[Bug other/60470] configure should fail if flex and/or bison are not installed and this is a snapshot and not a release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60470 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/66795] Incorrect and missed optimizations of __builtin_frame_address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66795 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug web/66816] gcc.gnu.org favicon should have retina version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66816 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71523] Static variables given automatic initializers with -finit-* and -fmax-stack-var-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71523 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/71812] gcc6/c++/functional:1726:40: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71812 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 71811 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/71811] gcc6/c++/functional:1726:40: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71811 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71493] [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71523] Static variables given automatic initializers with -finit-* and -fmax-stack-var-size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71523 --- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Sun Jul 17 20:13:41 2016 New Revision: 238420 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238420=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-17 Fritz Reese PR fortran/71523

[Bug target/71493] [6/7 regression] accidental ABI change for structure return on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71493 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Is there a testcase? I cannot reproduce the problem. powerpc-elf-gcc on both trunk and gcc-6-branch returns a struct in registers if it needs at most two registers for that, in float regs if it needs

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas --- Created attachment 38917 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38917=edit Further development of the patch This patch cures the problem described at the end of comment #1. The change in

[Bug target/70559] [4.9 Regression] Miscompilation of nsTextFormatter.cpp from Firefox with -Os -fomit-frame-pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71908] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (get_constraint_for_component_ref)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71908 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71903] Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/71913] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing RVO for operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.9.3 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/71913] New: [5/6/7 Regression] Missing RVO for operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71913 Bug ID: 71913 Summary: [5/6/7 Regression] Missing RVO for operator new Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, wrong-code

[Bug c++/71912] flexible array in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71912 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/71912] New: flexible array in union

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71912 Bug ID: 71912 Summary: flexible array in union Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee:

[Bug target/71903] Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson --- No worries. As the reporter you should be able to resolve it as "invalid".

[Bug ada/71911] New: [Cygwin] "gnatclean program" will remove the standard package .ali file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71911 Bug ID: 71911 Summary: [Cygwin] "gnatclean program" will remove the standard package .ali file Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/71903] Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903 --- Comment #2 from Carlos Rafael --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #1) > Can you add a standalone (compilable and runnable) test case? I beg your pardon, Mikael. It was my bad! After submitting the bug here, I could still did not

[Bug c++/71910] New: ICE on invalid OpenMP code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71910 Bug ID: 71910 Summary: ICE on invalid OpenMP code Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/71909] g++ accepts an unreachable function catch block that lacks a corresponding try

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71909 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/71904] comparing this to NULL should give a warning by default (this == NULL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71904 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- For an inline function like your example there's no warning unless the function is used. If it's used, or not inline, it always warns.

[Bug c++/71904] comparing this to NULL should give a warning by default (this == NULL)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71904 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic

[Bug c++/71909] New: g++ accepts an unreachable function catch block that lacks a corresponding try

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71909 Bug ID: 71909 Summary: g++ accepts an unreachable function catch block that lacks a corresponding try Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/71903] Wrong opcode using x86 SSE _mm_cmpge_ps intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71903 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson --- Can you add a standalone (compilable and runnable) test case?

[Bug tree-optimization/71908] New: ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (get_constraint_for_component_ref)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71908 Bug ID: 71908 Summary: ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (get_constraint_for_component_ref) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: