[Bug middle-end/69526] ivopts candidate strangeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526 rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com changed: What|Removed |Added Version|6.0 |unknown --- Comment

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 --- Comment #5 from Frank Bergemann --- I also tested on HP-UX with gcc-4.7.2. HP-UX ### B.11.31 U ia64 4035416745 unlimited-user license And it's also ok on HP-UX: hpux03 506> ./test using push_back(): == 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 1,

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 --- Comment #4 from Frank Bergemann --- The problem is on Linux Linux ### 2.6.32-358.55.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Dec 16 06:57:07 EST 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux \Frank

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 --- Comment #3 from Frank Bergemann --- But on solaris i only had gcc-4.7.2 yet \Frank

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 --- Comment #2 from Frank Bergemann --- it works on Solaris 5.10 SunOS ### 5.10 Generic_142900-05 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890 \Frank

[Bug c++/71639] [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 --- Comment #1 from Frank Bergemann --- Created attachment 38754 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38754=edit test program main.cpp

[Bug c++/71639] New: [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71639 Bug ID: 71639 Summary: [5.2.0] c++11 list initializer and std::transform - error? Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/48925] Code cleanup in write_float.def

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Bug 48852 depends on bug 48925, which changed state. Bug 48925 Summary: Code cleanup in write_float.def https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48925 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71638] New: ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu with -Wall (internal compiler error: non-constant element in constant CONSTRUCTOR)

-trunk/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160623 (experimental) [trunk revision 237733

[Bug preprocessor/60014] Bad warning suppression caused by track-macro-expansion when not using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, easyhack Last

[Bug middle-end/69526] ivopts candidate strangeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526 --- Comment #20 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to rdapp from comment #19) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18) > > > > The match.pd patch is slowly assuming shape... Two things however I'm still > unsure about: > > 1.

[Bug c++/71637] -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug middle-end/71585] Cannot selectively disable stack protector with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71585 --- Comment #3 from Julian Stecklina --- Is there the hope of having at least workaround here?

[Bug preprocessor/71637] New: -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71637 Bug ID: 71637 Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation only triggered when using integrated cpp Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71623] [5/6/7 Regression] Segfault when allocating deferred-length characters to size of a pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71623 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/57284] [OOP] ICE with find_array_spec for polymorphic arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57284 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug fortran/55501] [F03] ICE using MERGE in constant expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55501 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/71488] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code for vector comparisons with ivybridge and westmere targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |tree-optimization --- Comment #13 from

[Bug rtl-optimization/71636] Missed optimization in variable alignment test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636 --- Comment #1 from Richard Henderson --- Oh, and I meant to mention -- if the target doesn't have an andnot insn, both formulations are identical in complexity and minimal path. Which might suggest *always* performing the transformation at a

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 --- Comment #10 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > > Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you > > could give it a try. > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/71636] New: Missed optimization in variable alignment test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71636 Bug ID: 71636 Summary: Missed optimization in variable alignment test Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug preprocessor/60014] Bad warning suppression caused by track-macro-expansion when not using integrated cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60014 --- Comment #6 from Fredrik Hallenberg --- Reconfirmed with gcc 6.1.1

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > (In reply to Renlin Li from comment #0) > > char array[] = "abc"; > > return __builtin_strlen (array); > > There are DUPs for this part. Well, this actually

[Bug middle-end/71488] [6/7 Regression] Wrong code for vector comparisons with ivybridge and westmere targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488 --- Comment #12 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Thu Jun 23 16:58:54 2016 New Revision: 237738 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237738=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/71488 * gcc.target/i386/i386.exp

[Bug target/67400] -fno-plt doesn't work with function pointers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67400 --- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Jun 23 16:30:43 2016 New Revision: 237736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237736=gcc=rev Log: i386: Access external function via GOT slot for -fno-plt i386 psABI has

[Bug target/66232] -fPIC -fno-plt -mx32 fails to generate indirect branch via GOT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66232 --- Comment #10 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Thu Jun 23 16:30:43 2016 New Revision: 237736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237736=gcc=rev Log: i386: Access external function via GOT slot for -fno-plt i386 psABI has

[Bug c++/36159] C++ compiler should issue a warning with missing new operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/69526] ivopts candidate strangeness

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69526 --- Comment #19 from rdapp at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18) > The match.pd patch is slowly assuming shape... Two things however I'm still unsure about: 1. An existing rule in match.pd checks for

[Bug libfortran/48852] Invalid spaces in list-directed output of complex constants

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48852 --- Comment #17 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Thu Jun 23 15:58:05 2016 New Revision: 237735 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237735=gcc=rev Log: 2016-06-23 Jerry DeLisle PR

[Bug go/71635] gcc-go fails to link golang-googlecode-net

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71635 --- Comment #1 from Dan Horák --- original Fedora bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349371

[Bug go/71635] New: gcc-go fails to link golang-googlecode-net

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71635 Bug ID: 71635 Summary: gcc-go fails to link golang-googlecode-net Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug target/63359] aarch64: 32bit registers in inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/56069] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] RA pessimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56069 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug c/71560] union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c/71567] Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 --- Comment #8 from Artem --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #7) > See https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FAQ#misoptimization > > and https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html#Warning-Options Thank you for the links.

[Bug c/52952] Wformat location info is bad (wrong column number)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/71303] missing strlen optimization for strings initialized via a braced-init-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71303 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71296] missing warning on strcat appending to a non-string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71296 Bug 71296 depends on bug 71303, which changed state. Bug 71303 Summary: missing strlen optimization for strings initialized via a braced-init-list https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71303 What|Removed

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- *** Bug 71303 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/63359] aarch64: 32bit registers in inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359 --- Comment #12 from Richard Earnshaw --- We considered that, but it won't work. For example, in ILP32 address registers need to use the X form, but are still 32-bits in size. There are other cases as well where a W or X form is required but

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/71632] [7 Regression] hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- In any case, this looks to me like expansion or TER bug. The problem in this case is that expand_cond_expr_using_cmove expands the tree arguments: op00 = expand_normal (gimple_assign_rhs1 (srcstmt));

[Bug c/71602] [6/7 regression] ICE on __builtin_va_arg in build_va_arg, at c-family/c-common.c:5810

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71602 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #9 from

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- strlen is pure, not const, since its result depends on memory pointed to by its argument, not just the value of the pointer itself. See extend.texi: "Note that a function that has pointer

[Bug tree-optimization/71632] [7 Regression] hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- As in optimized dump: : c.1_1 = c; _85 = *c.1_1; _87 = *_85; iftmp.0_88 = d_27(D) < _87 ? 1.0e+0 : 0.0; _90 = MEM[(double *)_85 + 8B]; iftmp.0_91 = iftmp.0_88 < _90 ? 1.0e+0 : 0.0;

[Bug tree-optimization/71632] [7 Regression] hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632 --- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- The commit if-converts below loop: : # b.5_38 = PHI <0(3), _10(7)> # d_40 = PHI # ivtmp_17 = PHI <5(3), ivtmp_37(7)> _6 = (long unsigned int) b.5_38; _7 = _6 *

[Bug middle-end/71625] missing strlen optimization on different array initialization style

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71625 nsz at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] [7 Regression] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/71632] [7 Regression] hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/63359] aarch64: 32bit registers in inline asm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63359 --- Comment #11 from Jeremy --- int32_t n; asm( "str %1,[%0],#4" : "+r" (ptr) : "r" (n) : "memory" ); Caught me until I just happened to examine the assembler. Of course %w1 works - but then I need SEPARATE code for 32-bit ARM and for aarch64.

[Bug middle-end/71619] [7 Regression] ICE: in predict_loops, at predict.c:1772 with --param=max-predicted-iterations=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71619] [7 Regression] ICE: in predict_loops, at predict.c:1772 with --param=max-predicted-iterations=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71619 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Thu Jun 23 11:04:35 2016 New Revision: 237730 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237730=gcc=rev Log: Fix PR middle-end/71619 PR middle-end/71619 * predict.c

[Bug tree-optimization/71632] [7 Regression] hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71632 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/71634] New: Invalid write with in mark_loops_for_removal (ira-build.c:2256) with --param ira-max-loops-num=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71634 Bug ID: 71634 Summary: Invalid write with in mark_loops_for_removal (ira-build.c:2256) with --param ira-max-loops-num=0 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/71633] New: [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in inline_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633 Bug ID: 71633 Summary: [7 regression][CHKP] internal compiler error: in inline_call Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/71560] union compound literal initializes wrong union field

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Please let me know if you're planning to make these > changes, otherwise I can give it a whirl. Unfortunately I don't have time for this. Please go

[Bug c/71567] Incorrect loop optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Artem from comment #6) > Is there any way to indicate such kind of errors during compilation. > I tried to add options -Wall -Waggressive-loop-optimizations for compilation > code from the

[Bug c++/71618] Improve C++ compilation by adding specific optimization flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71618 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > Okay, I updated the Wiki. I would have liked to have added a link to the > --help option in the manual but, unfortunately, the anchors in it change > from

[Bug c/71632] New: hang at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160623 (experimental) [trunk revision 237726] (GCC) $: $: timeout -s 9 30 gcc-trunk -O3 small.c

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #8) > Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you > could give it a try. The intent was to see 1 preprocessed file attached (the

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 --- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Thiago, if you can parse Jakub's suggestion from comment 3 (I can't), you could give it a try.

[Bug tree-optimization/71631] New: Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71631 Bug ID: 71631 Summary: Wrong constant folding Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #16 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #15) > All these bogus valgrind warnings can be suppressed if you configure gcc > with --enable-valgrind-annotations. That's good to know, but Valgrind

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #15 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- All these bogus valgrind warnings can be suppressed if you configure gcc with --enable-valgrind-annotations.

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #14 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #12) > (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #11) > > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9) > > > Yes. Just invoke cc1plus directly. > > >

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #13 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10) > valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++... > will probably also print a backtrace. First error: ==32645== Conditional jump or move

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||milla.pohjanheimo at qt dot io

[Bug c++/71630] New: ICE on valid C++14 code with variable templates: in get, at cgraph.h:395

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71630 Bug ID: 71630 Summary: ICE on valid C++14 code with variable templates: in get, at cgraph.h:395 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #11 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9) > Yes. Just invoke cc1plus directly. > (Add -v to the gcc invocation and then copy & paste the cc1plus command > line, that is printed out. That's what

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++ ... will probably also print a backtrace.

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes g++... will probably also print a backtrace.

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #8) > cc1plus doesn't stop in gdb, for some reason. Instead, it prints: > > painting/qdrawhelper.cpp: In function ‘void >

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #8 from Thiago Macieira --- cc1plus doesn't stop in gdb, for some reason. Instead, it prints: painting/qdrawhelper.cpp: In function ‘void qt_bitmapblit_quint16(QRasterBuffer*, int, int, const QRgba64&, const uchar*, int, int, int)’:

[Bug target/71629] New: [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71629 Bug ID: 71629 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE in lra_set_insn_recog_data, at lra.c:964 w/ -O2 -mlra Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ra

[Bug c++/71628] New: ICE on valid C++11 code (with lambda expression, __typeof operator and variable length array): verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71628 Bug ID: 71628 Summary: ICE on valid C++11 code (with lambda expression, __typeof operator and variable length array): verify_gimple failed Product: gcc Version:

[Bug pch/71622] gcc 5.3.1 crashes when it tries to compile qtbase [dev]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71622 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Might be related to PR63319. Can you please run gcc under gdb to get a backtrace?