[Bug fortran/77400] fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is less than 33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/77400] fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is less than 33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400 --- Comment #2 from Sergey --- Indeed, I missed that it was dynamically linked by default and system bundled ( older ) libfortran was used. Thus it's a problem in the original program which has hard-coded seed(12) as it had been a constant for

[Bug tree-optimization/77399] SLP does not handle BIT_FIELD_REF or CONSTRUCTOR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug preprocessor/77410] macro reference supplied as macro reference argument is not expanded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77410] macro reference supplied as macro reference argument is not expanded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410 --- Comment #1 from J. Hart --- If an additional level of macro referencing is added, the result is correct. It would appear that if an argument is directly used with an concatenation directive, that argument is not expanded. example: #define

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 --- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt --- It does look possible that this is an LRA issue. Here's the code right before failure: 100dae08: f8 95 22 39 addir9,r2,-27144 100dae0c: 01 00 40 39 li r10,1 100dae10: 00

[Bug c/77410] New: macro reference supplied as macro reference argument is not expanded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77410 Bug ID: 77410 Summary: macro reference supplied as macro reference argument is not expanded Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- > The entire point of libssp is to provide this support on systems whose libc > does not include it, so that both -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE and -fstack-protector* > functionality would be available cross-platform.

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 Yaakov Selkowitz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #8 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > In fact this is by design. NetBSD for an example has ssp/stdio.h where you > use that to get the fority. This does not apply where the libc provides its own

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > > NetBSD which provide SSP in libc > > This statement is not true for older versions of netbsd. And really not true even for the current version of netbsd but

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- > NetBSD which provide SSP in libc This statement is not true for older versions of netbsd.

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes > > should be on the applications

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- In fact this is by design. NetBSD for an example has ssp/stdio.h where you use that to get the fority.

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #2 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes > should be on the applications side rather than the library side. The compiler is

[Bug other/77409] CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- I don't think this is a security hole at all. In fact the security holes should be on the applications side rather than the library side.

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 --- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt --- Backtrace info (svn r239837): Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. system.secondary_stack.ss_release (m=...) at ../rts/s-secsta.adb:479 479 To_Stack_Ptr (M.Sstk).Top := M.Sptr;

[Bug fortran/77406] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 09:35:59PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 > > --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- > Previous patch was

[Bug target/69201] Remove UNSPEC_LOADU and UNSPEC_STOREU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69201 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) > This may have been introduced by: > > 2016-08-03 Peter Bergner > > * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_option_override_internal):

[Bug fortran/77406] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #8 from John Marino --- if that attempt doesn't let you reproduce it, and if it still happens when I remove that flag, I can start bisecting and see if I can get it to a specific day or even commit that caused it. That will

[Bug other/77409] New: CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77409 Bug ID: 77409 Summary: CVE-2016-4973 Targets using libssp for SSP are missing -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE functionality Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > Unfortunately this is the first time I tried to build gcc 7.0 in this > configuration. My previous builds were for gcc 6 and it's been several > months since I ran a test build. OK, I'll try a

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #6 from John Marino --- oh, sorry, you're trying to bisect. Unfortunately this is the first time I tried to build gcc 7.0 in this configuration. My previous builds were for gcc 6 and it's been several months since I ran a test

[Bug target/77408] New: Copy relocation turns read-only data into writable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77408 Bug ID: 77408 Summary: Copy relocation turns read-only data into writable Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > from the attached log: > "Updated to revision 239832." The latest _working_ revision, not the broken one.

[Bug objc/77404] Add Wobjc-root-class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > clang supports: > > - the objc_root_class attribute, and > > - a warning Wobjc-root-class that warns if a class

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #4 from John Marino --- from the attached log: "Updated to revision 239832." It will be awhile before I can retry without that no-strict-alias flag but I will say all the test reports I've submitted over the last year have been

[Bug fortran/77406] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl --- Previous patch was bogus. Try this one: Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c === --- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 239833) +++

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/72715] ICE in gfc_trans_omp_do, at fortran/trans-openmp.c:3164

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72715 --- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: cesar Date: Mon Aug 29 21:16:04 2016 New Revision: 239845 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239845=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/72715 gcc/fortran/ * openmp.c

[Bug fortran/77406] ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|ada |target --- Comment #3 from Eric

[Bug target/77403] [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 --- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt --- See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 which appears to be very similar (slight difference in the error message).

[Bug target/72827] [7 Regression] gnat bootstrap broken on powerpc64le-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77403] [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 29 20:26:13 2016 New Revision: 239842 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239842=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77403 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_): Fix

[Bug objc/77404] Add Wobjc-root-class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug other/77353] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 --- Comment #12 from Berni --- Thanks, Georg-Johann, I can confirm that avr-g++ -S -Os -mmcu=atmega128 main.cpp performs a 16-bit comparison but avr-gcc -S -Os -mmcu=atmega128 main.c works as expected (8-bit comparison)

[Bug middle-end/77407] New: Optimize integer i / abs (i) into the sign of i

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77407 Bug ID: 77407 Summary: Optimize integer i / abs (i) into the sign of i Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/71229] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault, when copying an array in a constexpr function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71229 --- Comment #3 from gcc at tnix dot eu --- I tried it in gcc 6.2 and it does compile in 6.2.

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/77406] New: ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77406 Bug ID: 77406 Summary: ICE in generic_correspondence, at fortran/interface.c:1123 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/66493] ICE on alternate return argument for typebound procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66493 --- Comment #9 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Update, backtraces added : $ gfortran-7-20160828 pr66493.f90 f951: internal compiler error: in resolve_typebound_procedure, at fortran/resolve.c:12603 0x6e31ac

[Bug target/77403] [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 --- Comment #3 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 29 19:03:45 2016 New Revision: 239835 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239835=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77403 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_): Fix

[Bug target/77403] [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 --- Comment #2 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Aug 29 18:58:10 2016 New Revision: 239834 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239834=gcc=rev Log: PR target/77403 * config/i386/sse.md (vec_set_lo_): Fix

[Bug ada/77405] SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 --- Comment #1 from John Marino --- Created attachment 39515 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39515=edit gzipped build log

[Bug ada/77405] New: SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77405 Bug ID: 77405 Summary: SIGBUS from gnatmake in stage 3 (gcc 7.0) Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug libstdc++/77395] [6/7 Regression] std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 --- Comment #4 from Ville Voutilainen --- And now the hopefully final patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01990.html

[Bug libstdc++/77395] [6/7 Regression] std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 --- Comment #3 from Johannes S. Mueller-Roemer --- (In reply to Daniel Krügler from comment #1) > I think a better test-case is the following one, which does not depend on > tuple at all: > > //# > #include > >

[Bug c/77292] Spurious warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77292] Spurious warning: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77292 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Aug 29 18:13:13 2016 New Revision: 239833 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239833=gcc=rev Log: PR c/77292 * c-common.c (warn_logical_not_parentheses): Don't

[Bug libstdc++/77395] [6/7 Regression] std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 --- Comment #2 from Ville Voutilainen --- Right, patch available at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-08/msg01983.html Currently fixing negative test failures for it...

[Bug libstdc++/77395] [6/7 Regression] std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug tree-optimization/72866] [7 Regression] Compile time hog w/ -O3 (-Ofast)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72866 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/77379] incorrect mangling for non-virtual adjustor thunk (missing abi tag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77379 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/77398] first argument to va_arg not of type va_list error hidden by other error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77398 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77379] incorrect mangling for non-virtual adjustor thunk (missing abi tag)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77379 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Aug 29 16:42:57 2016 New Revision: 239830 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239830=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77379 - ABI tag on thunk * mangle.c (maybe_check_abi_tags):

[Bug c/77398] first argument to va_arg not of type va_list error hidden by other error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77398 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Aug 29 16:41:33 2016 New Revision: 239827 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239827=gcc=rev Log: Handle errors in both args of va_arg 2016-08-29 Tom de Vries

[Bug c++/77363] [5/6/7 Regression] Missing debug information in DWARF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77363 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug rtl-optimization/77401] [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug fortran/77400] fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is less than 33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug objc/77404] New: Add Wobjc-root-class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77404 Bug ID: 77404 Summary: Add Wobjc-root-class Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: objc Assignee:

[Bug target/77403] [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/77353] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77353] [AVR] uint16_t instead uint8_t comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77353 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug target/77403] New: [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77403 Bug ID: 77403 Summary: [7 Regression] assemble failure of vinserti64x4 with -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug target/63789] g++ -m32 on solaris has trouble finding abs with int64_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789 --- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse --- Sorry, by recent I meant at least 6.1, I should have been more specific.

[Bug target/63789] g++ -m32 on solaris has trouble finding abs with int64_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789 --- Comment #5 from Richard PALO --- Created attachment 39510 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39510=edit tabs.ii No, I still see the issue with both v5 and 4.9.4 attached is tabs.ii using -save-temps

[Bug libstdc++/77395] [6/7 Regression] std::is_constructible is false for type constructible via implicit conversion operator affecting std::tuple

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77395 Ville Voutilainen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63789] g++ -m32 on solaris has trouble finding abs with int64_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63789 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marc.glisse at normalesup dot org ---

[Bug libstdc++/77402] New: Use EBO for _Rb_tree_impl::_M_key_compare

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77402 Bug ID: 77402 Summary: Use EBO for _Rb_tree_impl::_M_key_compare Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ABI Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/77338] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 39509 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39509=edit gcc7-pr77338.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/77327] AddressSanitizer: heap-use-after-free gcc-trunk-239276/gcc/fortran/interface.c:403 in compare_components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77327 --- Comment #9 from foreese at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: foreese Date: Mon Aug 29 12:24:25 2016 New Revision: 239819 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239819=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-29 Fritz Reese Fix,

[Bug c++/77338] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77338 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77377] [7 Regression] c-c++-common/pr59037.c ICEs with -fpic -msse on i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77377 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/71151] [avr] -fmerge-constants and -fdata-sections/-ffunction-sections results in string constants in .progmem.gcc_sw section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151 --- Comment #20 from Georg-Johann Lay --- (In reply to Senthil Kumar Selvaraj from comment #19) > Can reproduce this on trunk So it's not related to PR72767 then? (Fixed since 2016-08-01)

[Bug rtl-optimization/77401] [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Created attachment 39507 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39507=edit reduced testcase

[Bug rtl-optimization/77401] New: [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77401 Bug ID: 77401 Summary: [7 Regression] ICE: in simplify_binary_operation_1, at simplify-rtx.c:3731 with out-of-bounds vector access Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status:

[Bug fortran/77400] New: fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is less than 33

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77400 Bug ID: 77400 Summary: fortran compfails on random_seed(PUT) if seed size is less than 33 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gcov-profile/77378] [7 Regression] tree-profile and libgcov assume long long atomic operations are supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77378 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6

[Bug middle-end/77399] Fails to use native instructions for vector casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Monakov --- I should also mention that for scalar code: void f(float *o, int *i) { *o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++; *o++ = *i++; } where SLP vectorization succeeds, one can see that c-style casts exist for

[Bug debug/77389] FAIL: g++.dg/debug/dwarf2/template-params-12f.C -std=gnu++11 scan-assembler-times DIE \\\\([^\\n]*\\\\) DW_TAG_template_value_param ...

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77389 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/77399] New: Fails to use native instructions for vector casts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77399 Bug ID: 77399 Summary: Fails to use native instructions for vector casts Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug c++/77375] [5/6/7 Regression] constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 39505 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39505=edit gcc7-pr77375.patch Untested fix.

[Bug c++/77375] [5/6/7 Regression] constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug c++/77375] [5/6/7 Regression] constant object with mutable subobject allocated in read-only memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77375 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug lto/65274] Internal compiler error: should die in combat

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65274 --- Comment #4 from Allan Jensen --- It works now.

[Bug libfortran/77261] gfortran.dg/random_3.f90 FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77261 --- Comment #6 from Janne Blomqvist --- Author: jb Date: Mon Aug 29 08:29:16 2016 New Revision: 239817 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239817=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/77261 Run random_3 testcase only when real(10) is available. Modified:

[Bug sanitizer/64078] FAIL: c-c++-common/ubsan/object-size-9.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078 --- Comment #16 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Aug 29 07:57:16 2016 New Revision: 239816 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239816=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-29 Tom de Vries backport from trunk:

[Bug tree-optimization/52345] Missed optimization dealing with bools

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52345 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- For the trunk, they all come close (at least for aarch64): f: cmp w0, 0 csetw0, ne orr w1, w0, w1 cmp w1, 0 csetw0, ne ret .size

[Bug tree-optimization/26731] Jump threading gets in the way of loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26731 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug c/77398] first argument to va_arg not of type va_list error hidden by other error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77398 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Related to bug 26749.

[Bug testsuite/65940] g++.dg/other/anon5.C requires dwarf4 support in ld

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65940 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Mon Aug 29 07:20:03 2016 New Revision: 239815 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239815=gcc=rev Log: 2016-08-29 Tom de Vries backport from trunk:

[Bug target/24074] (vector float){0, 0, b, a} code gen as not good as it should be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24074 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

[Bug target/24073] (vector float){a, b, 0, 0} code gen is not good

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24073 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|minor |enhancement

  1   2   >