[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 39904 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39904=edit untested patch testing this patch

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Oct 27 05:00:46 2016 New Revision: 241611 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241611=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78092

[Bug fortran/78092] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when calling SIZEOF on CLASS(*) entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78092 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Thu Oct 27 03:08:13 2016 New Revision: 241610 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241610=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/78092

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/78124] New: [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78124 Bug ID: 78124 Summary: [7 regression][c++1z] explicit inheriting constructor is ignored Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libfortran/78123] New: Short reads with T edit descriptor not padding correctly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78123 Bug ID: 78123 Summary: Short reads with T edit descriptor not padding correctly Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/48298] [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/20585] [meta-bug] Fortran 2003 support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20585 Bug 20585 depends on bug 48298, which changed state. Bug 48298 Summary: [F03] User-Defined Derived-Type IO (DTIO) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 What|Removed |Added

[Bug libfortran/77828] [7 Regression] Linking gfortran-7 compiled program with libgfortran of 5.x allowed but crashes when containing write to string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77828 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/71796] Link error referencing compiler generated symbol __vtab_xxx

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71796 --- Comment #3 from Ian Harvey --- If you want a test case that exhibits no run time error upon successful compilation and linking, then replace the entire main program with an END statement. MODULE ma IMPLICIT NONE PRIVATE TYPE, PUBLIC,

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #10 from PeteVine --- Hold on, I'm investigating the effect of binutils downgrade (2.27 -> 2.26) and switching to ld.bfd. Strange that it all works fine during normal bootstrap, regardless of the codegen options.

[Bug fortran/71862] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71862 --- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #9) > This is a 5/6 Regression. May I do the back port? Fine with me.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.3

[Bug fortran/78122] New: internal compiler error: in get, at cgraph.h:395

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122 Bug ID: 78122 Summary: internal compiler error: in get, at cgraph.h:395 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #1) > The blotch character in the quotes near the end seems to have ASCII value > 267. > Dunno why it's not displaying correctly. 267 is a tad high for a char

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- After reduction. a; static fn1(c) unsigned char c; { if (a) fn2(c); fn1('#'); } fn3() { fn1('�'); } The blotch character in the quotes near the end seems to have ASCII value 267. Dunno why it's

[Bug target/78056] [7 Regression] build failure on Power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056 --- Comment #17 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Oct 26 21:35:48 2016 New Revision: 241606 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241606=gcc=rev Log: Use this branch to prepare enhancements to the pr 78056 patch just

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Component|c

[Bug c/78121] New: ice in set_value_range

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39902 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39902=edit C source code The attached code, when compiled by gcc dated 20161026, and compiler flags -O2 -ansi, d

[Bug middle-end/72747] powerpc: wrong code generated for vec_splats in cascading assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72747 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |middle-end --- Comment #1 from Bill

[Bug target/78056] [7 Regression] build failure on Power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056 --- Comment #16 from kelvin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kelvin Date: Wed Oct 26 20:19:39 2016 New Revision: 241599 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241599=gcc=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-10-26 Kelvin Nilsen

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 emsr at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emsr at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- simple_type_specificer() is dereferencing a NULL result from c_common_type_for_mode and segfaulting: int prec = TYPE_PRECISION (t); if (ALL_FIXED_POINT_MODE_P (TYPE_MODE (t)))

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING

[Bug debug/77773] [6/7 Regression] Segfault when compiling __simd64_float16_t using arm-none-eabi-g++ with debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- Created attachment 39901 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39901=edit proposed patch

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug rtl-optimization/18146] if-conversion is not performed for some reason

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18146 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78120] New: [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78120 Bug ID: 78120 Summary: [6/7 Regression] If conversion no longer performed Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/78119] New: wrong diagnostic pointer for -Werror=ignored-qualifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78119 Bug ID: 78119 Summary: wrong diagnostic pointer for -Werror=ignored-qualifiers Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #20 from David Edelsohn --- If STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET has to be increased to 16, it has to be increased. info->parm_size probably was adjusted for VMX parameters. Note that GCC has gone through contortions with STACK_BOUNDARY,

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #20 from wilco at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #19) > I think the problem with anddi iordi and xordi instructions is that > they obscure the data flow between low and high half words. > When they are

[Bug target/78118] xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 --- Comment #2 from jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org --- The change that made xtensa backend go ICE looks completely unrelated, and indeed, the issue is caused by the side effect of compute_frame_size() function call hidden in the

[Bug target/78118] xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 jcmvbkbc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #19 from Ulrich Weigand --- I've been looking into this a bit with Dominik, and here's what I understand of the problem so far: - It really all starts with emit-rtl.c:init_emit doing: REGNO_POINTER_ALIGN

[Bug target/78118] New: xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78118 Bug ID: 78118 Summary: xtensa: ICE in gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/libgcc2.c:1992:1: error: unrecognizable insn Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger --- Author: edlinger Date: Wed Oct 26 17:26:00 2016 New Revision: 241591 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241591=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Bernd Edlinger PR

[Bug debug/78112] [7 regression] invalid DWARF generated by the compiler: DIE has multiple AT_inline attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78112 --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- > Try http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg02062.html ? Didn't help, unfortunately: I rebuilt cc1plus with the patch and compiled the

[Bug other/78109] ld with -pie creates a shared library instead of an executable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78109 --- Comment #3 from Hadrien --- Thank you for your messages. I called the 'file' command on a .so and an executable, they both show the same kind of information. I understand that a program like the file explorer can get confused. As

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-10-26 7:08 AM, marxin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > May I please ask you for testing the patch on your hppa64 machine? Testing. Thanks, Dave

[Bug target/78105] ICE during LTO bootstrap on AARCH64 with extra options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78105 --- Comment #9 from PeteVine --- Ha! It's not about the extra options, thank you! ;) Completely vanilla environment and gcc 5.4 produce this after a while: ../build-lto-noflags/./gcc/xgcc -B../build-lto-noflags/./gcc/

[Bug fortran/77973] [6/7 Regression] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Wed Oct 26 16:21:56 2016 New Revision: 241581 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241581=gcc=rev Log: PR fortran/77973 * gimplify.c (gimplify_adjust_omp_clauses_1): For

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #2 from Olivier Hainque --- Thanks for stepping in Segher ! Much appreciated :-) FWIW, I have just attached the bandaid patch we're currently using on our gcc-6 based compilers. It's more brutal than the original suggestion on the

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 --- Comment #3 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 26 16:13:49 2016 New Revision: 241575 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241575=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78108 *

[Bug target/77687] frame access after release without redzone on powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Hainque --- Created attachment 39899 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39899=edit bandaid patch we're currently using

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #19 from Bernd Edlinger --- I think the problem with anddi iordi and xordi instructions is that they obscure the data flow between low and high half words. When they are not enabled, we have the low and high parts expanded

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 --- Comment #18 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 39898 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39898=edit proposed patch This disables problematic di patterns when no fpu is used, and there is absolutely no chance that

[Bug middle-end/78098] error: interrupt service routine can't be called directly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78098 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > > > Why would we be not able to tailcall in an interupt handler? > > > > We

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- First I was a bit shocked, but i think my patch above looks reasonable. Because the installation is free-standing it is natural that we cannot #include . Although the eCos has no memalign, that is benign,

[Bug target/78057] [7 Regression]: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/bmi-{4,5,6}.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78057 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 26 15:13:39 2016 New Revision: 241556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241556=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-10-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/78037] Incorrect code generated at optimization level -O2 for tzcnt and binary and

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78037 --- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Wed Oct 26 15:13:39 2016 New Revision: 241556 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241556=gcc=rev Log: Backport from mainline 2016-10-21 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/78037] Incorrect code generated at optimization level -O2 for tzcnt and binary and

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78037 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 TC changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from TC

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 --- Comment #2 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Wed Oct 26 14:48:02 2016 New Revision: 241555 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241555=gcc=rev Log: 2016-10-26 Paul Thomas PR fortran/78108 *

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #4 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Output when running (on target) the code built with gcc-4.8.2-tilera: [hgbcarbon:~] $ ./tile-ss ee ss2: Found ee in abcdeefgh12345 [hgbcarbon:~] $ ./tile-ss 123 ss2: Found 123 in abcdeefgh12345

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #5 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39897 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39897=edit Preprocessed source code reproducing the bug (this time built with 6.2)

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #3 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39896 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39896=edit Assembly output with non-working compiler (6.2)

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #2 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39895 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39895=edit Assembly output with working compiler (4.8.2-tilera)

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #18 from David Edelsohn --- As long as GCC claims that it can make a distinction between the various alignments and macros, the GCC code generation must continue to honor it. On AIX, at least, the ABI claims a different stack

[Bug c++/69905] Digit separators break literal operators

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69905 aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aaron.mcdaid at gmail dot

[Bug target/78117] gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 --- Comment #1 from Henrik Grindal Bakken --- Created attachment 39894 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39894=edit Preprocessed source code reproducing the bug

[Bug target/78117] New: gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78117 Bug ID: 78117 Summary: gcc on tilegx builds faulty strstr() function (from glibc) Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 --- Comment #1 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 39892 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39892=edit test-case to reproduce Must be compiled with "-Ofast -funroll-loops -march=knl" options.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78116] New: [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78116 Bug ID: 78116 Summary: [7 regression] Performance drop after r241173 on avx512 target Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/78115] New: Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78115 Bug ID: 78115 Summary: Missed optimization for "int modulo 2^31" Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/78056] [7 Regression] build failure on Power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78056 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com ---

[Bug bootstrap/77359] [7 Regression] AIX bootstrap failure due to alignment of stack pointer + STACK_DYNAMIC_OFFSET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77359 --- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn --- Created attachment 39891 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39891=edit Experimental patch If this patch is correct, then there is a general problem for Linux also.

[Bug tree-optimization/78107] [7 Regression] verify_gimple failed ICE caused by Gimple loop splitting patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78107 --- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina --- Thanks!

[Bug tree-optimization/78088] [7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78088 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78061] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "Error: definition in block 117 does not dominate use in block 164"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78061 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78072] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78072 Bug 78072 depends on bug 78060, which changed state. Bug 78060 Summary: [7 Regression] -O3 causes "error: type mismatch in binary expression" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/78060] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "error: type mismatch in binary expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/78107] [7 Regression] verify_gimple failed ICE caused by Gimple loop splitting patch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78107 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #9) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > > The C++0x override control works for virtual and non-virtual names > > That's not true for what then

[Bug tree-optimization/78088] [7 Regression] error: non-trivial conversion in unary operation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78088 --- Comment #3 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78060] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "error: type mismatch in binary expression"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78060 --- Comment #5 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78061] [7 Regression] -O3 causes "Error: definition in block 117 does not dominate use in block 164"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78061 --- Comment #4 from Michael Matz --- Author: matz Date: Wed Oct 26 12:54:30 2016 New Revision: 241551 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241551=gcc=rev Log: fix pr78060 pr78061 pr78088 PR tree-optimization/78060 PR

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |amker at gcc dot

[Bug fortran/78021] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong result with optimization on character constant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78021 --- Comment #8 from Davide Cesari --- Thanks for the quick fix!

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] New: [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 Bug ID: 78114 Summary: [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/20710] g++ should warn when hiding non-virtual method in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20710 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sbergman at redhat dot com ---

[Bug target/77308] surprisingly large stack usage for sha512 on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77308 wilco at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilco at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/77973] [6/7 Regression] ICE in scan_omp_1_op, at omp-low.c:3841

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77973 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug fortran/71862] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_add_component_ref, at fortran/class.c:241

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71862 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- This is a 5/6 Regression. May I do the back port?

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- I fixed the detection of realpath, but also fixed the problem with the fallback code that was being used when realpath is not available.

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 39889 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39889=edit pro_and_epilogue dump

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Wed Oct 26 11:29:36 2016 New Revision: 241549 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241549=gcc=rev Log: PR78111 fix fallback code for filesystem::canonical PR libstdc++/78111

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/78111] [7 regression] experimental/filesystem/operations/canonical.cc FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78111 --- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak --- [...] > You will need at least the attached patch that includes for > PATH_MAX. > > PATH_MAX is used as a bypass in configure check for realpath.

[Bug libstdc++/78110] freestanding libstdc++ fails to compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78110 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #1) > oh, I am using eCos and that is based on newlib but on a very very old one. > I don't know what happens when I dont use --with-newlib, but I can try... > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 39888 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39888=edit split4 dump (right before sched2)

[Bug rtl-optimization/78029] [7 Regression] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2285

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78029 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Created attachment 39887 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39887=edit testcase

[Bug gcov-profile/78086] FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-1.c, etc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78086 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 39886 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39886=edit Untested patch May I please ask you for testing the patch on your hppa64 machine?

[Bug fortran/78108] Generic type-bound operator conflicts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78108 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/63746] i/o fragmentation inside basic_filebuf::xsputn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63746 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- I'll take a look, but please send patches to the mailing lists, not bugzilla. https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches https://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html

  1   2   >