.mitrokhin at phystech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71389 Bug ID: 71389 Summary: ICE on trunk gcc on ivybridge target (df_refs_verify) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Gcc considers the memset as being dead as nothing validly can assume anything about the memory after the inplacement new.

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 --- Comment #2 from David Abdurachmanov --- Doesn't std::memset apply here? They allocate storage, set it to 0x0 and then place construct the object. At first look I wouldn't expect GCC to remove std::memset.

[Bug c++/71388] [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71388] New: [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes)

2016-06-02 Thread david.abdurachmanov at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71388 Bug ID: 71388 Summary: [6/7 regression] wrong code, DSE removes memset in TBB allocate_scheduler (causes run-time crashes) Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status:

[Bug middle-end/71387] [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3418 with -Og

2016-06-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||5.3.1 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71378] A compilable file fails to compile when ASAN options are specified

2016-06-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Reduced test-case: $ cat tc.ii class A { public: int GetLen(); }; class B { A s_MDSPartIDStr; void FillLoadPartitionInfo(); }; void B::FillLoadPartitionInfo() { char a[s_MDSPartIDStr.GetLen()] = ""; }

[Bug c++/71378] A compilable file fails to compile when ASAN options are specified

2016-06-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/71387] [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3418 with -Og

2016-06-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- class EPoint { public: inline EPoint(); inline EPoint( const EPoint ); }; class EPointIteratorBase { public: explicit EPointIteratorBase( unsigned long size ) : m_index(0),

[Bug middle-end/71387] New: [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3418 with -Og

2016-06-02 Thread burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71387 Bug ID: 71387 Summary: [6/7 Regression] ICE in emit_move_insn, at expr.c:3418 with -Og Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug c++/71386] New: Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk)

2016-06-02 Thread anton.mitrokhin at phystech dot edu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71386 Bug ID: 71386 Summary: Wrong code on c++14 (GCC trunk) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71385] New: Internal compiler error when using concept as placeholder

2016-06-02 Thread srarnold at web dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71385 Bug ID: 71385 Summary: Internal compiler error when using concept as placeholder Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/71383] Misoptimized branch with inline assembly code.

2016-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71383] Misoptimized branch with inline assembly code.

2016-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71383 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug c++/71384] New: Global constructors (init_array) emitted for trivial initialisation depending on source code ordering

2016-06-02 Thread niels at penneman dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71384 Bug ID: 71384 Summary: Global constructors (init_array) emitted for trivial initialisation depending on source code ordering Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status:

[Bug rtl-optimization/71295] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in subreg_get_info, at rtlanal.c:3673 on arm

2016-06-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71295 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jun 2 12:26:42 2016 New Revision: 237034 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237034=gcc=rev Log: [rtlanal] Fix rtl-optimization/71295 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71383] New: Misoptimized branch with inline assembly code.

2016-06-02 Thread bmei at broadcom dot com
PA passes. My compiler is GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0 20160602 (experimental) [trunk revision 14336]. I can also reproduce this issue on our port of gcc 6.1.

[Bug driver/70936] Hard-coded C++ header paths and relocation problem on Windows

2016-06-02 Thread ismail at i10z dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70936 İsmail Dönmez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ismail at i10z dot com --- Comment #8

[Bug rtl-optimization/71374] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2190

2016-06-02 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

2016-06-02 Thread senthil.thecoder at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #12 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj --- Yes, tiny also has .rodata in .data I'd totally missed PR 63323, so just removing the target hook and turning on JUMP_TABLES_IN_TEXT_SECTION does the trick, like you said. Wrote a basic test to

[Bug c++/70972] [6 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-06-02 Thread paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70972] [6 Regression] Inheriting constructors taking parameters by value should move them, not copy

2016-06-02 Thread paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70972 --- Comment #7 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Thu Jun 2 11:30:44 2016 New Revision: 237032 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237032=gcc=rev Log: /cp 2016-06-02 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/71382] New: Unary plus doesn't works with pointers to instantiations of function templates

2016-06-02 Thread roman.perepelitsa at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71382 Bug ID: 71382 Summary: Unary plus doesn't works with pointers to instantiations of function templates Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c/71381] New: C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax

2016-06-02 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381 Bug ID: 71381 Summary: C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openacc, rejects-valid Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/71298] changes to libstdc++ breaks windows builds

2016-06-02 Thread lh_mouse at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71298 lh_mouse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug tree-optimization/71379] [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831

2016-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71379 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/64946] [AArch64] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c - "abs" vectorization fails for char/short types

2016-06-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946 --- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, shiva0217 at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946 > > Shiva Chen changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug c++/71378] A compilable file fails to compile when ASAN options are specified

2016-06-02 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2016-6-2 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71380] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2498

2016-06-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71380 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.1.0 Target

[Bug tree-optimization/71380] New: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2498

2016-06-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71380 Bug ID: 71380 Summary: [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2498 Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 38623 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38623=edit gcc7-pr71372.patch Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.

[Bug tree-optimization/71379] New: [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831

2016-06-02 Thread krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71379 Bug ID: 71379 Summary: [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r236831 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/70830] [6/7 Regression] ARM interrupt attribute: push/pop do not support {reglist}^

2016-06-02 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70830 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Thu Jun 2 08:54:15 2016 New Revision: 237027 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237027=gcc=rev Log: Fix fallout from: [ARM] PR target/70830: Avoid POP-{reglist}^ when

[Bug tree-optimization/64946] [AArch64] gcc.target/aarch64/vect-abs-compile.c - "abs" vectorization fails for char/short types

2016-06-02 Thread shiva0217 at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946 Shiva Chen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shiva0217 at gmail dot com --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek --- On the C++ cp_fold side, I think --- cp-gimplify.c.jj1 2016-05-26 10:38:01.0 +0200 +++ cp-gimplify.c 2016-06-02 10:21:33.903655321 +0200 @@ -2035,7 +2035,16 @@ cp_fold (tree x) if

[Bug tree-optimization/71261] [7 Regression] Trunk GCC hangs on knl and broadwell targets

2016-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71374] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2190

2016-06-02 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8) > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > Actually it's not a bug of those but of the callers (given fold_binary > doesn't get to see that flag).

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 > > --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, jakub at gcc

[Bug c++/71372] [6/7 Regression] C++ FE drops TREE_THIS_VOLATILE in cp_fold on all tcc_reference trees

2016-06-02 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 1 Jun 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug fortran/71156] PURE interface/definition inconsistency: accepts invalid, rejects valid

2016-06-02 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---