[Bug tree-optimization/71901] [7 Regression] ice in find_or_generate_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71901 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 19 10:19:46 2016 New Revision: 238468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238468=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-19 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71901] [7 Regression] ice in find_or_generate_expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71901 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71908] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (get_constraint_for_component_ref)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71908 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/71908] [7 Regression] ICE at -Os and above in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (get_constraint_for_component_ref)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71908 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 19 10:18:25 2016 New Revision: 238467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238467=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-18 Richard Biener PR

[Bug tree-optimization/71916] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug fortran/44265] Link error with reference to parameter array in specification expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44265 --- Comment #17 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > However, for reasons that I cannot see at the moment, the len_trim > is not doing the trimming :-( Seems related to the problem I have reported in comment 8.

[Bug c/71928] New: installed libcilkrts.so has RPATH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71928 Bug ID: 71928 Summary: installed libcilkrts.so has RPATH Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/71916] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 --- Comment #5 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to Qirun Zhang from comment #4) > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/71916] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 --- Comment #4 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 > > > > Martin Liška changed: > > > >

[Bug middle-end/71734] [7 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/simd4.f90 -O3 -g execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734 --- Comment #7 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- H.J. I've just checked this test with my local fixed compiler and got: Running /users/ysrumyan/workspaces/71261/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/vect/vect.exp ... PASS: g++.dg/vect/pr70729.cc -std=c++11

[Bug target/71921] missed vectorization optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71921 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug rtl-optimization/71923] return instruction emitted twice with branch target inbetween

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71923 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71924] missing -Wreturn-local-addr returning alloca result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71924 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/71927] stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71927 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*

[Bug tree-optimization/71916] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 > > Martin Liška changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/71916] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71916 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 09:26:30 2016 New Revision: 238465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238465=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 09:25:10 2016 New Revision: 238464 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238464=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/71758] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg, at tree-cfg.c:5212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71835] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with ambiguous overloaded operators: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘pointer_type’ in convert_like_real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71835 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/55004] [meta-bug] constexpr issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004 Bug 55004 depends on bug 71828, which changed state. Bug 71828 Summary: [6/7 regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with constexpr __Complex int variable declaration: in operand_equal_p, at fold-const.c:2790

[Bug c++/71828] [6/7 regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with constexpr __Complex int variable declaration: in operand_equal_p, at fold-const.c:2790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71828 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71822] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Fixed for 6.2+.

[Bug c++/70869] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71758] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg, at tree-cfg.c:5212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 09:14:03 2016 New Revision: 238463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238463=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/71758] ICE in verify_gimple_in_cfg, at tree-cfg.c:5212

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71758 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 09:02:11 2016 New Revision: 238462 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238462=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-11 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71835] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with ambiguous overloaded operators: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl minimal’ structure, have ‘pointer_type’ in convert_like_real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71835 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:46:26 2016 New Revision: 238461 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238461=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71828] [6/7 regression] ICE on valid C++11 code with constexpr __Complex int variable declaration: in operand_equal_p, at fold-const.c:2790

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71828 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:44:04 2016 New Revision: 238460 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238460=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71822] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:42:12 2016 New Revision: 238459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238459=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71871] ICE on mixing templates and vector extensions ternary operator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71871 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:40:37 2016 New Revision: 238458 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238458=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-18 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/71054] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in expand_expr_real_2, at expr.c:8097

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71054 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:39:12 2016 New Revision: 238457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238457=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-07 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/70869] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Jul 19 08:39:12 2016 New Revision: 238457 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238457=gcc=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-07 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/71907] [6 regression] missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71907 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||7.0 Summary|[6/7

[Bug c/7652] -Wswitch-break : Warn if a switch case falls through

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652 --- Comment #47 from Marek Polacek --- (In reply to Tim Haines from comment #46) > (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #45) > > Patches posted . > > Thank you for putting in the work

[Bug c++/71918] Internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71918 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11) > The issue can be fixed by a microcode/bios update. > So it is clearly an Intel bug and I don't think anything should change for > gcc. The wrong cpuid

[Bug middle-end/71907] [6/7 regression] missing buffer overflow warnings with -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71907 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Tue Jul 19 07:35:05 2016 New Revision: 238456 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238456=gcc=rev Log: 2016-07-19 Richard Biener PR lto/71907 *

[Bug c++/71918] Internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71918 --- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Note that with GMP it isn't always just misconfigured GMP, see > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331943 > seems some Skylake Pentium/Celeron

[Bug c++/71918] Internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71918 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/71927] stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71927 Micha³ Miros³aw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38926|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/71927] stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71927 --- Comment #2 from Micha³ Miros³aw --- gcc 4.9.3 generates the same code. $ gcc-4.9 -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4.9 COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-linux-gnu Configured with:

[Bug middle-end/71927] stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71927 Micha³ Miros³aw changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #38925|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug middle-end/71927] New: stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71927 Bug ID: 71927 Summary: stack alignment prologue not optimized out when no local variables remain Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

<    1   2