[Bug fortran/77532] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77532 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > $ cat zc1.f90 > module m >type t >contains > procedure :: s > generic :: write(unformatted) => s >end type > contains >subroutine s(dtv, *) > class(t),

[Bug fortran/77532] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77532 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 --- Comment #13 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to avieira from comment #12) > I heard Kugan was working on getting rid of superfluous zero_extends. Adding > him to the watch list. > > @Kugan: Could your work help this case? And when

[Bug c++/77585] New: g++ incorrectly decides that member function is called without object in generic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77585 Bug ID: 77585 Summary: g++ incorrectly decides that member function is called without object in generic lambda Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/67197] GCC_FINAL causes bootstrap failure on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67197 --- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn --- The patch was reverted, but we don't know why it caused problems.

[Bug rtl-optimization/77289] [7 Regression] ICE in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2212 on powerpc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77289 --- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Tue Sep 13 21:25:04 2016 New Revision: 240124 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240124=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-13 Bernd Edlinger PR

[Bug sanitizer/77567] ASAN: Bugus error "alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete [])" with C++17's over-aligned types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567 --- Comment #6 from Kostya Serebryany --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Created attachment 39612 [details] > pr77567-2.patch > > Slightly larger patch, which attempts to diagnose that, but fails to do so, > because

[Bug c++/77581] [6/7 Regression] ICE: instantiate_template_1, cp/pt.c:17391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77581 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/70713] msp430 interrupt attribute prevents overriding weak symbols

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70713 --- Comment #3 from dj at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dj Date: Tue Sep 13 20:06:47 2016 New Revision: 240123 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240123=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-13 Joe Seymour gcc/ PR target/70713 *

[Bug fortran/77584] New: Unclassifiable statement error with procedure pointer using template named "structure_"

Galacticus/Tools/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-trunk/configure --prefix=/home/abenson/Galacticus/Tools --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --disable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160913 (experimental) (GCC) $ g

[Bug tree-optimization/77454] [7 Regression] IMM ERROR w/ -O2 and above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77454 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 13 19:19:33 2016 New Revision: 240120 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240120=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77454 * tree-ssa-dom.c (optimize_stmt): Set

[Bug fortran/77583] ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- With official releases (configured with --enable-checking=release) : $ gfortran-6 z1.f90 z1.f90:3:20: pure subroutine s 1 Error:

[Bug fortran/77583] New: ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77583 Bug ID: 77583 Summary: ICE in pp_quoted_string, at pretty-print.c:966 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/77532] ICE in check_dtio_interface1, at fortran/interface.c:4622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77532 Gerhard Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/77582] Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 --- Comment #3 from Cong Wang --- Hi, Andrew I just posted it: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2016-09/msg00051.html Please review. I caught this when using Google protobuf on Fedora 21, _M_mutate() is shown in perf top profile, inlined into

[Bug libstdc++/77582] New: Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 Bug ID: 77582 Summary: Improve std::string::clear performace Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug sanitizer/68260] false positive with tsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68260 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rogero at howzatt dot demon.co.uk ---

[Bug libstdc++/77582] Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Patches goto gcc-patches@ and libstdc++@. Note !_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI is most likely not going to be used for 90% of applications. It is only needed if you are linking between old binaries and using the

[Bug libstdc++/77582] Improve std::string::clear performace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77582 --- Comment #1 from Cong Wang --- Created attachment 39614 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39614=edit A possible patch This patch improves it by using _S_empty_rep directly when _GLIBCXX_FULLY_DYNAMIC_STRING is not enabled.

[Bug sanitizer/63627] thread sanitizer does not instrument __atomic_test_and_set or __atomic_clear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63627 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/67128] Makefile.in, libcc1 and --enable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67128 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- You either need --with-pic or not do what you are trying to do.

[Bug other/67165] please enable libbacktrace to work with compressed debug sections

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67165 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/67162] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67162 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug debug/67163] g2 generates incorrect decl_line

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67163 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 67162 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug bootstrap/67197] GCC_FINAL causes bootstrap failure on AIX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67197 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Has this been fixed? if so please close it.

[Bug other/67179] failed to build gcc on RHEL 6.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67179 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77553] [6/7 Regression] wrong code with post-increment operator in constexpr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77553 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 13 17:10:39 2016 New Revision: 240119 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240119=gcc=rev Log: PR c++/77553 * constexpr.c (cxx_fold_pointer_plus_expression): New

[Bug c++/77581] New: ICE: instantiate_template_1, cp/pt.c:17391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77581 Bug ID: 77581 Summary: ICE: instantiate_template_1, cp/pt.c:17391 Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug fortran/77420] [5/6/7 Regression] gfortran and equivalence produces internal compiler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77420 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Tue Sep 13 17:00:29 2016 New Revision: 240118 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240118=gcc=rev Log: 2016-09-13 Steven G. Kargl PR

[Bug sanitizer/77567] ASAN: Bugus error "alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete [])" with C++17's over-aligned types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 39612 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39612=edit pr77567-2.patch Slightly larger patch, which attempts to diagnose that, but fails to do so, because asan_allocator.cc

[Bug sanitizer/77567] ASAN: Bugus error "alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete [])" with C++17's over-aligned types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 39611 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39611=edit pr77567-1.patch This (version for current compiler-rt, for gcc it needs a one-liner tweak in the // See line -

[Bug sanitizer/77567] ASAN: Bugus error "alloc-dealloc-mismatch (malloc vs operator delete [])" with C++17's over-aligned types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/77511] internal compiler error: in get_ptr_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77511 --- Comment #6 from Evgenii Zheltonozhskii --- I've added I've added a build log in build_log.txt in the upper link. Maybe it'll be useful

[Bug tree-optimization/77511] internal compiler error: in get_ptr_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77511 --- Comment #5 from Evgenii Zheltonozhskii --- So what should I do to get one?

[Bug c++/77427] [6/7 Regression] ice when canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77427 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77427] [6/7 Regression] ice when canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77427 --- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue Sep 13 16:05:20 2016 New Revision: 240114 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240114=gcc=rev Log: backport "Don't treat array as builtin type in set_underlying_type" 2016-09-13

[Bug tree-optimization/77536] Vectorizer not maintaining relationship of relative block frequencies in absence of real profile data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77536 --- Comment #1 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Tue Sep 13 15:58:52 2016 New Revision: 240113 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240113=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77536 PR rtl-optimization/68212 *

[Bug rtl-optimization/68212] Loop unroller breaks basic block frequencies

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68212 --- Comment #2 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Tue Sep 13 15:58:52 2016 New Revision: 240113 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240113=gcc=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/77536 PR rtl-optimization/68212 *

[Bug c++/77427] [6/7 Regression] ice when canonical types differ for identical types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77427 --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries --- Author: vries Date: Tue Sep 13 15:56:03 2016 New Revision: 240112 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240112=gcc=rev Log: Don't treat array as builtin type in set_underlying_type 2016-09-13 Jason Merrill

[Bug target/77571] __clear_cache is broken on arm64 for big.little where the cache line sizes are different between cores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77571 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 --- Comment #2 from Cristian Rodríguez --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > I guess the question is > 1) in which pass to do this (during expansion of calls?); for SSA_NAMEs it > could perhaps use get_range_info and warn if it would

[Bug tree-optimization/77580] Improve devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug middle-end/77580] Improve devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77580 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77580] New: Improve devirtualization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77580 Bug ID: 77580 Summary: Improve devirtualization Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug lto/77576] gcc-ar doesn't work if all options are read from file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77576 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to likan_999.student from comment #2) > Andrew, do you how I can tell whether plugin has been picked by > successfully? Also, if I use ar, do I need to pass it some flag, e.g. > --plugin=something,

[Bug target/77526] [7 Regression] ICE: in verify_dominators, at dominance.c:1039 with -mstringop-strategy=byte_loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77526 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/77568] [7 regression] CSE/PRE/Hoisting blocks common instruction contractions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77568 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the integer testcase (-Dfloat=int) for the first testcase here has more issues than the float case (since there is no fma opcode being defined for aarch64) but that is being tracked as bug 77579.

[Bug target/77579] Missed multiple add (int) for CSEd case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77579 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Just so there is no confussion on the testcase here it is without need the -D option: void f(int x, int y, int z, int *s) { int t = y * z; s[0] = t + x; s[1] = x - t; }

[Bug lto/77576] gcc-ar doesn't work if all options are read from file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77576 --- Comment #2 from likan_999.student at sina dot com --- Andrew, do you how I can tell whether plugin has been picked by successfully? Also, if I use ar, do I need to pass it some flag, e.g. --plugin=something, or it will just work if it is used

[Bug target/77579] New: Missed multiple add (int) for CSEd case

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77579 Bug ID: 77579 Summary: Missed multiple add (int) for CSEd case Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement

[Bug c/77531] __attribute__((alloc_size(1,2))) could also warn on multiplication overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77531 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess the question is 1) in which pass to do this (during expansion of calls?); for SSA_NAMEs it could perhaps use get_range_info and warn if it would always overflow (i.e. if the minimum of arg1's range *

[Bug tree-optimization/77550] [6/7 Regression] std::deque with -O3 has infinite std::distance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77550 --- Comment #16 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > The patch should at least work (loads are similarly affected). At some > point we want some infrastructure in the middle-end to chose a better > fallback

[Bug middle-end/77568] [7 regression] CSE/PRE/Hoisting blocks common instruction contractions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77568 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||FIXME --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug middle-end/77574] Wrong if condition in predict.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1) > Hello Bernd. > > Thanks for the PR, as well the suggested patch. The patch works for me, > I'm going to test it and submit to mailing list. Please ping me if

[Bug middle-end/77568] [7 regression] CSE/PRE/Hoisting blocks common instruction contractions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77568 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Note that all "bad" transforms can be done by users on the source level > already. So the _only_ proper solution is to handle the situation in the > passes

[Bug c++/77578] [5 Regression] ICE in cp_parser_omp_for_loop (cp/parser.c:29404)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code CC|

[Bug c++/77578] [5 Regression] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/77541] [7 Regression] wrong code with 512bit vectors of int128 @ -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77541 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/77578] Compiler crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578 --- Comment #1 from Tomas Oberhuber --- Created attachment 39610 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39610=edit main.cpp

[Bug c++/77578] New: Compiler crashes with segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77578 Bug ID: 77578 Summary: Compiler crashes with segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 5.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug middle-end/77568] [7 regression] CSE/PRE/Hoisting blocks common instruction contractions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77568 --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener --- Note that all "bad" transforms can be done by users on the source level already. So the _only_ proper solution is to handle the situation in the passes that now refuse to do an important optimization (like

[Bug middle-end/77574] Wrong if condition in predict.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77554] ICE on valid C++11 code with variadic template function: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |---

[Bug tree-optimization/77550] [6/7 Regression] std::deque with -O3 has infinite std::distance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77550 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- The patch should at least work (loads are similarly affected). At some point we want some infrastructure in the middle-end to chose a better fallback (as Andrew says, if possible we can use the alias-set

[Bug tree-optimization/77544] [6/7 Regression] segfault at -O0 - infinite loop in simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Started with r233216.

[Bug c++/77548] ICE on invalid C++ code with overloaded functions: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77548 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |---

[Bug tree-optimization/77544] [6/7 Regression] segfault at -O0 - infinite loop in simplification

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/77542] __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) ignored on function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77542 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|WAITING

[Bug sanitizer/77538] segmentation fault: thread sanitizer shadow stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77522] ICE on invalid code C++14 code: in tsubst_decl, at cp/pt.c:12447

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|5.5 |---

[Bug tree-optimization/77511] internal compiler error: in get_ptr_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77511 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||lto Component|lto

[Bug tree-optimization/77514] [6/7 Regression] ICE in VN_INFO_GET, at tree-ssa-sccvn.c:406 w/ -O2 (and above)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/77548] ICE on invalid C++ code with overloaded functions: in instantiate_type, at cp/class.c:8270

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77548 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/77574] Wrong if condition in predict.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- On 09/13/2016 12:30 AM, bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77574 > > Bug ID: 77574 >Summary: Wrong if condition in predict.c >

[Bug target/70557] uint64_t zeroing on 32-bit hardware

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70557 --- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab --- When compiling for m68k the compiler already generates the latter.

[Bug c++/77549] [7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code that references undeclared variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77549 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/77575] Bogus error when alias template yielding a reference type used as template template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77575 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/77554] ICE on valid C++11 code with variadic template function: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3524

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77554 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug rtl-optimization/77499] [7 Regression] Regression after code-hoisting, due to combine pass failing to evaluate known value range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499 avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/77475] unnecessary or misleading context in reporting command line problems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Tue Sep 13 08:45:36 2016 New Revision: 240107 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240107=gcc=rev Log: PR middle-end/77475 * opts.h (candidates_list_and_hint): Declare.

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Reduced: struct A { A(int) {} A(unsigned) {} // Comment to make it work explicit A(long) {} // Comment to make it work }; void f(A) { } int main() { f(2); f(3l); }

[Bug lto/77511] internal compiler error: in get_ptr_info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77511 --- Comment #3 from Evgenii Zheltonozhskii --- The files are too big so here is link: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/dz1zeh5dgn3tmxw/AAAOcPmn59O166uqieYmLYMca?dl=0 Using built-in specs.

[Bug c++/77563] [5/6/7 Regression] explicit constructor breaks narrowing conversion overload resolution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77563 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid

[Bug c++/77542] __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) ignored on function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77542 --- Comment #3 from afenkart at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 39608 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39608=edit excerpt of code showing problem

[Bug c++/77542] __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) ignored on function template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77542 --- Comment #2 from afenkart at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Do you have a full example which shows the issue? > In your case does ReturnValue have a copy constructor? > If so this is a dup of bug 38172. Note

[Bug c/77577] missing warnings about too few array elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77577 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/50584] No warning for passing small array to C99 static array declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50584 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||drepper.fsp+rhbz at gmail dot com

[Bug c/77577] New: missing warnings about too few array elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77577 Bug ID: 77577 Summary: missing warnings about too few array elements Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: