[Bug libgcc/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #1 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- Does anyone has a clue on this? I've tried to follow the stacktrace and it seems like it's generating an invalid code tag for this particular operation. Any help would be much appreciated!

[Bug c++/71564] label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564 --- Comment #1 from lh_mouse --- clang++ 3.0 seems to have issues dealing with this, but it seems to have been fixed since clang++ 3.1.

[Bug c++/71564] New: label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside it

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71564 Bug ID: 71564 Summary: label inside a lambda conflicts (?) with another one outside it Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71552] Confusing error for incorrect struct initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71552 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/71561] ICE with -Wall on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5249

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71561 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug tree-optimization/71563] New: Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563 Bug ID: 71563 Summary: Regression in GCC-7.0.0's optimizer. Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug libstdc++/71562] New: Changing the fix size of _S_local_capacity in sso_string_base.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71562 Bug ID: 71562 Summary: Changing the fix size of _S_local_capacity in sso_string_base.h Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/71560] union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|wrong-code |documentation --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/71561] New: ICE with -Wall on valid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu: in potential_constant_expression_1, at cp/constexpr.c:5249

: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160616 (experimental) [trunk revision 237533] (GCC) $ $ g++-trunk -c small.cpp $ g++-4.9 -c -Wall small.cpp

[Bug c/71560] New: union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 Bug ID: 71560 Summary: union compound literal initializes wrong union field Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgcc/71559] New: ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 Bug ID: 71559 Summary: ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512) Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/71558] missed optimization for type short, char and floating point types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71558 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #1 from

[Bug c++/71541] destructor of condition_variable_any crashes with static linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71541 --- Comment #4 from gcc_bugzilla at haphi dot de --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > You need to link to libpthread to use std::condition_variable_any. Adding -lpthread doesn't change the situation.

[Bug c++/70563] SFINAE fails when trying invalid template instantiation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70563 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/70733] Wrong code with nested structs and bit field.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70733 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71558] New: missed optimization for type short, char and floating point types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71558 Bug ID: 71558 Summary: missed optimization for type short, char and floating point types Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/71364] [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3 merge.cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71242] [ia64] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71242 --- Comment #1 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 16 14:32:40 2016 New Revision: 237530 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237530=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71242 * config/ia64/ia64.c (enum ia64_builtins)

[Bug target/71555] [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-valid-code |compile-time-hog CC|

[Bug target/71242] [ia64] Missing built-in functions for float128 NaNs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71242 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71460] Copying structs can trap (on x86-32) due to SNaN to QNaN

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71460 --- Comment #28 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote: > > All these memory model issues would best be raised directly with WG14, > > What is the best way to do it? If your National

[Bug libstdc++/71557] New: time_get is case sensitive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557 Bug ID: 71557 Summary: time_get is case sensitive Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug tree-optimization/71550] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71550 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/71364] [7 regression] recent tuple changes break range-v3 merge.cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364 Casey Carter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Casey at Carter dot net --- Comment #4

[Bug libstdc++/71556] set::get_time() requires leading 0s for %H and friends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/71556] set::get_time() requires leading 0s for %H and friends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556 --- Comment #1 from Julian Andres Klode --- To be clear, while the attachment uses the (I assume still) non-standard C.UTF-8, the same also happens with the C locale, and the "" locale in an en_IE.UTF-8 environment.

[Bug libstdc++/71556] New: set::get_time() requires leading 0s for %H and friends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71556 Bug ID: 71556 Summary: set::get_time() requires leading 0s for %H and friends Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/71279] [6/7 Regression] ICE on trunk gcc with knl target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71279 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tripiana at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #10 from

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Carlos Tripiana Montes from comment #8) > OK, but 6.1.1 is not yet released, so in this case I just need the link to > the original bug, so as to seek for the patch. > > I just unable to

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #8 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- OK, but 6.1.1 is not yet released, so in this case I just need the link to the original bug, so as to seek for the patch. I just unable to find the bug. Please, I need the link. (In reply to

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 16 11:38:24 2016 New Revision: 237522 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237522=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71554 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl peephole2):

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas --- (In reply to Ian Harvey from comment #10) > The patch discussed in #5 applies changes to the wrong location in > trans-decl.c. Corrected patch attached. > > With this latest patch I see no variation in

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #44 from Marek Polacek --- FYI, I have got a candidate patch, but the trouble comes with code such as case 1: if (x) bar (); // warn here else { bar (); return; } case 0: so this

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #6 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- I have clean and redone the compilation, without LTO. Now fails in the file compilation, not at link time. I have attached the preprocessed file(s). NOTE: This only happens in KNL/AVX512 machine.

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #5 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- Created attachment 38712 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38712=edit assembler file

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #4 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- Created attachment 38711 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38711=edit intermediate file

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #2 from Carlos Tripiana Montes --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > Please include preprocessed source code. I wanted to do so, but this compilation line does not give me a *.i file(s) just a bunch of ltrans0.ltrans.o,

[Bug target/71555] [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Please include preprocessed source code.

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 16 10:38:21 2016 New Revision: 237520 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237520=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71554 * config/i386/i386.md (setcc + movzbl peephole2):

[Bug target/71555] New: [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71555 Bug ID: 71555 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: compilation "never" finishes with -O -mtune=sandybridge -mavx512bw Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 16 10:21:43 2016 New Revision: 237513 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237513=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71554 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71554.c: New test.

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 16 10:20:45 2016 New Revision: 237512 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237512=gcc=rev Log: PR target/71554 * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr71554.c: New test.

[Bug target/71554] Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71553] [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553 --- Comment #1 from dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com --- The ICE only occurs on -O2 and up, -O1 works.

[Bug c++/71553] [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553 dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |c++

[Bug target/71554] New: Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71554 Bug ID: 71554 Summary: Miscompilation of __builtin_mul_overflow on i686 Product: gcc Version: 5.4.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/71553] New: [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553 Bug ID: 71553 Summary: [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/71552] New: Confusing error for incorrect struct initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71552 Bug ID: 71552 Summary: Confusing error for incorrect struct initialization Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/71550] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71550 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code

[Bug tree-optimization/71551] New: Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71551 Bug ID: 71551 Summary: Another ICE in fold_convert_loc, in fold-const.c:2366 but this time for KNL/AVX512 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/71549] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2) > Patch in testing: Bah. it fails bootstrap when compiling bitmap_allocator.o: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/ext/bitmap_allocator.h:199:7: internal

[Bug target/71549] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549 --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- Patch in testing: --cut here-- diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c index c5e5e12..3a6e63a 100644 --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c @@ -3802,14 +3802,8 @@

[Bug target/71549] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 with -g enabled in 64-bit mode on x86_64-linux-gnu: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5952

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71549 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71528] [5/6 Regression] multiple extern reference declarations produce uninitialized access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71528 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] multiple |[5/6 Regression] multiple

[Bug rtl-optimization/71532] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90 -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71532 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC|jakub at

[Bug rtl-optimization/71532] [7 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/select_char_1.f90 -O2 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71532 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Thu Jun 16 07:11:37 2016 New Revision: 237503 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237503=gcc=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/71532 * cse.c (cse_insn): For const/pure calls,

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #10 from Ian Harvey --- The patch discussed in #5 applies changes to the wrong location in trans-decl.c. Corrected patch attached. With this latest patch I see no variation in check-fortran test results.

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #9 from Ian Harvey --- Created attachment 38708 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38708=edit Updated patch against r23740

[Bug c++/71534] Initializing a static constexpr data member of a base class by using a static constexpr data member of a derived class should be an error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71534 --- Comment #2 from Michele Caini --- The fact that it compiles it is misleading at least. Consider the following code: #include template using void_t = void; template> struct has_foo: